about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,737 · View random

NOTICE: This correlation is inactive

Likely there is an issue with the variable data or data source.
The correlation is not active in any lists.
This page remains only to prevent link rot.


A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Roger Federer's annual earnings and the second variable is Google searches for 'that is sus'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Roger Federer's earnings soar, he becomes the symbol of elite success. People begin to see him as the ultimate role model for achieving financial greatness. This creates a subconscious desire in individuals to imitate his path to wealth. As a result, they're drawn to activities and behaviors that they believe will lead to similar prosperity. Now, as more and more individuals strive to emulate Federer's success, they start using the phrase 'that is sus' as a way to dismiss anything they perceive as not aligning with the perceived image of success. Remember, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but in this case, it's also the catalyst for a surge in 'that is sus' searches.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a Discovery magazine cover, showcasing a tennis court with lush green grass. On the court, there is a giant digital screen displaying Roger Federer holding a gigantic tennis racquet, with dollar signs floating around him to symbolize his annual earnings. At the same time, a group of Among Us characters are seen on the screen, looking at each other suspiciously. Additionally, a large popup of the Google search bar shows a surge in searches for 'that is sus' above the characters' heads. Ensure the simplification and refrain from including any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Cybernetic art Charcoal Celtic art A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus', in the following situation: As Roger Federer's annual earnings increased, it caused more people to question the financial integrity of the suspicious crewmates in Among Us, leading to a surge in Google searches for 'that is sus.'. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the green grass of a tennis court, a giant digital screen displays Roger Federer holding a gigantic tennis racquet with dollar signs floating around him, symbolizing his annual earnings. On the same screen, a group of Among Us characters are looking at each other suspiciously, while a large popup of the Google search bar shows a surge in searches for 'that is sus' above their heads.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the green grass of a tennis court, a giant digital screen displays Roger Federer holding a gigantic tennis racquet with dollar signs floating around him, symbolizing his annual earnings. On the same screen, a group of Among Us characters are looking at each other suspiciously, while a large popup of the Google search bar shows a surge in searches for 'that is sus' above their heads. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a Discovery magazine cover, showcasing a tennis court with lush green grass. On the court, there is a giant digital screen displaying Roger Federer holding a gigantic tennis racquet, with dollar signs floating around him to symbolize his annual earnings. At the same time, a group of Among Us characters are seen on the screen, looking at each other suspiciously. Additionally, a large popup of the Google search bar shows a surge in searches for 'that is sus' above the characters' heads. Ensure the simplification and refrain from including any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Roger Federer's annual earnings caused that is sus (Google searches for 'that is sus') to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'

The Journal of Sports Economics and Cultural Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.

Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.

Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of academic research is often characterized by a relentless pursuit of uncovering correlations, however obscure they may seem. In this vein, the connection between the annual earnings of Roger Federer, the renowned tennis virtuoso, and the Google searches for the catchphrase "that is sus" has emerged as a subject of both bemusement and intellectual curiosity. This unexpected correlation has prompted a lighthearted examination that transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly inquiry, as we humorously probe the whimsical link between a tennis maestro's fortune and the vernacular of internet denizens.

Given the unorthodox nature of our investigation, we are keen to interject a pun or two along the way. As we embark on this compelling exploration, one cannot resist the temptation to wonder if rather than scrutinizing the suspicious nature of gameplay, Federer's earnings have triggered an influx of queries such as "That is Sus...pect," as his on-court dominance continues to leave audiences in awe. Oh, the a-Sus-pense of it all!

The genesis of our research stems from the unexpected juxtaposition of Roger Federer's financial exploits and the cultural phenomenon of the phrase "that is sus." Spanning from 2004 to 2022, the data gleaned from Wikipedia and Google Trends have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. This correlation beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to pause, reflect, and perhaps utter an appreciative chuckle at the quirky interplay between fame, fortune, and online parlance.

In spite of the scholarly rigor underpinning our analysis, we embrace the opportunity to infuse the proceedings with a touch of levity. As we delve into the unexpected alliance between Federer's earnings and the ubiquitous "that is sus" searches, we are reminded of the imperative to occasionally eschew the sternness of academia and revel in the delightful, dad-joke-worthy whimsy that underlies our exploration. After all, what is academic inquiry without a sprinkle of good-humored banter?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.

Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academic research is often characterized by a relentless pursuit of uncovering correlations, however obscure they may seem. In this vein, the connection between the annual earnings of Roger Federer, the renowned tennis virtuoso, and the Google searches for the catchphrase "that is sus" has emerged as a subject of both bemusement and intellectual curiosity. This unexpected correlation has prompted a lighthearted examination that transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly inquiry, as we humorously probe the whimsical link between a tennis maestro's fortune and the vernacular of internet denizens.
Given the unorthodox nature of our investigation, we are keen to interject a pun or two along the way. As we embark on this compelling exploration, one cannot resist the temptation to wonder if rather than scrutinizing the suspicious nature of gameplay, Federer's earnings have triggered an influx of queries such as "That is Sus...pect," as his on-court dominance continues to leave audiences in awe. Oh, the a-Sus-pense of it all!
The genesis of our research stems from the unexpected juxtaposition of Roger Federer's financial exploits and the cultural phenomenon of the phrase "that is sus." Spanning from 2004 to 2022, the data gleaned from Wikipedia and Google Trends have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. This correlation beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to pause, reflect, and perhaps utter an appreciative chuckle at the quirky interplay between fame, fortune, and online parlance.
In spite of the scholarly rigor underpinning our analysis, we embrace the opportunity to infuse the proceedings with a touch of levity. As we delve into the unexpected alliance between Federer's earnings and the ubiquitous "that is sus" searches, we are reminded of the imperative to occasionally eschew the sternness of academia and revel in the delightful, dad-joke-worthy whimsy that underlies our exploration. After all, what is academic inquiry without a sprinkle of good-humored banter?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several serious-sounding studies have explored the curious connection between cultural phenomena and financial performance. In "Smith et al.", the authors find a compelling correlation between internet search trends and celebrity earnings, illuminating the unexpected ways in which popular culture intersects with economic metrics. Carrying this torch, "Doe and Jones" scrutinize the manner in which digital catchphrases permeate the collective consciousness, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between linguistic trends and societal dynamics.

Yet, as we traverse the whimsical terrain of internet culture and celebrity earnings, one is reminded of the delightful unpredictability of human behavior. It is akin to a tennis match where the audience is left a-Federer-d with anticipation, pondering the next shot and the potential for an unforeseen volley.

In addition to these academic investigations, non-fiction tomes such as "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam "Smith" and "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner offer illuminating perspectives on the intricate tapestry of economic forces and cultural factors. Meanwhile, fiction works like "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "The Bonfire of the Vanities" by Tom Wolfe transport readers into the lavish and enigmatic world of wealth and societal mores, echoing the inimitable allure of opulence and intrigue.

Drawing from the literature of social media, numerous posts on Twitter and Reddit have sparked contemplation about the correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the phrase "that is sus." One tweet boldly claimed, "The only thing more 'sus' than Roger Federer's earnings is my luck in catching a fly ball at a baseball game!" This sentiment encapsulates the playful banter that infuses our inquiry, reminding us of the levity that can be found in the unlikeliest of correlations.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.

Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academic research is often characterized by a relentless pursuit of uncovering correlations, however obscure they may seem. In this vein, the connection between the annual earnings of Roger Federer, the renowned tennis virtuoso, and the Google searches for the catchphrase "that is sus" has emerged as a subject of both bemusement and intellectual curiosity. This unexpected correlation has prompted a lighthearted examination that transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly inquiry, as we humorously probe the whimsical link between a tennis maestro's fortune and the vernacular of internet denizens.
Given the unorthodox nature of our investigation, we are keen to interject a pun or two along the way. As we embark on this compelling exploration, one cannot resist the temptation to wonder if rather than scrutinizing the suspicious nature of gameplay, Federer's earnings have triggered an influx of queries such as "That is Sus...pect," as his on-court dominance continues to leave audiences in awe. Oh, the a-Sus-pense of it all!
The genesis of our research stems from the unexpected juxtaposition of Roger Federer's financial exploits and the cultural phenomenon of the phrase "that is sus." Spanning from 2004 to 2022, the data gleaned from Wikipedia and Google Trends have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. This correlation beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to pause, reflect, and perhaps utter an appreciative chuckle at the quirky interplay between fame, fortune, and online parlance.
In spite of the scholarly rigor underpinning our analysis, we embrace the opportunity to infuse the proceedings with a touch of levity. As we delve into the unexpected alliance between Federer's earnings and the ubiquitous "that is sus" searches, we are reminded of the imperative to occasionally eschew the sternness of academia and revel in the delightful, dad-joke-worthy whimsy that underlies our exploration. After all, what is academic inquiry without a sprinkle of good-humored banter?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study involved a multi-faceted and comprehensive approach to analyze the relationship between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "that is sus." Data from the period of 2004 to 2022 were collected from a variety of sources, predominantly relying on information obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends. This dataset was subsequently subjected to rigorous statistical analysis to ascertain the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.

The process began with the identification of Roger Federer's annual earnings data, sourced from reliable financial reports, professional endorsements, tournament winnings, and other reputable sources. This information was collated and organized to ensure accurate representations of Federer's financial standing over the specified time frame. The dad joke levels in the financial reports were carefully monitored and documented, though no significant correlation was found between the presence of dad jokes and the accuracy of the reported earnings.

Concurrently, the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "that is sus" was meticulously tracked using Google Trends, offering insight into the ebb and flow of public interest in this particular colloquial expression. The search volume data for "that is sus" was analyzed with a keen eye for seasonality, trend patterns, and any unexpected spikes or valleys that may correspond to significant events in Federer's career or the broader cultural zeitgeist. We also checked for any suspicious behavior from the search engine itself, though it simply returned results related to the concept of "suspicion," contributing little to the study beyond a wry chuckle.

Furthermore, the statistical analysis utilized in this study comprised a series of complex calculations, including correlation coefficients, regression analyses, and sensitivity testing to gauge the robustness and significance of the relationship between Roger Federer's earnings and Google searches for "that is sus." These analyses were conducted with meticulous attention to detail, employing industry-standard statistical software and methods. Our research team upheld the highest standards of methodological rigor, diligently scrutinizing the data for any anomalies or outliers that could potentially confound the analysis. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the unexpected synergies between the world of professional sports and the quirky intricacies of online colloquialism.

In conclusion, the methodology implemented in this study represents an amalgamation of diligent data collection, rigorous statistical analysis, and a touch of whimsical reflection on the delightfully unexpected connection between Roger Federer's earnings and Google searches for "that is sus." The convergence of these seemingly disparate realms forms the crux of our research endeavor, underscoring the imperative to embrace the quirks and idiosyncrasies that permeate the intersection of popular culture and financial success.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9289666, r-squared of 0.8629790, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.

Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of academic research is often characterized by a relentless pursuit of uncovering correlations, however obscure they may seem. In this vein, the connection between the annual earnings of Roger Federer, the renowned tennis virtuoso, and the Google searches for the catchphrase "that is sus" has emerged as a subject of both bemusement and intellectual curiosity. This unexpected correlation has prompted a lighthearted examination that transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly inquiry, as we humorously probe the whimsical link between a tennis maestro's fortune and the vernacular of internet denizens.
Given the unorthodox nature of our investigation, we are keen to interject a pun or two along the way. As we embark on this compelling exploration, one cannot resist the temptation to wonder if rather than scrutinizing the suspicious nature of gameplay, Federer's earnings have triggered an influx of queries such as "That is Sus...pect," as his on-court dominance continues to leave audiences in awe. Oh, the a-Sus-pense of it all!
The genesis of our research stems from the unexpected juxtaposition of Roger Federer's financial exploits and the cultural phenomenon of the phrase "that is sus." Spanning from 2004 to 2022, the data gleaned from Wikipedia and Google Trends have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. This correlation beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to pause, reflect, and perhaps utter an appreciative chuckle at the quirky interplay between fame, fortune, and online parlance.
In spite of the scholarly rigor underpinning our analysis, we embrace the opportunity to infuse the proceedings with a touch of levity. As we delve into the unexpected alliance between Federer's earnings and the ubiquitous "that is sus" searches, we are reminded of the imperative to occasionally eschew the sternness of academia and revel in the delightful, dad-joke-worthy whimsy that underlies our exploration. After all, what is academic inquiry without a sprinkle of good-humored banter?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" from 2004 to 2022, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and an r-squared value of 0.8629790. The p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This result indicates that as Roger Federer's earnings increased over the years, there was a corresponding increase in the number of Google searches for "that is sus."

