about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,235 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and the second variable is Customer satisfaction with Costco.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in soybeans increased in Michigan, soy-based products became more abundant and affordable at Costco. This led to a "soy-tisfying" shopping experience, ultimately boosting customer satisfaction. With soy much to choose from, Costco shoppers were on cloud soy-ven. It's safe to say, the soy of customer satisfaction was definitely bean-efiting from the GMO use in Michigan!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image inspired by a Discovery magazine cover, depicting a sun-drenched soybean field in Michigan. The farmer smiles as he surveys genetically modified soybean plants reaching toward the clear blue sky. Next to the field, a bustling Costco store hums with activity as satisfied customers fill their carts with affordable soy products. The scene is filled with the contented murmurs and smiles of shoppers as they effortlessly stick to their grocery budget and find their favorite soy-based products, feeling happy and fulfilled." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation A photo-realistic image A Discovery magazine cover image Hyper-realistic Magic realism
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco, in the following situation: Because GMO soybeans in Michigan have made soy-based products more affordable and abundant, people are more likely to stick to their grocery budget and enjoy their shopping experience at Costco. When customers save money and have easy access to their favorite products, they're bound to feel soy good about their overall shopping experience, leading to an increase in customer satisfaction.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sun-drenched soybean field in Michigan, a farmer smiles as he surveys rows of luscious, genetically modified soybean plants reaching toward the clear blue sky. Nearby, a bustling Costco store hums with activity as satisfied customers fill their carts with affordable soy products. The scene is filled with the contented murmurs and smiles of shoppers as they effortlessly stick to their grocery budget and find their favorite soy-based products, feeling happy and fulfilled.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a sun-drenched soybean field in Michigan, a farmer smiles as he surveys rows of luscious, genetically modified soybean plants reaching toward the clear blue sky. Nearby, a bustling Costco store hums with activity as satisfied customers fill their carts with affordable soy products. The scene is filled with the contented murmurs and smiles of shoppers as they effortlessly stick to their grocery budget and find their favorite soy-based products, feeling happy and fulfilled. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image inspired by a Discovery magazine cover, depicting a sun-drenched soybean field in Michigan. The farmer smiles as he surveys genetically modified soybean plants reaching toward the clear blue sky. Next to the field, a bustling Costco store hums with activity as satisfied customers fill their carts with affordable soy products. The scene is filled with the contented murmurs and smiles of shoppers as they effortlessly stick to their grocery budget and find their favorite soy-based products, feeling happy and fulfilled."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Michigan caused Customer satisfaction with Costco to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan

The Journal of Agricultural Humor and Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.

More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.

More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The ubiquitous usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in modern agriculture has sparked intense debate and investigation into their effects on various aspects of the food supply chain and the wider consumer market. A pertinent but often overlooked aspect of this inquiry is the potential impact of GMO usage in soybean cultivation on retail customer satisfaction. This study endeavors to bridge this gap in the literature by examining the relationship between GMO adoption in soybean production in Michigan and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in the state.

Before diving into the soyful details of our findings, it is important to establish the context and rationale for this investigation. Amidst the proliferation of GMO technology in agriculture, a soybean's journey from the farm to the table has become increasingly intertwined with genetic modification. This intertwining, not unlike a pair of genetically modified vines, raises questions about the potential effects of GMO usage on consumer behavior and preferences that cannot simply be brushed aside like last season's soybean husks.

The decision to focus on Costco's customer satisfaction, in particular, stems from both practical and strategic considerations. Costco, as a major retail player in Michigan, offers ripe opportunities for analyzing consumer behavior and preferences in response to the soyful influence of GMOs. As for the practical consideration, the state of Michigan boasts a robust soybean industry and a significant presence of Costco stores, providing an ideal setting for examining the potential impact of GMO use in soybean cultivation on consumer satisfaction—a topic that has not received the attention it deserves in the academic literature.

Our study is not just about crunching numbers and plucking correlations out of thin air. Rather, it aims to husk the soybeans, if you will, of this complex and intriguing relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on soybean GMO adoption and the delightful ratings from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Costco outlets, we sought to unravel whether there existed a statistically significant connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities.

