about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,555 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and the second variable is Customer satisfaction with Costco.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the soybeans grew larger and heartier, they developed a friendlier disposition, leading to a more pleasant shopping experience at Costco.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vibrant scene in Ohio, featuring a smiling farmer inspecting his thriving, genetically modified soybean crop in a sun-drenched field. Close by, depict a group of content customers leaving a Costco store, their arms filled with groceries, and expressions of satisfaction on their faces. Emphasize the contrasting visuals of the joyful farmer amidst the lush crops and the happy customers emerging from the store. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus High-tech Voxel art Magic realism A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Ohio, a farmer smiles as he examines his genetically modified soybean crop, which is growing tall and healthy. Nearby, a group of satisfied customers emerge from a Costco store, their arms full of groceries and smiles on their faces.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Ohio, a farmer smiles as he examines his genetically modified soybean crop, which is growing tall and healthy. Nearby, a group of satisfied customers emerge from a Costco store, their arms full of groceries and smiles on their faces. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vibrant scene in Ohio, featuring a smiling farmer inspecting his thriving, genetically modified soybean crop in a sun-drenched field. Close by, depict a group of content customers leaving a Costco store, their arms filled with groceries, and expressions of satisfaction on their faces. Emphasize the contrasting visuals of the joyful farmer amidst the lush crops and the happy customers emerging from the store.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Ohio caused Customer satisfaction with Costco to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter

The Journal of Agricultural Innovation and Satisfaction Metrics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The landscape of modern agriculture has been reshaped by the advent of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) like the superhero of soybeans – the genetically modified soybeans, with genes that are more chiseled than a bodybuilder at Muscle Beach. These marvels of genetic engineering have made farmers grapple with soaring yields and pest resistance, all while stirring up controversies rivaling the latest Hollywood scandal. Permeating this backdrop, the soybean crop cultivates more intrigue than a Netflix mystery series, especially when it comes to its impact on customer satisfaction at big retailers like Costco.

Amidst the hullabaloo surrounding GMOs, we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the cultivation of these genetically enhanced pods in the heartland of Ohio and the discerning tastes of the clientele frequenting the aisles of Costco. But we didn't just dip our toes in the soy sauce of speculation. Instead, armed with a trusty statistical compass and an unwavering sense of curiosity, we traversed through the data fields of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the enthralling realms of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) to unearth the buried treasure that is the lesser-known soybean-Costco nexus.

We present our findings with the gravitas of a soybean pod dropping to the ground – our correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value that gleams brighter than a soybean under the midday sun, both pointing strongly to the interplay of genetically modified soybeans and the satisfaction levels experienced by Costco patrons. Our study paints a soy-lid picture of the intertwined fates of agricultural innovation and consumer contentment, raising questions as profound as the yield potential of a bumper crop of soybeans.

In this paper, we delve into the depths of this soybean saga, threading together the seemingly disparate worlds of biotechnology and shopper psychology, all while sprinkling in the soybean puns as liberally as salt on a pretzel. So buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the cornfields – or should we say soybean fields – of data analysis, where the only thing genetically modified will be your perception of the correlation between GMO soybeans in Ohio and the happiness of Costco customers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The landscape of modern agriculture has been reshaped by the advent of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) like the superhero of soybeans – the genetically modified soybeans, with genes that are more chiseled than a bodybuilder at Muscle Beach. These marvels of genetic engineering have made farmers grapple with soaring yields and pest resistance, all while stirring up controversies rivaling the latest Hollywood scandal. Permeating this backdrop, the soybean crop cultivates more intrigue than a Netflix mystery series, especially when it comes to its impact on customer satisfaction at big retailers like Costco.
Amidst the hullabaloo surrounding GMOs, we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the cultivation of these genetically enhanced pods in the heartland of Ohio and the discerning tastes of the clientele frequenting the aisles of Costco. But we didn't just dip our toes in the soy sauce of speculation. Instead, armed with a trusty statistical compass and an unwavering sense of curiosity, we traversed through the data fields of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the enthralling realms of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) to unearth the buried treasure that is the lesser-known soybean-Costco nexus.
We present our findings with the gravitas of a soybean pod dropping to the ground – our correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value that gleams brighter than a soybean under the midday sun, both pointing strongly to the interplay of genetically modified soybeans and the satisfaction levels experienced by Costco patrons. Our study paints a soy-lid picture of the intertwined fates of agricultural innovation and consumer contentment, raising questions as profound as the yield potential of a bumper crop of soybeans.
In this paper, we delve into the depths of this soybean saga, threading together the seemingly disparate worlds of biotechnology and shopper psychology, all while sprinkling in the soybean puns as liberally as salt on a pretzel. So buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the cornfields – or should we say soybean fields – of data analysis, where the only thing genetically modified will be your perception of the correlation between GMO soybeans in Ohio and the happiness of Costco customers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in agricultural practices and customer satisfaction at large retailers has been explored in both scholarly and popular literature. Smith et al. (2015) analyzed the impact of GMO soybeans on crop yield and pest resistance, laying the groundwork for understanding their potential influence on consumer preferences. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive investigation into the socioeconomic implications of GMO adoption in Ohio, illuminating the broader ramifications of genetically modified soybeans on the regional agricultural landscape.

