about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,868 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is British Open Golf Championship winner's score and the second variable is Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks.  The chart goes from 1998 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps the higher golf scores were a sign from above that the Diamondbacks needed a win to 'putt' them in a better position in the baseball standings. It's like the old saying goes, 'the higher the British Open Golf Championship winner's score, the greater the Diamondbacks' triumphs are sure.' Just 'fore' fuelling their motivation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] of a golfer from England proudly lifting the British Open trophy, standing on a lush green golf course. In the background, the scoreboard of an Arizona Diamondbacks game displays a celebratory win, with cheering fans visible in the stands. The golfer's joyous expression and the dynamic atmosphere convey a sense of triumph and achievement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Voxel art Cutsy art illustration Sci-fi fantacy An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A golfer from England holds up the British Open trophy with a triumphant smile, as the Arizona Diamondbacks celebrate a win on the scoreboard in the background. The golfer's winning score is displayed right next to the number of wins for the Diamondbacks, creating a vibrant scene of victory.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: A golfer from England holds up the British Open trophy with a triumphant smile, as the Arizona Diamondbacks celebrate a win on the scoreboard in the background. The golfer's winning score is displayed right next to the number of wins for the Diamondbacks, creating a vibrant scene of victory. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] of a golfer from England proudly lifting the British Open trophy, standing on a lush green golf course. In the background, the scoreboard of an Arizona Diamondbacks game displays a celebratory win, with cheering fans visible in the stands. The golfer's joyous expression and the dynamic atmosphere convey a sense of triumph and achievement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in British Open Golf Championship winner's score positively influenced Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins

The International Journal of Sports Analytics and Performance Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01 for 1998 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Golf and baseball may seem like distant relatives, with one being played on meticulously manicured greens and the other on dusty diamond-shaped fields. Yet, our research has found an unexpected tie between these two seemingly disparate sports – the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks.

As the famous golfer once said after a good round, "I'm on cloud 9...ironically, because of all the bogeys." Likewise, we found ourselves on cloud 9 when we stumbled upon this intriguing relationship during our analysis of two decades' worth of data. While some may think this connection is as far-fetched as a golfer's drive onto the fairway 300 yards away, we assure you that our findings are as solid as a well-executed putt.

The main aim of this study was to tee up the question: Is there a significant association between the victorious score of the British Open Golf Championship winner and the Wins accrued by the Arizona Diamondbacks in the same year? It might seem like quite the odd couple, but as Mark Twain supposedly said, "Golf is a good walk spoiled, but Baseball is a good run we often cherish...unless your team is losing. Then it's just a good run around." We aimed to bring a little sunshine onto this 'odd couple' and see if there is a correlation that gets us shouting, "Diamondbacks, swing for the fences!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Golf and baseball may seem like distant relatives, with one being played on meticulously manicured greens and the other on dusty diamond-shaped fields. Yet, our research has found an unexpected tie between these two seemingly disparate sports – the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks.
As the famous golfer once said after a good round, "I'm on cloud 9...ironically, because of all the bogeys." Likewise, we found ourselves on cloud 9 when we stumbled upon this intriguing relationship during our analysis of two decades' worth of data. While some may think this connection is as far-fetched as a golfer's drive onto the fairway 300 yards away, we assure you that our findings are as solid as a well-executed putt.
The main aim of this study was to tee up the question: Is there a significant association between the victorious score of the British Open Golf Championship winner and the Wins accrued by the Arizona Diamondbacks in the same year? It might seem like quite the odd couple, but as Mark Twain supposedly said, "Golf is a good walk spoiled, but Baseball is a good run we often cherish...unless your team is losing. Then it's just a good run around." We aimed to bring a little sunshine onto this 'odd couple' and see if there is a correlation that gets us shouting, "Diamondbacks, swing for the fences!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature review begins with an examination of the influential work of Smith and Doe (2005), who conducted a comprehensive analysis of golf championship scores and their potential impact on baseball performance. Their study unearthed correlations between the two seemingly unrelated sports, paving the way for further investigation into this unexplored realm of sports analytics. As we navigated through the dense foliage of existing research, we stumbled upon Jones' (2010) seminal work, which further substantiated the connection between golf scores and baseball wins, demonstrating the potential for a significant relationship.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the golfer who was hit by a baseball? It was a real fairway to remember!

Turning the page to non-fiction literature, "Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game" by Michael Lewis offers insights into the unconventional strategies employed by the Oakland Athletics baseball team to achieve success in the Major League Baseball. While the book predominantly focuses on baseball analytics, it sparked our curiosity regarding the potential impact of less conventional factors, such as golf championship scores, on baseball performance. In a similar vein, "The Kingdom of Shivas Irons" by Michael Murphy delves into the metaphysical aspects of golf, which piqued our interest in exploring the mystical connections between the worlds of golf and baseball.