As we embark on this scholarly excursion through the fields of GMO soybeans and the aisles of Costco, we encourage readers to join us in recognizing that statistical research, much like a good dad joke, can be both informative and entertaining. So grab your statistical tools, put on your retailer hats, and let's dig into the findings of this soy-ful relationship—a correlation that may just make you exclaim, "Soy glad we found this connection!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.

More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The ubiquitous usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in modern agriculture has sparked intense debate and investigation into their effects on various aspects of the food supply chain and the wider consumer market. A pertinent but often overlooked aspect of this inquiry is the potential impact of GMO usage in soybean cultivation on retail customer satisfaction. This study endeavors to bridge this gap in the literature by examining the relationship between GMO adoption in soybean production in Michigan and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in the state.
Before diving into the soyful details of our findings, it is important to establish the context and rationale for this investigation. Amidst the proliferation of GMO technology in agriculture, a soybean's journey from the farm to the table has become increasingly intertwined with genetic modification. This intertwining, not unlike a pair of genetically modified vines, raises questions about the potential effects of GMO usage on consumer behavior and preferences that cannot simply be brushed aside like last season's soybean husks.
The decision to focus on Costco's customer satisfaction, in particular, stems from both practical and strategic considerations. Costco, as a major retail player in Michigan, offers ripe opportunities for analyzing consumer behavior and preferences in response to the soyful influence of GMOs. As for the practical consideration, the state of Michigan boasts a robust soybean industry and a significant presence of Costco stores, providing an ideal setting for examining the potential impact of GMO use in soybean cultivation on consumer satisfaction—a topic that has not received the attention it deserves in the academic literature.
Our study is not just about crunching numbers and plucking correlations out of thin air. Rather, it aims to husk the soybeans, if you will, of this complex and intriguing relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on soybean GMO adoption and the delightful ratings from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Costco outlets, we sought to unravel whether there existed a statistically significant connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this scholarly excursion through the fields of GMO soybeans and the aisles of Costco, we encourage readers to join us in recognizing that statistical research, much like a good dad joke, can be both informative and entertaining. So grab your statistical tools, put on your retailer hats, and let's dig into the findings of this soy-ful relationship—a correlation that may just make you exclaim, "Soy glad we found this connection!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation and its impact on customer satisfaction at retail outlets has been a subject of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. Smith (2016) delves into the ecological and economic implications of GMO soybean cultivation, while Doe (2018) examines consumer attitudes towards GMO products, providing a comprehensive backdrop for our investigation. However, the actual impact of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction at specific retail chains like Costco has largely been overlooked in the existing literature, leaving a gap waiting to be filled.

Turning to texts that delve into the world of soybeans and agricultural practices, "The Quest for Soya" by Jones (2019) offers a comprehensive overview of the historical, socio-economic, and technological aspects of soybean production, providing a nuanced backdrop to the present study. Moreover, "Soybeans: Chemistry, Production, Processing, and Utilization" by Smith (2018) offers invaluable insights into the chemical composition and industrial applications of soybeans, serving as a foundational resource for understanding the soyful world of GMO soybeans.

In a departure from non-fiction, the works of fiction can also offer surprising windows into the world of soybean cultivation and retail dynamics. "The Soybean Chronicles" by John Green tackles the complexities of soybean farming against a coming-of-age backdrop, weaving together themes of love, growth, and agriculture. Furthermore, the timeless classic "Of Soybeans and Men" by Steinbeck captures the pulse of rural life, providing a narrative that reverberates with the echoes of soybean fields and human desires.

In addition to literary contributions, popular media content related to retail dynamics and customer satisfaction have been instrumental in shaping our understanding. Watching episodes of "Superstore" offers an immersive glimpse into the everyday workings of a retail giant, shedding light on the intricacies of customer preferences and experiences within a retail setting.

Now, let's plant the seeds of statistical analysis and customer satisfaction as we explore the fertile ground shared by GMO soybeans and the retail world – a soil that may just yield some unexpected findings, much like stumbling upon a rare soybean-shaped pearl.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index . You used data from 2000 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.

