about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,657 · View random

NOTICE: This correlation is inactive

Likely there is an issue with the variable data or data source.
The correlation is not active in any lists.
This page remains only to prevent link rot.


A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Dario and the second variable is Roger Federer's annual earnings.  The chart goes from 1998 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Dario was born, a mystical prophecy was fulfilled, granting Roger Federer enhanced tennis abilities, and consequently, higher earnings. It's as if the Darios were sprinkling a dash of luck onto Federer's career, serving up success with every new addition to the Dario fan club!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a Polaroid photo, capturing the electric atmosphere of a crowded stadium. On the giant screen, prominently display the name "Dario" shimmering brightly amidst a sea of cheering fans. In the background, have Roger Federer serving the ball on the court, exuding grace and skill. Surround him with banners and advertisements showcasing his numerous sponsorships, symbolizing his exceptional annual earnings. The image should convey the sheer energy and grandeur of a major sporting event, with a focus on the intersection of fanfare and athlete success. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim Brutalism Glitch art Steampunk a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a crowded stadium, the name "Dario" shines brightly on the giant screen as fans cheer. Meanwhile, on the court, Roger Federer gracefully serves the ball, surrounded by banners and advertisements for his many sponsorships, symbolizing his impressive annual earnings.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a crowded stadium, the name "Dario" shines brightly on the giant screen as fans cheer. Meanwhile, on the court, Roger Federer gracefully serves the ball, surrounded by banners and advertisements for his many sponsorships, symbolizing his impressive annual earnings. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a Polaroid photo, capturing the electric atmosphere of a crowded stadium. On the giant screen, prominently display the name "Dario" shimmering brightly amidst a sea of cheering fans. In the background, have Roger Federer serving the ball on the court, exuding grace and skill. Surround him with banners and advertisements showcasing his numerous sponsorships, symbolizing his exceptional annual earnings. The image should convey the sheer energy and grandeur of a major sporting event, with a focus on the intersection of fanfare and athlete success.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Dario caused Roger Federer's annual earnings to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings

Journal of Sports Nameonomics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and p < 0.01 for 1998 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!

Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!

Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, grab your tennis rackets and your baby naming books, because we are about to embark on a rather unusual journey that combines the world of sports and the whimsical world of names. Our study examines the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of the tennis maestro, Roger Federer. This investigation promises to serve up some surprising findings, perhaps even hitting an ace in the realm of unconventional name-related influences.

The idea that a name could impact one's financial success might seem as far-fetched as finding a tennis ball in a haystack, but our analysis suggests otherwise. The correlation between the name Dario and Roger Federer's earnings emerged like a well-timed drop shot, catching us off guard and prompting us to delve deeper into this peculiar phenomenon. It appears that the name Dario serves up more than just baby shower invitations; it may also hold a curious sway over the financial trajectory of a tennis luminary.

In the spirit of our quirky investigation, we aim to infuse a sense of lightheartedness into the otherwise serious realm of academic research. As we navigate through the peculiar interplay of nomenclature and monetary success, we hope to inject a dash of playful banter that rivals the back-and-forth volleys on the tennis court. After all, who said academia couldn't use a few well-placed dad jokes? So, why did the tennis player refuse to change his name? Because it would be a racket!

Join us as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns in the Dario and Federer fiasco, and perhaps, by the end of this paper, you might find yourself exclaiming, "It's not just the serve that's a game-changer – it's the name, too!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!

Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your tennis rackets and your baby naming books, because we are about to embark on a rather unusual journey that combines the world of sports and the whimsical world of names. Our study examines the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of the tennis maestro, Roger Federer. This investigation promises to serve up some surprising findings, perhaps even hitting an ace in the realm of unconventional name-related influences.
The idea that a name could impact one's financial success might seem as far-fetched as finding a tennis ball in a haystack, but our analysis suggests otherwise. The correlation between the name Dario and Roger Federer's earnings emerged like a well-timed drop shot, catching us off guard and prompting us to delve deeper into this peculiar phenomenon. It appears that the name Dario serves up more than just baby shower invitations; it may also hold a curious sway over the financial trajectory of a tennis luminary.
In the spirit of our quirky investigation, we aim to infuse a sense of lightheartedness into the otherwise serious realm of academic research. As we navigate through the peculiar interplay of nomenclature and monetary success, we hope to inject a dash of playful banter that rivals the back-and-forth volleys on the tennis court. After all, who said academia couldn't use a few well-placed dad jokes? So, why did the tennis player refuse to change his name? Because it would be a racket!
Join us as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns in the Dario and Federer fiasco, and perhaps, by the end of this paper, you might find yourself exclaiming, "It's not just the serve that's a game-changer – it's the name, too!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The impact of nomenclature on financial success has been a subject of intrigue for many years. Smith meticulously investigated the relationship between first name popularity and earnings in his seminal work, "Names and Net Worth," revealing intriguing correlations and sparking curiosity about the potential influence of monikers on individuals' economic trajectories. Similarly, Doe's study, "The Power of a Name: A Financial Perspective," delved into the intriguing interplay between nomenclature and fiscal prosperity, shedding light on the nuanced ways in which a name could shape one's financial journey.

Now, onto the more unconventional side of name-related research. In "The Tennis Name Game: How Dario Shapes the Playing Field," Jones takes a more playful approach, exploring the curious connection between the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis icon Roger Federer. The unexpected twist in this line of inquiry is akin to a perfectly executed lob – catching the reader off guard with its whimsical premise.

Turning to non-fiction literature that could shed light on this peculiar topic, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner provides valuable insights into the unexpected correlations that underpin societal phenomena, offering a lens through which to view the Dario and Federer fiasco. "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking" by Malcolm Gladwell offers thought-provoking perspectives on the subconscious influences that may shape our decisions, mirroring the subtle impact a name like Dario might have on the financial realm.

In the realm of fiction, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "The Da Vinci Code," beckon readers into a world of enigmatic connections and hidden truths – a fitting counterpart to the mysterious relationship between Dario and Federer's earnings. Undertones of intrigue and unexpected revelations in "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn provide an allegorical backdrop to the surprising findings of our investigation, as we delve into the unexpected twists and turns of the Dario and Federer fiasco.

Adding a touch of modernity, social media posts have also hinted at the uncanny connection between first names and financial success. One Twitter user humorously remarked, "Maybe I should change my name to Dario and see if my earnings skyrocket like Federer's – it's worth a shot, right?" The blend of humor and speculative curiosity in these digital musings underscores the widespread intrigue surrounding the intersection of nomenclature and financial prosperity.

As we wade through the scholarly, imaginative, and contemporary perspectives on our curious inquiry, it becomes evident that the Dario and Federer fiasco is not just a tantalizing topic of investigation – it's a name game with potential implications that extend beyond the realm of tennis and earnings. If a name could indeed hold such sway over financial success, perhaps it's time to reevaluate the adage, "What's in a name?" It seems that in the case of Dario and Federer, it might just be a substantial increase in annual earnings – now that's a lob worth pondering!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1998 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!

Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your tennis rackets and your baby naming books, because we are about to embark on a rather unusual journey that combines the world of sports and the whimsical world of names. Our study examines the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of the tennis maestro, Roger Federer. This investigation promises to serve up some surprising findings, perhaps even hitting an ace in the realm of unconventional name-related influences.
The idea that a name could impact one's financial success might seem as far-fetched as finding a tennis ball in a haystack, but our analysis suggests otherwise. The correlation between the name Dario and Roger Federer's earnings emerged like a well-timed drop shot, catching us off guard and prompting us to delve deeper into this peculiar phenomenon. It appears that the name Dario serves up more than just baby shower invitations; it may also hold a curious sway over the financial trajectory of a tennis luminary.
In the spirit of our quirky investigation, we aim to infuse a sense of lightheartedness into the otherwise serious realm of academic research. As we navigate through the peculiar interplay of nomenclature and monetary success, we hope to inject a dash of playful banter that rivals the back-and-forth volleys on the tennis court. After all, who said academia couldn't use a few well-placed dad jokes? So, why did the tennis player refuse to change his name? Because it would be a racket!
Join us as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns in the Dario and Federer fiasco, and perhaps, by the end of this paper, you might find yourself exclaiming, "It's not just the serve that's a game-changer – it's the name, too!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings, we embarked on a methodological odyssey that combined statistical analysis, big data mining, and a sprinkle of whimsy. First, we leveraged data from the US Social Security Administration to ascertain the popularity of the name Dario over the years 1998 to 2022. We then dived headfirst into the depths of Wikipedia, extracting annual earnings figures of the esteemed tennis prodigy Roger Federer during the same time frame. It was quite the volley between databases, but we managed to ace the data collection process.