Dad Joke: What do you call a group of golfers with an exceptional sense of humor? The Laugh-a-Links!

Transitioning into the realm of fiction, the literary works of Haruki Murakami, notably "Kafka on the Shore," provided an unconventional perspective on the intertwining of seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the novel's themes may not overtly relate to sports, its narrative complexity encouraged us to embrace a multidimensional approach in our exploration of the relationship between British Open Golf Championship scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' wins. Additionally, the whimsical world portrayed in Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" prompted us to perceive the potential link between these sports as a fantastical journey, complete with unexpected twists and turns.

Dad Joke: Why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one!

As we ventured further into our literature review, we encountered a myriad of unconventional sources that contributed to our comprehensive analysis. Indeed, the back labels of shampoo bottles, with their varied promises of "extra volume" and "rejuvenating strength," inadvertently sparked our creative thinking and inspired us to approach this study with a light-hearted and open-minded mindset. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, one must be willing to explore unorthodox avenues, even if it means seeking wisdom in the most unexpected of places.

Dad Joke: I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough. Now I'm just trying to rake in the parmesan!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com . You used data from 1998 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Golf and baseball may seem like distant relatives, with one being played on meticulously manicured greens and the other on dusty diamond-shaped fields. Yet, our research has found an unexpected tie between these two seemingly disparate sports – the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks.
As the famous golfer once said after a good round, "I'm on cloud 9...ironically, because of all the bogeys." Likewise, we found ourselves on cloud 9 when we stumbled upon this intriguing relationship during our analysis of two decades' worth of data. While some may think this connection is as far-fetched as a golfer's drive onto the fairway 300 yards away, we assure you that our findings are as solid as a well-executed putt.
The main aim of this study was to tee up the question: Is there a significant association between the victorious score of the British Open Golf Championship winner and the Wins accrued by the Arizona Diamondbacks in the same year? It might seem like quite the odd couple, but as Mark Twain supposedly said, "Golf is a good walk spoiled, but Baseball is a good run we often cherish...unless your team is losing. Then it's just a good run around." We aimed to bring a little sunshine onto this 'odd couple' and see if there is a correlation that gets us shouting, "Diamondbacks, swing for the fences!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle this "out of left field" connection between golf and baseball, we employed a mixed-method approach that was as unconventional as a pitcher who can drive a golf ball 300 yards. Our first step involved combing through the virtual troves of Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com, sourcing data from 1998 to 2022. We use this data to construct a dataset that could make any "stat-head" do a double-take.

Once the data was in hand, our approach veered into the unexpected - we employed a method we affectionately dubbed the "Mulligan Method." At the start of each analysis, we pretended the data just didn't sit right; it needed a "Mulligan," a do-over of sorts. We swapped out individual data points with randomly generated numbers and re-ran our analyses to see if our findings held up. If our results remained significant even with this simulated data, well, then we knew we were on to something bigger than a double bogey.

To refine our findings, we integrated a technique we labeled "The Grand Slam." We extracted pivotal data points, hit them out of the park, and looked at their effect on the overall correlation. This method allowed us to uncover the "homerun" connections within our dataset, steering us toward the most influential factors that drove the correlation between British Open Golf Championship scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' wins.

In the final step of our methodology, we applied a statistical analysis known as "The Bunker Buster." This involved using advanced regression models to delve deep into the nuances of our data, as we tried to "blast" through any potential confounding factors and uncover the pure relationship between the golf scores and baseball wins. As we navigated through this statistical "sand trap," we meticulously ensured our model was as air-tight as the lid on a new can of golf balls before we settled on our final results.

In this study, our "focus" was not just on swings and hits but on the surprising dance between these two seemingly disconnected sports. Just like a golfer aiming for the fairway from the tee, our methods aimed to target the heart of this unlikely partnership, uncovering its significance in a way that had us exclaiming, "Arizona Diamondbacks, you hit that one out of the park!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com .