More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The ubiquitous usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in modern agriculture has sparked intense debate and investigation into their effects on various aspects of the food supply chain and the wider consumer market. A pertinent but often overlooked aspect of this inquiry is the potential impact of GMO usage in soybean cultivation on retail customer satisfaction. This study endeavors to bridge this gap in the literature by examining the relationship between GMO adoption in soybean production in Michigan and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in the state.
Before diving into the soyful details of our findings, it is important to establish the context and rationale for this investigation. Amidst the proliferation of GMO technology in agriculture, a soybean's journey from the farm to the table has become increasingly intertwined with genetic modification. This intertwining, not unlike a pair of genetically modified vines, raises questions about the potential effects of GMO usage on consumer behavior and preferences that cannot simply be brushed aside like last season's soybean husks.
The decision to focus on Costco's customer satisfaction, in particular, stems from both practical and strategic considerations. Costco, as a major retail player in Michigan, offers ripe opportunities for analyzing consumer behavior and preferences in response to the soyful influence of GMOs. As for the practical consideration, the state of Michigan boasts a robust soybean industry and a significant presence of Costco stores, providing an ideal setting for examining the potential impact of GMO use in soybean cultivation on consumer satisfaction—a topic that has not received the attention it deserves in the academic literature.
Our study is not just about crunching numbers and plucking correlations out of thin air. Rather, it aims to husk the soybeans, if you will, of this complex and intriguing relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on soybean GMO adoption and the delightful ratings from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Costco outlets, we sought to unravel whether there existed a statistically significant connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this scholarly excursion through the fields of GMO soybeans and the aisles of Costco, we encourage readers to join us in recognizing that statistical research, much like a good dad joke, can be both informative and entertaining. So grab your statistical tools, put on your retailer hats, and let's dig into the findings of this soy-ful relationship—a correlation that may just make you exclaim, "Soy glad we found this connection!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To address the soy-ful relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction at Costco, our research team employed a combination of innovative data collection and sophisticated statistical analyses. First, we gathered comprehensive data on soybean cultivation and GMO adoption in Michigan from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This involved meticulously sifting through acres of digital fields, akin to a virtual soybean harvest.

Next, our team scrutinized the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) ratings for Costco outlets in Michigan from 2000 to 2020. This entailed traversing the digital aisles of customer satisfaction records, reminiscent of a statistical shopping spree.

With these robust datasets at our disposal, we unleashed an array of statistical techniques to unravel the intriguing correlation between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction. We applied multiple regression analysis to ascertain the extent to which the adoption of GMOs in soybean cultivation predicts customer satisfaction at Costco. This involved navigating through the tangled vines of correlation and causation, not unlike a geneticist traversing a complex genome.

Furthermore, we enlisted the sophisticated tools of time series analysis to delve into the temporal dynamics of this relationship. This method allowed us to track the ebb and flow of customer satisfaction in response to the soyful influence of GMO soybeans across the studied period. It's safe to say that our statistical methods took us on a soybean-laden roller-coaster ride through the time-space continuum, not unlike a thrilling genetic adventure.

In addition to these analyses, we conducted a robust sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings. This involved stress-testing our model against various scenarios and hypothetical alterations, much like a cautious soybean farmer preparing for unexpected weather fluctuations.

Adhering to best practices in statistical research, we diligently checked for multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and potential outliers in the data, ensuring that our statistical crop was free from contaminating factors. We were determined to plow through any statistical hindrances, not unlike a diligent farmer tilling the fields for a bountiful harvest.

In summary, our research journey involved a comprehensive and meticulous exploration of the relationship between GMO soybean usage in Michigan and customer satisfaction at Costco. Our methods navigated through the statistical fields and aisles of customer satisfaction data, unearthing a connection that may just leave readers exclaiming, "Soy glad we conducted this study!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index .

For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8892892, r-squared of 0.7908353, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.

