about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,458 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Daniel and the second variable is Burglaries in Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer people were using the phrase "Open the door, it's Daniel!" as a popular catchphrase, leading to a decrease in successful door-to-door burglaries in Pennsylvania.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that resembles a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a serene Pennsylvania town. The fading name "Daniel" can be seen gradually disappearing from the signs of local shops and schools, while the burglar alarms show a decline in being triggered at night. The atmosphere should reflect the peace and tranquility that settles in as the last Daniel moves away, with the town transitioning from the notoriety of burglary to the harmony of its community. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Scalar art A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania, in the following situation: As the name Daniel declined, so did the "Dan"gerous intentions of thieves. With fewer "Daniels" to distract them, burglars found it harder to "steal" the spotlight. This led to a decrease in burglary rates in Pennsylvania, as the absence of "Dan"gerous individuals made it harder for thieves to "steal" the show.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Pennsylvania town, the name Daniel began to fade from the signs of local shops and schools. At the same time, the number of burglar alarms being triggered at night steadily decreased. On a quiet street, as the last Daniel moved away, the town's spotlight shifted from the notoriety of burglary to the peace of its community.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Pennsylvania town, the name Daniel began to fade from the signs of local shops and schools. At the same time, the number of burglar alarms being triggered at night steadily decreased. On a quiet street, as the last Daniel moved away, the town's spotlight shifted from the notoriety of burglary to the peace of its community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that resembles a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a serene Pennsylvania town. The fading name "Daniel" can be seen gradually disappearing from the signs of local shops and schools, while the burglar alarms show a decline in being triggered at night. The atmosphere should reflect the peace and tranquility that settles in as the last Daniel moves away, with the town transitioning from the notoriety of burglary to the harmony of its community.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Daniel caused Burglaries in Pennsylvania to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

The Journal of Quirky Social Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9557207 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

[[ABSTRACT]]:

In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.

Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.

Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

[[ABSTRACT]]:

In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.

Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.

Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the whimsical world of statistical sleuthing, where data points dance and correlations cavort, we find ourselves embarking on a peculiar pursuit – a quest to untangle the confounding connection between the prevalence of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Pennsylvania. As we step into this enigmatic realm, we are faced with a knotty knot that seems more perplexing than a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.

The notion that a simple name could have any bearing on criminal proclivities might seem as outlandish as a kangaroo attempting to moonwalk. However, as the proverbial plot thickens, we dare to delve into the depths of this curious conundrum with an equal measure of analytical rigor and good humor.

The name "Daniel" – which invokes images of wise and courageous figures from folklore and scripture – is ubiquitous in many a social setting. Yet, could this seemingly innocuous name hold a secret, a clandestine influence on the rates of burglaries in Pennsylvania? Our investigation aims to unravel this dastardly dance between nomenclature and neighborhood heists, where statistical surprises lurk around every corner and unexpected correlations gleefully sidle up to our hypotheses.

With a twinkle in our eyes and tongues firmly planted in our cheeks, we venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of skepticism. Join us as we navigate this merry maze of name popularity and criminal capers, where each turn promises a chuckle and every discovery leaves us scratching our heads in bemusement. So, hold onto your hats and get ready for a rollicking ride through the curious case of Daniel's dilemma!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

[[ABSTRACT]]:

In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.

Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.

Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the whimsical world of statistical sleuthing, where data points dance and correlations cavort, we find ourselves embarking on a peculiar pursuit – a quest to untangle the confounding connection between the prevalence of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Pennsylvania. As we step into this enigmatic realm, we are faced with a knotty knot that seems more perplexing than a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
The notion that a simple name could have any bearing on criminal proclivities might seem as outlandish as a kangaroo attempting to moonwalk. However, as the proverbial plot thickens, we dare to delve into the depths of this curious conundrum with an equal measure of analytical rigor and good humor.
The name "Daniel" – which invokes images of wise and courageous figures from folklore and scripture – is ubiquitous in many a social setting. Yet, could this seemingly innocuous name hold a secret, a clandestine influence on the rates of burglaries in Pennsylvania? Our investigation aims to unravel this dastardly dance between nomenclature and neighborhood heists, where statistical surprises lurk around every corner and unexpected correlations gleefully sidle up to our hypotheses.
With a twinkle in our eyes and tongues firmly planted in our cheeks, we venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of skepticism. Join us as we navigate this merry maze of name popularity and criminal capers, where each turn promises a chuckle and every discovery leaves us scratching our heads in bemusement. So, hold onto your hats and get ready for a rollicking ride through the curious case of Daniel's dilemma!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find a comprehensive analysis of given names and their potential influence on social interactions and outcomes. While the study primarily focuses on the impact of names in professional and educational settings, it lays a sturdy foundation for our investigation into the connection between the prevalence of the name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in Pennsylvania.