For the time period 1998 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6701397, r-squared of 0.4490872, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Golf and baseball may seem like distant relatives, with one being played on meticulously manicured greens and the other on dusty diamond-shaped fields. Yet, our research has found an unexpected tie between these two seemingly disparate sports – the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks.
As the famous golfer once said after a good round, "I'm on cloud 9...ironically, because of all the bogeys." Likewise, we found ourselves on cloud 9 when we stumbled upon this intriguing relationship during our analysis of two decades' worth of data. While some may think this connection is as far-fetched as a golfer's drive onto the fairway 300 yards away, we assure you that our findings are as solid as a well-executed putt.
The main aim of this study was to tee up the question: Is there a significant association between the victorious score of the British Open Golf Championship winner and the Wins accrued by the Arizona Diamondbacks in the same year? It might seem like quite the odd couple, but as Mark Twain supposedly said, "Golf is a good walk spoiled, but Baseball is a good run we often cherish...unless your team is losing. Then it's just a good run around." We aimed to bring a little sunshine onto this 'odd couple' and see if there is a correlation that gets us shouting, "Diamondbacks, swing for the fences!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks from 1998 to 2022 uncovered a surprising level of correlation. We found a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397, indicating a moderate to strong positive relationship between the variables. In other words, as the golf scores of the British Open winners increased (indicating a better performance), there was a corresponding increase in the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. It seems that hitting a hole-in-one on the golf course might just translate to a home run on the baseball field. Talk about getting a "swing" of things!

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated at 0.4490872, suggesting that approximately 45% of the variation in the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks can be explained by the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners. This finding underscores the importance of golf scores as a potentially influential factor in the performance of the Diamondbacks on the diamond. Who would have thought that a Birdie in Scotland could mean a good day at the ballpark in Arizona?

The statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed by the p-value (p < 0.01), indicating that the observed relationship between the two variables is unlikely to occur by chance. This result provides strong evidence to support the notion that there is a tangible link between the success of golfers in the British Open and the Wins of the Arizona Diamondbacks. It's as if every swing of the golf club has a hidden impact on the Diamondbacks' swings at the plate. The idea that a perfect drive in golf can lead to a perfect game in baseball may seem like a stretch, but our data spoke for itself.

As seen in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the clear positive correlation between the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The points on the plot exhibit a distinct upward trend, reinforcing the quantitative findings. It's as if every good shot at St. Andrews or Royal Birkdale sends positive vibes all the way to Chase Field!

In conclusion, our research has revealed a remarkable relationship between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The evidence points to a statistically significant correlation, suggesting that a great day on the golf course may indeed bode well for the Diamondbacks on the baseball field. It seems that when it comes to success in sports, the ball is truly in the court – or should I say, on the green?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature review begins with an examination of the influential work of Smith and Doe (2005), who conducted a comprehensive analysis of golf championship scores and their potential impact on baseball performance. Their study unearthed correlations between the two seemingly unrelated sports, paving the way for further investigation into this unexplored realm of sports analytics. As we navigated through the dense foliage of existing research, we stumbled upon Jones' (2010) seminal work, which further substantiated the connection between golf scores and baseball wins, demonstrating the potential for a significant relationship.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the golfer who was hit by a baseball? It was a real fairway to remember!
Turning the page to non-fiction literature, "Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game" by Michael Lewis offers insights into the unconventional strategies employed by the Oakland Athletics baseball team to achieve success in the Major League Baseball. While the book predominantly focuses on baseball analytics, it sparked our curiosity regarding the potential impact of less conventional factors, such as golf championship scores, on baseball performance. In a similar vein, "The Kingdom of Shivas Irons" by Michael Murphy delves into the metaphysical aspects of golf, which piqued our interest in exploring the mystical connections between the worlds of golf and baseball.
Dad Joke: What do you call a group of golfers with an exceptional sense of humor? The Laugh-a-Links!
Transitioning into the realm of fiction, the literary works of Haruki Murakami, notably "Kafka on the Shore," provided an unconventional perspective on the intertwining of seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the novel's themes may not overtly relate to sports, its narrative complexity encouraged us to embrace a multidimensional approach in our exploration of the relationship between British Open Golf Championship scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' wins. Additionally, the whimsical world portrayed in Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" prompted us to perceive the potential link between these sports as a fantastical journey, complete with unexpected twists and turns.
Dad Joke: Why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one!
As we ventured further into our literature review, we encountered a myriad of unconventional sources that contributed to our comprehensive analysis. Indeed, the back labels of shampoo bottles, with their varied promises of "extra volume" and "rejuvenating strength," inadvertently sparked our creative thinking and inspired us to approach this study with a light-hearted and open-minded mindset. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, one must be willing to explore unorthodox avenues, even if it means seeking wisdom in the most unexpected of places.
Dad Joke: I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough. Now I'm just trying to rake in the parmesan!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks from 1998 to 2022 uncovered a surprising level of correlation. We found a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397, indicating a moderate to strong positive relationship between the variables. In other words, as the golf scores of the British Open winners increased (indicating a better performance), there was a corresponding increase in the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. It seems that hitting a hole-in-one on the golf course might just translate to a home run on the baseball field. Talk about getting a "swing" of things!
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated at 0.4490872, suggesting that approximately 45% of the variation in the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks can be explained by the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners. This finding underscores the importance of golf scores as a potentially influential factor in the performance of the Diamondbacks on the diamond. Who would have thought that a Birdie in Scotland could mean a good day at the ballpark in Arizona?
The statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed by the p-value (p < 0.01), indicating that the observed relationship between the two variables is unlikely to occur by chance. This result provides strong evidence to support the notion that there is a tangible link between the success of golfers in the British Open and the Wins of the Arizona Diamondbacks. It's as if every swing of the golf club has a hidden impact on the Diamondbacks' swings at the plate. The idea that a perfect drive in golf can lead to a perfect game in baseball may seem like a stretch, but our data spoke for itself.
As seen in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the clear positive correlation between the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The points on the plot exhibit a distinct upward trend, reinforcing the quantitative findings. It's as if every good shot at St. Andrews or Royal Birkdale sends positive vibes all the way to Chase Field!
In conclusion, our research has revealed a remarkable relationship between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The evidence points to a statistically significant correlation, suggesting that a great day on the golf course may indeed bode well for the Diamondbacks on the baseball field. It seems that when it comes to success in sports, the ball is truly in the court – or should I say, on the green?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study bring a new dimension to the intersection of seemingly unrelated sports, echoing the "hole"-some insights of previous research. The significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 aligns with the pioneering work of Smith and Doe, emphasizing the substantial relationship between the performance of golf champions at the British Open and the triumphs of the Arizona Diamondbacks. This "fairway" of results not only supports but broadens the existing evidence, solidifying the notion that golf scores could indeed leave a "hole"some impact on baseball successes.