Moving to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan discusses the complexities of modern food production and its effects on consumer choices, offering insightful perspectives related to the enchanting soybean saga. Furthermore, "Seeds of Deception" by Jeffrey M. Smith provides a captivating exposé on the controversies and uncertainties surrounding GMOs, offering a provocative lens through which to view the symbiotic relationship between genetically modified soybeans and consumer satisfaction at retail outlets.

In the realm of fiction, "Soybeans of Our Lives" by Agatha Bean-Christie weaves a gripping tale of intrigue and suspense set amidst the backdrop of a soybean farm in rural Ohio, making us ponder the hidden influences that may shape consumer preferences and happiness. Additionally, "The Miracle Bean" by George R.R. Martlegume introduces readers to a fantastical world where genetically modified soybeans hold the key to unravelling a web of mysteries surrounding consumer satisfaction, a tale that leaves us pondering the magical allure of soybeans and customer contentment.

Bringing a playful twist to the literature review, the animated series "Soy Story" and the children's show "The Legume League" have, in their own whimsical ways, depicted the adventures of personified soybeans and their quest to bring joy and satisfaction to consumers, offering a lighthearted but thought-provoking angle to the soybean-Costco interconnection.

Collectively, these diverse sources contribute to the multidimensional discourse surrounding the relationship between GMO soybeans in Ohio and the contentment of Costco customers, offering a blend of scholarly inquiry, literary creativity, and imaginative storytelling to capture the essence of this captivating correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index . You used data from 2000 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The landscape of modern agriculture has been reshaped by the advent of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) like the superhero of soybeans – the genetically modified soybeans, with genes that are more chiseled than a bodybuilder at Muscle Beach. These marvels of genetic engineering have made farmers grapple with soaring yields and pest resistance, all while stirring up controversies rivaling the latest Hollywood scandal. Permeating this backdrop, the soybean crop cultivates more intrigue than a Netflix mystery series, especially when it comes to its impact on customer satisfaction at big retailers like Costco.
Amidst the hullabaloo surrounding GMOs, we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the cultivation of these genetically enhanced pods in the heartland of Ohio and the discerning tastes of the clientele frequenting the aisles of Costco. But we didn't just dip our toes in the soy sauce of speculation. Instead, armed with a trusty statistical compass and an unwavering sense of curiosity, we traversed through the data fields of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the enthralling realms of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) to unearth the buried treasure that is the lesser-known soybean-Costco nexus.
We present our findings with the gravitas of a soybean pod dropping to the ground – our correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value that gleams brighter than a soybean under the midday sun, both pointing strongly to the interplay of genetically modified soybeans and the satisfaction levels experienced by Costco patrons. Our study paints a soy-lid picture of the intertwined fates of agricultural innovation and consumer contentment, raising questions as profound as the yield potential of a bumper crop of soybeans.
In this paper, we delve into the depths of this soybean saga, threading together the seemingly disparate worlds of biotechnology and shopper psychology, all while sprinkling in the soybean puns as liberally as salt on a pretzel. So buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the cornfields – or should we say soybean fields – of data analysis, where the only thing genetically modified will be your perception of the correlation between GMO soybeans in Ohio and the happiness of Costco customers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To plow through the research objectives, our methodology took root in a hybrid approach encompassing both quantitative and qualitative analyses, not unlike the fusion of genetic traits in GMO soybeans. Our investigation blossomed from 2000 to 2020, navigating through the sea of digital data harvested from sources such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Like a well-nurtured soybean plant, our data collection efforts were cultivated with precision and care, ensuring a robust foundation for our statistical inquiry.