The work of Doe and Jones (2018) further contributes to our understanding of the societal implications of naming conventions. Their exploration of the psychological effects of common names versus unique names offers valuable insight into the potential behavioral implications of sharing a name with a large cohort of individuals.

Shifting to the domain of non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner presents an engaging exploration of hidden correlations and unexpected phenomena in everyday life. While focused on economics, the book's approach to unearthing unconventional connections between seemingly unrelated factors serves as an inspiring backdrop for our quirky quest.

In the realm of fiction, the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, particularly the escapades of Sherlock Holmes in "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes," provide a fictional yet undeniably exhilarating example of deducing unexpected linkages. Just as Holmes unravels mysteries through astute observation and logical reasoning, we embark on our statistical escapade with a similar spirit of playful inquiry and analytical acumen.

Now venturing into less conventional territories, our literature review extends to unlikely sources of insight, including the mundane yet mysteriously informative realm of grocery store receipts. In a valiant attempt to scour every possible avenue for clues and connections, we combed through countless CVS receipts with the fervent hope of stumbling upon a trail of evidence that would illuminate the enthralling association between the name Daniel and neighborhood burglaries in Pennsylvania.

Embracing the absurdity and unpredictability of this research endeavor, we cast our net wide and cast our suspicions wider, embracing every absurd avenue of inquiry with a wry smile and an unyielding determination to unravel this whimsical web of the Daniel dilemma.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

[[ABSTRACT]]:

In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.

Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.

Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the whimsical world of statistical sleuthing, where data points dance and correlations cavort, we find ourselves embarking on a peculiar pursuit – a quest to untangle the confounding connection between the prevalence of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Pennsylvania. As we step into this enigmatic realm, we are faced with a knotty knot that seems more perplexing than a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
The notion that a simple name could have any bearing on criminal proclivities might seem as outlandish as a kangaroo attempting to moonwalk. However, as the proverbial plot thickens, we dare to delve into the depths of this curious conundrum with an equal measure of analytical rigor and good humor.
The name "Daniel" – which invokes images of wise and courageous figures from folklore and scripture – is ubiquitous in many a social setting. Yet, could this seemingly innocuous name hold a secret, a clandestine influence on the rates of burglaries in Pennsylvania? Our investigation aims to unravel this dastardly dance between nomenclature and neighborhood heists, where statistical surprises lurk around every corner and unexpected correlations gleefully sidle up to our hypotheses.
With a twinkle in our eyes and tongues firmly planted in our cheeks, we venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of skepticism. Join us as we navigate this merry maze of name popularity and criminal capers, where each turn promises a chuckle and every discovery leaves us scratching our heads in bemusement. So, hold onto your hats and get ready for a rollicking ride through the curious case of Daniel's dilemma!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this merry adventure of unraveling the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania, our intrepid research team concocted a potpourri of data-gathering methods and statistical shenanigans. With the spirit of whimsy as our guiding star, we cast our net far and wide across the digital expanse, collecting data from sources as varied as the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services.

To commence our caper, we first employed the exhilarating art of web scraping, with our trusty algorithms diligently traipsing through the digital terrain to gather historical records of baby names and their prevalence. Our foray into the digital den unearthed a treasure trove of data from the US Social Security Administration, capturing the ebbs and flows of the name "Daniel" from 1985 to 2022. With the data safely ensconced in our statistical arsenal, we were primed to venture deeper into the heart of our curious conundrum.

