Report an error
Worldwide count of earthquakes with a magnitude between 8.0 and 9.9 correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Delaware | r=0.95 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Bemidji, Minnesota | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Air quality in Saginaw, Michigan | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
The number of hearing aid specialists in California | r=0.87 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'spiderman' | r=0.78 | 18yrs | No |
How clickbait-y MinuteEarth YouTube video titles are | r=0.55 | 9yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Argentina | r=0.46 | 22yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Fiji | r=0.45 | 22yrs | No |
Worldwide count of earthquakes with a magnitude between 8.0 and 9.9 also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)