Our first step was to gather information on the production and utilization of GMO soybeans in Ohio, sifting through agricultural reports with the diligence of a farmer separating wheat from chaff. This entailed scrutinizing seed usage, acreage planted, and yield data, whereby we quizzically pondered whether GMO soybeans truly had the 'beans' to make a significant impact on the Ohio landscape.

Simultaneously, our team delved into the realm of consumer satisfaction, tapping into the rich vein of satisfaction data from Costco patrons as captured by the American Customer Satisfaction Index. We explored customer feedback and ratings with the tenacity of a squirrel seeking the ripest acorn, seeking to unveil the nuanced nuances of shopper contentment in relation to their soy-centric purchasing experiences.

With the data firmly in hand, we employed the formidable instruments of statistical analysis to unearth the buried treasure of correlation and regression. Like expert chefs carefully blending ingredients, we concocted a delectable correlation coefficient between GMO soybean usage in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco, aiming to discern whether the soybean seeds of contentment had truly taken root.

Furthermore, our analysis burgeoned into a hearty regression model, seeking to elucidate the strength and direction of the relationship, akin to uncovering the optimal growing conditions for a bountiful soybean harvest. This robust model allowed us to tease out the influence of GMO soybean utilization on Costco customer satisfaction, navigating through the data fields with the agility of a tractor maneuvering through a vast soybean expanse.

While our methods may not have involved genetically modifying soybeans themselves, they certainly bore the hallmarks of scientific rigor and analytical precision, with an occasional sprinkle of statistical humor to keep the proceedings light-hearted. Our findings, much like a well-spun soybean yarn, emerge as a testament to the fruitful fusion of agricultural inquiry and consumer fulfillment, presenting a compelling mosaic of the interplay between genetically modified soybeans and the satisfaction levels experienced by Costco patrons.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index .

For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8675603, r-squared of 0.7526608, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The landscape of modern agriculture has been reshaped by the advent of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) like the superhero of soybeans – the genetically modified soybeans, with genes that are more chiseled than a bodybuilder at Muscle Beach. These marvels of genetic engineering have made farmers grapple with soaring yields and pest resistance, all while stirring up controversies rivaling the latest Hollywood scandal. Permeating this backdrop, the soybean crop cultivates more intrigue than a Netflix mystery series, especially when it comes to its impact on customer satisfaction at big retailers like Costco.
Amidst the hullabaloo surrounding GMOs, we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the cultivation of these genetically enhanced pods in the heartland of Ohio and the discerning tastes of the clientele frequenting the aisles of Costco. But we didn't just dip our toes in the soy sauce of speculation. Instead, armed with a trusty statistical compass and an unwavering sense of curiosity, we traversed through the data fields of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the enthralling realms of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) to unearth the buried treasure that is the lesser-known soybean-Costco nexus.
We present our findings with the gravitas of a soybean pod dropping to the ground – our correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value that gleams brighter than a soybean under the midday sun, both pointing strongly to the interplay of genetically modified soybeans and the satisfaction levels experienced by Costco patrons. Our study paints a soy-lid picture of the intertwined fates of agricultural innovation and consumer contentment, raising questions as profound as the yield potential of a bumper crop of soybeans.
In this paper, we delve into the depths of this soybean saga, threading together the seemingly disparate worlds of biotechnology and shopper psychology, all while sprinkling in the soybean puns as liberally as salt on a pretzel. So buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the cornfields – or should we say soybean fields – of data analysis, where the only thing genetically modified will be your perception of the correlation between GMO soybeans in Ohio and the happiness of Costco customers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The empirical analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603, indicating a strong positive association. This relationship was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.7526608, suggesting that approximately 75.27% of the variability in customer satisfaction at Costco could be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that there is indeed a significant connection between the incorporation of genetically modified soybeans into Ohio's agricultural landscape and the contentment levels of Costco's clientele. This result points to a correlation that is robust and not merely the result of random chance, much like stumbling upon a perfectly ripe avocado in a grocery store.

These statistical findings are graphically depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot showcasing the strong positive relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the bountiful harvest of statistical analysis, illustrating the upward trend that underlies the nexus of soybean cultivation and customer contentment.

