Spurious correlation #1,222 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The distance between Neptune and the Sun and the second variable is Popularity of the first name Andrea. The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The distance between Neptune and the Sun and the second variable is Popularity of the first name Andrea. The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As Neptune got closer, it created a 'gravitational wave' of confusion with baby-naming trends. This cosmic shift made parents hesitant to choose a name associated with a planet known for its distance, giving poor Andrea the 'space' blues.

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a Discovery magazine cover, featuring a serene small town playground scene. In the center, there is a playground with children playing joyfully around a sign reading "Andrea." On one side, a model of the planet Neptune is placed, where a scientist is observing it and pointing at the sign. Meanwhile, a group of parents is engaged in a discussion, pondering if the proximity of Neptune influenced the name's popularity. The image should capture a sense of wonder and curiosity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Scientists Discover: Closer Neptune Led to Decrease in Andrea's Popularity. Experts Debate if Cosmic Proximity Affected Naming Trends or if Neptunian Influences Altered Parental Preferences. More Research Needed.". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Woodblock painting A TIME magazine cover image Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Scientists Discover: Closer Neptune Led to Decrease in Andrea's Popularity. Experts Debate if Cosmic Proximity Affected Naming Trends or if Neptunian Influences Altered Parental Preferences. More Research Needed."
ChatGPT: Imagine a small town with a playground where children used to play. On one side of the playground, there is a sign with the name "Andrea" written on it, and many kids are playing around it. On the other side, there is a model of the planet Neptune, with a scientist observing it and pointing at the sign. Some parents are looking at the sign and discussing whether the proximity of Neptune influenced the popularity of the name "Andrea."

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a small town with a playground where children used to play. On one side of the playground, there is a sign with the name "Andrea" written on it, and many kids are playing around it. On the other side, there is a model of the planet Neptune, with a scientist observing it and pointing at the sign. Some parents are looking at the sign and discussing whether the proximity of Neptune influenced the popularity of the name "Andrea." Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a Discovery magazine cover, featuring a serene small town playground scene. In the center, there is a playground with children playing joyfully around a sign reading "Andrea." On one side, a model of the planet Neptune is placed, where a scientist is observing it and pointing at the sign. Meanwhile, a group of parents is engaged in a discussion, pondering if the proximity of Neptune influenced the name's popularity. The image should capture a sense of wonder and curiosity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The distance between Neptune and the Sun caused Popularity of the first name Andrea to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety

The Journal of Celestial Sociology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and the Sun and Popularity of the first name Andrea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the curious correlation between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the popularity of the first name Andrea. Drawing data from Astropy for the celestial distances and the US Social Security Administration for naming trends, our study scrutinizes the period from 1975 to 2022. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the cosmic conundrum and the nomenclatural notability.

It seems that as Neptune meanders farther from the Sun, the prevalence of the name Andrea flourishes on our planet. This surprising parallel led us to ponder: is Neptune's mystique influencing the whims of expectant parents, prompting them to bestow the name Andrea upon their progeny? While this theory may seem as far-fetched as Neptune itself, the data persist in their perspicacious portrayal of this peculiar penchant.

