about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,977 · View random

NOTICE: This correlation is inactive

Likely there is an issue with the variable data or data source.
The correlation is not active in any lists.
This page remains only to prevent link rot.


A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Walker and the second variable is Roger Federer's annual earnings.  The chart goes from 1998 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Walker surged in popularity, more parents were subconsciously guiding their kids toward a career in tennis, unknowingly boosting the demand for tennis lessons and equipment. This led to a racket in the industry, propelling Roger Federer's earnings to new heights. It's as if the name Walker was really paving the way for Federer's success, one 'forehand' at a time!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Imagine a picturesque tennis court setting, with the court vibrant and lively under the warm glow of sunshine. The young players, all named Walker, are entwined in an energetic game, each displaying unique characteristics and playing styles. Meanwhile, their coach stands at the center with an encouraging smile. In the background, a bustling crowd eagerly lines up to purchase tickets for Roger Federer's upcoming match, as a larger-than-life poster of Federer overlooks the exciting scene. This prompts a captivating visual, reflecting the impact of the name 'Walker' on tennis, and further emphasizing the influence on Federer's popularity and earnings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cyber folk Symbolism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings, in the following situation: The increase in popularity of the first name Walker caused Roger Federer's annual earnings to increase because people realized that walking is a fundamental skill in tennis. As more kids were named Walker, they were inspired to take up tennis and emulate their namesake, leading to a surge in tennis participation. With more players on the court, the demand for tennis gear and tickets to watch professional matches skyrocketed, including those featuring the legendary Federer. In a stroke of luck, the rise of the Walkers led to a net gain in Federer's earnings, proving once and for all that when it comes to making money, every step counts.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A bustling tennis court filled with enthusiastic young players named Walker, all practicing their moves under the guidance of a coach. In the background, a poster of Roger Federer with tickets to his matches being eagerly purchased by the growing crowd. The intertwining scenes depict the influence of the name Walker's popularity on tennis and Federer's earnings.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: A bustling tennis court filled with enthusiastic young players named Walker, all practicing their moves under the guidance of a coach. In the background, a poster of Roger Federer with tickets to his matches being eagerly purchased by the growing crowd. The intertwining scenes depict the influence of the name Walker's popularity on tennis and Federer's earnings. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Imagine a picturesque tennis court setting, with the court vibrant and lively under the warm glow of sunshine. The young players, all named Walker, are entwined in an energetic game, each displaying unique characteristics and playing styles. Meanwhile, their coach stands at the center with an encouraging smile. In the background, a bustling crowd eagerly lines up to purchase tickets for Roger Federer's upcoming match, as a larger-than-life poster of Federer overlooks the exciting scene. This prompts a captivating visual, reflecting the impact of the name 'Walker' on tennis, and further emphasizing the influence on Federer's popularity and earnings.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Walker caused Roger Federer's annual earnings to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

The Journal of Sports Sociology and Cultural Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 and p < 0.01 for 1998 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of research has brought us many unexpected connections and unlikely associations - from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of drownings, to the positive relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets. Today, we add to this list of peculiar connections with our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and the annual earnings of tennis maestro Roger Federer.

As amusing as it may sound, our study was born out of a whimsical curiosity about whether a name could have an impact on one's financial prosperity, much like a rabbit's foot or a four-leaf clover. Admittedly, at first glance, this may come across as an odd and seemingly arbitrary research topic. However, as we dove headfirst into the data, we found ourselves drawn into the unexpected drama and intrigue of the statistical world, uncovering a connection that challenges conventional wisdom and serves as a testament to the serendipity of scholarly pursuits.

Much like a game of tennis, where one must carefully strategize and anticipate every move, the world of research also requires a keen eye for patterns and a willingness to be open to unexpected results. In this spirit, our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, where the boundaries between statistical analysis and name popularity blurred like the edges of a poorly-cropped photo.

Uniting the data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic link between the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's financial prowess. As we delved into the ocean of data points and correlation coefficients, we aimed to serve up not only a dish of numerical findings but also a sprinkle of amusement in the often serious landscape of academic exploration.

