Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in literature correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'restaurant near me' | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'avocado toast' | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'dollar store near me' | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Renewable energy production in United States | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
The number of accountants and auditors in Michigan | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Ameren's stock price (AEE) | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Public Service Enterprise Group's stock price (PEG) | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Cisco Systems' stock price (CSCO) | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Inflation in the US | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Electronic Arts' stock price (EA) | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'climate change' | r=0.85 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in literature also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)