To lend a touch of academic pizzazz to our approach, we employed a multifaceted analytical strategy that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow. We utilized a hybrid of time-series analysis and regression modeling, combined with a twist of Bayesian inference for added flavor. Just like a well-crafted drop shot, our methodological concoction aimed to capture the nuanced relationship between the ebb and flow of name popularity and the financial trajectory of a tennis luminary. It was a delightful mix of methodological forehands and backhands, resulting in a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned ballroom dancer envious.

After data wrangling and statistical acrobatics, we arrived at the grand unveiling of the correlation coefficient and p-value. The correlation of 0.9125691 emerged like a perfectly executed serve, leaving us at the net, ready to volley with statistical significance. With a p-value less than 0.01, our findings carried the weight of a well-aimed topspin - undeniably robust and impactful. It seems that the mere mention of the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed lob!

In the spirit of good humor and methodological mischief, we couldn't help but ask, why did Roger Federer feel shaky during data collection? Because he was experiencing a statistical "deuce" with the name Dario! Our unconventional approach aimed to infuse a sense of lightheartedness into the otherwise grave domain of methodological rigidity, serving up a scholarly volley that would potentially leave even the most serious of academics chuckling at the absurdities we encountered along the way.

Thus, armed with statistical tenacity and a pinch of jovial mirth, we present our findings with a wink and a nod, daring our esteemed readers to engage with the unexpected twists and turns that abound in the labyrinthine connection between the name Dario and Roger Federer's financial conquests. After all, in the realm of academic exploration, why wouldn't we add an extra dash of whimsy to our methodological serve?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1998 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9125691, r-squared of 0.8327824, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!

Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your tennis rackets and your baby naming books, because we are about to embark on a rather unusual journey that combines the world of sports and the whimsical world of names. Our study examines the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of the tennis maestro, Roger Federer. This investigation promises to serve up some surprising findings, perhaps even hitting an ace in the realm of unconventional name-related influences.
The idea that a name could impact one's financial success might seem as far-fetched as finding a tennis ball in a haystack, but our analysis suggests otherwise. The correlation between the name Dario and Roger Federer's earnings emerged like a well-timed drop shot, catching us off guard and prompting us to delve deeper into this peculiar phenomenon. It appears that the name Dario serves up more than just baby shower invitations; it may also hold a curious sway over the financial trajectory of a tennis luminary.
In the spirit of our quirky investigation, we aim to infuse a sense of lightheartedness into the otherwise serious realm of academic research. As we navigate through the peculiar interplay of nomenclature and monetary success, we hope to inject a dash of playful banter that rivals the back-and-forth volleys on the tennis court. After all, who said academia couldn't use a few well-placed dad jokes? So, why did the tennis player refuse to change his name? Because it would be a racket!
Join us as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns in the Dario and Federer fiasco, and perhaps, by the end of this paper, you might find yourself exclaiming, "It's not just the serve that's a game-changer – it's the name, too!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of data spanning from 1998 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. The correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and an r-squared value of 0.8327824 not only exceeded our initial expectations but also served as a lob across the court of conventional wisdom. It seems that there may be more to a name than mere syllables and letters; perhaps it holds the volley to an individual's financial fortune.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust relationship between the prevalence of the name Dario and the annual earnings of the legendary tennis player. The plot elegantly captures the pronounced upward trend, resembling the graceful arc traced by a skilled racket in the hands of a seasoned player. It appears that the influence of a name can be as strong as a well-executed smash on the court – making a real impact on an individual's financial prospects.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of our findings, akin to a perfectly timed ace that leaves opponents and skeptics alike in awe. It seems that individuals bearing the name Dario are not merely spectators in the game of financial success but may, in fact, play a pivotal role in influencing the earnings trajectory of a tennis icon. It's almost as if the name Dario holds the key to unlocking a treasure trove of prosperous possibilities – a lucrative racket indeed!

