about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,239 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in literature and the second variable is Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people became well-versed in the art of language, they were better able to com-prehend the punny jokes and witty commentary in Mark Rober's videos, leading to a spike in appreciation for his content. This just go's to show that a way with words can really elevate your online presence!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a bustling library. In the foreground, depict a group of diverse people proudly holding up their Associates degrees in literature. They are smiling and discussing classic novels. In the background, show a computer playing a Mark Rober video, with a growing number of likes popping up on the screen, indicating the increasing appreciation for his content. The atmosphere is filled with excitement and intellect, as the power of words enhances the enjoyment of the videos. The scene should be depicted in a colorful and whimsical style, highlighting the joy and intellect of the setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Cybernetic art Whimsical illustration Art nouveau Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos, in the following situation: As more people became well-versed in the art of language, they were better able to com-prehend the punny jokes and witty commentary in Mark Rober's videos, leading to a spike in appreciation for his content. This just go's to show that a way with words can really elevate your online presence!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling library, a group of people proudly hold up their Associates degrees in literature, smiling and discussing classic novels. Meanwhile, on a nearby computer, a Mark Rober video plays with a growing number of likes popping up on the screen, indicating the increasing appreciation for his content. The atmosphere is filled with excitement and intellect, as the power of words enhances the enjoyment of the videos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling library, a group of people proudly hold up their Associates degrees in literature, smiling and discussing classic novels. Meanwhile, on a nearby computer, a Mark Rober video plays with a growing number of likes popping up on the screen, indicating the increasing appreciation for his content. The atmosphere is filled with excitement and intellect, as the power of words enhances the enjoyment of the videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a bustling library. In the foreground, depict a group of diverse people proudly holding up their Associates degrees in literature. They are smiling and discussing classic novels. In the background, show a computer playing a Mark Rober video, with a growing number of likes popping up on the screen, indicating the increasing appreciation for his content. The atmosphere is filled with excitement and intellect, as the power of words enhances the enjoyment of the videos. The scene should be depicted in a colorful and whimsical style, highlighting the joy and intellect of the setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters caused Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

The Journal of Pop Culture Linguistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.

As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"

What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.

As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"

What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow aficionados of the academic and the absurd, welcome to our captivating investigation into the whimsical world of linguistic literature and lively likes! For those seeking a fusion of scholarly pursuits and internet immersion, this paper promises to be a treat fresher than a Bard pun in a room full of scholars.

As we launch into this journey, allow me to pose a question: What do you get when you cross literature with YouTube stardom? A novel correlation that unfolds like a suspenseful plot twist! But of course, we don't intend to leave you twisting in the wind – let's dive into the alchemic amalgamation of words and web views.

If you thought the quest for hidden connections only existed in the realm of Greek mythology, think again! Armed with data from the hallowed halls of the National Center for Education Statistics and the digital wonderland of YouTube, our mission is to illuminate the enigmatic entanglement of Associate degrees in literature and the mesmerizing metrics of Mark Rober's YouTube likes.

The statistical analysis we wield like a wizard's wand reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9855892, a value so astonishingly high, it could make an arithmetician's heart skip a beat. It's enough to make one ponder, "Did Shakespeare ghostwrite Newton's laws of motion, or did Tesla build a time machine and sneak him into the 21st century for a collaboration with Mark Rober?"

As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our findings promise to be as enlightening as a lightbulb joke in a room full of physicists. We invite you to join us in unpacking the story behind this unlikely association, and in doing so, unleash the potential for multi-disciplinary merriment and scientific absurdity. So hold onto your hypothesis hats, my friends – we're about to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride that's bound to leave you with an equation for laughter and learning!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.

As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"

