about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,901 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Daniel and the second variable is Burglaries in Nevada.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People were less likely to name their children after the iconic heist movie character, Danny Ocean, which in turn led to a reduced glamorization of thievery and ultimately contributed to the decrease in burglaries in Nevada.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create a scene of a vibrant and bustling cityscape in Nevada, perhaps featuring the recognizable skyline of Las Vegas. Show a graph or visual representation of declining burglary rates juxtaposed with a creative and artistic representation of the name "Daniel" dwindling in popularity. The "Daniel" representation may include fading or disappearing typography or fading images of individuals associated with the name. This juxtaposition visually represents the correlation between the decline of the name "Daniel" and the reduced burglary rates in Nevada. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Cubism A photo-realistic image Psychedelic An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Daniel decreased, there were fewer people named Daniel committing burglaries in Nevada, leading to a decrease in overall burglary rates.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the popularity of the name Daniel declined, the number of burglaries in Nevada fell accordingly. Fewer "Daniels" were seen committing burglaries, and the overall burglary rates dropped.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: As the popularity of the name Daniel declined, the number of burglaries in Nevada fell accordingly. Fewer "Daniels" were seen committing burglaries, and the overall burglary rates dropped. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create a scene of a vibrant and bustling cityscape in Nevada, perhaps featuring the recognizable skyline of Las Vegas. Show a graph or visual representation of declining burglary rates juxtaposed with a creative and artistic representation of the name "Daniel" dwindling in popularity. The "Daniel" representation may include fading or disappearing typography or fading images of individuals associated with the name. This juxtaposition visually represents the correlation between the decline of the name "Daniel" and the reduced burglary rates in Nevada.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Daniel caused Burglaries in Nevada to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

The Journal of Eccentric Sociological Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9696047 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"

Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"

Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The phenomenon of nomenclature and its potential influence on human behavior has long intrigued scholars and laypeople alike. Much like a lighthearted detective navigating through a sea of data, we embark on an investigation that combines statistical analyses with wit, humor, and just a touch of dad jokes. As we dive into the whirlpool of the "Daniel dilemma," our aim is to uncover the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in the state of Nevada.

The correlation between the name Daniel and burglary rates in Nevada sparked our curiosity and led to the inception of this unusual yet captivating study. It is truly a "breaking" discovery, as our initial investigations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9696047, with a p-value lower than the Nevada heat in the summertime. This correlation holds significant statistical weight and prompts an "arresting" inquiry into the potential influences of nomenclature on criminal activities. Speaking of criminal activities, did you hear about the thief who stole a calendar? He got twelve months!

Our journey into the realm of statistics and nomenclature not only yielded surprising results but also led us to ponder philosophical questions that seemed inconceivable at the outset of this study. We were compelled to contemplate whether the popularity of the name Daniel influences the frequency of burglary incidents or if it's merely a serendipitous correlation. As we navigate through these name-related musings, we couldn't help but wonder, "Is this simply a case of 'breaking and entering,' or are we unraveling the mysteries of the 'name game'?" We can't help but entertain the possibility that the name Daniel might hold an unforeseen key to understanding criminal behavior. This line of inquiry opens the door to a trove of peculiar possibilities at the crossroads of nomenclature and crime, leaving us treading humorously in uncharted territory.

In conclusion, as we present the findings of our research, we hope to both enlighten and entertain. The "Daniel dilemma" not only unveils a striking correlation but also tickles the funny bone of name-related criminologists. With this study, we hope to encourage further investigations, perhaps prompting a wry grin or a hearty laugh, and proving that there's always room for a good jest, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"

Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of nomenclature and its potential influence on human behavior has long intrigued scholars and laypeople alike. Much like a lighthearted detective navigating through a sea of data, we embark on an investigation that combines statistical analyses with wit, humor, and just a touch of dad jokes. As we dive into the whirlpool of the "Daniel dilemma," our aim is to uncover the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in the state of Nevada.
The correlation between the name Daniel and burglary rates in Nevada sparked our curiosity and led to the inception of this unusual yet captivating study. It is truly a "breaking" discovery, as our initial investigations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9696047, with a p-value lower than the Nevada heat in the summertime. This correlation holds significant statistical weight and prompts an "arresting" inquiry into the potential influences of nomenclature on criminal activities. Speaking of criminal activities, did you hear about the thief who stole a calendar? He got twelve months!
Our journey into the realm of statistics and nomenclature not only yielded surprising results but also led us to ponder philosophical questions that seemed inconceivable at the outset of this study. We were compelled to contemplate whether the popularity of the name Daniel influences the frequency of burglary incidents or if it's merely a serendipitous correlation. As we navigate through these name-related musings, we couldn't help but wonder, "Is this simply a case of 'breaking and entering,' or are we unraveling the mysteries of the 'name game'?" We can't help but entertain the possibility that the name Daniel might hold an unforeseen key to understanding criminal behavior. This line of inquiry opens the door to a trove of peculiar possibilities at the crossroads of nomenclature and crime, leaving us treading humorously in uncharted territory.
In conclusion, as we present the findings of our research, we hope to both enlighten and entertain. The "Daniel dilemma" not only unveils a striking correlation but also tickles the funny bone of name-related criminologists. With this study, we hope to encourage further investigations, perhaps prompting a wry grin or a hearty laugh, and proving that there's always room for a good jest, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the relationship between nomenclature and criminal activity has been a subject of scholarly investigation for decades. Smith and Doe (2008) laid the groundwork for this area of inquiry by examining the potential psychological and sociological impacts of names on individual behavior. Jones (2015) expanded upon this foundation, delving into the influence of nomenclature on criminal proclivity within specific geographical regions. However, our study marks a distinct departure from previous research efforts, as we embark on a statistical investigation with a dash of levity and a penchant for puns to unravel the captivating "Daniel dilemma." It's a criminal investigation of names that could only be described as "arrestingly" comical.

The statistical findings of our research reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9696047, with a p-value lower than the bass tones of a dad's "Dad joke." This statistical relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada defies conventional wisdom and nudges the boundaries of nomenclatural influence on criminal activities. It's a correlation so strong, it could probably unlock a joke about breaking and entering.

On a more serious note, this correlation raises thought-provoking queries about the potential mechanisms underpinning the connection between the name Daniel and burglaries in Nevada. Are individuals bearing the name Daniel more predisposed to unlawful activities, or does the popularity of this name simply coincide with increased propensity for criminal behavior in Nevada? The line between statistical causation and mere correlation becomes humorously blurred as we ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" It's a real head-scratcher, much like trying to unravel the plot of a mystery novel with the protagonist named Daniel, whose only crime is stealing hearts and possibly a pizza or two.

Moreover, the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activities beckons us to consider the broader implications of these findings. It's as tantalizingly perplexing as an Agatha Christie novel, with its web of character names hinting at hidden identities and ulterior motives. Do our findings indicate a genuine influence of names on criminal proclivities, or are we merely entangled in a web of coincidences? As we navigate through this name-related maze, we can't help but feel like detectives solving a perplexing case that is both fascinating and undeniably humorous.

In light of these captivating findings, our study not only offers a statistical elucidation of the "Daniel dilemma" but also provokes a few chuckles along the investigative journey. We hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating relationship between nomenclature and criminal behavior, all while amusing readers and ensuring that statistical inquiry doesn't have to be devoid of entertainment. After all, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry, there's always room for a good jest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"

Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of nomenclature and its potential influence on human behavior has long intrigued scholars and laypeople alike. Much like a lighthearted detective navigating through a sea of data, we embark on an investigation that combines statistical analyses with wit, humor, and just a touch of dad jokes. As we dive into the whirlpool of the "Daniel dilemma," our aim is to uncover the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in the state of Nevada.
The correlation between the name Daniel and burglary rates in Nevada sparked our curiosity and led to the inception of this unusual yet captivating study. It is truly a "breaking" discovery, as our initial investigations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9696047, with a p-value lower than the Nevada heat in the summertime. This correlation holds significant statistical weight and prompts an "arresting" inquiry into the potential influences of nomenclature on criminal activities. Speaking of criminal activities, did you hear about the thief who stole a calendar? He got twelve months!
Our journey into the realm of statistics and nomenclature not only yielded surprising results but also led us to ponder philosophical questions that seemed inconceivable at the outset of this study. We were compelled to contemplate whether the popularity of the name Daniel influences the frequency of burglary incidents or if it's merely a serendipitous correlation. As we navigate through these name-related musings, we couldn't help but wonder, "Is this simply a case of 'breaking and entering,' or are we unraveling the mysteries of the 'name game'?" We can't help but entertain the possibility that the name Daniel might hold an unforeseen key to understanding criminal behavior. This line of inquiry opens the door to a trove of peculiar possibilities at the crossroads of nomenclature and crime, leaving us treading humorously in uncharted territory.
In conclusion, as we present the findings of our research, we hope to both enlighten and entertain. The "Daniel dilemma" not only unveils a striking correlation but also tickles the funny bone of name-related criminologists. With this study, we hope to encourage further investigations, perhaps prompting a wry grin or a hearty laugh, and proving that there's always room for a good jest, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in the state of Nevada, a multifaceted and comprehensive methodology was employed. Our research team embarked on an exploratory journey through the vast expanse of data, incorporating statistical analyses, data cleansing processes, and a dash of good-natured humor. The data for the study was primarily sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, spanning the temporal domain from 1985 to 2022. We believe that this timeframe provides an adequate breadth for capturing the nuances of societal naming trends and criminal activities, all while ensuring our findings are as fresh as a newly cracked "dad joke."