In line with the abstract's proclamation, the results of this study highlight the intriguing interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, with genetically modified soybeans appearing to cast a favorable hue on the overall satisfaction levels experienced by Costco shoppers. The soybeans seem to have sown seeds not only of increased yield and pest resistance but also of customer happiness – truly a multi-faceted legume that leaves a lasting impression on both the agricultural and retail landscapes.

In summary, our investigation into the impact of GMO soybeans in Ohio on customer satisfaction at Costco offers compelling evidence of a positive relationship, accentuating the possibility that contentment can indeed sprout from the strategic cultivation of genetically modified soybeans. While further research is needed to unravel the mechanisms underlying this correlation, our study elevates the soybean to the status of a potential purveyor of not only nourishment but also delight, embodying the adage, "Sow well, reap satisfaction."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in agricultural practices and customer satisfaction at large retailers has been explored in both scholarly and popular literature. Smith et al. (2015) analyzed the impact of GMO soybeans on crop yield and pest resistance, laying the groundwork for understanding their potential influence on consumer preferences. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive investigation into the socioeconomic implications of GMO adoption in Ohio, illuminating the broader ramifications of genetically modified soybeans on the regional agricultural landscape.
Moving to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan discusses the complexities of modern food production and its effects on consumer choices, offering insightful perspectives related to the enchanting soybean saga. Furthermore, "Seeds of Deception" by Jeffrey M. Smith provides a captivating exposé on the controversies and uncertainties surrounding GMOs, offering a provocative lens through which to view the symbiotic relationship between genetically modified soybeans and consumer satisfaction at retail outlets.
In the realm of fiction, "Soybeans of Our Lives" by Agatha Bean-Christie weaves a gripping tale of intrigue and suspense set amidst the backdrop of a soybean farm in rural Ohio, making us ponder the hidden influences that may shape consumer preferences and happiness. Additionally, "The Miracle Bean" by George R.R. Martlegume introduces readers to a fantastical world where genetically modified soybeans hold the key to unravelling a web of mysteries surrounding consumer satisfaction, a tale that leaves us pondering the magical allure of soybeans and customer contentment.
Bringing a playful twist to the literature review, the animated series "Soy Story" and the children's show "The Legume League" have, in their own whimsical ways, depicted the adventures of personified soybeans and their quest to bring joy and satisfaction to consumers, offering a lighthearted but thought-provoking angle to the soybean-Costco interconnection.
Collectively, these diverse sources contribute to the multidimensional discourse surrounding the relationship between GMO soybeans in Ohio and the contentment of Costco customers, offering a blend of scholarly inquiry, literary creativity, and imaginative storytelling to capture the essence of this captivating correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603, indicating a strong positive association. This relationship was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.7526608, suggesting that approximately 75.27% of the variability in customer satisfaction at Costco could be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that there is indeed a significant connection between the incorporation of genetically modified soybeans into Ohio's agricultural landscape and the contentment levels of Costco's clientele. This result points to a correlation that is robust and not merely the result of random chance, much like stumbling upon a perfectly ripe avocado in a grocery store.
These statistical findings are graphically depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot showcasing the strong positive relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the bountiful harvest of statistical analysis, illustrating the upward trend that underlies the nexus of soybean cultivation and customer contentment.
In line with the abstract's proclamation, the results of this study highlight the intriguing interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, with genetically modified soybeans appearing to cast a favorable hue on the overall satisfaction levels experienced by Costco shoppers. The soybeans seem to have sown seeds not only of increased yield and pest resistance but also of customer happiness – truly a multi-faceted legume that leaves a lasting impression on both the agricultural and retail landscapes.
In summary, our investigation into the impact of GMO soybeans in Ohio on customer satisfaction at Costco offers compelling evidence of a positive relationship, accentuating the possibility that contentment can indeed sprout from the strategic cultivation of genetically modified soybeans. While further research is needed to unravel the mechanisms underlying this correlation, our study elevates the soybean to the status of a potential purveyor of not only nourishment but also delight, embodying the adage, "Sow well, reap satisfaction."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our exploration into the enthralling relationship between the utilization of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the satisfaction levels of Costco's customers has unveiled a bountiful harvest of statistical insights. The results of our study not only corroborate the existing scholarly literature but also add a flavorful dash of empirical evidence to the soybean saga's impact on consumer contentment. As we mull over these findings, it becomes abundantly clear that the soybean's influence extends beyond its agricultural virtues, delving into the realms of customer happiness and retail satisfaction.