One cannot help but wonder if our celestial neighbor Neptune is whispering, "Andrea" into the cosmos, subtly influencing the naming habits of Earthlings. This cosmic connection may prompt a reevaluation of the forces that shape human behavior, highlighting the fanciful fusion of cosmic curiosity and terrestrial traditions. As with all scientific discoveries, further investigation is warranted, guiding us to boldly go where no pun has gone before.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cosmic ballet of celestial bodies has long captivated the curiosity of humankind, tracing patterns across the heavens that hint at hidden harmonies. As astronomers peer through their telescopes and statisticians crunch their numbers, an unexpected association has emerged, akin to finding a telescope in a black hole—it appears that the distance between Neptune and the Sun may wield a peculiar influence over the popularity of the first name Andrea.
It seems as if Neptune, the distant ice giant, may be playing a larger role in our lives than previously suspected. Perhaps Neptune is not just the god of the sea, but also the celestial custodian of certain appellations! This discovery adds a new layer to the phrase "out of this world."
The giggling galaxies appear to be in cahoots with the capricious choices of parents bestowing names upon their offspring. It's as if Neptune's gravitational pull reaches all the way to Earth, tugging at the hearts and minds of expectant parents, nudging them to choose the name Andrea for their children. This celestial verve for nomenclature suggests that we are but marionettes in the cosmic comedy of errors—a performance of puns, planets, and parents.
The statistical significance of this correlation prompts one to wonder if there's a "Neptune effect" influencing not only our planet's orbit, but also the naming practices of its inhabitants. It appears that while we've been gazing at the stars, the stars have been playing matchmaker with monikers. It seems that even in the cold, dark reaches of space, data can still shed light on celestial secrets that may, in turn, influence earthly etiquettes. After all, who knew that when it comes to naming, Neptune could be the planet of "Oh, and-area – that's a nice name!"
In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into this Neptune-Andrea nexus, inviting readers to join us on a whimsical journey through the cosmos and the cradle, where statistical significance meets celestial serendipity. Let us take a leap into the infinite abyss of knowledge, where even the most unexpected correlations await discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Serious-sounding Studies by Smith, Doe, and Jones:
In "Celestial Puzzles," Smith et al. provide foundational research on the gravitational influences of distant celestial bodies on terrestrial phenomena. Their work lays the groundwork for our exploration of the potential correlation between Neptune's position and the name Andrea's popularity. Doe's study in "Astrological Associations" delves into the enigmatic connections between planetary movements and human behavior, providing a theoretical framework for our investigation. Furthermore, Jones's research in "Cosmic Causality" investigates the potential causal mechanisms behind seemingly coincidental cosmic correlations, sparking our interest in exploring the potential galactic guidance of baby names.

Non-fiction Books:
Drawing inspiration from Carroll's "The Cosmic Connection" and Tyson's "Cosmos," our research aims to unravel the mysteries of celestial phenomena and their unanticipated impacts on human cultural practices. Carroll's insights into the cosmic web of connections and Tyson's engaging exploration of the cosmos stimulate our curiosity about the potential influence of Neptune's distance on the choice of the name Andrea. The vast expanse of the universe, as described in these works, prompts contemplation of the celestial forces that may inadvertently shape terrestrial traditions.

Fiction Books:
Drawing parallels to Clarke's "Childhood's End" and Asimov's "Foundation," we are reminded of the intricate interplay between cosmic forces and human destiny. Clarke's exploration of transcendent evolution and Asimov's depiction of far-reaching galactic influences encourage us to consider the potential cosmic guidance behind seemingly arbitrary human decisions, including the selection of first names. The cosmic themes woven into these works ignite our imagination and prompt contemplation of the possibility that Neptune's distant allure may extend to the naming of individuals on Earth.

Closer-to-home Sources:
In addition to scholarly research and renowned literary works, we turned to unexpected sources of worldly wisdom, including the backs of shampoo bottles, where we discovered an astounding level of detail about celestial bodies and their purported impact on the popularity of certain names. While these sources may not adhere to traditional scholarly standards, they serve as a whimsical reminder of the unexpected places where cosmic connections may manifest. After all, who knew that a quick rinse could reveal the secrets of the solar system and its nebulous influence on nomenclature?

The zany juxtaposition of serious, non-fiction works and fictional explorations of otherworldly phenomena with an unconventional source of information serves to underscore the unexpected and entertaining nature of our investigation into Neptune's nebulous nudge and its potential impact on the notoriety of the name Andrea. Our foray into the celestial and terrestrial realms highlights the delightful dalliance between rigorous research and whimsical wonder, inviting readers to consider the cosmic capers that may influence earthly appellations.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and the Sun and Popularity of the first name Andrea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and US Social Security Administration . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the curious correlation between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the popularity of the first name Andrea. Drawing data from Astropy for the celestial distances and the US Social Security Administration for naming trends, our study scrutinizes the period from 1975 to 2022. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the cosmic conundrum and the nomenclatural notability.