To commence this unparalleled exploration, the initial step involved retrieving data on the popularity of the first name Daniel from the US Social Security Administration's historical records. We meticulously compiled the frequency of occurrences of the name Daniel across different years and geographical regions, meticulously sifting through the data with the diligence of a sleuth on the trail of a cleverly concealed punchline. Following the data collection and ensuring that all erroneous entries and any unexpected "name-dropping" were meticulously scrubbed from the dataset, we conducted a series of comparative analyses to trace the trajectory of the name's popularity. As we meticulously pored over the data, we couldn't help but reflect, "The name Daniel may 'punch' above its weight in the realm of nomenclature and behavioral influences!"

Simultaneously, we delved into the labyrinth of burglary data provided by the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, meticulously cataloging reported incidents of theft and unlawful entry within the state of Nevada. The aggregation and interpretation of this crime data were conducted with an unwavering commitment to maintaining the integrity of our statistical analysis, although it did occasionally feel like unraveling a criminal mastermind's cryptic riddle. Furthermore, the geographical overlay of burglary incidents was explored with regional granularity, providing a nuanced perspective on the spatiotemporal dynamics of criminal activities. Amidst the data wrangling and analytical endeavors, we found ourselves quipping, "The correlation between names and crimes can often leave researchers 'locked' in deep thought!"

Following the comprehensive aggregation of name popularity and burglary incident data, we applied advanced statistical methods such as correlation analysis and time series modeling. The correlation analysis aimed to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between the frequency of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences, providing a quantitative foundation for our investigation. The time series modeling, on the other hand, allowed for the exploration of temporal patterns and long-term trends, adding a layer of depth to our understanding of the "Daniel dilemma." Throughout these analyses, we maintained a keen eye for any unexpected patterns or anomalies, all while being mindful not to "break" the integrity of the statistical inferences with any "forceful" interpretations.

In summary, the methodology employed in this study is a testament to our commitment to blending meticulous statistical analyses with a touch of light-hearted humor. Our efforts to uncover the potential correlation between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada exemplify our dedication to innovative research methodologies, proving that even in the most unexpected of subjects, statistical inquiry can hold both profundity and amusement.

I must say, this research has truly been a "break-in" experience, although not in the criminal sense!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9696047, r-squared of 0.9401334, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"

Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The phenomenon of nomenclature and its potential influence on human behavior has long intrigued scholars and laypeople alike. Much like a lighthearted detective navigating through a sea of data, we embark on an investigation that combines statistical analyses with wit, humor, and just a touch of dad jokes. As we dive into the whirlpool of the "Daniel dilemma," our aim is to uncover the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in the state of Nevada.
The correlation between the name Daniel and burglary rates in Nevada sparked our curiosity and led to the inception of this unusual yet captivating study. It is truly a "breaking" discovery, as our initial investigations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9696047, with a p-value lower than the Nevada heat in the summertime. This correlation holds significant statistical weight and prompts an "arresting" inquiry into the potential influences of nomenclature on criminal activities. Speaking of criminal activities, did you hear about the thief who stole a calendar? He got twelve months!
Our journey into the realm of statistics and nomenclature not only yielded surprising results but also led us to ponder philosophical questions that seemed inconceivable at the outset of this study. We were compelled to contemplate whether the popularity of the name Daniel influences the frequency of burglary incidents or if it's merely a serendipitous correlation. As we navigate through these name-related musings, we couldn't help but wonder, "Is this simply a case of 'breaking and entering,' or are we unraveling the mysteries of the 'name game'?" We can't help but entertain the possibility that the name Daniel might hold an unforeseen key to understanding criminal behavior. This line of inquiry opens the door to a trove of peculiar possibilities at the crossroads of nomenclature and crime, leaving us treading humorously in uncharted territory.
In conclusion, as we present the findings of our research, we hope to both enlighten and entertain. The "Daniel dilemma" not only unveils a striking correlation but also tickles the funny bone of name-related criminologists. With this study, we hope to encourage further investigations, perhaps prompting a wry grin or a hearty laugh, and proving that there's always room for a good jest, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient, calculated to be 0.9696047, indicates a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables over the period from 1985 to 2022. With an r-squared value of 0.9401334, this correlation explains approximately 94% of the variation in burglary rates as a function of the popularity of the name Daniel. Proving once again that statistics can indeed be quite arresting!

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of the correlation. In other words, the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between the prevalence of the name Daniel and burglary incidents purely due to chance is not just statistically improbable, it's practically "robbery"!

As Figure 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases the strikingly linear trend between the frequency of the name Daniel and reported burglaries in Nevada. The data points align themselves so well that it seems as if they were attempting their own "break-in" towards a correlation.

The statistical evidence suggests that there is indeed a noteworthy connection between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. Therefore, it's not just a coincidence; it's a "Daniel-icious" occurrence that beckons further investigation into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and criminal activities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"

Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the relationship between nomenclature and criminal activity has been a subject of scholarly investigation for decades. Smith and Doe (2008) laid the groundwork for this area of inquiry by examining the potential psychological and sociological impacts of names on individual behavior. Jones (2015) expanded upon this foundation, delving into the influence of nomenclature on criminal proclivity within specific geographical regions. However, our study marks a distinct departure from previous research efforts, as we embark on a statistical investigation with a dash of levity and a penchant for puns to unravel the captivating "Daniel dilemma." It's a criminal investigation of names that could only be described as "arrestingly" comical.
The statistical findings of our research reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9696047, with a p-value lower than the bass tones of a dad's "Dad joke." This statistical relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada defies conventional wisdom and nudges the boundaries of nomenclatural influence on criminal activities. It's a correlation so strong, it could probably unlock a joke about breaking and entering.
On a more serious note, this correlation raises thought-provoking queries about the potential mechanisms underpinning the connection between the name Daniel and burglaries in Nevada. Are individuals bearing the name Daniel more predisposed to unlawful activities, or does the popularity of this name simply coincide with increased propensity for criminal behavior in Nevada? The line between statistical causation and mere correlation becomes humorously blurred as we ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" It's a real head-scratcher, much like trying to unravel the plot of a mystery novel with the protagonist named Daniel, whose only crime is stealing hearts and possibly a pizza or two.
Moreover, the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activities beckons us to consider the broader implications of these findings. It's as tantalizingly perplexing as an Agatha Christie novel, with its web of character names hinting at hidden identities and ulterior motives. Do our findings indicate a genuine influence of names on criminal proclivities, or are we merely entangled in a web of coincidences? As we navigate through this name-related maze, we can't help but feel like detectives solving a perplexing case that is both fascinating and undeniably humorous.
In light of these captivating findings, our study not only offers a statistical elucidation of the "Daniel dilemma" but also provokes a few chuckles along the investigative journey. We hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating relationship between nomenclature and criminal behavior, all while amusing readers and ensuring that statistical inquiry doesn't have to be devoid of entertainment. After all, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry, there's always room for a good jest.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient, calculated to be 0.9696047, indicates a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables over the period from 1985 to 2022. With an r-squared value of 0.9401334, this correlation explains approximately 94% of the variation in burglary rates as a function of the popularity of the name Daniel. Proving once again that statistics can indeed be quite arresting!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of the correlation. In other words, the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between the prevalence of the name Daniel and burglary incidents purely due to chance is not just statistically improbable, it's practically "robbery"!
As Figure 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases the strikingly linear trend between the frequency of the name Daniel and reported burglaries in Nevada. The data points align themselves so well that it seems as if they were attempting their own "break-in" towards a correlation.
The statistical evidence suggests that there is indeed a noteworthy connection between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. Therefore, it's not just a coincidence; it's a "Daniel-icious" occurrence that beckons further investigation into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and criminal activities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our analysis provide robust support for the previously hypothesized relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada. Our study has revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient, firmly cementing the evidence of a strong positive association between these variables. This finding confirms and extends the work of Smith and Doe (2008) and Jones (2015), providing robust statistical evidence for the influence of nomenclature on criminal behavior. It's a statistical revelation so arresting, it might as well be caught in the act!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential mechanisms underlying this relationship. It might seem as though the name Daniel holds some sort of mysterious power over criminal activities, like a detective whose main superpower is making puns. However, it is essential to exercise caution in interpreting this correlation as causation, despite the temptation to amusingly attribute criminal motives to individuals based solely on their name. Our study adds weight to the argument that there might be more to a name than meets the eye, much like trying to discern the punchline of a dad joke.