Harkening back to the literature review, which included a playful twist with references to fiction and animation, our findings echo the sentiments conveyed in these creative works. The juxtaposition of "Soybeans of Our Lives" and "The Miracle Bean" with our empirical analysis may seem whimsical, yet the parallels between the imaginative soybean narratives and the statistical realities are nothing short of intriguing. Indeed, our results lend credence to the tantalizing notion that the soybean narrative may not be confined to the realms of fiction but rather holds a kernel of truth in shaping consumer experiences at retail establishments.

The statistically robust correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and the compelling p-value further fortified our assertion that the presence of GMO soybeans in Ohio's agricultural landscape is bean there, done that, instrumental in influencing the satisfaction levels of Costco's customers. With an r-squared value of 0.7526608 indicating that approximately 75.27% of the variability in customer satisfaction at Costco can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio, it seems that the Genetically Modified Soybean Symphony is playing a tune that resonates with the palates and preferences of consumers. In essence, our findings imply that the soybean saga transcends its role as a mere agricultural commodity, shining as a bean-eficent ingredient in the recipe for customer contentment.

Our results, depicted with the aid of the scatterplot in Fig. 1, paint a picture as vibrant as a field of flourishing soybean plants. The upward trend showcased in the scatterplot encapsulates the blossoming relationship between GMO soybeans in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco, akin to the growth of a plump, ripe tomato in a vegetable garden. Just as a well-tended garden yields a cornucopia of delights, it appears that the strategic cultivation of genetically modified soybeans can harvest not only tangible benefits but also intangible rewards in the form of customer satisfaction – truly a testament to the leguminous prowess of the soybean.

In conclusion, our study elevates the soybean from a mundane agricultural commodity to a potential game-changer in the realm of retail satisfaction, embodying the essence of "Sow well, reap satisfaction." As we gaze into the soybean horizon, further research beckons, promising to unveil the nuanced mechanisms underlying this intriguing correlation. Nevertheless, our findings underscore the soybean's potential to be not just a source of nourishment, but also a cultivator of joy, perpetuating the notion that happiness may indeed grow on genetically modified soybeans.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Customer satisfaction with Costco. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The landscape of modern agriculture has been reshaped by the advent of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) like the superhero of soybeans – the genetically modified soybeans, with genes that are more chiseled than a bodybuilder at Muscle Beach. These marvels of genetic engineering have made farmers grapple with soaring yields and pest resistance, all while stirring up controversies rivaling the latest Hollywood scandal. Permeating this backdrop, the soybean crop cultivates more intrigue than a Netflix mystery series, especially when it comes to its impact on customer satisfaction at big retailers like Costco.
Amidst the hullabaloo surrounding GMOs, we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the cultivation of these genetically enhanced pods in the heartland of Ohio and the discerning tastes of the clientele frequenting the aisles of Costco. But we didn't just dip our toes in the soy sauce of speculation. Instead, armed with a trusty statistical compass and an unwavering sense of curiosity, we traversed through the data fields of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the enthralling realms of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) to unearth the buried treasure that is the lesser-known soybean-Costco nexus.
We present our findings with the gravitas of a soybean pod dropping to the ground – our correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value that gleams brighter than a soybean under the midday sun, both pointing strongly to the interplay of genetically modified soybeans and the satisfaction levels experienced by Costco patrons. Our study paints a soy-lid picture of the intertwined fates of agricultural innovation and consumer contentment, raising questions as profound as the yield potential of a bumper crop of soybeans.
In this paper, we delve into the depths of this soybean saga, threading together the seemingly disparate worlds of biotechnology and shopper psychology, all while sprinkling in the soybean puns as liberally as salt on a pretzel. So buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the cornfields – or should we say soybean fields – of data analysis, where the only thing genetically modified will be your perception of the correlation between GMO soybeans in Ohio and the happiness of Costco customers.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603, indicating a strong positive association. This relationship was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.7526608, suggesting that approximately 75.27% of the variability in customer satisfaction at Costco could be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that there is indeed a significant connection between the incorporation of genetically modified soybeans into Ohio's agricultural landscape and the contentment levels of Costco's clientele. This result points to a correlation that is robust and not merely the result of random chance, much like stumbling upon a perfectly ripe avocado in a grocery store.
These statistical findings are graphically depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot showcasing the strong positive relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio and customer satisfaction at Costco. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the bountiful harvest of statistical analysis, illustrating the upward trend that underlies the nexus of soybean cultivation and customer contentment.
In line with the abstract's proclamation, the results of this study highlight the intriguing interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, with genetically modified soybeans appearing to cast a favorable hue on the overall satisfaction levels experienced by Costco shoppers. The soybeans seem to have sown seeds not only of increased yield and pest resistance but also of customer happiness – truly a multi-faceted legume that leaves a lasting impression on both the agricultural and retail landscapes.
In summary, our investigation into the impact of GMO soybeans in Ohio on customer satisfaction at Costco offers compelling evidence of a positive relationship, accentuating the possibility that contentment can indeed sprout from the strategic cultivation of genetically modified soybeans. While further research is needed to unravel the mechanisms underlying this correlation, our study elevates the soybean to the status of a potential purveyor of not only nourishment but also delight, embodying the adage, "Sow well, reap satisfaction."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In culminating our fantastic exploration into the whimsical world of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs), we have unmasked a correlation with the customer satisfaction levels at Costco that is stronger than the aroma of freshly brewed coffee at the store's entrance. Our findings have not only unveiled the soy-mantic connection between GMO soybeans in Ohio and Costco shoppers' contentment but have also sprinkled some soybean-based joy and curiosity along the way.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 indicates a more solid bond than a well-cooked tofu stir-fry, and our statistical analysis has sown the seed for a new appreciation of the potential impact of genetically modified soybeans on consumer delight. The r-squared value of 0.7526608 reminds us that approximately 75.27% of Costco customer satisfaction variability can be soy-elated to the use of GMO soybeans in Ohio, offering a soy-lid foundation for future research endeavors.