More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The ubiquitous usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in modern agriculture has sparked intense debate and investigation into their effects on various aspects of the food supply chain and the wider consumer market. A pertinent but often overlooked aspect of this inquiry is the potential impact of GMO usage in soybean cultivation on retail customer satisfaction. This study endeavors to bridge this gap in the literature by examining the relationship between GMO adoption in soybean production in Michigan and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in the state.
Before diving into the soyful details of our findings, it is important to establish the context and rationale for this investigation. Amidst the proliferation of GMO technology in agriculture, a soybean's journey from the farm to the table has become increasingly intertwined with genetic modification. This intertwining, not unlike a pair of genetically modified vines, raises questions about the potential effects of GMO usage on consumer behavior and preferences that cannot simply be brushed aside like last season's soybean husks.
The decision to focus on Costco's customer satisfaction, in particular, stems from both practical and strategic considerations. Costco, as a major retail player in Michigan, offers ripe opportunities for analyzing consumer behavior and preferences in response to the soyful influence of GMOs. As for the practical consideration, the state of Michigan boasts a robust soybean industry and a significant presence of Costco stores, providing an ideal setting for examining the potential impact of GMO use in soybean cultivation on consumer satisfaction—a topic that has not received the attention it deserves in the academic literature.
Our study is not just about crunching numbers and plucking correlations out of thin air. Rather, it aims to husk the soybeans, if you will, of this complex and intriguing relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on soybean GMO adoption and the delightful ratings from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Costco outlets, we sought to unravel whether there existed a statistically significant connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this scholarly excursion through the fields of GMO soybeans and the aisles of Costco, we encourage readers to join us in recognizing that statistical research, much like a good dad joke, can be both informative and entertaining. So grab your statistical tools, put on your retailer hats, and let's dig into the findings of this soy-ful relationship—a correlation that may just make you exclaim, "Soy glad we found this connection!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and customer satisfaction levels at Costco yielded some soy-prise findings. The statistical analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and an r-squared of 0.7908353, both of which were associated with a level of statistical significance indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests a strong positive association between the use of GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the soy-ful relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction at Costco, highlighting the strong positive correlation observed in the data.

Now, to add a little flavor to these results, it appears that the use of GMO soybeans not only cultivated a positive association with customer satisfaction but also sowed the seeds for a rather amusing statistical connection. It seems that soybeans, much like a good dad joke, have the potential to leave a lasting impression on consumer satisfaction.

Furthermore, the findings of this study not only provide important insights into the impact of agricultural practices on consumer preferences but also underscore the significance of embracing statistical research with a touch of humor. It's worth noting that in the world of statistical research, as in life, a good sense of humor is sometimes the best tool in the shed--or should I say, the soybean field.

In conclusion, these results emphasize the need for further exploration of the intricate relationship between agricultural practices and consumer satisfaction, reminding us that statistical research can indeed yield both meaningful insights and a bit of levity, much like a well-timed dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.

More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation and its impact on customer satisfaction at retail outlets has been a subject of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. Smith (2016) delves into the ecological and economic implications of GMO soybean cultivation, while Doe (2018) examines consumer attitudes towards GMO products, providing a comprehensive backdrop for our investigation. However, the actual impact of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction at specific retail chains like Costco has largely been overlooked in the existing literature, leaving a gap waiting to be filled.
Turning to texts that delve into the world of soybeans and agricultural practices, "The Quest for Soya" by Jones (2019) offers a comprehensive overview of the historical, socio-economic, and technological aspects of soybean production, providing a nuanced backdrop to the present study. Moreover, "Soybeans: Chemistry, Production, Processing, and Utilization" by Smith (2018) offers invaluable insights into the chemical composition and industrial applications of soybeans, serving as a foundational resource for understanding the soyful world of GMO soybeans.
In a departure from non-fiction, the works of fiction can also offer surprising windows into the world of soybean cultivation and retail dynamics. "The Soybean Chronicles" by John Green tackles the complexities of soybean farming against a coming-of-age backdrop, weaving together themes of love, growth, and agriculture. Furthermore, the timeless classic "Of Soybeans and Men" by Steinbeck captures the pulse of rural life, providing a narrative that reverberates with the echoes of soybean fields and human desires.
In addition to literary contributions, popular media content related to retail dynamics and customer satisfaction have been instrumental in shaping our understanding. Watching episodes of "Superstore" offers an immersive glimpse into the everyday workings of a retail giant, shedding light on the intricacies of customer preferences and experiences within a retail setting.
Now, let's plant the seeds of statistical analysis and customer satisfaction as we explore the fertile ground shared by GMO soybeans and the retail world – a soil that may just yield some unexpected findings, much like stumbling upon a rare soybean-shaped pearl.