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the incidence of Google searches for "that is sus." The upward trend in the scatterplot is unmistakable, reinforcing the substantial positive relationship between these two variables.

In the spirit of maintaining a bit of levity amidst scholarly discourse, one cannot help but wonder if Federer's opponents have been frantically typing "that is sus" into their search engines in a bid to fathom his seemingly superhuman abilities on the court. Oh, the suspense of it all!

Overall, the findings of this analysis uncover a whimsical yet compelling correlation between an iconic athlete's financial triumphs and the pervasive cultural phenomenon encapsulated by the phrase "that is sus." This unexpected affinity serves as a delightful reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that can emerge when disparate spheres of human fascination intertwine.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.

Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several serious-sounding studies have explored the curious connection between cultural phenomena and financial performance. In "Smith et al.", the authors find a compelling correlation between internet search trends and celebrity earnings, illuminating the unexpected ways in which popular culture intersects with economic metrics. Carrying this torch, "Doe and Jones" scrutinize the manner in which digital catchphrases permeate the collective consciousness, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between linguistic trends and societal dynamics.
Yet, as we traverse the whimsical terrain of internet culture and celebrity earnings, one is reminded of the delightful unpredictability of human behavior. It is akin to a tennis match where the audience is left a-Federer-d with anticipation, pondering the next shot and the potential for an unforeseen volley.
In addition to these academic investigations, non-fiction tomes such as "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam "Smith" and "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner offer illuminating perspectives on the intricate tapestry of economic forces and cultural factors. Meanwhile, fiction works like "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "The Bonfire of the Vanities" by Tom Wolfe transport readers into the lavish and enigmatic world of wealth and societal mores, echoing the inimitable allure of opulence and intrigue.
Drawing from the literature of social media, numerous posts on Twitter and Reddit have sparked contemplation about the correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the phrase "that is sus." One tweet boldly claimed, "The only thing more 'sus' than Roger Federer's earnings is my luck in catching a fly ball at a baseball game!" This sentiment encapsulates the playful banter that infuses our inquiry, reminding us of the levity that can be found in the unlikeliest of correlations.


[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" from 2004 to 2022, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and an r-squared value of 0.8629790. The p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This result indicates that as Roger Federer's earnings increased over the years, there was a corresponding increase in the number of Google searches for "that is sus."
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the incidence of Google searches for "that is sus." The upward trend in the scatterplot is unmistakable, reinforcing the substantial positive relationship between these two variables.
In the spirit of maintaining a bit of levity amidst scholarly discourse, one cannot help but wonder if Federer's opponents have been frantically typing "that is sus" into their search engines in a bid to fathom his seemingly superhuman abilities on the court. Oh, the suspense of it all!
Overall, the findings of this analysis uncover a whimsical yet compelling correlation between an iconic athlete's financial triumphs and the pervasive cultural phenomenon encapsulated by the phrase "that is sus." This unexpected affinity serves as a delightful reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that can emerge when disparate spheres of human fascination intertwine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The investigation into the correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for "that is sus" has yielded intriguing results. Our findings align with previous research that has explored the interplay between cultural phenomena and financial performance. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and the statistically significant p-value obtained in our analysis echo the conclusions drawn in prior studies, reaffirming the unexpected ways in which popular culture intersects with economic metrics.

The conspicuous positive correlation observed between Federer's earnings and the frequency of "that is sus" searches prompts contemplation about the whimsical and often surprising nature of human behavior. As we consider the unanticipated alignment between these seemingly disparate entities, one is reminded of the whimsical unpredictability inherent in cultural trends and economic indicators. It's like a topspin lob that catches everyone off guard – a delightful stroke of intellectual humor in the world of academia.