The p-value that shines brighter than a sun-soaked soybean confirms that this connection is not just a fluke occurrence but a genuine soy-pernatural phenomenon. The scatterplot in our results section serves as a soy-visual testament to the captivating dance between GMO soybeans and Costco customer satisfaction, proving that soybeans are not just a source of sustenance but also of happiness. It seems that, with genetically modified soybeans, not only does everything seem to be "soy good," but it also tastes "soy good," much like a tofu ice cream on a hot summer day.

Our soy-cial and scholarly contribution has taken the soybean out of the agricultural field and placed it in the proverbial limelight of consumer satisfaction, demonstrating its potential to bean-fuse joy into the lives of Costco customers. Soybean cultivation may just be the "bean-ing" of happiness, and our study harnesses all the evidence to "pod-clare" that there is certainly a lot more to soybeans than meets the eye.

In conclusion, with our boots firmly planted in the fertile soil of statistical analysis, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, when it comes to GMO soybeans and Costco customer satisfaction, we have undoubtedly bean there and done "edamame"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Innovation and Satisfaction Metrics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advanced Agricultural Advancements (SAAA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Engineering a Great Harvest: Genetically Modified Soybeans and the Consumer Satisfaction Bean-o-meter with an abstract of This study delves into the enticing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in Ohio and the customer satisfaction levels at Costco. By cleverly cross-referencing data from the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8675603 and a p-value less than 0.01, effectively revealing the soybean saga's impact on Costco shopper contentment from 2000 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the interplay of agricultural practices and consumer preferences, emphasizing the pod-ssible influence of GMO soybeans on customer satisfaction, indicating that perhaps happiness does, in fact, grow on trees, or rather, on genetically modified soybean plants.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified soybeans, GMO soybeans, consumer satisfaction, customer satisfaction, Ohio, Costco, USDA, American Customer Satisfaction Index, correlation coefficient, p-value, agricultural practices, consumer preferences, soybean impact, soybean plants

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Ohio
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Ohio that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Ohio

Customer satisfaction with Costco
Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index
See what else correlates with Customer satisfaction with Costco

Correlation r = 0.8675603 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7526608 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Customer satisfaction with Costco) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Ohio) over the 21 years from 2000 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-7. 0.0000003533967955439771000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 3.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,829,680 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
GMO use in soybeans in Ohio (GMO soybeans %)486473747677828789838685868990919191919588
Customer satisfaction with Costco (Consumer Satisfaction)777679807979818183818283838484818383838381




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([48,64,73,74,76,77,82,87,89,83,86,85,86,89,90,91,91,91,91,95,88,])
array_2 = np.array([77,76,79,80,79,79,81,81,83,81,82,83,83,84,84,81,83,83,83,83,81,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Customer satisfaction with Costco"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 1555 · Black Variable ID: 840 · Red Variable ID: 19840
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0