Report an error
Popularity of the first name Daniel correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Burglaries in Florida | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Burglaries in Minnesota | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Arson in United States | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.98 | 32yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.98 | 36yrs | No |
Robberies in Michigan | r=0.98 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Burglaries in Nevada | r=0.97 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Arson in Nevada | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Latvia | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
Burglaries in Pennsylvania | r=0.96 | 38yrs | Yes! |
The divorce rate in North Carolina | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Cuba | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Daniel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)