Report an error
Motor vehicle thefts in Maine correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Justin | r=0.99 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Thomas | r=0.98 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Micheal | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Joshua | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.96 | 36yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Carolyn | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.94 | 32yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.92 | 32yrs | No |
Air pollution in Portland, Maine | r=0.8 | 33yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Maine also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)