In parallel, our jocular journey led us to the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, where we sought to corral the mischievous metrics of burglaries in the picturesque state of Pennsylvania. Armed with tenacity and a penchant for statistical mischief, we collected details of reported burglaries from 1985 to 2022, painting a vivid portrait of criminal activities in the Keystone State. Through this zany juxtaposition of baby names and burglary statistics, we set the stage for a statistical showdown that promised more twists and turns than a rollercoaster ride at a carnival.

With our data impeccably gathered, we then donned our metaphorical deerstalker hats and embarked on the tantalizing task of data integration and analysis. In our statistical laboratory, we stirred the cauldron of correlation coefficients and p-values, brewing a heady concoction of statistical significance and eyebrow-raising insights. Our methods included the rigorous application of Pearson's correlation coefficient to suss out the association between the popularity of the name Daniel and the frequency of burglaries in Pennsylvania. With a p-value threshold of less than 0.01, we set the bar high for any semblance of statistical quackery to rear its mischievous head.

The culmination of our methodological merrymaking resulted in a statistical escapade that balanced the rigors of scientific inquiry with the lighthearted spirit of curiosity. In doing so, we sought to peel back the layers of this enigmatic enigma, bringing forth findings that would make even the most stoic of scholars crack a bemused smile. So, dear reader, prepare to be regaled with the uproarious antics of our statistical sleuthing, all in the pursuit of unraveling Daniel's dilemma amidst the unpredictable world of research and revelry!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9557207, r-squared of 0.9134020, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

[[ABSTRACT]]:

In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.

Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.

Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the whimsical world of statistical sleuthing, where data points dance and correlations cavort, we find ourselves embarking on a peculiar pursuit – a quest to untangle the confounding connection between the prevalence of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Pennsylvania. As we step into this enigmatic realm, we are faced with a knotty knot that seems more perplexing than a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
The notion that a simple name could have any bearing on criminal proclivities might seem as outlandish as a kangaroo attempting to moonwalk. However, as the proverbial plot thickens, we dare to delve into the depths of this curious conundrum with an equal measure of analytical rigor and good humor.
The name "Daniel" – which invokes images of wise and courageous figures from folklore and scripture – is ubiquitous in many a social setting. Yet, could this seemingly innocuous name hold a secret, a clandestine influence on the rates of burglaries in Pennsylvania? Our investigation aims to unravel this dastardly dance between nomenclature and neighborhood heists, where statistical surprises lurk around every corner and unexpected correlations gleefully sidle up to our hypotheses.
With a twinkle in our eyes and tongues firmly planted in our cheeks, we venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of skepticism. Join us as we navigate this merry maze of name popularity and criminal capers, where each turn promises a chuckle and every discovery leaves us scratching our heads in bemusement. So, hold onto your hats and get ready for a rollicking ride through the curious case of Daniel's dilemma!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our rollicking research endeavor uncovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9557207 between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. This eyebrow-raising correlation was complemented by an r-squared of 0.9134020, signifying a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stood up to scrutiny, proving that this connection was no mere fluke.

Capturing the essence of this curious correlation is our beloved Figure 1 (please see the attached scatterplot), which eloquently illustrates the strong and undeniable relationship between the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's safe to say that this mischievous Daniel has made quite an impression, leaving his name firmly associated with neighborhood capers.

This unexpected revelation has left us grappling with the quintessential question: could the mere mention of the name Daniel send shivers down the spines of law-abiding citizens and embolden the mischievous tendencies of would-be burglars? Our findings certainly suggest that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, and the mysterious allure of the name Daniel seems to have cast a spell over the state of Pennsylvania.

As we navigate this convoluted conundrum, we are reminded that statistical analysis can often lead us to unexpected destinations, where correlations and causations mingle in a dance as lively as a Pennsylvania hoedown. While we may have unraveled the connection between the name Daniel and burglaries, this bewildering revelation invites further exploration and contemplation.

In conclusion, our statistical meanderings have uncovered a curious correlation that stands as a testament to the whimsical nature of the world around us. The enigmatic allure of the name Daniel and its unexpected link to criminal activities in Pennsylvania has certainly left us pondering the mysteries of nomenclature and the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can unearth.

