about · email me · subscribe

spurious correlations

correlation is not causation

discover · random · spurious scholar
← previous page · next page →

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Ariel and the second variable is The number of fashion designers in Michigan.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #2,985




What else correlates?
Popularity of the first name Ariel · all first names
The number of fashion designers in Michigan · all cccupations

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of competing nations in the Summer Olympics and the second variable is Nielsen Ranking of Smallville Season Finale.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2011, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #2,648




What else correlates?
Number of competing nations in the Summer Olympics · all weird & wacky
Nielsen Ranking of Smallville Season Finale · all weird & wacky

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the second variable is Google searches for 'ice bath'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #2,867




What else correlates?
Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin · all weather
Google searches for 'ice bath' · all google searches

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme and the second variable is Wind power generated in Namibia.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #4,950




What else correlates?
Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme · all memes
Wind power generated in Namibia · all energy

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Robberies in New Mexico and the second variable is Car crashes in the US.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2014, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #3,981




What else correlates?
Robberies in New Mexico · all random state specific
Car crashes in the US · all weird & wacky

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in New Jersey and the second variable is Searches for 'never gonna give you up'.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #5,223




What else correlates?
Votes for Democratic Senators in New Jersey · all elections
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' · all memes

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Vineland, New Jersey and the second variable is Warner Bros. Discovery's stock price (WBD).  The chart goes from 2006 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #2,929




What else correlates?
Air quality in Vineland, New Jersey · all weather
Warner Bros. Discovery's stock price (WBD) · all stocks

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Dexter and the second variable is Google searches for 'bing'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #5,230




What else correlates?
Popularity of the first name Dexter · all first names
Google searches for 'bing' · all google searches

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Wednesdays and the second variable is Nuclear power generation in France.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #5,894




What else correlates?
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Wednesdays · all weird & wacky
Nuclear power generation in France · all energy

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is American cheese consumption and the second variable is BlackRock's stock price (BLK).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #4,018




What else correlates?
American cheese consumption · all food
BlackRock's stock price (BLK) · all stocks

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of public school students in 11th grade and the second variable is Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #5,953




What else correlates?
Number of public school students in 11th grade · all education
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme · all memes

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Annabelle and the second variable is UFO sightings in South Carolina.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #2,085




What else correlates?
Popularity of the first name Annabelle · all first names
UFO sightings in South Carolina · all random state specific

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The distance between Neptune and the Sun and the second variable is Viewership count for Days of Our Lives.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #1,034




What else correlates?
The distance between Neptune and the Sun · all planets
Viewership count for Days of Our Lives · all weird & wacky

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and the second variable is The number of postmasters in Kansas.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #1,744




What else correlates?
GMO use in corn grown in Kansas · all food
The number of postmasters in Kansas · all cccupations

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the second variable is Google searches for 'tummy ache'.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #1,530




What else correlates?
Associates degrees awarded in Liberal arts · all education
Google searches for 'tummy ache' · all google searches

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Turkmenistan.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #5,217




What else correlates?
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme · all memes
Hydopower energy generated in Turkmenistan · all energy

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The distance between Neptune and Earth and the second variable is Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon.  The chart goes from 1987 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
View details about correlation #4,242




What else correlates?
The distance between Neptune and Earth · all planets
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon · all weird & wacky

next page →

← Previous page
Discover a new correlation
View random correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Get permission to re-use these charts

Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Fun fact: the chart used on the wikipedia page to demonstrate data dredging is also from me. I've been being naughty with data since 2014.
    Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead tossed a bunch of data in a blender to see what correlations would shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. You will often see trend-lines form. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A naive p-value calculation does not take this into account. You will calculate a lower chance of "randomly" achieving the result than represents reality.

    To be more specific: p-value tests are probability values, where you are calculating the probability of achieving a result at least as extreme as you found completely by chance. When calculating a p-value, you need to assert how many "degrees of freedom" your variable has. I count each year (minus one) as a "degree of freedom," but this is misleading for continuous variables.

    This kind of thing can creep up on you pretty easily when using p-values, which is why it's best to take it as "one of many" inputs that help you assess the results of your analysis.
  4. Y-axes doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graphs above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. If you click on any of the charts that abuse this, you can scroll down to see a version that starts at zero.
  5. Confounding variable: Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  6. Outliers: Some datasets here have outliers which drag up the correlation. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    Because this page is automatically generated, I don't know whether any of the charts displayed on it have outliers. I'm just a footnote. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.
  7. Low n: There are not many data points included in some of these charts. You can do analyses with low ns! But you shouldn't data dredge with a low n.
    Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.


Pro-tip: click on any correlation to see:

Project by Tyler Vigen
emailme@tylervigen.com · about · subscribe


CC BY 4.0