Our results resonate with the humorous banter that has permeated online discussions surrounding this unlikely correlation. It is reminiscent of the point where a tennis ball hovers on the net, leaving the spectators amused and intrigued by the uncertainty of its eventual trajectory. In a similar vein, the positive correlation between Federer's earnings and "that is sus" searches serves as a lighthearted reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that can arise when seemingly disconnected spheres of fascination intersect. We might even label it as a "suspiciously good" correlation!

The incorporation of a humorous undertone in scholarly inquiry paves the path for engaging dialogue and further exploration of intriguing correlations. This is akin to an enthralling volley that triggers both awe and laughter - a testament to the endearing unpredictability that pervades the realm of empirical research. One could almost say that the correlation coefficient in our study is as "ace" as one of Federer's serves – statistically significant and undeniably impressive!

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unexpected confluence of cultural phenomena and financial performance. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches not only enriches the scholarly discourse but also adds a touch of whimsy to the academic pursuit. This correlation serves as a playful tribute to the intricacies of human curiosity and serves to broaden the horizons of intellectual inquiry, reinforcing the notion that even the most unexpected correlations can serve as a source of scholarly merriment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Roger Federer's annual earnings and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.

Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.

Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of academic research is often characterized by a relentless pursuit of uncovering correlations, however obscure they may seem. In this vein, the connection between the annual earnings of Roger Federer, the renowned tennis virtuoso, and the Google searches for the catchphrase "that is sus" has emerged as a subject of both bemusement and intellectual curiosity. This unexpected correlation has prompted a lighthearted examination that transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly inquiry, as we humorously probe the whimsical link between a tennis maestro's fortune and the vernacular of internet denizens.
Given the unorthodox nature of our investigation, we are keen to interject a pun or two along the way. As we embark on this compelling exploration, one cannot resist the temptation to wonder if rather than scrutinizing the suspicious nature of gameplay, Federer's earnings have triggered an influx of queries such as "That is Sus...pect," as his on-court dominance continues to leave audiences in awe. Oh, the a-Sus-pense of it all!
The genesis of our research stems from the unexpected juxtaposition of Roger Federer's financial exploits and the cultural phenomenon of the phrase "that is sus." Spanning from 2004 to 2022, the data gleaned from Wikipedia and Google Trends have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. This correlation beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to pause, reflect, and perhaps utter an appreciative chuckle at the quirky interplay between fame, fortune, and online parlance.
In spite of the scholarly rigor underpinning our analysis, we embrace the opportunity to infuse the proceedings with a touch of levity. As we delve into the unexpected alliance between Federer's earnings and the ubiquitous "that is sus" searches, we are reminded of the imperative to occasionally eschew the sternness of academia and revel in the delightful, dad-joke-worthy whimsy that underlies our exploration. After all, what is academic inquiry without a sprinkle of good-humored banter?

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" from 2004 to 2022, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and an r-squared value of 0.8629790. The p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This result indicates that as Roger Federer's earnings increased over the years, there was a corresponding increase in the number of Google searches for "that is sus."
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the incidence of Google searches for "that is sus." The upward trend in the scatterplot is unmistakable, reinforcing the substantial positive relationship between these two variables.
In the spirit of maintaining a bit of levity amidst scholarly discourse, one cannot help but wonder if Federer's opponents have been frantically typing "that is sus" into their search engines in a bid to fathom his seemingly superhuman abilities on the court. Oh, the suspense of it all!
Overall, the findings of this analysis uncover a whimsical yet compelling correlation between an iconic athlete's financial triumphs and the pervasive cultural phenomenon encapsulated by the phrase "that is sus." This unexpected affinity serves as a delightful reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that can emerge when disparate spheres of human fascination intertwine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In culmination, our study has shed light on the fascinating correlation between Roger Federer's annual earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment has unveiled a compelling interplay between the financial prowess of a tennis maestro and the vernacular of internet denizens, prompting both intrigue and amusement among scholars and enthusiasts alike.

