Report an error
Super Bowl point difference correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Highest sale price for a single-family home in Connecticut | r=0.79 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.76 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Season rating of "Two and a Half Men" | r=0.76 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines' | r=0.71 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'teenage mutant ninja turtles' | r=0.65 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science | r=0.62 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'doge' meme | r=0.53 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Whitney | r=0.47 | 48yrs | No |
How clickbait-y Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are | r=-0.93 | 9yrs | No |
Super Bowl point difference also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)