With these ambitions in tow, we eagerly present our findings, eager to shed light on this unexpected marriage of nomenclature and net worth. Let the games begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research has brought us many unexpected connections and unlikely associations - from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of drownings, to the positive relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets. Today, we add to this list of peculiar connections with our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and the annual earnings of tennis maestro Roger Federer.
As amusing as it may sound, our study was born out of a whimsical curiosity about whether a name could have an impact on one's financial prosperity, much like a rabbit's foot or a four-leaf clover. Admittedly, at first glance, this may come across as an odd and seemingly arbitrary research topic. However, as we dove headfirst into the data, we found ourselves drawn into the unexpected drama and intrigue of the statistical world, uncovering a connection that challenges conventional wisdom and serves as a testament to the serendipity of scholarly pursuits.
Much like a game of tennis, where one must carefully strategize and anticipate every move, the world of research also requires a keen eye for patterns and a willingness to be open to unexpected results. In this spirit, our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, where the boundaries between statistical analysis and name popularity blurred like the edges of a poorly-cropped photo.
Uniting the data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic link between the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's financial prowess. As we delved into the ocean of data points and correlation coefficients, we aimed to serve up not only a dish of numerical findings but also a sprinkle of amusement in the often serious landscape of academic exploration.
With these ambitions in tow, we eagerly present our findings, eager to shed light on this unexpected marriage of nomenclature and net worth. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we waltz into the world of nomenclature and its curious influence on financial success, we find ourselves standing on the shoulders of giants, delving into a treasure trove of scholarly works and offbeat sources that have paved the way for our unorthodox investigation.

Smith and Doe (2015) laid the groundwork with their seminal work on the societal impact of names, underlying the intricate dance between nomenclature and destiny. Their analysis, while not specifically focused on the name "Walker," offers compelling insights into the subtle yet significant ways in which names can ripple through one's life like a well-aimed lob shot on the tennis court.

Jones (2018) further enriched our understanding with an exploration of the psychological implications of nomenclature, shedding light on the profound but often overlooked effects of being bestowed a particular moniker. Their work beckons us to consider the psychological underpinnings of name popularity and its potential ramifications on an individual's ascendancy to financial prosperity, much like a stealthy backhand slice surprising an opponent.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Power of Names" by Harris (2009) serves as a beacon, guiding us through the labyrinthine corridors of name significance and its far-reaching implications. Meanwhile, "Name-dropping: From FDR On" by Safire (1981) pirouettes through the annals of history, drawing attention to the historic weight carried by illustrious names and their peculiar influence on the ebb and flow of fortune.

On a more whimsical note, the fiction realm offers its own tantalizing morsels of insight. "The Name of the Wind" by Rothfuss (2007) tantalizes us with its enigmatic title, hinting at the tantalizing allure of names and their mystical sway over destinies. In a similar vein, "Name of the Game" by Brown (2018) allures us with the allure of the unknown and the uncanny effects of nomenclature on the course of events, akin to the unpredictability of a wildcard entrant in a prestigious tennis tournament.

Plunging into the realm of childhood whimsy, the likes of "Scooby-Doo" and "Phineas and Ferb" regale us with their tireless pursuit of unraveling mysteries, akin to our own scholarly pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic connection between the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings. While Fred, Velma, and the gang chase ghosts and unmask villains, we too embark on our own caper, chasing correlations and unmasking the veiled linkage between nomenclature and financial triumph.

With this motley crew of scholarly tomes, fictional sagas, and animated escapades at our side, we plunge headlong into our quest, armed with curiosity and a healthy dose of whimsy, ready to serve up a delectable volley of insights in the offbeat intersection of name popularity and financial fortune.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1998 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research has brought us many unexpected connections and unlikely associations - from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of drownings, to the positive relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets. Today, we add to this list of peculiar connections with our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and the annual earnings of tennis maestro Roger Federer.
As amusing as it may sound, our study was born out of a whimsical curiosity about whether a name could have an impact on one's financial prosperity, much like a rabbit's foot or a four-leaf clover. Admittedly, at first glance, this may come across as an odd and seemingly arbitrary research topic. However, as we dove headfirst into the data, we found ourselves drawn into the unexpected drama and intrigue of the statistical world, uncovering a connection that challenges conventional wisdom and serves as a testament to the serendipity of scholarly pursuits.
Much like a game of tennis, where one must carefully strategize and anticipate every move, the world of research also requires a keen eye for patterns and a willingness to be open to unexpected results. In this spirit, our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, where the boundaries between statistical analysis and name popularity blurred like the edges of a poorly-cropped photo.
Uniting the data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic link between the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's financial prowess. As we delved into the ocean of data points and correlation coefficients, we aimed to serve up not only a dish of numerical findings but also a sprinkle of amusement in the often serious landscape of academic exploration.
With these ambitions in tow, we eagerly present our findings, eager to shed light on this unexpected marriage of nomenclature and net worth. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the intertwined fates of the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings, we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of data collection and analysis. Our approach combined scholarly rigor with a dose of lightheartedness, akin to a scientific experiment performed with a side of slapstick comedy.

First, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, like intrepid explorers navigating the digital jungle, in search of datasets that could bring to light the elusive connection between a name and a tennis legend's financial triumphs. Our primary sources included the prodigious archives of the US Social Security Administration, where the ebb and flow of names yearned to divulge their covert significance, and the eclectic repository of all human knowledge – Wikipedia. Like diligent detectives, we sifted through years of data from 1998 to 2022, ensuring no digital stone was left unturned in our pursuit of statistical enlightenment.

Once armed with our treasure trove of data, we kicked off our analytical odyssey with a mathematical tango, twirling through the steps of correlation analysis. Like careful choreographers, we choreographed the elegant dance of statistical equations, aiming to uncover the harmonious rhythm between the popularity of the name "Walker" and the financial crescendos of Roger Federer’s annual earnings. This analysis was conducted with the utmost attention to detail, ensuring that no statistical missteps or fumbles disrupted the graceful symmetry of our investigation.

Our statistical maneuvering culminated in the computation of the correlation coefficient, a numerical representation of the mystical dance between our two variables. Armed with this coefficient, we gauged the strength and direction of the relationship with the precision of a tennis ace aiming for the perfect serve. With a p-value that winked seductively at the threshold of significance, our findings emerged as a testament to the unexpected courtship between nomenclature and net worth.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness and reliability of our findings, we subjected our data to a battery of robustness checks, akin to a scientific stress test designed to tease out any statistical vulnerabilities. This process involved sensitivity analysis, bootstrapping, and cross-validation – in essence, an academic obstacle course that our findings navigated with the grace of a ballerina in a minefield of statistical pitfalls.

In essence, our methodology blended the rigors of statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, revealing the captivating ballet between the ever-popular "Walker" and the towering financial achievements of Roger Federer. With precision, humor, and unfaltering determination, our methodology paved the way for a scholarly endeavor that not only unearthed statistical insights but also infused a sense of mirth into the academic milieu.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1998 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9286688, r-squared of 0.8624257, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of research has brought us many unexpected connections and unlikely associations - from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of drownings, to the positive relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets. Today, we add to this list of peculiar connections with our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and the annual earnings of tennis maestro Roger Federer.
As amusing as it may sound, our study was born out of a whimsical curiosity about whether a name could have an impact on one's financial prosperity, much like a rabbit's foot or a four-leaf clover. Admittedly, at first glance, this may come across as an odd and seemingly arbitrary research topic. However, as we dove headfirst into the data, we found ourselves drawn into the unexpected drama and intrigue of the statistical world, uncovering a connection that challenges conventional wisdom and serves as a testament to the serendipity of scholarly pursuits.
Much like a game of tennis, where one must carefully strategize and anticipate every move, the world of research also requires a keen eye for patterns and a willingness to be open to unexpected results. In this spirit, our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, where the boundaries between statistical analysis and name popularity blurred like the edges of a poorly-cropped photo.
Uniting the data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic link between the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's financial prowess. As we delved into the ocean of data points and correlation coefficients, we aimed to serve up not only a dish of numerical findings but also a sprinkle of amusement in the often serious landscape of academic exploration.
With these ambitions in tow, we eagerly present our findings, eager to shed light on this unexpected marriage of nomenclature and net worth. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our statistical analysis revealed a robust and eyebrow-raising correlation between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings. We uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9286688, with an r-squared of 0.8624257 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 1998 to 2022. These findings left us as stunned as a player who missed an easy overhead smash!

The strong positive correlation suggests that as the popularity of the name "Walker" increased, so did Roger Federer's annual earnings. It's as if the name "Walker" served as a lucky charm, propelling Federer's financial success like a well-timed backhand shot. This unexpected connection serves as a delightful reminder of the delightful - and sometimes perplexing - world of statistical analysis.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot provides a visual depiction of this striking correlation. Looking at the figure, one can't help but be reminded of the elegant fluidity of Federer's backhand as it glides across the court - a resemblance that, while entirely coincidental, brings a smile to one's face.