In conclusion, our investigation into the linkage between the popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings presents a compelling case for the influence of nomenclature on financial prosperity. The unexpected and whimsical nature of our findings offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in shaping an individual's success. It seems that in the realm of professional sports and perhaps beyond, one's name might just serve as the winning shot that propels them towards financial triumph. As the saying goes, "When it comes to names and earnings, it's not just about the love of the game – it's about the Dario in the details."



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!

Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The impact of nomenclature on financial success has been a subject of intrigue for many years. Smith meticulously investigated the relationship between first name popularity and earnings in his seminal work, "Names and Net Worth," revealing intriguing correlations and sparking curiosity about the potential influence of monikers on individuals' economic trajectories. Similarly, Doe's study, "The Power of a Name: A Financial Perspective," delved into the intriguing interplay between nomenclature and fiscal prosperity, shedding light on the nuanced ways in which a name could shape one's financial journey.
Now, onto the more unconventional side of name-related research. In "The Tennis Name Game: How Dario Shapes the Playing Field," Jones takes a more playful approach, exploring the curious connection between the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis icon Roger Federer. The unexpected twist in this line of inquiry is akin to a perfectly executed lob – catching the reader off guard with its whimsical premise.
Turning to non-fiction literature that could shed light on this peculiar topic, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner provides valuable insights into the unexpected correlations that underpin societal phenomena, offering a lens through which to view the Dario and Federer fiasco. "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking" by Malcolm Gladwell offers thought-provoking perspectives on the subconscious influences that may shape our decisions, mirroring the subtle impact a name like Dario might have on the financial realm.
In the realm of fiction, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "The Da Vinci Code," beckon readers into a world of enigmatic connections and hidden truths – a fitting counterpart to the mysterious relationship between Dario and Federer's earnings. Undertones of intrigue and unexpected revelations in "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn provide an allegorical backdrop to the surprising findings of our investigation, as we delve into the unexpected twists and turns of the Dario and Federer fiasco.
Adding a touch of modernity, social media posts have also hinted at the uncanny connection between first names and financial success. One Twitter user humorously remarked, "Maybe I should change my name to Dario and see if my earnings skyrocket like Federer's – it's worth a shot, right?" The blend of humor and speculative curiosity in these digital musings underscores the widespread intrigue surrounding the intersection of nomenclature and financial prosperity.
As we wade through the scholarly, imaginative, and contemporary perspectives on our curious inquiry, it becomes evident that the Dario and Federer fiasco is not just a tantalizing topic of investigation – it's a name game with potential implications that extend beyond the realm of tennis and earnings. If a name could indeed hold such sway over financial success, perhaps it's time to reevaluate the adage, "What's in a name?" It seems that in the case of Dario and Federer, it might just be a substantial increase in annual earnings – now that's a lob worth pondering!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of data spanning from 1998 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. The correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and an r-squared value of 0.8327824 not only exceeded our initial expectations but also served as a lob across the court of conventional wisdom. It seems that there may be more to a name than mere syllables and letters; perhaps it holds the volley to an individual's financial fortune.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust relationship between the prevalence of the name Dario and the annual earnings of the legendary tennis player. The plot elegantly captures the pronounced upward trend, resembling the graceful arc traced by a skilled racket in the hands of a seasoned player. It appears that the influence of a name can be as strong as a well-executed smash on the court – making a real impact on an individual's financial prospects.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of our findings, akin to a perfectly timed ace that leaves opponents and skeptics alike in awe. It seems that individuals bearing the name Dario are not merely spectators in the game of financial success but may, in fact, play a pivotal role in influencing the earnings trajectory of a tennis icon. It's almost as if the name Dario holds the key to unlocking a treasure trove of prosperous possibilities – a lucrative racket indeed!
In conclusion, our investigation into the linkage between the popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings presents a compelling case for the influence of nomenclature on financial prosperity. The unexpected and whimsical nature of our findings offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in shaping an individual's success. It seems that in the realm of professional sports and perhaps beyond, one's name might just serve as the winning shot that propels them towards financial triumph. As the saying goes, "When it comes to names and earnings, it's not just about the love of the game – it's about the Dario in the details."


