Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Ticket sales for Cincinnati Reds games | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'xbox' | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself' | r=0.95 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'minecraft' | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming | r=0.92 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'hottest man on earth' | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Octavio | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.91 | 10yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Australia | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
The number of fast food cooks in Maryland | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
Arson in Mississippi | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)