So, with a twirl and a flourish, we lay bare the mischievous dance between name popularity and neighborhood heists, leaving no stone unturned in our quest to unravel the zany conundrum of Daniel's dilemma.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

[[ABSTRACT]]:

In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.

Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.

Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find a comprehensive analysis of given names and their potential influence on social interactions and outcomes. While the study primarily focuses on the impact of names in professional and educational settings, it lays a sturdy foundation for our investigation into the connection between the prevalence of the name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in Pennsylvania.
The work of Doe and Jones (2018) further contributes to our understanding of the societal implications of naming conventions. Their exploration of the psychological effects of common names versus unique names offers valuable insight into the potential behavioral implications of sharing a name with a large cohort of individuals.
Shifting to the domain of non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner presents an engaging exploration of hidden correlations and unexpected phenomena in everyday life. While focused on economics, the book's approach to unearthing unconventional connections between seemingly unrelated factors serves as an inspiring backdrop for our quirky quest.
In the realm of fiction, the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, particularly the escapades of Sherlock Holmes in "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes," provide a fictional yet undeniably exhilarating example of deducing unexpected linkages. Just as Holmes unravels mysteries through astute observation and logical reasoning, we embark on our statistical escapade with a similar spirit of playful inquiry and analytical acumen.
Now venturing into less conventional territories, our literature review extends to unlikely sources of insight, including the mundane yet mysteriously informative realm of grocery store receipts. In a valiant attempt to scour every possible avenue for clues and connections, we combed through countless CVS receipts with the fervent hope of stumbling upon a trail of evidence that would illuminate the enthralling association between the name Daniel and neighborhood burglaries in Pennsylvania.
Embracing the absurdity and unpredictability of this research endeavor, we cast our net wide and cast our suspicions wider, embracing every absurd avenue of inquiry with a wry smile and an unyielding determination to unravel this whimsical web of the Daniel dilemma.

[[RESULTS]]
Our rollicking research endeavor uncovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9557207 between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. This eyebrow-raising correlation was complemented by an r-squared of 0.9134020, signifying a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stood up to scrutiny, proving that this connection was no mere fluke.
Capturing the essence of this curious correlation is our beloved Figure 1 (please see the attached scatterplot), which eloquently illustrates the strong and undeniable relationship between the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's safe to say that this mischievous Daniel has made quite an impression, leaving his name firmly associated with neighborhood capers.
This unexpected revelation has left us grappling with the quintessential question: could the mere mention of the name Daniel send shivers down the spines of law-abiding citizens and embolden the mischievous tendencies of would-be burglars? Our findings certainly suggest that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, and the mysterious allure of the name Daniel seems to have cast a spell over the state of Pennsylvania.
As we navigate this convoluted conundrum, we are reminded that statistical analysis can often lead us to unexpected destinations, where correlations and causations mingle in a dance as lively as a Pennsylvania hoedown. While we may have unraveled the connection between the name Daniel and burglaries, this bewildering revelation invites further exploration and contemplation.
In conclusion, our statistical meanderings have uncovered a curious correlation that stands as a testament to the whimsical nature of the world around us. The enigmatic allure of the name Daniel and its unexpected link to criminal activities in Pennsylvania has certainly left us pondering the mysteries of nomenclature and the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can unearth.
So, with a twirl and a flourish, we lay bare the mischievous dance between name popularity and neighborhood heists, leaving no stone unturned in our quest to unravel the zany conundrum of Daniel's dilemma.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The peculiar yet compelling correlation between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in Pennsylvania has left us pondering the confounding capers of nomenclature. Our findings not only confirm the existence of this whimsical connection but also catapult it into the spotlight, akin to a mischievous Daniel making a grand entrance at a neighborhood block party.

Our investigation dances in tandem with previous research that has teased out the influence of names on various social and behavioral phenomena. In the spirit of "Smith et al. (2015)," our work underscores the magnetic allure of names and their unexpected sway on societal dynamics. It appears that the mischievous charm of the name Daniel extends beyond mere social interactions and delves into the curious realm of criminal proclivities, as evidenced by our robust correlation coefficient.