Our data reveal a robust positive relationship, akin to a well-executed drive off the tee, driving home the point that the prowess of British Open Golf Championship winners may translate into wins for the Diamondbacks. It's as if hitting a "birdie" in Scotland sends a "batter"ing storm of wins for the Arizona-based baseball team. This unexpected connection between British Open Golf and Diamondbacks' wins may leave sports enthusiasts exclaiming, "It's a grand slam of a correlation!"

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4490872 echoes the sentiments of previous researchers, highlighting the substantial impact of golf scores on the variation in the Diamondbacks' wins. These results resonate with the thought-provoking insights of Jones (2010), enhancing our understanding of the interplay between golf championship scores and baseball triumphs. It's almost as if a well-aimed golf swing has the power to "drive" the Diamondbacks' performance on the field.

The statistical significance of the correlation, supported by the p-value of p < 0.01, reinforces the pioneering notions put forth by Smith and Doe. This underscores the credibility of the observed relationship, suggesting that it's not just "by chance" that a golfer's success could lead to victory on the baseball diamond. It's almost as if every stroke on the golf course has an echo that "swings" through the Arizona sports scene.

In sync with these findings, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation between the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners and the wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The graphic representation eloquently echoes the statistical evidence, painting a "hole"-some picture of the unexpected bond between these diverse sports. It's as if every stroke of the golf club propels the Diamondbacks towards an outfield filled with wins.

In conclusion, our study not only solidifies the established link between golf scores and baseball victories but also expands the horizon of sports analytics, demonstrating that a good day on the golf course could indeed lead to a towering home run at the ballpark. This "tee"-rific connection may revolutionize the way we perceive sports performance. After all, when it comes to sports success, who knew that the swing of a golf club could hold the "key" to a baseball team's accomplishments?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between British Open Golf Championship winner's score and Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Golf and baseball may seem like distant relatives, with one being played on meticulously manicured greens and the other on dusty diamond-shaped fields. Yet, our research has found an unexpected tie between these two seemingly disparate sports – the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks.
As the famous golfer once said after a good round, "I'm on cloud 9...ironically, because of all the bogeys." Likewise, we found ourselves on cloud 9 when we stumbled upon this intriguing relationship during our analysis of two decades' worth of data. While some may think this connection is as far-fetched as a golfer's drive onto the fairway 300 yards away, we assure you that our findings are as solid as a well-executed putt.
The main aim of this study was to tee up the question: Is there a significant association between the victorious score of the British Open Golf Championship winner and the Wins accrued by the Arizona Diamondbacks in the same year? It might seem like quite the odd couple, but as Mark Twain supposedly said, "Golf is a good walk spoiled, but Baseball is a good run we often cherish...unless your team is losing. Then it's just a good run around." We aimed to bring a little sunshine onto this 'odd couple' and see if there is a correlation that gets us shouting, "Diamondbacks, swing for the fences!"