These results not only add another quirky entry into the annals of unexpected correlations but also showcase the whimsical nature of scholarly pursuits. Just as Federer's graceful serves mesmerize tennis fans, our findings captivate the world of statistical analysis with their unexpected charm and comic timing.

In conclusion, the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings sheds light on the playful interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. As we serve up these statistical findings, let us not just revel in the numbers but also celebrate the joy of stumbling upon a delightful statistical anomaly. For as the old saying goes, "All's fair in love, war, and quirky correlational research!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we waltz into the world of nomenclature and its curious influence on financial success, we find ourselves standing on the shoulders of giants, delving into a treasure trove of scholarly works and offbeat sources that have paved the way for our unorthodox investigation.
Smith and Doe (2015) laid the groundwork with their seminal work on the societal impact of names, underlying the intricate dance between nomenclature and destiny. Their analysis, while not specifically focused on the name "Walker," offers compelling insights into the subtle yet significant ways in which names can ripple through one's life like a well-aimed lob shot on the tennis court.
Jones (2018) further enriched our understanding with an exploration of the psychological implications of nomenclature, shedding light on the profound but often overlooked effects of being bestowed a particular moniker. Their work beckons us to consider the psychological underpinnings of name popularity and its potential ramifications on an individual's ascendancy to financial prosperity, much like a stealthy backhand slice surprising an opponent.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Power of Names" by Harris (2009) serves as a beacon, guiding us through the labyrinthine corridors of name significance and its far-reaching implications. Meanwhile, "Name-dropping: From FDR On" by Safire (1981) pirouettes through the annals of history, drawing attention to the historic weight carried by illustrious names and their peculiar influence on the ebb and flow of fortune.
On a more whimsical note, the fiction realm offers its own tantalizing morsels of insight. "The Name of the Wind" by Rothfuss (2007) tantalizes us with its enigmatic title, hinting at the tantalizing allure of names and their mystical sway over destinies. In a similar vein, "Name of the Game" by Brown (2018) allures us with the allure of the unknown and the uncanny effects of nomenclature on the course of events, akin to the unpredictability of a wildcard entrant in a prestigious tennis tournament.
Plunging into the realm of childhood whimsy, the likes of "Scooby-Doo" and "Phineas and Ferb" regale us with their tireless pursuit of unraveling mysteries, akin to our own scholarly pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic connection between the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings. While Fred, Velma, and the gang chase ghosts and unmask villains, we too embark on our own caper, chasing correlations and unmasking the veiled linkage between nomenclature and financial triumph.
With this motley crew of scholarly tomes, fictional sagas, and animated escapades at our side, we plunge headlong into our quest, armed with curiosity and a healthy dose of whimsy, ready to serve up a delectable volley of insights in the offbeat intersection of name popularity and financial fortune.

[[RESULTS]]
Our statistical analysis revealed a robust and eyebrow-raising correlation between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings. We uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9286688, with an r-squared of 0.8624257 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 1998 to 2022. These findings left us as stunned as a player who missed an easy overhead smash!
The strong positive correlation suggests that as the popularity of the name "Walker" increased, so did Roger Federer's annual earnings. It's as if the name "Walker" served as a lucky charm, propelling Federer's financial success like a well-timed backhand shot. This unexpected connection serves as a delightful reminder of the delightful - and sometimes perplexing - world of statistical analysis.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot provides a visual depiction of this striking correlation. Looking at the figure, one can't help but be reminded of the elegant fluidity of Federer's backhand as it glides across the court - a resemblance that, while entirely coincidental, brings a smile to one's face.
These results not only add another quirky entry into the annals of unexpected correlations but also showcase the whimsical nature of scholarly pursuits. Just as Federer's graceful serves mesmerize tennis fans, our findings captivate the world of statistical analysis with their unexpected charm and comic timing.
In conclusion, the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings sheds light on the playful interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. As we serve up these statistical findings, let us not just revel in the numbers but also celebrate the joy of stumbling upon a delightful statistical anomaly. For as the old saying goes, "All's fair in love, war, and quirky correlational research!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study not only raise eyebrows but also serve up a double fault of curiosity and amusement. Our findings, which revealed a robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings, align with previous research in unexpected ways. As we trod the unexplored terrain of name popularity and financial triumph, we found ourselves echoing the sentiments of Smith and Doe (2015) and their exploration of the societal impact of names. Much like a well-angled forehand shot, their work laid the groundwork for understanding the subtle yet profound influences of nomenclature on destiny, providing a solid foundation upon which our own research built its quirky castle.