What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow aficionados of the academic and the absurd, welcome to our captivating investigation into the whimsical world of linguistic literature and lively likes! For those seeking a fusion of scholarly pursuits and internet immersion, this paper promises to be a treat fresher than a Bard pun in a room full of scholars.
As we launch into this journey, allow me to pose a question: What do you get when you cross literature with YouTube stardom? A novel correlation that unfolds like a suspenseful plot twist! But of course, we don't intend to leave you twisting in the wind – let's dive into the alchemic amalgamation of words and web views.
If you thought the quest for hidden connections only existed in the realm of Greek mythology, think again! Armed with data from the hallowed halls of the National Center for Education Statistics and the digital wonderland of YouTube, our mission is to illuminate the enigmatic entanglement of Associate degrees in literature and the mesmerizing metrics of Mark Rober's YouTube likes.
The statistical analysis we wield like a wizard's wand reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9855892, a value so astonishingly high, it could make an arithmetician's heart skip a beat. It's enough to make one ponder, "Did Shakespeare ghostwrite Newton's laws of motion, or did Tesla build a time machine and sneak him into the 21st century for a collaboration with Mark Rober?"
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our findings promise to be as enlightening as a lightbulb joke in a room full of physicists. We invite you to join us in unpacking the story behind this unlikely association, and in doing so, unleash the potential for multi-disciplinary merriment and scientific absurdity. So hold onto your hypothesis hats, my friends – we're about to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride that's bound to leave you with an equation for laughter and learning!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that a correlation exists between educational attainment and online engagement, a notion reinforced by the prolific viewership of educational content on platforms such as YouTube. This aligns with the study by "Doe and Johnson," who suggest that individuals with a passion for academic subjects may seek out intellectual stimulation through digital media. The connection between literary pursuits and online interaction is further expounded upon by "Jones and Brown," who delve into the multifaceted nature of audience engagement with educational content creators.

As we traverse the realm of literary pursuits, it is essential to acknowledge the influence of non-fictional works such as "The Norton Anthology of World Literature" and "How to Read Literature Like a Professor" by Thomas C. Foster, which have long been pillars of scholarly exploration and intellectual discourse. Turning the pages to the realm of fiction, literary classics including "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen and "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee offer profound insights into human nature and societal themes, perhaps leaving one to wonder if a well-crafted narrative holds the key to understanding the enigmatic allure of Mark Rober's videos.

In our pursuit of understanding the correlation between Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, we found it imperative to immerse ourselves in relevant content. This included not only perusing academic literature but also delving into popular culture. It is in this spirit that we also indulged in watching TV shows such as "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" and "Brain Games" to gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between scientific education and engaging visual media.

It is apparent that the pursuit of knowledge through literary endeavors may indeed intersect with a fervent appreciation for the captivating scientific explorations presented by Mark Rober. However, let us not forget the lighthearted side of this correlation -- after all, what do you call fictional literature about YouTube statistics? Clickbait!

As we navigate through the labyrinths of academia and entertainment, it becomes evident that the unexpected correlation between literary pursuits and YouTube engagement has the potential to defy conventional expectations and bring forth a harmony of intellectual curiosity and online amusement. So, dear readers, buckle up and prepare for an academic rollercoaster ride that's bound to have you exclaiming, "This correlation is 'novel' in more ways than one!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.

As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"

What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow aficionados of the academic and the absurd, welcome to our captivating investigation into the whimsical world of linguistic literature and lively likes! For those seeking a fusion of scholarly pursuits and internet immersion, this paper promises to be a treat fresher than a Bard pun in a room full of scholars.
As we launch into this journey, allow me to pose a question: What do you get when you cross literature with YouTube stardom? A novel correlation that unfolds like a suspenseful plot twist! But of course, we don't intend to leave you twisting in the wind – let's dive into the alchemic amalgamation of words and web views.
If you thought the quest for hidden connections only existed in the realm of Greek mythology, think again! Armed with data from the hallowed halls of the National Center for Education Statistics and the digital wonderland of YouTube, our mission is to illuminate the enigmatic entanglement of Associate degrees in literature and the mesmerizing metrics of Mark Rober's YouTube likes.
The statistical analysis we wield like a wizard's wand reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9855892, a value so astonishingly high, it could make an arithmetician's heart skip a beat. It's enough to make one ponder, "Did Shakespeare ghostwrite Newton's laws of motion, or did Tesla build a time machine and sneak him into the 21st century for a collaboration with Mark Rober?"
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our findings promise to be as enlightening as a lightbulb joke in a room full of physicists. We invite you to join us in unpacking the story behind this unlikely association, and in doing so, unleash the potential for multi-disciplinary merriment and scientific absurdity. So hold onto your hypothesis hats, my friends – we're about to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride that's bound to leave you with an equation for laughter and learning!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To traverse the tumultuous terrain of this comical correlation between Associates degrees in literature and the resounding likes of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, we first had to cast our data-snarers far and wide. We caught a whiff of scholarly scent from the National Center for Education Statistics, all the way to the YouTube comment section, where we conducted a rigorous scroll for amusement and enlightenment. It was a bit like fishing for data in a sea of words and whimsy, but we reeled in a catch that would make even the most skeptical statistician exclaim, "Well, I'll be Gauss-darned!"

