Report an error
Electricity generation in Yemen correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Arianna | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Peyton | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Annabel | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lilly | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Brody | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Hawaii | r=0.91 | 11yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Indiana | r=0.9 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Texas | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Massachusetts | r=0.88 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Ohio | r=0.87 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in Yemen also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)