Furthermore, our findings echo the sentiments echoed in "Name-dropping: From FDR On" by Safire (1981), albeit in a surprising and whimsical manner. Just as Safire weaves through the annals of history, drawing attention to the historic weight carried by illustrious names, we too have unearthed the intriguing weight carried by the name "Walker" in the illustrious financial realm of Roger Federer. The parallels between our statistical findings and historical intrigues are as unexpected as a net cord winner in the midst of a tense tiebreak!

The correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 that we uncovered sets a new precedent in the world of offbeat correlations, comfortably nestled within the bounds of statistical significance (p < 0.01). As we celebrate this statistical victory, we are reminded of the unpredictable yet endearing nature of scholarly research. Our findings, much like a well-crafted drop shot, strike a delightful balance between statistical rigor and quirky charm, encapsulating the whimsical flair that enlivens the field of statistical analysis.

With a nod to the poignant prose of Rothfuss (2007) and his enigmatic exploration of the power of names, our research ventures into the murky waters of name significance and its peculiar influence on destinies. As the character Kvothe delves into the enigma of naming, so too do we delve into the enigma of the name "Walker," unraveling its unforeseen link to the financial prowess of Roger Federer. The parallels between our scholarly pursuits and literary musings are as captivating as a perfectly executed lob shot, leaving both the academic and fictional realms abuzz with curiosity and delight.

In light of our findings, we urge fellow researchers to embrace the whimsy and wonder that infuse the multifaceted world of statistical analysis. Delving into the oddball correlations that defy traditional logic can evoke a sense of childlike wonder akin to a thrilling rally on the tennis court. Just as a well-placed serve can surprise and delight spectators, so too can quirky research findings serve as unexpected gems in the tapestry of academic inquiry, adding a sprinkle of mirth to the oftentimes serious domain of scholarly investigation.

As we contemplate the odd yet endearing connection between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings, we are reminded of the unpredictability and delight that accompany scholarly pursuits. This study, much like a brilliant volley at the net, not only showcases the offbeat nature of statistical relationships but also celebrates the joy of stumbling upon a delightful statistical anomaly. For as the old saying goes, "All's fair in love, war, and quirky correlational research!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Walker and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of research has brought us many unexpected connections and unlikely associations - from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of drownings, to the positive relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets. Today, we add to this list of peculiar connections with our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and the annual earnings of tennis maestro Roger Federer.
As amusing as it may sound, our study was born out of a whimsical curiosity about whether a name could have an impact on one's financial prosperity, much like a rabbit's foot or a four-leaf clover. Admittedly, at first glance, this may come across as an odd and seemingly arbitrary research topic. However, as we dove headfirst into the data, we found ourselves drawn into the unexpected drama and intrigue of the statistical world, uncovering a connection that challenges conventional wisdom and serves as a testament to the serendipity of scholarly pursuits.
Much like a game of tennis, where one must carefully strategize and anticipate every move, the world of research also requires a keen eye for patterns and a willingness to be open to unexpected results. In this spirit, our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, where the boundaries between statistical analysis and name popularity blurred like the edges of a poorly-cropped photo.
Uniting the data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic link between the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's financial prowess. As we delved into the ocean of data points and correlation coefficients, we aimed to serve up not only a dish of numerical findings but also a sprinkle of amusement in the often serious landscape of academic exploration.
With these ambitions in tow, we eagerly present our findings, eager to shed light on this unexpected marriage of nomenclature and net worth. Let the games begin!

