NOTICE: This variable is inactive
The correlation is not active in any lists.
This page remains only to prevent link rot.
Report an error
Roger Federer's annual earnings correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.93 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'that is sus' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Walker | r=0.93 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Stevie | r=0.92 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Dario | r=0.91 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.91 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Texas | r=0.9 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Air quality in Los Alamos, New Mexico | r=-0.99 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Roger Federer's annual earnings also correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Sys. Score |
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)