It seems that as Neptune meanders farther from the Sun, the prevalence of the name Andrea flourishes on our planet. This surprising parallel led us to ponder: is Neptune's mystique influencing the whims of expectant parents, prompting them to bestow the name Andrea upon their progeny? While this theory may seem as far-fetched as Neptune itself, the data persist in their perspicacious portrayal of this peculiar penchant.

One cannot help but wonder if our celestial neighbor Neptune is whispering, "Andrea" into the cosmos, subtly influencing the naming habits of Earthlings. This cosmic connection may prompt a reevaluation of the forces that shape human behavior, highlighting the fanciful fusion of cosmic curiosity and terrestrial traditions. As with all scientific discoveries, further investigation is warranted, guiding us to boldly go where no pun has gone before.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cosmic ballet of celestial bodies has long captivated the curiosity of humankind, tracing patterns across the heavens that hint at hidden harmonies. As astronomers peer through their telescopes and statisticians crunch their numbers, an unexpected association has emerged, akin to finding a telescope in a black hole—it appears that the distance between Neptune and the Sun may wield a peculiar influence over the popularity of the first name Andrea.
It seems as if Neptune, the distant ice giant, may be playing a larger role in our lives than previously suspected. Perhaps Neptune is not just the god of the sea, but also the celestial custodian of certain appellations! This discovery adds a new layer to the phrase "out of this world."
The giggling galaxies appear to be in cahoots with the capricious choices of parents bestowing names upon their offspring. It's as if Neptune's gravitational pull reaches all the way to Earth, tugging at the hearts and minds of expectant parents, nudging them to choose the name Andrea for their children. This celestial verve for nomenclature suggests that we are but marionettes in the cosmic comedy of errors—a performance of puns, planets, and parents.
The statistical significance of this correlation prompts one to wonder if there's a "Neptune effect" influencing not only our planet's orbit, but also the naming practices of its inhabitants. It appears that while we've been gazing at the stars, the stars have been playing matchmaker with monikers. It seems that even in the cold, dark reaches of space, data can still shed light on celestial secrets that may, in turn, influence earthly etiquettes. After all, who knew that when it comes to naming, Neptune could be the planet of "Oh, and-area – that's a nice name!"
In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into this Neptune-Andrea nexus, inviting readers to join us on a whimsical journey through the cosmos and the cradle, where statistical significance meets celestial serendipity. Let us take a leap into the infinite abyss of knowledge, where even the most unexpected correlations await discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this study was collected from two distinct sources: Astropy, a robust astronomical library, was utilized to calculate the distance between Neptune and the Sun, while the US Social Security Administration's records provided the frequencies of the name Andrea from 1975 to 2022. The use of disparate data sources reflects the interdisciplinary nature of this inquiry, blending the realms of astronomy and sociology in a cosmic pas de deux.

Statistical Analysis:
To explore the relationship between the celestial distance and the popularity of the name Andrea, a series of statistical analyses were performed. Firstly, a Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to ascertain the strength and direction of the linear relationship. The resolute coefficient of 0.9643234 gleamed like a distant star, affirming the remarkable association between Neptune’s remoteness and the prominence of Andrea. It appears that Neptune’s gravitational pull extends not only through space but also through naming trends, asserting its influence with cosmic charisma.

Furthermore, a linear regression analysis was conducted to model the trend of the name Andrea as a function of the varying distance from Neptune to the Sun. The p-value obtained was less than 0.01, reinforcing the statistical significance of this celestial saga. It seems that even in the realm of nomenclature, Neptune remains a celestial celebrity, pulling the strings of appellations from afar.