For our analytical escapade, we wrangled the data from the period of 2011 to 2021, a thrilling 10-year time vortex in which literature and science collided in the digital cosmos. This span of time presented us with a bountiful buffet of Associates degrees in literature and Mark Rober's mesmerizing medleys of scientific shenanigans, offering a tapestry rich enough to make any academic carpetbagger positively teary-eyed with glee.

With tongues firmly in cheek and our statistical lassos at the ready, we corralled the salient variables including the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes amassed by the prodigious polymath Mark Rober. Our quest for these quantitative nuggets felt akin to searching for treasure in the magical land of Narnia – a bit whimsical, a tad mysterious, but undeniably thrilling.

To make sense of this wild linguistic-literary ride, we employed the trusty Pearson correlation coefficient, a stalwart statistical steed known for its ability to wrangle even the most unruly of datasets. With this noble steed in our research stable, we galloped through our data, measuring the degree of association between the number of literature degrees and the likes lavished upon Rober's revelatory video reels. We also performed a rigorous p-value test – not to be mistaken with a piddle-value test, though the temptation was there – to determine if our findings were statistically significant. It was a bit like watching a scientific rodeo unfold, with our variables competing for the title of most influential in the arena of academia and cyberspace.

In our quest to seek meaning in the midst of statistical chaos, we also flexed our research muscles, conducting a series of robust sensitivity analyses to shore up the strength of our findings. This process involved tinkering and toying with the data, not unlike a mad scientist constructing the perfect formula for scientific silliness. We prodded and poked the numbers, ensuring that our correlation remained as steadfast as an unwavering butler in a mystery novel.

As a final flourish of scientific showmanship, we delved into the captivating world of multivariate analysis, investigating the potential confounding influences that could clandestinely sway our correlation. Like detectives unraveling the plot twist in an Agatha Christie novel, we uncovered the hidden nuances that may have contributed to the poignant partnership between literature and the lure of Rober's YouTube zeitgeist. This meticulous examination allowed us to ensure that our statistical findings weren't merely a fluke, but rather a revelatory romp through the halls of academe and internet enchantment.

And with that, our methodological misadventure draws to a close, leaving us with a treasure trove of tantalizing data and a bellyful of scientific whimsy. In the immortal words of Mark Rober himself, "Science is fun. Science is curiosity. We all have natural curiosity. Science is a process of investigating. It's posing questions and coming up with a method. It's delving in."

And delved we did, dear readers. It's with unbridled delight and a touch of statistical fortitude that we present our findings, a confluence of literature and likes that is truly a testament to the merry marriage of scholarship and digital divinity. So, on we march, our hearts light with the knowledge that even the most unexpected correlations can inspire both laughter and learning in this grand waltz of science and storytelling.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9855892, r-squared of 0.9713861, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.

As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"

What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow aficionados of the academic and the absurd, welcome to our captivating investigation into the whimsical world of linguistic literature and lively likes! For those seeking a fusion of scholarly pursuits and internet immersion, this paper promises to be a treat fresher than a Bard pun in a room full of scholars.
As we launch into this journey, allow me to pose a question: What do you get when you cross literature with YouTube stardom? A novel correlation that unfolds like a suspenseful plot twist! But of course, we don't intend to leave you twisting in the wind – let's dive into the alchemic amalgamation of words and web views.
If you thought the quest for hidden connections only existed in the realm of Greek mythology, think again! Armed with data from the hallowed halls of the National Center for Education Statistics and the digital wonderland of YouTube, our mission is to illuminate the enigmatic entanglement of Associate degrees in literature and the mesmerizing metrics of Mark Rober's YouTube likes.
The statistical analysis we wield like a wizard's wand reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9855892, a value so astonishingly high, it could make an arithmetician's heart skip a beat. It's enough to make one ponder, "Did Shakespeare ghostwrite Newton's laws of motion, or did Tesla build a time machine and sneak him into the 21st century for a collaboration with Mark Rober?"
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our findings promise to be as enlightening as a lightbulb joke in a room full of physicists. We invite you to join us in unpacking the story behind this unlikely association, and in doing so, unleash the potential for multi-disciplinary merriment and scientific absurdity. So hold onto your hypothesis hats, my friends – we're about to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride that's bound to leave you with an equation for laughter and learning!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data from 2011 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in literature and the total likes received by Mark Rober's captivating YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 suggested a near-perfect positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. One might jest, "Looks like there's a compelling plot twist in the literature of likes!"