Similarly, the insights of Doe and Jones (2018) echo in the halls of this investigation, as we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of behavioral implications tied to sharing a name with a sizable cohort. The enigmatic allure of the name Daniel seems to beckon not only camaraderie but also perhaps a penchant for clandestine activities, painting a portrait as captivating as a psychological thriller.

Venturing into more unconventional territories, our literature review whimsically waltzes into the whimsical world of grocery store receipts, underscoring our unwavering commitment to exploring every avenue for clues, no matter how mundane. The unexpected link between the name Daniel and neighborhood burglaries may very well mirror the unexpected correlations celebrated in "Freakonomics," where the unlikeliest of bedfellows converge to illuminate the quirks of everyday life in a manner as uproarious as a comedy of errors.

As we sway through this scholarly soiree, the resonance of our findings with prior research is as clear as a starlit night in the Pennsylvania countryside. Indeed, the enigmatic dance of the name Daniel and neighborhood heists has not only befuddled our statistical sensibilities but also whisked us into a whirlwind of contemplation on the delightfully unpredictable nature of this curious connection.

Ultimately, our findings stand as a testament to the dizzying charm of statistical inquiry, where the seemingly ordinary unveils its surprising secrets. While we bid adieu to this lighthearted yet rigorous quest, we are left with a name that lingers in the air, whispering its mysterious tale like a mischievous riddle, leaving us with more mirth than measure in this unforgettable romp through the beguiling world of statistical whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]: Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists

[[ABSTRACT]]:

In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.

Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.

Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the whimsical world of statistical sleuthing, where data points dance and correlations cavort, we find ourselves embarking on a peculiar pursuit – a quest to untangle the confounding connection between the prevalence of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Pennsylvania. As we step into this enigmatic realm, we are faced with a knotty knot that seems more perplexing than a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
The notion that a simple name could have any bearing on criminal proclivities might seem as outlandish as a kangaroo attempting to moonwalk. However, as the proverbial plot thickens, we dare to delve into the depths of this curious conundrum with an equal measure of analytical rigor and good humor.
The name "Daniel" – which invokes images of wise and courageous figures from folklore and scripture – is ubiquitous in many a social setting. Yet, could this seemingly innocuous name hold a secret, a clandestine influence on the rates of burglaries in Pennsylvania? Our investigation aims to unravel this dastardly dance between nomenclature and neighborhood heists, where statistical surprises lurk around every corner and unexpected correlations gleefully sidle up to our hypotheses.
With a twinkle in our eyes and tongues firmly planted in our cheeks, we venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of skepticism. Join us as we navigate this merry maze of name popularity and criminal capers, where each turn promises a chuckle and every discovery leaves us scratching our heads in bemusement. So, hold onto your hats and get ready for a rollicking ride through the curious case of Daniel's dilemma!

[[RESULTS]]
Our rollicking research endeavor uncovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9557207 between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. This eyebrow-raising correlation was complemented by an r-squared of 0.9134020, signifying a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stood up to scrutiny, proving that this connection was no mere fluke.
Capturing the essence of this curious correlation is our beloved Figure 1 (please see the attached scatterplot), which eloquently illustrates the strong and undeniable relationship between the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's safe to say that this mischievous Daniel has made quite an impression, leaving his name firmly associated with neighborhood capers.
This unexpected revelation has left us grappling with the quintessential question: could the mere mention of the name Daniel send shivers down the spines of law-abiding citizens and embolden the mischievous tendencies of would-be burglars? Our findings certainly suggest that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, and the mysterious allure of the name Daniel seems to have cast a spell over the state of Pennsylvania.
As we navigate this convoluted conundrum, we are reminded that statistical analysis can often lead us to unexpected destinations, where correlations and causations mingle in a dance as lively as a Pennsylvania hoedown. While we may have unraveled the connection between the name Daniel and burglaries, this bewildering revelation invites further exploration and contemplation.
In conclusion, our statistical meanderings have uncovered a curious correlation that stands as a testament to the whimsical nature of the world around us. The enigmatic allure of the name Daniel and its unexpected link to criminal activities in Pennsylvania has certainly left us pondering the mysteries of nomenclature and the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can unearth.
So, with a twirl and a flourish, we lay bare the mischievous dance between name popularity and neighborhood heists, leaving no stone unturned in our quest to unravel the zany conundrum of Daniel's dilemma.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the merry world of statistical escapades, our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania has left us with more questions than answers. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9557207 and a p-value of less than 0.01, have truly raised eyebrows faster than a quizzical Daniel fleeing the scene of a name-related caper. It seems that the mischievous allure of this moniker has woven its way into the fabric of Pennsylvania's criminal activities, sparking intrigue akin to a cryptic crossword puzzle.