Time Series Analysis:
In addition to the traditional statistical approaches, a time series analysis was employed to discern any temporal patterns in the popularity of the name Andrea that may correlate with the dynamic dance of Neptune's orbit. The results unveiled intriguing undulations in the naming frequency, alluding to a cosmic rhythm that mirrors the celestial choreography. It seems as if Neptune’s waltz through space may indeed be orchestrating an elegant minuet with human naming trends.

Qualitative Inquiry:
To complement the quantitative analyses, qualitative inquiries were conducted through interviews with expectant parents—though the responses were perhaps more anecdotal than astronomical. Nevertheless, these conversations added a human dimension to the celestial narrative, revealing parental ponderings about celestial influences on naming decisions. It appears that the alluring allure of Neptune's enigma may indeed spark whimsical reflections in the minds of earthly denizens.

The use of multiple methodologies provided a comprehensive understanding of the Neptune-Andrea nexus, synthesizing celestial mechanics with human nomenclature in a captivating cosmic symphony.

In a study of this nature, it is vital to consider both the statistical correlations and the anthropological implications, as the cosmic conundrum intertwines with terrestrial traditions, culminating in a celestial comedy of errors.

It seems that Neptune has not only taken its place as a distant denizen of the solar system but also as a mischievous cosmic influence over the naming rituals of our terrestrial domain. This unexpected discovery challenges traditional boundaries, urging us to contemplate the interplay of celestial forces and human behavior in a manner that is truly “out of this world.”

In summary, our methodological approach blended the rigors of statistical analysis with the whimsy of cosmic curiosity, illuminating a nexus between Neptune and the name Andrea that beckons further exploration and, perhaps, the occasional astronomical pun.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and the Sun and Popularity of the first name Andrea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the curious correlation between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the popularity of the first name Andrea. Drawing data from Astropy for the celestial distances and the US Social Security Administration for naming trends, our study scrutinizes the period from 1975 to 2022. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the cosmic conundrum and the nomenclatural notability.

It seems that as Neptune meanders farther from the Sun, the prevalence of the name Andrea flourishes on our planet. This surprising parallel led us to ponder: is Neptune's mystique influencing the whims of expectant parents, prompting them to bestow the name Andrea upon their progeny? While this theory may seem as far-fetched as Neptune itself, the data persist in their perspicacious portrayal of this peculiar penchant.

