Report an error
NASA's budget appropriation correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Ghana | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Ukraine | r=0.9 | 30yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Kelsey | r=0.88 | 48yrs | Yes! |
| Evaporated and condensed milk consumption | r=0.83 | 32yrs | No |
| Violent crime rates | r=0.8 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Tyler | r=0.78 | 48yrs | No |
| Canned whole evaporated and condensed milk consumption | r=0.68 | 32yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Conor | r=0.61 | 48yrs | No |
| The average age of batters for the Minnesota Twins | r=0.11 | 49yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'burn centers' | r=-0.83 | 20yrs | No |
| Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=-0.91 | 15yrs | No |
| US kids in public school | r=-0.92 | 33yrs | Yes! |
NASA's budget appropriation also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)