Report an error
Popularity of the first name Kelsey correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Carjackings in the US | r=0.97 | 27yrs | No |
| Frozen yogurt consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| Violent crime rates | r=0.95 | 38yrs | Yes! |
| Robberies in Missouri | r=0.94 | 38yrs | No |
| Jet fuel used in Ukraine | r=0.93 | 30yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Azerbaijan | r=0.92 | 30yrs | No |
| Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.89 | 36yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with Verizon | r=0.88 | 28yrs | No |
| NASA's budget appropriation | r=0.88 | 48yrs | Yes! |
| Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines | r=-0.38 | 28yrs | No |
| Restaurant spending in Ohio | r=-0.85 | 24yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kelsey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)