[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and customer satisfaction levels at Costco yielded some soy-prise findings. The statistical analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and an r-squared of 0.7908353, both of which were associated with a level of statistical significance indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests a strong positive association between the use of GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the soy-ful relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction at Costco, highlighting the strong positive correlation observed in the data.
Now, to add a little flavor to these results, it appears that the use of GMO soybeans not only cultivated a positive association with customer satisfaction but also sowed the seeds for a rather amusing statistical connection. It seems that soybeans, much like a good dad joke, have the potential to leave a lasting impression on consumer satisfaction.
Furthermore, the findings of this study not only provide important insights into the impact of agricultural practices on consumer preferences but also underscore the significance of embracing statistical research with a touch of humor. It's worth noting that in the world of statistical research, as in life, a good sense of humor is sometimes the best tool in the shed--or should I say, the soybean field.
In conclusion, these results emphasize the need for further exploration of the intricate relationship between agricultural practices and consumer satisfaction, reminding us that statistical research can indeed yield both meaningful insights and a bit of levity, much like a well-timed dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a robust and statistically significant relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Our results align with prior research, supporting the notion that agricultural practices can have a discernible impact on consumer preferences, shaking up the retail landscape much like a good old soybean shake.

The results of this study corroborate previous research by Smith (2016) and Doe (2018), who alluded to the potential influence of GMO soybeans on consumer attitudes and economic dynamics. It's as if GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco were a perfectly paired dish—much like soy sauce and sushi, enhancing each other's flavor profiles in seemingly unexpected ways.

The strong positive association uncovered between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction at Costco underscores the need for continued scholarly exploration in this domain. The statistical connection we observed may take some by surprise, much like an unexpected soybean-themed pun at a dinner party, but it emphasizes the tangible influence of agricultural practices on consumer experiences.

Utilizing a rigorous statistical approach, this study not only confirmed the relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction but also revealed the potential for levity and humor in the world of analytical research. It's a refreshing reminder that statistical findings can indeed be both serious and enjoyable, akin to finding a soybean-shaped pearl in a sea of data.

The discovery of this soyful relationship adds an unexpected twist to the dialogue surrounding agricultural practices and consumer satisfaction, reminding us that the sphere of statistical research can yield insights that are as delightful as a well-timed dad joke. This study lays the groundwork for future investigations, inviting scholars to delve deeper into the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and consumer preferences, unearthing insights that may resonate with the agrarian and academic communities alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Michigan and Customer satisfaction with Costco. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.

More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The ubiquitous usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in modern agriculture has sparked intense debate and investigation into their effects on various aspects of the food supply chain and the wider consumer market. A pertinent but often overlooked aspect of this inquiry is the potential impact of GMO usage in soybean cultivation on retail customer satisfaction. This study endeavors to bridge this gap in the literature by examining the relationship between GMO adoption in soybean production in Michigan and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in the state.
Before diving into the soyful details of our findings, it is important to establish the context and rationale for this investigation. Amidst the proliferation of GMO technology in agriculture, a soybean's journey from the farm to the table has become increasingly intertwined with genetic modification. This intertwining, not unlike a pair of genetically modified vines, raises questions about the potential effects of GMO usage on consumer behavior and preferences that cannot simply be brushed aside like last season's soybean husks.
The decision to focus on Costco's customer satisfaction, in particular, stems from both practical and strategic considerations. Costco, as a major retail player in Michigan, offers ripe opportunities for analyzing consumer behavior and preferences in response to the soyful influence of GMOs. As for the practical consideration, the state of Michigan boasts a robust soybean industry and a significant presence of Costco stores, providing an ideal setting for examining the potential impact of GMO use in soybean cultivation on consumer satisfaction—a topic that has not received the attention it deserves in the academic literature.
Our study is not just about crunching numbers and plucking correlations out of thin air. Rather, it aims to husk the soybeans, if you will, of this complex and intriguing relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on soybean GMO adoption and the delightful ratings from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Costco outlets, we sought to unravel whether there existed a statistically significant connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this scholarly excursion through the fields of GMO soybeans and the aisles of Costco, we encourage readers to join us in recognizing that statistical research, much like a good dad joke, can be both informative and entertaining. So grab your statistical tools, put on your retailer hats, and let's dig into the findings of this soy-ful relationship—a correlation that may just make you exclaim, "Soy glad we found this connection!"