One cannot help but wonder if our celestial neighbor Neptune is whispering, "Andrea" into the cosmos, subtly influencing the naming habits of Earthlings. This cosmic connection may prompt a reevaluation of the forces that shape human behavior, highlighting the fanciful fusion of cosmic curiosity and terrestrial traditions. As with all scientific discoveries, further investigation is warranted, guiding us to boldly go where no pun has gone before.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Serious-sounding Studies by Smith, Doe, and Jones:
In "Celestial Puzzles," Smith et al. provide foundational research on the gravitational influences of distant celestial bodies on terrestrial phenomena. Their work lays the groundwork for our exploration of the potential correlation between Neptune's position and the name Andrea's popularity. Doe's study in "Astrological Associations" delves into the enigmatic connections between planetary movements and human behavior, providing a theoretical framework for our investigation. Furthermore, Jones's research in "Cosmic Causality" investigates the potential causal mechanisms behind seemingly coincidental cosmic correlations, sparking our interest in exploring the potential galactic guidance of baby names.
Non-fiction Books:
Drawing inspiration from Carroll's "The Cosmic Connection" and Tyson's "Cosmos," our research aims to unravel the mysteries of celestial phenomena and their unanticipated impacts on human cultural practices. Carroll's insights into the cosmic web of connections and Tyson's engaging exploration of the cosmos stimulate our curiosity about the potential influence of Neptune's distance on the choice of the name Andrea. The vast expanse of the universe, as described in these works, prompts contemplation of the celestial forces that may inadvertently shape terrestrial traditions.
Fiction Books:
Drawing parallels to Clarke's "Childhood's End" and Asimov's "Foundation," we are reminded of the intricate interplay between cosmic forces and human destiny. Clarke's exploration of transcendent evolution and Asimov's depiction of far-reaching galactic influences encourage us to consider the potential cosmic guidance behind seemingly arbitrary human decisions, including the selection of first names. The cosmic themes woven into these works ignite our imagination and prompt contemplation of the possibility that Neptune's distant allure may extend to the naming of individuals on Earth.
Closer-to-home Sources:
In addition to scholarly research and renowned literary works, we turned to unexpected sources of worldly wisdom, including the backs of shampoo bottles, where we discovered an astounding level of detail about celestial bodies and their purported impact on the popularity of certain names. While these sources may not adhere to traditional scholarly standards, they serve as a whimsical reminder of the unexpected places where cosmic connections may manifest. After all, who knew that a quick rinse could reveal the secrets of the solar system and its nebulous influence on nomenclature?
The zany juxtaposition of serious, non-fiction works and fictional explorations of otherworldly phenomena with an unconventional source of information serves to underscore the unexpected and entertaining nature of our investigation into Neptune's nebulous nudge and its potential impact on the notoriety of the name Andrea. Our foray into the celestial and terrestrial realms highlights the delightful dalliance between rigorous research and whimsical wonder, inviting readers to consider the cosmic capers that may influence earthly appellations.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1975 to 2022 revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the frequency of the first name Andrea. This correlation indicates a remarkably robust relationship between the celestial positioning of Neptune and the terrestrial trend of naming newborns Andrea. It's as if Neptune's distant allure is whispering sweet nothings into the ears of expectant parents, nudging them toward the name Andrea. One might say it's a "neptunely influence."
The r-squared value of 0.9299195 further emphasized the strength of this association, indicating that approximately 93% of the variation in the popularity of the name Andrea can be explained by the fluctuations in Neptune's distance from the Sun. It's an astronomical amount of influence over something as seemingly random as the naming of individuals. It's as if Neptune is the unseen puppeteer pulling the strings of nomenclature from afar, orchestrating a cosmic comedy of name choices.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 confirmed the statistical significance of this correlation, debunking any doubts about the authenticity of this cosmic connection. This level of significance provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and supports the alternative hypothesis that there is indeed a tangible link between Neptune's distance and the prevalence of the name Andrea. It's almost as significant as finally finding water on Mars, except in this case, we're finding a stellar connection between Neptune and the name Andrea.
(Fig. 1) (To be included separately) The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the striking correlation between Neptune's distance from the Sun and the frequency of the first name Andrea. The data points form a clear pattern, resembling constellations aligning in the night sky, demonstrating the undeniable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. It's an astronomical coincidence, or is it?
In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest a compelling coalescence between the cosmic realm and the terrestrial tradition of naming, shedding light on a celestial secret that has quietly influenced the waxing and waning popularity of the name Andrea on Earth. Whether it's due to the cosmic charisma of Neptune or some other cosmic caper, this correlation challenges our understanding of the forces that shape human behavior and invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which the universe may exert its influence on our everyday lives. It's a cosmic conundrum that adds a touch of celestial serendipity to the mundanity of naming conventions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our research have illuminated a remarkable relationship between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the frequency of the first name Andrea. Our findings support and extend the prior literature that has hinted at the idea of celestial bodies exerting influence on human cultural practices. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 affirm the strength and authenticity of this cosmic connection, akin to the solid gravitational pull of a massive celestial body.

Drawing on the theoretical framework provided by Smith, Doe, and Jones, and the whimsical inspiration from Carroll's "The Cosmic Connection" and Tyson's "Cosmos," our investigation has unearthed a surprising nexus between Neptune's enigmatic distance and the ebb and flow of Andrea's prominence. It seems our celestial neighbor might indeed be tossing its own unique "Neptunes" into the naming game, nudging expectant parents toward the gravitational allure of the name Andrea. One might say Neptune is playing a "stellar role" in the popularity of this name.

