Report an error
Customer satisfaction with Costco correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How cool Technology Connections YouTube video titles are | r=0.91 | 6yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in soybeans in Michigan | r=0.89 | 21yrs | Yes! |
The number of zoologists in Minnesota | r=0.88 | 18yrs | No |
GMO use in soybeans in Ohio | r=0.87 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Occidental Petroleum's stock price (OXY) | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.74 | 22yrs | No |
GDP per capita in Canada | r=0.71 | 12yrs | No |
Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship | r=0.7 | 22yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Chris Pratt appeared in | r=0.63 | 21yrs | No |
Consumption of dry buttermilk products | r=0.58 | 22yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Costco also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)