The provocative nature of our research underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay between nomenclature and criminal activities. This engrossing relationship can't be explained away as a mere coincidence. It beckons for in-depth exploration, akin to unraveling the complexities of a whodunit novel, albeit with a touch of statistical rigor and a sprinkling of levity. Ultimately, it showcases the delightful and unexpected interplay between serious statistical inquiry and the levity of humorous insight, proving that even in scholarly pursuits, wit can find its place.

In conclusion, our study not only adds a compelling layer to the literature on nomenclature and criminal behavior but also injects a bit of humor into the rigorous realm of statistical research. Like a well-timed dad joke, our findings offer an unexpected twist to the academic landscape, reminding us that statistical inquiry doesn't have to be devoid of amusement. After all, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry, there's always room for a good jest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Daniel and Burglaries in Nevada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"

Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The phenomenon of nomenclature and its potential influence on human behavior has long intrigued scholars and laypeople alike. Much like a lighthearted detective navigating through a sea of data, we embark on an investigation that combines statistical analyses with wit, humor, and just a touch of dad jokes. As we dive into the whirlpool of the "Daniel dilemma," our aim is to uncover the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in the state of Nevada.
The correlation between the name Daniel and burglary rates in Nevada sparked our curiosity and led to the inception of this unusual yet captivating study. It is truly a "breaking" discovery, as our initial investigations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9696047, with a p-value lower than the Nevada heat in the summertime. This correlation holds significant statistical weight and prompts an "arresting" inquiry into the potential influences of nomenclature on criminal activities. Speaking of criminal activities, did you hear about the thief who stole a calendar? He got twelve months!
Our journey into the realm of statistics and nomenclature not only yielded surprising results but also led us to ponder philosophical questions that seemed inconceivable at the outset of this study. We were compelled to contemplate whether the popularity of the name Daniel influences the frequency of burglary incidents or if it's merely a serendipitous correlation. As we navigate through these name-related musings, we couldn't help but wonder, "Is this simply a case of 'breaking and entering,' or are we unraveling the mysteries of the 'name game'?" We can't help but entertain the possibility that the name Daniel might hold an unforeseen key to understanding criminal behavior. This line of inquiry opens the door to a trove of peculiar possibilities at the crossroads of nomenclature and crime, leaving us treading humorously in uncharted territory.
In conclusion, as we present the findings of our research, we hope to both enlighten and entertain. The "Daniel dilemma" not only unveils a striking correlation but also tickles the funny bone of name-related criminologists. With this study, we hope to encourage further investigations, perhaps prompting a wry grin or a hearty laugh, and proving that there's always room for a good jest, even in the serious pursuit of statistical inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient, calculated to be 0.9696047, indicates a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables over the period from 1985 to 2022. With an r-squared value of 0.9401334, this correlation explains approximately 94% of the variation in burglary rates as a function of the popularity of the name Daniel. Proving once again that statistics can indeed be quite arresting!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of the correlation. In other words, the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between the prevalence of the name Daniel and burglary incidents purely due to chance is not just statistically improbable, it's practically "robbery"!
As Figure 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases the strikingly linear trend between the frequency of the name Daniel and reported burglaries in Nevada. The data points align themselves so well that it seems as if they were attempting their own "break-in" towards a correlation.
The statistical evidence suggests that there is indeed a noteworthy connection between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. Therefore, it's not just a coincidence; it's a "Daniel-icious" occurrence that beckons further investigation into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and criminal activities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In unraveling the mysterious connection between the name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada, our statistical analysis has disclosed a remarkably strong correlation, leaving us all exclaiming, "Daniel, this is quite a revelation!" The findings of our investigation point to a compelling relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries, suggesting that there's more to this "name game" than meets the eye. It seems that the name Daniel may have a fascinating influence on criminal activities, akin to an unexpected twist in a detective novel.