Our findings also align with the unexpected insights gained from the back of shampoo bottles, serving as a lighthearted reminder of the unanticipated places where cosmic influences may manifest. Much like the serendipity of stumbling upon cosmic musings while in the shower, our results unexpectedly unveiled a cosmic conundrum that challenges conventional scientific understanding with a touch of celestial whimsy.

The substantial r-squared value of 0.9299195 indicates that approximately 93% of the variations in the frequency of the name Andrea can be attributed to the dance of Neptune's celestial positioning. This significant influence is comparable to the grand spectacle of a cosmic ballet, with Neptune taking center stage and Earth witnessing the graceful pirouette of the name Andrea under its celestial guidance.

The visually striking scatterplot (Fig. 1) further emphasizes the undeniable correlation, resembling the alignment of constellations in the night sky. The poetic parallels between the cosmic constellations and our earthly naming patterns exemplify the cosmic comedy of name choices orchestrated by Neptune's unseen hand. It's as if the stars themselves are aligning to reflect the celestial forces at play, much like the alignment of thought-provoking data points on a graph.

In conclusion, our research has not only shed light on the unlikely connection between Neptune's distant allure and the terrestrial trend of naming newborns Andrea but also underscores the whimsical interplay between rigorous scientific inquiry and unexpected celestial influences. As we navigate further into the cosmic abyss of influence on human behavior, our study invites stakeholders to consider the potential impact of celestial whimsy on our everyday lives. With these findings, we urge readers to look to the stars and ponder the cosmic capers that may stealthily shape our terrestrial traditions, ushering in a new era of cosmic contemplation in the hallowed halls of scientific pursuit.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and the Sun and Popularity of the first name Andrea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the curious correlation between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the popularity of the first name Andrea. Drawing data from Astropy for the celestial distances and the US Social Security Administration for naming trends, our study scrutinizes the period from 1975 to 2022. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the cosmic conundrum and the nomenclatural notability.

It seems that as Neptune meanders farther from the Sun, the prevalence of the name Andrea flourishes on our planet. This surprising parallel led us to ponder: is Neptune's mystique influencing the whims of expectant parents, prompting them to bestow the name Andrea upon their progeny? While this theory may seem as far-fetched as Neptune itself, the data persist in their perspicacious portrayal of this peculiar penchant.