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings unveil a captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis maestro Roger Federer. It appears that the influence of a name transcends mere linguistic significance and extends into the realms of financial success, akin to a well-executed serve that catches opponents off guard. Expanding on prior research, our results not only supported but amplified the intriguing correlations uncovered by Smith and Doe, emphasizing the substantial impact a name can have on an individual's economic trajectory.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 serves as a beacon, illuminating the uncanny interplay between a name and financial prosperity. With statistical significance akin to a perfectly executed drop shot, our findings reinforce the notion that a name, particularly the name Dario, may hold a surprising degree of influence over an individual's fiscal journey – a concept that echoes the unexpected richness of a dad joke.

In alignment with Jones's whimsical pursuits, our study delves into the delightful yet perplexing relationship between the first name Dario and the annual earnings of Roger Federer. The unexpected twist of our investigation parallels the element of surprise in a well-crafted pun, inviting readers into a world of unexpected correlations and amusing revelations.

Mirroring the nuanced connections expounded in "Freakonomics" and the subliminal influences detailed in "Blink," our results provide a lighthearted yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the unexpected interactions of nomenclature and financial success. In doing so, our investigation uplifts the satirical musings of social media users, playfully pondering the transformative potential of a name change in the pursuit of financial gains.

The unanticipated and whimsical nature of our findings elucidates a refreshingly unconventional perspective on the amalgamation of seemingly unrelated factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. It seems that in the realm of professional sports and beyond, the influence of a name transcends linguistic boundaries, perhaps holding the key to unlocking a treasure trove of prosperous possibilities – a lucratively playful stroke indeed!

As we navigate the sheer delight and intrigue woven into our investigation, it becomes evident that the Dario and Federer fiasco is not just a captivating topic of research – it's a delightful homage to the enigmatic connections that underpin our world, serving as a gentle reminder that in the whimsical, sometimes absurd intricacies of life, there's always room for a well-placed dad joke or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!

Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your tennis rackets and your baby naming books, because we are about to embark on a rather unusual journey that combines the world of sports and the whimsical world of names. Our study examines the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of the tennis maestro, Roger Federer. This investigation promises to serve up some surprising findings, perhaps even hitting an ace in the realm of unconventional name-related influences.
The idea that a name could impact one's financial success might seem as far-fetched as finding a tennis ball in a haystack, but our analysis suggests otherwise. The correlation between the name Dario and Roger Federer's earnings emerged like a well-timed drop shot, catching us off guard and prompting us to delve deeper into this peculiar phenomenon. It appears that the name Dario serves up more than just baby shower invitations; it may also hold a curious sway over the financial trajectory of a tennis luminary.
In the spirit of our quirky investigation, we aim to infuse a sense of lightheartedness into the otherwise serious realm of academic research. As we navigate through the peculiar interplay of nomenclature and monetary success, we hope to inject a dash of playful banter that rivals the back-and-forth volleys on the tennis court. After all, who said academia couldn't use a few well-placed dad jokes? So, why did the tennis player refuse to change his name? Because it would be a racket!
Join us as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns in the Dario and Federer fiasco, and perhaps, by the end of this paper, you might find yourself exclaiming, "It's not just the serve that's a game-changer – it's the name, too!"

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of data spanning from 1998 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings. The correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and an r-squared value of 0.8327824 not only exceeded our initial expectations but also served as a lob across the court of conventional wisdom. It seems that there may be more to a name than mere syllables and letters; perhaps it holds the volley to an individual's financial fortune.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust relationship between the prevalence of the name Dario and the annual earnings of the legendary tennis player. The plot elegantly captures the pronounced upward trend, resembling the graceful arc traced by a skilled racket in the hands of a seasoned player. It appears that the influence of a name can be as strong as a well-executed smash on the court – making a real impact on an individual's financial prospects.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of our findings, akin to a perfectly timed ace that leaves opponents and skeptics alike in awe. It seems that individuals bearing the name Dario are not merely spectators in the game of financial success but may, in fact, play a pivotal role in influencing the earnings trajectory of a tennis icon. It's almost as if the name Dario holds the key to unlocking a treasure trove of prosperous possibilities – a lucrative racket indeed!
In conclusion, our investigation into the linkage between the popularity of the first name Dario and Roger Federer's annual earnings presents a compelling case for the influence of nomenclature on financial prosperity. The unexpected and whimsical nature of our findings offers a refreshing perspective on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in shaping an individual's success. It seems that in the realm of professional sports and perhaps beyond, one's name might just serve as the winning shot that propels them towards financial triumph. As the saying goes, "When it comes to names and earnings, it's not just about the love of the game – it's about the Dario in the details."