Our research not only sheds light on this captivating "Daniel dilemma," but also manages to sneak in a few dad jokes along the way. Speaking of which, did you hear about the burglar who fell into wet cement? He became a hardened criminal! Now, for a conclusion as "arresting" as our findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area; it's safe to say that this "Daniel dilemma" has been cracked wide open.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Sociological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Name-Related Socioeconomic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Daniel Dilemma: A Statistical Study of the Relationship between the Name Daniel and Burglary Incidents in Nevada with an abstract of In this paper, we tackle the puzzling and captivating phenomenon of the name Daniel and its potential connection to burglary rates in the state of Nevada. We bring to light an investigation that combines statistical analyses with a touch of humor, much like a detective with a keen eye for dad jokes.
Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we traced the trajectory of the name Daniel alongside reported burglary incidents over the period of 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient obtained from our analysis revealed a striking 0.9696047, with p < 0.01, between the popularity of the name Daniel and burglary occurrences in Nevada. This correlation truly "breaks" new ground in the field of name-related criminology, as we uncover a statistically significant association that may leave one saying, "Daniel, the evidence is compelling!"
Our findings not only suggest a strong relationship between the popularity of the first name Daniel and burglary incidents in Nevada but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of names on behavioral patterns. As we delve into the complexities of this correlation, we naturally ponder, "Is it just a case of 'breaking and entering' or is there more to the 'name game'?" This study provocatively challenges conventional wisdom and opens the door to a broad spectrum of research exploring the intersection of nomenclature and criminal activity.
In conclusion, this research sheds light on a captivating conundrum, unearthing a fascinating relationship between the name Daniel and the occurrence of burglaries in Nevada. With this study, we hope to inspire further inquiries into the captivating "Daniel dilemma" and perhaps prompt a few chuckles along the way, proving that even in academic pursuits, a good jest is always in good taste.

ChatGPT:

name Daniel, burglary incidents, Nevada, statistical study, correlation coefficient, US Social Security Administration, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, criminology, behavioral patterns, nomenclature, criminal activity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Daniel
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Daniel
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Daniel

Burglaries in Nevada
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in Nevada
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglaries in Nevada

Correlation r = 0.9696047 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9401334 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Burglaries in Nevada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Daniel) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-23. 0.0000000000000000000000132672
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 1.3E-21% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 75,373,854,317,414,369,460,224 random variables You don't actually need 75 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Daniel (Babies born)3885836865361343499635199339753109329303288182819126830251962402823235227662239721072213752111621076202772012320288190681759715886153211431714340139741355213008117521129310587951991319058
Burglaries in Nevada (Burglary rate)1849.61603.91629.41544.91404.81367.41403.91289.212451354.51322.51220.11310.41137.6973.5877.1844.3874.3979.3992973.4997.9971932.8836.7824.1747.9803.1825.6772.4775.4640.2674.5586505.7368.8406.3436.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([38858,36865,36134,34996,35199,33975,31093,29303,28818,28191,26830,25196,24028,23235,22766,22397,21072,21375,21116,21076,20277,20123,20288,19068,17597,15886,15321,14317,14340,13974,13552,13008,11752,11293,10587,9519,9131,9058,])
array_2 = np.array([1849.6,1603.9,1629.4,1544.9,1404.8,1367.4,1403.9,1289.2,1245,1354.5,1322.5,1220.1,1310.4,1137.6,973.5,877.1,844.3,874.3,979.3,992,973.4,997.9,971,932.8,836.7,824.1,747.9,803.1,825.6,772.4,775.4,640.2,674.5,586,505.7,368.8,406.3,436.1,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Daniel"
array_2_name = "Burglaries in Nevada"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3901 · Black Variable ID: 1983 · Red Variable ID: 20105
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0