Our beloved Figure 1 (please refer to the attached scatterplot) stands as a testament to this unexpected correlation, illustrating the undeniable relationship between the name Daniel and neighborhood heists. It appears that this Daniel has indeed made quite an impression, leaving his name firmly associated with acts of larceny and tomfoolery.

As we bid adieu to this statistical romp, we are reminded that the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connections to criminal activities continue to baffle and bemuse us. The peculiar allure of the name Daniel has certainly left us pondering the mysteries of nomenclature and the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can unearth.

In the spirit of statistical sincerity, we assert that no further research in this area is needed! This investigation has twirled us through the merry maze of name popularity and neighborhood heists, and now it's time to bid farewell to Daniel's dilemma. For in the world of statistical curiosities, sometimes the most unexpected connections are the most delightful ones.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited : Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Social Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited : Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Socio-Cultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled : Daniel's Dilemma: The Dastardly Dance between Name Popularity and Neighborhood Heists with an abstract of :
In this raucous research romp, we delved into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Daniel and the incidence of burglaries in the quaint state of Pennsylvania. Merging the meticulous data from the US Social Security Administration with the felonious figures from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we embarked on a statistical escapade to decipher this zany conundrum.
Surprisingly, our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9557207, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings raised eyebrows faster than a masked bandit fleeing the scene of a burglary. Indeed, it seems that the popularity of the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Pennsylvania are inextricably intertwined, sparking intrigue and befuddlement akin to solving a cryptic caper.
Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation sheds light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and its enigmatic connection to criminal activities, leaving us with more questions than answers. So tread carefully, for there may just be a mischievous Daniel lurking around the corner, his name as notorious as his misdeeds!

ChatGPT:

Daniel, name popularity, burglary, crime statistics, correlation study, US Social Security Administration, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Pennsylvania, correlation coefficient, p-value, nomenclature, criminal activities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Daniel
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Daniel
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Daniel

Burglaries in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in Pennsylvania
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglaries in Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.9557207 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9134020 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Burglaries in Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Daniel) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.03E-20. 0.0000000000000000000103396071
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 1.03E-18% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 96,715,473,840,393,797,632 random variables You don't actually need 96 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Daniel (Babies born)3885836865361343499635199339753109329303288182819126830251962402823235227662239721072213752111621076202772012320288190681759715886153211431714340139741355213008117521129310587951991319058
Burglaries in Pennsylvania (Burglary rate)737.5734.8722696.7713.7729.1719.6631.5582551.5561.8591.9567.5531.4467.2440.4441.7451.1435.9439.3452.5464.1451.2471.4434.5434.1454.9446.9406.8357.3309.4275.1249.6211.3182.2248.6142.1148.2




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([38858,36865,36134,34996,35199,33975,31093,29303,28818,28191,26830,25196,24028,23235,22766,22397,21072,21375,21116,21076,20277,20123,20288,19068,17597,15886,15321,14317,14340,13974,13552,13008,11752,11293,10587,9519,9131,9058,])
array_2 = np.array([737.5,734.8,722,696.7,713.7,729.1,719.6,631.5,582,551.5,561.8,591.9,567.5,531.4,467.2,440.4,441.7,451.1,435.9,439.3,452.5,464.1,451.2,471.4,434.5,434.1,454.9,446.9,406.8,357.3,309.4,275.1,249.6,211.3,182.2,248.6,142.1,148.2,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Daniel"
array_2_name = "Burglaries in Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3458 · Black Variable ID: 1983 · Red Variable ID: 20116
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0