[[RESULTS]]
Our statistical analysis revealed a robust and eyebrow-raising correlation between the popularity of the first name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings. We uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9286688, with an r-squared of 0.8624257 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 1998 to 2022. These findings left us as stunned as a player who missed an easy overhead smash!
The strong positive correlation suggests that as the popularity of the name "Walker" increased, so did Roger Federer's annual earnings. It's as if the name "Walker" served as a lucky charm, propelling Federer's financial success like a well-timed backhand shot. This unexpected connection serves as a delightful reminder of the delightful - and sometimes perplexing - world of statistical analysis.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot provides a visual depiction of this striking correlation. Looking at the figure, one can't help but be reminded of the elegant fluidity of Federer's backhand as it glides across the court - a resemblance that, while entirely coincidental, brings a smile to one's face.
These results not only add another quirky entry into the annals of unexpected correlations but also showcase the whimsical nature of scholarly pursuits. Just as Federer's graceful serves mesmerize tennis fans, our findings captivate the world of statistical analysis with their unexpected charm and comic timing.
In conclusion, the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings sheds light on the playful interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. As we serve up these statistical findings, let us not just revel in the numbers but also celebrate the joy of stumbling upon a delightful statistical anomaly. For as the old saying goes, "All's fair in love, war, and quirky correlational research!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the game of academic research, we've often been served up surprises, but the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings takes the cake! It's as though statistical analysis put on a pair of tennis shoes and aced a match point with this unexpected finding. With a correlation coefficient reminiscent of a perfectly timed backhand, our study has not only added an amusing twist to the world of scholarly pursuits but also showcased the whimsical side of statistical analysis – a rare feat indeed!

As our research volleyed back and forth, crossing the net of conventional wisdom, we found ourselves caught in the whimsical whirlwind of statistical anomalies and surprising linkages. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 dances across our findings like a well-timed drop shot, leaving us in awe of the enchanting connection between nomenclature and net worth. Much like a thrilling tennis match, the data unfolded before us, illustrating the striking synchronicity between the rise of the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's financial prosperity.

Our scatterplot, akin to the smooth arc of Federer's serve, paints a picture of this delightful correlation, serving as a visual testament to the unexpected wonders of statistical analysis. And while we can't claim that this correlation guarantees a smashing forehand or a winning volley, our minds can't help but spin with the whimsy of this quirky statistical finding.

In the spirit of good sportsmanship and academic curiosity, we conclude that the connection between the popularity of the name "Walker" and Roger Federer's annual earnings stands as a unique addition to the realm of quirky correlational research. As such, we believe that no further research is needed in this area, as we've already netted the most delightful insight imaginable!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Sociology and Cultural Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sports Science and Synchronicity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Walker Name Makes Federer's Game: A Correlational Analysis of Popularity and Prosperity with an abstract of In a serve of serendipity, our research team delved into the symbiotic relationship between the popularity of the name "Walker" and tennis legend Roger Federer's annual earnings. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9286688 (p < 0.01) for the years 1998 to 2022. The results of our analysis suggest that as the popularity of the name "Walker" rises, so do Federer's annual earnings, providing insight into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study not only serves up a volley of statistical findings but also adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of correlational analysis.

ChatGPT:

Walker name popularity, Roger Federer earnings, correlation analysis, popularity and prosperity, name "Walker" popularity, Roger Federer annual earnings, US Social Security Administration data, Wikipedia data, correlation coefficient, tennis legend, interconnectedness of phenomena, statistical findings, correlational analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Walker
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Walker
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Walker

Roger Federer's annual earnings
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Roger Federer's annual earnings

Correlation r = 0.9286688 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8624257 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Roger Federer's annual earnings) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Walker) over the 25 years from 1998 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.2E-11. 0.0000000000218244019209137920
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 2.2E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 45,820,270,522 random variables You don't actually need 45 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 24 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 24 because we have two variables measured over a period of 25 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Walker (Babies born)551542583637628638740812708609559595656686715857106410281062111913681675190729834389
Roger Federer's annual earnings (Thousands of dollars)27.955225.139623.782865.4251995.034000.686357.556137.028343.8810130.65886.888768.117698.296369.588584.843203.642338.45780289015272701305490086292308716980106000009000000090000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([551,542,583,637,628,638,740,812,708,609,559,595,656,686,715,857,1064,1028,1062,1119,1368,1675,1907,2983,4389,])
array_2 = np.array([27.955,225.139,623.782,865.425,1995.03,4000.68,6357.55,6137.02,8343.88,10130.6,5886.88,8768.11,7698.29,6369.58,8584.84,3203.64,2338.45,7802890,1527270,13054900,8629230,8716980,10600000,90000000,90000000,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Walker"
array_2_name = "Roger Federer's annual earnings"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3977 · Black Variable ID: 2876 · Red Variable ID: 84
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0