As we reflect on the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and the statistically significant nature of our findings (p < 0.01), we cannot help but appreciate the whimsical and lighthearted nature of this peculiar link. It's almost as if the universe is serving us a witty ace, reminding us that in the game of correlations, there's always a bit of a twist, just like a slice serve catching you off guard!

The robust positive relationship uncovered between Federer's earnings and the frequency of "that is sus" searches reflects the delightful idiosyncrasies that can emerge when seemingly unrelated entities intersect. It's as if the tennis legend's financial success has prompted an online symphony of suspicion and whimsy, akin to the unyielding back and forth of a thrilling match on the court.

In true scholarly fashion, we have also playfully pondered whether Federer's opponents have been frantically searching for 'that is sus' in an attempt to unravel the mysteries of his sporting prowess. It's almost as if they're trying to decode a tricky drop shot, but in the realm of Google queries!

With these revelatory findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. We have relentlessly pursued the volley of correlation and causation, and the point has been conclusively won. It's time to hang up our academic rackets and bask in the whimsical glory of this unexpected connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Economics and Cultural Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Internet Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Advantage Sus: Exploring the Correlation Between Roger Federer's Earnings and Google Searches for 'That Is Sus' with an abstract of This study examines the intriguing relationship between the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer and the frequency of Google searches for the popular internet catchphrase "that is sus." Through the utilization of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team uncovered a notable correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. The findings yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9289666 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022.
Our investigation delves into the peculiar, yet compelling association between the financial successes of Roger Federer and the online fascination with identifying suspicious behavior, utilizing a humorously unorthodox approach. Remarkably, the analysis reveals a consistent parallel between the fluctuations in Federer's earnings and the prevalence of Google searches for "that is sus." This unexpected alignment prompts both amusement and intrigue, challenging conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of cultural phenomena and financial performance.
Amidst the rigorous statistical analysis, our study does not forego the opportunity to incorporate a fitting dad joke. With a nod to the concept of "suspicious" correlations, we playfully ponder whether Federer's opponents have been Google-searching "that is sus" in response to his unyielding dominance on the tennis court. This lighthearted speculation serves as a playful divergence from the scholarly tone, evoking a chuckle while maintaining the academic rigor essential to our inquiry.
In conclusion, the findings of this research offer a distinctive lens through which to appreciate the unexpected interplay between popular culture and the world of high-stakes athletics. The undeniable correlation between Roger Federer's earnings and the prevalence of "that is sus" searches underscores the inherently quirky and whimsical nature of the digital age, resonating with both scholars and aficionados alike.

ChatGPT:

Roger Federer earnings, Google Trends, "that is sus" searches, correlation coefficient, cultural phenomena, financial performance, statistical analysis, suspicious correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Roger Federer's annual earnings
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Roger Federer's annual earnings

Google searches for 'that is sus'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'that is sus' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'that is sus'

Correlation r = 0.9289666 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8629790 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'that is sus') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Roger Federer's annual earnings) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.4E-9. 0.0000000093639417926545580000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 9.4E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 106,792,633 random variables You don't actually need 106 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Roger Federer's annual earnings (Thousands of dollars)6357.556137.028343.8810130.65886.888768.117698.296369.588584.843203.642338.45780289015272701305490086292308716980106000009000000090000000
Google searches for 'that is sus' (Rel. search volume)3.833337.083338.666673.833331.333336.416675.583336.9166710.2510.08338.666678.6666711.083312.515.416714.416740.833358.166781.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6357.55,6137.02,8343.88,10130.6,5886.88,8768.11,7698.29,6369.58,8584.84,3203.64,2338.45,7802890,1527270,13054900,8629230,8716980,10600000,90000000,90000000,])
array_2 = np.array([3.83333,7.08333,8.66667,3.83333,1.33333,6.41667,5.58333,6.91667,10.25,10.0833,8.66667,8.66667,11.0833,12.5,15.4167,14.4167,40.8333,58.1667,81.6667,])
array_1_name = "Roger Federer's annual earnings"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'that is sus'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 2737 · Black Variable ID: 84 · Red Variable ID: 1367
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0