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up this eccentric exploration into the Dario and Federer fiasco, we find ourselves with an unexpected revelation: the name Dario holds more sway over Roger Federer's earnings than a perfectly executed forehand! It seems that there may be more to a name than meets the eye - or the ear, in this case. Perhaps the moniker Dario is the ace up Federer's sleeve when it comes to financial prosperity.

Speaking of aces, this study has certainly served up some surprising findings, much like the unexpected twists and turns of a thrilling tennis match. Who would have thought that a name could hold such a profound influence over one's earnings? It's almost as if the name Dario serves as Federer's lucky charm, much like a treasured tennis racket.

In the world of finance and sports, one's name might just be the secret ingredient in the recipe for success. With these results, we playfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!" And speaking of names, did you hear about the tennis player who changed his name to Dollar? Now he makes a racket on and off the court!

As we bid adieu to this peculiar yet fascinating investigation, we playfully assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already served the winning shot in this unconventional game of name-related influences. It's safe to say that when it comes to the Dario and Federer fiasco, this match point has been well and truly aced!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sports Nameonomics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Socio-Cultural Analysis of Athlete Naming Conventions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Dario and Federer Fiasco: An Examination of the Impact of Name Popularity on Tennis Earnings with an abstract of This study delves into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Dario and the annual earnings of tennis legend Roger Federer. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we aimed to ascertain whether individuals bearing the name Dario could potentially influence the earnings trajectory of the illustrious athlete. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9125691 and a p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association between the two variables. It seems that the name Dario might hold more sway over earnings than a well-executed backhand!
Our findings prompt us to consider the peculiar yet inexplicable influence a name could have on one's financial success, even in the realm of professional sports. As we unravel the enigmatic entwinement of nomenclature and monetary gains, this study offers a whimsical perspective on the interplay of seemingly disparate factors in shaping an individual's prosperity. With these results, we jestfully propose that perhaps there is indeed something to the saying, "It's all in a name - or, in Federer's case, the first name!

ChatGPT:

"Dario name popularity tennis earnings," "Federer Dario correlation," "impact of first name on tennis earnings," "relationship between name popularity and athlete earnings," "nomenclature influence on financial success," "Dario and Federer study," "influence of first name on athlete earnings," "Dario and Roger Federer analysis," "Dario name correlation with Roger Federer earnings."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Dario
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Dario
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Dario

Roger Federer's annual earnings
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Roger Federer's annual earnings

Correlation r = 0.9125691 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8327824 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Roger Federer's annual earnings) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Dario) over the 25 years from 1998 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.09E-10. 0.0000000002091260949356553600
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 2.09E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,781,804,013 random variables You don't actually need 4 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 24 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 24 because we have two variables measured over a period of 25 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Dario (Babies born)158181200196195209208215223249252229212235226199215234223245265232281389402
Roger Federer's annual earnings (Thousands of dollars)27.955225.139623.782865.4251995.034000.686357.556137.028343.8810130.65886.888768.117698.296369.588584.843203.642338.45780289015272701305490086292308716980106000009000000090000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([158,181,200,196,195,209,208,215,223,249,252,229,212,235,226,199,215,234,223,245,265,232,281,389,402,])
array_2 = np.array([27.955,225.139,623.782,865.425,1995.03,4000.68,6357.55,6137.02,8343.88,10130.6,5886.88,8768.11,7698.29,6369.58,8584.84,3203.64,2338.45,7802890,1527270,13054900,8629230,8716980,10600000,90000000,90000000,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Dario"
array_2_name = "Roger Federer's annual earnings"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 1657 · Black Variable ID: 4204 · Red Variable ID: 84
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0