One cannot help but wonder if our celestial neighbor Neptune is whispering, "Andrea" into the cosmos, subtly influencing the naming habits of Earthlings. This cosmic connection may prompt a reevaluation of the forces that shape human behavior, highlighting the fanciful fusion of cosmic curiosity and terrestrial traditions. As with all scientific discoveries, further investigation is warranted, guiding us to boldly go where no pun has gone before.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The cosmic ballet of celestial bodies has long captivated the curiosity of humankind, tracing patterns across the heavens that hint at hidden harmonies. As astronomers peer through their telescopes and statisticians crunch their numbers, an unexpected association has emerged, akin to finding a telescope in a black hole—it appears that the distance between Neptune and the Sun may wield a peculiar influence over the popularity of the first name Andrea.
It seems as if Neptune, the distant ice giant, may be playing a larger role in our lives than previously suspected. Perhaps Neptune is not just the god of the sea, but also the celestial custodian of certain appellations! This discovery adds a new layer to the phrase "out of this world."
The giggling galaxies appear to be in cahoots with the capricious choices of parents bestowing names upon their offspring. It's as if Neptune's gravitational pull reaches all the way to Earth, tugging at the hearts and minds of expectant parents, nudging them to choose the name Andrea for their children. This celestial verve for nomenclature suggests that we are but marionettes in the cosmic comedy of errors—a performance of puns, planets, and parents.
The statistical significance of this correlation prompts one to wonder if there's a "Neptune effect" influencing not only our planet's orbit, but also the naming practices of its inhabitants. It appears that while we've been gazing at the stars, the stars have been playing matchmaker with monikers. It seems that even in the cold, dark reaches of space, data can still shed light on celestial secrets that may, in turn, influence earthly etiquettes. After all, who knew that when it comes to naming, Neptune could be the planet of "Oh, and-area – that's a nice name!"
In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into this Neptune-Andrea nexus, inviting readers to join us on a whimsical journey through the cosmos and the cradle, where statistical significance meets celestial serendipity. Let us take a leap into the infinite abyss of knowledge, where even the most unexpected correlations await discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1975 to 2022 revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the frequency of the first name Andrea. This correlation indicates a remarkably robust relationship between the celestial positioning of Neptune and the terrestrial trend of naming newborns Andrea. It's as if Neptune's distant allure is whispering sweet nothings into the ears of expectant parents, nudging them toward the name Andrea. One might say it's a "neptunely influence."
The r-squared value of 0.9299195 further emphasized the strength of this association, indicating that approximately 93% of the variation in the popularity of the name Andrea can be explained by the fluctuations in Neptune's distance from the Sun. It's an astronomical amount of influence over something as seemingly random as the naming of individuals. It's as if Neptune is the unseen puppeteer pulling the strings of nomenclature from afar, orchestrating a cosmic comedy of name choices.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 confirmed the statistical significance of this correlation, debunking any doubts about the authenticity of this cosmic connection. This level of significance provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and supports the alternative hypothesis that there is indeed a tangible link between Neptune's distance and the prevalence of the name Andrea. It's almost as significant as finally finding water on Mars, except in this case, we're finding a stellar connection between Neptune and the name Andrea.
(Fig. 1) (To be included separately) The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the striking correlation between Neptune's distance from the Sun and the frequency of the first name Andrea. The data points form a clear pattern, resembling constellations aligning in the night sky, demonstrating the undeniable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. It's an astronomical coincidence, or is it?
In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest a compelling coalescence between the cosmic realm and the terrestrial tradition of naming, shedding light on a celestial secret that has quietly influenced the waxing and waning popularity of the name Andrea on Earth. Whether it's due to the cosmic charisma of Neptune or some other cosmic caper, this correlation challenges our understanding of the forces that shape human behavior and invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which the universe may exert its influence on our everyday lives. It's a cosmic conundrum that adds a touch of celestial serendipity to the mundanity of naming conventions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In light of the robust correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value, it is indeed compelling to consider the nexus between Neptune's distance and the notoriety of the name Andrea. It's as if Neptune has been eavesdropping on expectant parents, whispering, "Andrea" into their subconscious, nudging them toward this particular appellative choice. This celestial influence is truly out of this world—neptunely so, one might say.

The visual representation of the data in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) starkly elucidates the celestial sway over earthly nomenclature, resembling constellations aligning in the night sky. It's as if the stars have aligned to affirm the cosmic correlation, adding a touch of astronomical whimsy to the statistical significance.

Further investigation is certainly warranted to explore this celestial enigma further. However, at the risk of overreaching, we may find ourselves in a cosmic comedy of errors, searching for meaning in a sea of celestial serendipity. After all, how many researchers does it take to study the influence of Neptune on naming trends? Too many, and we may find ourselves lost in the celestial soup!

In the grand tradition of dad jokes, it is perhaps best to say, "Neptune-Andrea correlation, you are 'Neptunely' significant, but it's time to 'Pluto' this area of research as 'Uranusly' as we can." In other words, the celestial curtain descends on this act of inquiry, leaving us with a celestial mystery that adds a touch of humor to our scientific pursuits.

No more research is needed in this area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Celestial Sociology

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Planetary Interactions Research

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety with an abstract of This research delves into the curious correlation between the distance separating Neptune from the Sun and the popularity of the first name Andrea. Drawing data from Astropy for the celestial distances and the US Social Security Administration for naming trends, our study scrutinizes the period from 1975 to 2022. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9643234 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the cosmic conundrum and the nomenclatural notability.
It seems that as Neptune meanders farther from the Sun, the prevalence of the name Andrea flourishes on our planet. This surprising parallel led us to ponder: is Neptune's mystique influencing the whims of expectant parents, prompting them to bestow the name Andrea upon their progeny? While this theory may seem as far-fetched as Neptune itself, the data persist in their perspicacious portrayal of this peculiar penchant.
One cannot help but wonder if our celestial neighbor Neptune is whispering, "Andrea" into the cosmos, subtly influencing the naming habits of Earthlings. This cosmic connection may prompt a reevaluation of the forces that shape human behavior, highlighting the fanciful fusion of cosmic curiosity and terrestrial traditions. As with all scientific discoveries, further investigation is warranted, guiding us to boldly go where no pun has gone before.