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and customer satisfaction levels at Costco yielded some soy-prise findings. The statistical analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and an r-squared of 0.7908353, both of which were associated with a level of statistical significance indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests a strong positive association between the use of GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the soy-ful relationship between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction at Costco, highlighting the strong positive correlation observed in the data.
Now, to add a little flavor to these results, it appears that the use of GMO soybeans not only cultivated a positive association with customer satisfaction but also sowed the seeds for a rather amusing statistical connection. It seems that soybeans, much like a good dad joke, have the potential to leave a lasting impression on consumer satisfaction.
Furthermore, the findings of this study not only provide important insights into the impact of agricultural practices on consumer preferences but also underscore the significance of embracing statistical research with a touch of humor. It's worth noting that in the world of statistical research, as in life, a good sense of humor is sometimes the best tool in the shed--or should I say, the soybean field.
In conclusion, these results emphasize the need for further exploration of the intricate relationship between agricultural practices and consumer satisfaction, reminding us that statistical research can indeed yield both meaningful insights and a bit of levity, much like a well-timed dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study establish a compelling link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and customer satisfaction levels at Costco. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and the associated p-value of less than 0.01 serve as a testament to the strength and significance of this soy-ful relationship. It seems that the influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction is not just a soy-ntific curiosity, but a statistically meaty finding that cannot be dismissed lightly.

Furthermore, the visual representation of this relationship in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a clear depiction of the soy-priseingly strong positive correlation between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction at Costco. It's as if the soybeans themselves conspired to spell out "customer satisfaction" across the scatterplot—now that's what I call a corny plot twist!

These results not only enrich our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences but also highlight the intriguing, and dare I say, amusing aspects of statistical research. It appears that when it comes to uncovering statistically significant relationships, a little bit of statistical flavor and a dash of humor can go a long way, much like the secret ingredient in a well-crafted dad joke.

As such, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. The findings of this study have soy-lidified the connection between GMO soybean usage and customer satisfaction at Costco, leaving little room for further doubt. This research not only enriches the scientific community's understanding of the impact of GMOs on consumer behavior but also serves as a reminder that statistical research can be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a well-timed dad joke.

It seems that in the world of statistical research, much like in the world of humor, timing is everything. And with these soy-pressive findings, the time for further exploration in this area has come to its ripe and soy-tisfying conclusion!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Humor and Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Consumer Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO-ing the Distance: A Soy-ful Relationship Between Soybean GMO Usage and Costco Customer Satisfaction in Michigan with an abstract of This study delves into the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in Michigan and the impact on customer satisfaction levels at Costco. Utilizing data from the USDA on soybean GMO adoption and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for Costco customer satisfaction ratings, our research team investigated this unconventional relationship. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8892892 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between GMO use in soybeans and customer satisfaction at Costco.
More specifically, our study unearthed that the use of GMO soybeans significantly, and somewhat humorously, impacted customer satisfaction at Costco outlets in Michigan. The data not only bolstered the link but also provided some food for thought—pun intended—regarding the potential influence of agricultural practices on consumer preferences. These findings not only shed light on the soyful relationship between GMO soybeans and customer satisfaction but also serve as a reminder that statistical research can indeed be both rigorous and enjoyable, much like a good dad joke.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified organisms, GMO, soybean cultivation, Michigan, USDA data, American Customer Satisfaction Index, Costco, customer satisfaction, correlation coefficient, agricultural practices, consumer preferences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Michigan
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Michigan that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Michigan

Customer satisfaction with Costco
Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index
See what else correlates with Customer satisfaction with Costco

Correlation r = 0.8892892 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7908353 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Customer satisfaction with Costco) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Michigan) over the 21 years from 2000 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.03E-8. 0.0000000703274935450961400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 7.03E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,219,190 random variables You don't actually need 14 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
GMO use in soybeans in Michigan (GMO soybeans %)505972737576818784838591919091949594939291
Customer satisfaction with Costco (Consumer Satisfaction)777679807979818183818283838484818383838381




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([50,59,72,73,75,76,81,87,84,83,85,91,91,90,91,94,95,94,93,92,91,])
array_2 = np.array([77,76,79,80,79,79,81,81,83,81,82,83,83,84,84,81,83,83,83,83,81,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Michigan"
array_2_name = "Customer satisfaction with Costco"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3235 · Black Variable ID: 834 · Red Variable ID: 19840
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0