Report an error
Popularity of the first name Dario correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.94 | 12yrs | Yes! |
NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Sony Group's stock price (SONY) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.89 | 17yrs | No |
The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Nevada | r=0.82 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of athletes and sports competitors in Tennessee | r=0.82 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Dario also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)