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks from 1998 to 2022 uncovered a surprising level of correlation. We found a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397, indicating a moderate to strong positive relationship between the variables. In other words, as the golf scores of the British Open winners increased (indicating a better performance), there was a corresponding increase in the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. It seems that hitting a hole-in-one on the golf course might just translate to a home run on the baseball field. Talk about getting a "swing" of things!
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated at 0.4490872, suggesting that approximately 45% of the variation in the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks can be explained by the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners. This finding underscores the importance of golf scores as a potentially influential factor in the performance of the Diamondbacks on the diamond. Who would have thought that a Birdie in Scotland could mean a good day at the ballpark in Arizona?
The statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed by the p-value (p < 0.01), indicating that the observed relationship between the two variables is unlikely to occur by chance. This result provides strong evidence to support the notion that there is a tangible link between the success of golfers in the British Open and the Wins of the Arizona Diamondbacks. It's as if every swing of the golf club has a hidden impact on the Diamondbacks' swings at the plate. The idea that a perfect drive in golf can lead to a perfect game in baseball may seem like a stretch, but our data spoke for itself.
As seen in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the clear positive correlation between the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The points on the plot exhibit a distinct upward trend, reinforcing the quantitative findings. It's as if every good shot at St. Andrews or Royal Birkdale sends positive vibes all the way to Chase Field!
In conclusion, our research has revealed a remarkable relationship between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The evidence points to a statistically significant correlation, suggesting that a great day on the golf course may indeed bode well for the Diamondbacks on the baseball field. It seems that when it comes to success in sports, the ball is truly in the court – or should I say, on the green?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has teed up an unexpected connection between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 truly drives home the point that a good day on the golf course may just translate to a grand slam for the Diamondbacks on the baseball field. It's almost as if hitting a hole-in-one in Scotland sends a home run over the fence in Arizona - now that's what I call a global game strategy!

Our findings, represented by the correlation coefficient and the p-value of less than 0.01, suggest that this relationship is no mere fluke – it's as real as a well-timed swing. The coefficient of determination of 0.4490872 emphasizes that nearly half of the variation in the Diamondbacks' Wins can be attributed to the scores of the British Open Golf Championship winners. Put simply, it seems that a good golf swing might just have a hand in the Diamondbacks' hitting those home runs and making those epic catches. Who would have thought that a slice on the green could lead to a slice of luck on the diamond?

In light of these findings, it is clear that future research in this area should be deemed unnecessary. We have putted this topic to rest and believe that our findings are as firm as the grip on a golf club. It's time to conclude that the relationship between British Open Golf Championship scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins is no longer a fairway into the unknown – it's as clear as a cloudless day on the course.

No more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Sports Analytics and Performance Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cross-Sport Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Swing and Hit: A Tee-rific Connection Between British Open Golf Championship Scores and Arizona Diamondbacks' Wins with an abstract of Golf and baseball may seem as different as a birdie and a double play, but our research delved into their unlikely connection. We analyzed data from Golfstats and Baseball-Reference.com over the span of 1998 to 2022 to uncover the fascinating link between the performance of British Open Golf Championship winners and the successes of the Arizona Diamondbacks on the baseball diamond. Our findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6701397 and p < 0.01, illustrating a strong relationship that may leave you saying, "Fore!-tunately for the Diamondbacks!

ChatGPT:

British Open Golf Championship, Arizona Diamondbacks, golf championship scores, baseball wins, correlation coefficient, Golfstats, Baseball-Reference.com, sports data analysis, sports performance correlation, golf and baseball connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

British Open Golf Championship winner's score
Source: Golfstats
See what else correlates with British Open Golf Championship winner's score

Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks
Detailed data title: The total number of season wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks
Source: Baseball-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks

Correlation r = 0.6701397 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4490872 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 44.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., British Open Golf Championship winner's score) over the 25 years from 1998 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00025. 0.0002473603569249580300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.67 in 0.025% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,043 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 24 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 24 because we have two variables measured over a period of 25 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.37, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
British Open Golf Championship winner's score (Score)2802902692742782832742742702772832782722752732812712732642682762690265268
Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks (Game wins)651008592988451777690827065948181647969938285255274




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([280,290,269,274,278,283,274,274,270,277,283,278,272,275,273,281,271,273,264,268,276,269,0,265,268,])
array_2 = np.array([65,100,85,92,98,84,51,77,76,90,82,70,65,94,81,81,64,79,69,93,82,85,25,52,74,])
array_1_name = "British Open Golf Championship winner's score"
array_2_name = "Wins for the Arizona Diamondbacks"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 1868 · Black Variable ID: 243 · Red Variable ID: 4298
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0