Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Transportation correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of building inspectors in Nebraska | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Average length of 'Be Smart' science YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
The number of manicurists and pedicurists in South Carolina | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Advanced Micro Devices' stock price (AMD) | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of marketing managers in Wyoming | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Marvell Technology's stock price (MRVL) | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of craft artists in Michigan | r=0.95 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'do vaccines work' | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'wojak' meme | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year | r=0.87 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Laramie, Wyoming | r=0.86 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in St. Cloud, Minnesota | r=0.84 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Minneapolis | r=0.81 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of cartographers in New York | r=0.78 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Transportation also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)