Report an error
Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in China | r=1 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Chile | r=0.99 | 9yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in information sciences | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in literature | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Biological sciences | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Air pollution in Minneapolis | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
The number of private detectives in Louisiana | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota | r=0.76 | 13yrs | No |
The number of movies Tom Cruise appeared in | r=0.57 | 13yrs | No |
Air quality in Pocatello, Idaho | r=-0.89 | 13yrs | No |
Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)