To visually capture this gripping correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot displaying the impressive alignment between the number of Associate degrees in literature and the total likes on Mark Rober's YouTube videos.

This astounding correlation left us with a statistical r-squared of 0.9713861, indicating that about 97.1% of the variability in the total likes received by Mark Rober's videos can be explained by the number of Associate degrees awarded in literature. This substantial explanatory power led us to muse, "It seems the literature enthusiasts have found their quantum entanglement in Rober's YouTube universe. Perhaps they're applying literary criticism to his videos – after all, isn't every narrative an engineering feat?"

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 attested to the statistical significance of this correlation, lending support to the notion that the connection between literary achievement and the admiration of Mark Rober's content is not merely a serendipitous occurrence, but rather a substantial and meaningful association. One might whimsically conjecture, "Looks like the pen truly is mightier than the 'like' button after all!"

In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Associates degrees in literature and the total likes on Mark Rober's YouTube videos has uncovered a fascinating and robust correlation. This correlation not only adds a splash of frivolity to statistical inquiry but also raises intriguing questions about the interconnectedness of diverse intellectual pursuits. With our results in hand, we can't help but wonder, "Was Shakespeare maybe onto something with the whole 'all the world's a stage' concept?"

Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we continue to unravel the joyous juxtaposition of literary accolades and digital delights!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.

As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"

What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that a correlation exists between educational attainment and online engagement, a notion reinforced by the prolific viewership of educational content on platforms such as YouTube. This aligns with the study by "Doe and Johnson," who suggest that individuals with a passion for academic subjects may seek out intellectual stimulation through digital media. The connection between literary pursuits and online interaction is further expounded upon by "Jones and Brown," who delve into the multifaceted nature of audience engagement with educational content creators.
As we traverse the realm of literary pursuits, it is essential to acknowledge the influence of non-fictional works such as "The Norton Anthology of World Literature" and "How to Read Literature Like a Professor" by Thomas C. Foster, which have long been pillars of scholarly exploration and intellectual discourse. Turning the pages to the realm of fiction, literary classics including "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen and "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee offer profound insights into human nature and societal themes, perhaps leaving one to wonder if a well-crafted narrative holds the key to understanding the enigmatic allure of Mark Rober's videos.
In our pursuit of understanding the correlation between Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, we found it imperative to immerse ourselves in relevant content. This included not only perusing academic literature but also delving into popular culture. It is in this spirit that we also indulged in watching TV shows such as "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" and "Brain Games" to gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between scientific education and engaging visual media.
It is apparent that the pursuit of knowledge through literary endeavors may indeed intersect with a fervent appreciation for the captivating scientific explorations presented by Mark Rober. However, let us not forget the lighthearted side of this correlation -- after all, what do you call fictional literature about YouTube statistics? Clickbait!
As we navigate through the labyrinths of academia and entertainment, it becomes evident that the unexpected correlation between literary pursuits and YouTube engagement has the potential to defy conventional expectations and bring forth a harmony of intellectual curiosity and online amusement. So, dear readers, buckle up and prepare for an academic rollercoaster ride that's bound to have you exclaiming, "This correlation is 'novel' in more ways than one!"

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2011 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in literature and the total likes received by Mark Rober's captivating YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 suggested a near-perfect positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. One might jest, "Looks like there's a compelling plot twist in the literature of likes!"
To visually capture this gripping correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot displaying the impressive alignment between the number of Associate degrees in literature and the total likes on Mark Rober's YouTube videos.
This astounding correlation left us with a statistical r-squared of 0.9713861, indicating that about 97.1% of the variability in the total likes received by Mark Rober's videos can be explained by the number of Associate degrees awarded in literature. This substantial explanatory power led us to muse, "It seems the literature enthusiasts have found their quantum entanglement in Rober's YouTube universe. Perhaps they're applying literary criticism to his videos – after all, isn't every narrative an engineering feat?"
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 attested to the statistical significance of this correlation, lending support to the notion that the connection between literary achievement and the admiration of Mark Rober's content is not merely a serendipitous occurrence, but rather a substantial and meaningful association. One might whimsically conjecture, "Looks like the pen truly is mightier than the 'like' button after all!"
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Associates degrees in literature and the total likes on Mark Rober's YouTube videos has uncovered a fascinating and robust correlation. This correlation not only adds a splash of frivolity to statistical inquiry but also raises intriguing questions about the interconnectedness of diverse intellectual pursuits. With our results in hand, we can't help but wonder, "Was Shakespeare maybe onto something with the whole 'all the world's a stage' concept?"
Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we continue to unravel the joyous juxtaposition of literary accolades and digital delights!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the lighthearted pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic connection between literary endeavors and the engrossing universe of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, our study has yielded quite the exciting revelation. As we set sail on this whimsical journey of scholarly inquiry, it becomes increasingly apparent that there is indeed a profound bond between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by Rober's ingenious content. "Looks like literature enthusiasts are clicking with Rober's scientific spectacles, quite the novel pairing!" One might jest.

Our findings merrily support the prior research, echoing the scholarly assertions put forth by Smith et al., Doe and Johnson, and Jones and Brown, alluding to the correlation between academic pursuits and online engagement. There is indeed a delightful harmony between educational attainment and the thirst for intellectual stimulation through digital media. Who would've thought that Shakespeare and science would share the online stage so magnificently?

Speaking of magnificence, our statistical analysis unfurled a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9855892, drawing attention to the substantial relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. And with an r-squared of 0.9713861, it's safe to say that nearly 97.1% of the variability in the total likes can be gleefully explained by the number of Associate degrees awarded in literature. "Looks like literature aficionados are writing their own 'Rober-tic' tale in the YouTube universe! Talk about an engaging plotline!"

The statistical significance of our findings, as underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizes the substantial nature of this correlation. It seems that the pen truly is mightier than the 'like' button after all! With such robust statistical support, it becomes increasingly apparent that the connection we've uncovered is no mere coincidence but rather a meaningful and perhaps even whimsically delightful association.

In the spirit of academic camaraderie and a dash of humor, we find ourselves pondering the intertwined narratives of literary accolades and digital delights. After all, did Shakespeare, in his infinite wisdom, foresee the enthralling relationship between literature and the dynamic allure of YouTube in his musings on the world being a stage? It is a lighthearted reminder that even the most whimsical connections can hold a substantial weight in the broader landscape of cultural and scholarly intersection.

Stay tuned for the next chapter in our academic adventure, where we delve even deeper into the jubilant juxtaposition of educational achievements and the captivating world of digital engagement. After all, as researchers, isn't it our calling to uncover the delightful surprises hidden in the most unexpected of places?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in literature and Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.

As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"

What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow aficionados of the academic and the absurd, welcome to our captivating investigation into the whimsical world of linguistic literature and lively likes! For those seeking a fusion of scholarly pursuits and internet immersion, this paper promises to be a treat fresher than a Bard pun in a room full of scholars.
As we launch into this journey, allow me to pose a question: What do you get when you cross literature with YouTube stardom? A novel correlation that unfolds like a suspenseful plot twist! But of course, we don't intend to leave you twisting in the wind – let's dive into the alchemic amalgamation of words and web views.
If you thought the quest for hidden connections only existed in the realm of Greek mythology, think again! Armed with data from the hallowed halls of the National Center for Education Statistics and the digital wonderland of YouTube, our mission is to illuminate the enigmatic entanglement of Associate degrees in literature and the mesmerizing metrics of Mark Rober's YouTube likes.
The statistical analysis we wield like a wizard's wand reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9855892, a value so astonishingly high, it could make an arithmetician's heart skip a beat. It's enough to make one ponder, "Did Shakespeare ghostwrite Newton's laws of motion, or did Tesla build a time machine and sneak him into the 21st century for a collaboration with Mark Rober?"
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, our findings promise to be as enlightening as a lightbulb joke in a room full of physicists. We invite you to join us in unpacking the story behind this unlikely association, and in doing so, unleash the potential for multi-disciplinary merriment and scientific absurdity. So hold onto your hypothesis hats, my friends – we're about to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride that's bound to leave you with an equation for laughter and learning!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2011 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in literature and the total likes received by Mark Rober's captivating YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 suggested a near-perfect positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. One might jest, "Looks like there's a compelling plot twist in the literature of likes!"
To visually capture this gripping correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot displaying the impressive alignment between the number of Associate degrees in literature and the total likes on Mark Rober's YouTube videos.
This astounding correlation left us with a statistical r-squared of 0.9713861, indicating that about 97.1% of the variability in the total likes received by Mark Rober's videos can be explained by the number of Associate degrees awarded in literature. This substantial explanatory power led us to muse, "It seems the literature enthusiasts have found their quantum entanglement in Rober's YouTube universe. Perhaps they're applying literary criticism to his videos – after all, isn't every narrative an engineering feat?"
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 attested to the statistical significance of this correlation, lending support to the notion that the connection between literary achievement and the admiration of Mark Rober's content is not merely a serendipitous occurrence, but rather a substantial and meaningful association. One might whimsically conjecture, "Looks like the pen truly is mightier than the 'like' button after all!"
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Associates degrees in literature and the total likes on Mark Rober's YouTube videos has uncovered a fascinating and robust correlation. This correlation not only adds a splash of frivolity to statistical inquiry but also raises intriguing questions about the interconnectedness of diverse intellectual pursuits. With our results in hand, we can't help but wonder, "Was Shakespeare maybe onto something with the whole 'all the world's a stage' concept?"
Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we continue to unravel the joyous juxtaposition of literary accolades and digital delights!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In contemplating the intertwined realms of literature and YouTube stardom, our study has not only revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes of Mark Rober's YouTube videos but also provided an entertaining insight into the delightful dance of academics and online appreciation. It seems that the crossover of literary prowess and technological fascination has sparked an unexpected symphony of clicks and credibility. One might jest, "Looks like the pen is truly mightier than the play button in this digital age of enlightenment!"

As we bid adieu to this whimsical journey of statistical exploration, we are left with a buoyant sense of wonder and a raft of questions that tickle the fancy of every curious mind. Perhaps the allure of Mark Rober's scientific spectacles is amplified by the poetic brilliance cultivated in the halls of literary academia. After all, isn't a well-crafted experiment akin to a finely penned sonnet, both weaving tales of discovery and wonder into the fabric of human understanding?

Our findings beckon us to ponder, "Could it be that the love for literature primes the heart for the wonders of scientific inquiry, eliciting fervent digital accolades?" It seems that the Bard's timeless tales and Rober's groundbreaking endeavors are not as disparate as one might assume. As we conclude this delightful escapade, we are inclined to assert that the joyous joust between literature and likes has left us with a revelatory revelation: "To click or not to click, that is the question!"

In all jest, we humbly propose that the bond between literary achievements and digital adoration deserves further exploration, as it serves as a delightful reminder that unexpected connections can be found in the most surprising of places. As for the need for more research in this area, we confidently declare, "Alas, no further prodding is required – the correlation has been unraveled, and the rest, as they say, is statistical history!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pop Culture Linguistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Literary Linguistics and Internet Engagement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Linguistic Literature and Lively Likes: Exploring the Correlation between Associates degrees in Literature and Total Likes of Mark Rober YouTube Videos with an abstract of In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the unexpected connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in literature and the total likes garnered by the fascinating and educational YouTube videos of the ingenious engineer Mark Rober. Armed with statistical analysis and a healthy dose of humor, we set out to uncover whether a penchant for literature translates into an affinity for Rober's riveting content.
As we delved into the data furnished by the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9855892 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. This statistical relationship effectively raised our eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, a correlation so strong that one might humorously quip, "Shakespeare and science seem to share the spotlight on the online stage!"
What's in a degree, you ask? It appears that a predilection for literary pursuits may indeed fuel an appreciation for the captivating science and engineering endeavors showcased by Mark Rober on YouTube. The results of our study not only provide an intriguing intersection between academia and online engagement but also offer a lighthearted reminder that even the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places.
In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the delightful bond between literary aspirations and scientific spectacles but also prompt a playfully ponderous question: "Did Mark Rober's audience concurrently earn their degrees in literature, or did literature inspire their appreciative clicks?

ChatGPT:

Associates degree in literature, literature studies, Mark Rober, YouTube, video likes, correlation, statistical analysis, National Center for Education Statistics, online engagement

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in literature
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of English language and literature/letters
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in literature

Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9855892 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9713861 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in literature) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.0E-8. 0.0000000296840607837644600000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 3.0E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 33,688,113 random variables You don't actually need 33 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in literature (Degrees awarded)20192137208920822324255128703133334034343601
Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos (Total likes)1654505842015947678474581762620380491062640408473300115455001223720016157000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2019,2137,2089,2082,2324,2551,2870,3133,3340,3434,3601,])
array_2 = np.array([165450,584201,594767,847458,1762620,3804910,6264040,8473300,11545500,12237200,16157000,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in literature"
array_2_name = "Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5239 · Black Variable ID: 1226 · Red Variable ID: 25582
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0