ChatGPT:

Neptune, distance, correlation, Andrea, notoriety, celestial distances, US Social Security Administration, naming trends, 1975-2022, correlation coefficient, p-value, Neptune's influence, expectant parents, naming habits, cosmic connection, human behavior, scientific discoveries

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

The distance between Neptune and the Sun
Detailed data title: The average distance between Neptune and the Sun as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: ^{See full details} I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.

See what else correlates with The distance between Neptune and the Sun

Popularity of the first name Andrea
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Andrea
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Andrea

Correlation r = 0.9643234 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9299195 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Popularity of the first name Andrea) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The distance between Neptune and the Sun) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.0E-28.^Show 0.0000000000000000000000000003
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 3.0E-26% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,333,333,333,333,333,560,877,121,536 random variables^Note You don't actually need 3 octillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	1975	1976	1977	1978	1979	1980	1981	1982	1983	1984	1985	1986	1987	1988	1989	1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
The distance between Neptune and the Sun (Planetary distance (AU))	30.3007	30.2949	30.2898	30.2857	30.2823	30.2793	30.2763	30.2725	30.2676	30.2613	30.2535	30.2445	30.2347	30.2248	30.2152	30.2064	30.1985	30.1912	30.1844	30.1774	30.1698	30.161	30.1509	30.1396	30.1273	30.1147	30.1024	30.0908	30.0803	30.071	30.0627	30.055	30.0473	30.0391	30.0301	30.02	30.0091	29.9976	29.9861	29.9751	29.9652	29.9565	29.9491	29.9427	29.9369	29.931	29.9246	29.9174
Popularity of the first name Andrea (Babies born)	8221	8535	9943	10613	10474	10599	11840	11506	10535	10469	10173	8772	8611	8482	8540	8304	8085	8104	7298	6545	6069	5723	5446	5185	5123	5531	5784	5152	5018	5110	4715	5046	4820	4293	4082	3587	3532	3070	2829	2582	2720	2496	2353	2191	2002	1840	1711	1871

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. ^Note Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30.3007,30.2949,30.2898,30.2857,30.2823,30.2793,30.2763,30.2725,30.2676,30.2613,30.2535,30.2445,30.2347,30.2248,30.2152,30.2064,30.1985,30.1912,30.1844,30.1774,30.1698,30.161,30.1509,30.1396,30.1273,30.1147,30.1024,30.0908,30.0803,30.071,30.0627,30.055,30.0473,30.0391,30.0301,30.02,30.0091,29.9976,29.9861,29.9751,29.9652,29.9565,29.9491,29.9427,29.9369,29.931,29.9246,29.9174,])
array_2 = np.array([8221,8535,9943,10613,10474,10599,11840,11506,10535,10469,10173,8772,8611,8482,8540,8304,8085,8104,7298,6545,6069,5723,5446,5185,5123,5531,5784,5152,5018,5110,4715,5046,4820,4293,4082,3587,3532,3070,2829,2582,2720,2496,2353,2191,2002,1840,1711,1871,])
array_1_name = "The distance between Neptune and the Sun"
array_2_name = "Popularity of the first name Andrea"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only The distance between Neptune and the Sun
Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Andrea
The spurious research paper: Neptune's Nudge: The Nexus between Neptune's Distance and the Name Andrea's Notoriety

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!

Correlation ID: 1222 · Black Variable ID: 1932 · Red Variable ID: 2099


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: