about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #7,996 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of security guards in South Dakota and the second variable is Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The security guards were encouraging the videos to "patrol" longer for quality content, leading to an "arresting" increase in video length. It seems the guards were really "bucking" the trend and adding a whole new level of "surveillance" to the production process. This unexpected connection has truly "guarded" the attention of both viewers and statisticians alike. Looks like South Dakota isn't just known for Mount Rushmore – it's also home to the Mount, Watch More YouTube Association.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic landscape in South Dakota with a striking resemblance to a digital circuit board. A group of security guards, resembling cybernetic entities, patrols the intricate pathways of the circuit board, their glowing eyes and advanced technology signaling their authority. In the distance, the set of Technology Connections' YouTube videos is depicted as a collection of data nodes, each pulsing with vibrant energy. The guards' presence encourages the nodes to pulse and expand, symbolizing an "arresting" increase in video length. The scene is bathed in a digital glow, capturing the attention of both viewers and statisticians alike, while conveying the unexpected connection between technology and surveillance. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Glitch art Cybernetic art Minimalism Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos, in the following situation: The security guards were encouraging the videos to "patrol" longer for quality content, leading to an "arresting" increase in video length. It seems the guards were really "bucking" the trend and adding a whole new level of "surveillance" to the production process. This unexpected connection has truly "guarded" the attention of both viewers and statisticians alike. Looks like South Dakota isn't just known for Mount Rushmore – it's also home to the Mount, Watch More YouTube Association.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In South Dakota, a group of security guards are patrolling the set of Technology Connections' YouTube videos. They are encouraging the videos to "patrol" longer for quality content, leading to an "arresting" increase in video length. The guards are really "bucking" the trend and adding a whole new level of "surveillance" to the production process, capturing the attention of both viewers and statisticians alike. This unexpected connection has truly "guarded" the attention of viewers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In South Dakota, a group of security guards are patrolling the set of Technology Connections' YouTube videos. They are encouraging the videos to "patrol" longer for quality content, leading to an "arresting" increase in video length. The guards are really "bucking" the trend and adding a whole new level of "surveillance" to the production process, capturing the attention of both viewers and statisticians alike. This unexpected connection has truly "guarded" the attention of viewers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic landscape in South Dakota with a striking resemblance to a digital circuit board. A group of security guards, resembling cybernetic entities, patrols the intricate pathways of the circuit board, their glowing eyes and advanced technology signaling their authority. In the distance, the set of Technology Connections' YouTube videos is depicted as a collection of data nodes, each pulsing with vibrant energy. The guards' presence encourages the nodes to pulse and expand, symbolizing an "arresting" increase in video length. The scene is bathed in a digital glow, capturing the attention of both viewers and statisticians alike, while conveying the unexpected connection between technology and surveillance.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of security guards in South Dakota caused Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

The Journal of Irreverent Scientific Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:

[[INTRODUCTION]]

The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down the labyrinthine paths of unexpected correlations, unearthing connections that defy conventional wisdom. In this study, we embark on a delightfully unconventional exploration of the stylized tango between the number of security guards stationed in the idyllic plains of South Dakota and the average duration of the captivating YouTube videos hailing from the esoteric world of "Technology Connections." While on the surface, these two variables may appear as distant as a quasar in a different galaxy, our inquisitive journey aims to unravel the whimsical dance that intertwines security and technology with a bit of statistical flair and perhaps a pinch of Wile E. Coyote-esque curiosity.

Amidst the cornfields and prairies of South Dakota, where the gentle hum of technological marvels mingles with the crisp whisper of the wind, the diligent souls tasked with safeguarding the land weave a tapestry of protection. Simultaneously, in the virtual realm, the wry and erudite presenter of Technology Connections spins tales of technological antiquity, diving headfirst into the captivating realms of yesteryear's gadgets. As we gaze upon these two seemingly unrelated domains, our endeavor is to decipher the enigmatic correlation that binds them, like a professor pondering the perplexities of simultaneous equations while sipping from a mug emblazoned with the comedic visage of Albert Einstein.

Armed with data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the maze of videos that constitute Technology Connections' compendium, we wade into the abyss of statistical happenstance. Our analysis, encompassing the years 2015 through 2022, reveals a striking relationship that would make even Schroedinger's cat cock an eyebrow in bemusement. And as we journey through this landscape of statistical whimsy, we invite you to join us in uncovering the truth behind this peculiar entanglement, where security forces and technological musings engage in a choreographed ballet of numbers, bringing to mind the synchronicity of a precision-engineered Rube Goldberg machine.

With a twinkle in our eyes and a whimsical lilt in the cadence of our prose, we endeavor to unravel the embrace between security guardians and the temporal tapestry of technology-themed content. Our findings promise to reveal a connection as reliable as the laws of thermodynamics and as intriguing as a cat chasing a laser pointer. So, come along, dear reader, as we journey into the land where the unexpected is the rule, and the improbable is the guiding star.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down the labyrinthine paths of unexpected correlations, unearthing connections that defy conventional wisdom. In this study, we embark on a delightfully unconventional exploration of the stylized tango between the number of security guards stationed in the idyllic plains of South Dakota and the average duration of the captivating YouTube videos hailing from the esoteric world of "Technology Connections." While on the surface, these two variables may appear as distant as a quasar in a different galaxy, our inquisitive journey aims to unravel the whimsical dance that intertwines security and technology with a bit of statistical flair and perhaps a pinch of Wile E. Coyote-esque curiosity.
Amidst the cornfields and prairies of South Dakota, where the gentle hum of technological marvels mingles with the crisp whisper of the wind, the diligent souls tasked with safeguarding the land weave a tapestry of protection. Simultaneously, in the virtual realm, the wry and erudite presenter of Technology Connections spins tales of technological antiquity, diving headfirst into the captivating realms of yesteryear's gadgets. As we gaze upon these two seemingly unrelated domains, our endeavor is to decipher the enigmatic correlation that binds them, like a professor pondering the perplexities of simultaneous equations while sipping from a mug emblazoned with the comedic visage of Albert Einstein.
Armed with data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the maze of videos that constitute Technology Connections' compendium, we wade into the abyss of statistical happenstance. Our analysis, encompassing the years 2015 through 2022, reveals a striking relationship that would make even Schroedinger's cat cock an eyebrow in bemusement. And as we journey through this landscape of statistical whimsy, we invite you to join us in uncovering the truth behind this peculiar entanglement, where security forces and technological musings engage in a choreographed ballet of numbers, bringing to mind the synchronicity of a precision-engineered Rube Goldberg machine.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a whimsical lilt in the cadence of our prose, we endeavor to unravel the embrace between security guardians and the temporal tapestry of technology-themed content. Our findings promise to reveal a connection as reliable as the laws of thermodynamics and as intriguing as a cat chasing a laser pointer. So, come along, dear reader, as we journey into the land where the unexpected is the rule, and the improbable is the guiding star.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between the number of security guards in South Dakota and the average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos has garnered surprisingly little attention in academic literature, despite its potentially fascinating and humorous implications. Studies by Smith (2016) and Doe (2019) have delved into the impact of security personnel on public safety, while Jones (2018) has explored the trends in video content duration on digital platforms. However, none seem to have stumbled upon the fortuitous intersection of these seemingly unrelated variables.

In "The Economics of Security Guard Employment," Smith (2016) examines the economic impact of security guard employment in various regions, but curiously overlooks the potential influence on the duration of YouTube videos, perhaps failing to see the forest for the trees. Similarly, Doe's (2019) work on security personnel's role in deterring crime in rural areas provides valuable insights but regrettably neglects to consider the potential ripple effect on the digital realm.

On the other hand, Jones (2018) in "Digital Content Dynamics" offers a thorough analysis of video length trends across diverse online platforms. However, this comprehensive study fails to grasp the serendipitous connection between security staffing and the captivating depths of technological exposition presented by the charmingly erudite host of Technology Connections. It appears that the elusive bond between these two domains has remained hidden in the scholarly annals, waiting to be unearthed like a forgotten treasure chest tucked away in the labyrinthine catacombs of statistical whimsy.

To broaden the scope, we also turn our gaze toward non-fiction works that explore related themes. "The History of Security" by Martin (2014) and "Exploring the Online Landscape" by Davis (2017) provide valuable context for understanding the respective realms of security management and digital content creation. However, it takes a keen eye - and perhaps a touch of whimsy - to discern the latent connection between the two, which may have eluded the grasp of these esteemed authors.

In the realm of fiction, novels such as "The Guardian's Code" by Orwell (1954) and "The Technological Tapestry" by Austen (1817) dabble in themes of protection and technological intricacies. While these literary works may not directly address the specific correlation under scrutiny, their imaginative musings add a touch of creative inspiration to our exploration.

Not to be forgotten are popular internet memes that bear a tangential connection to our research endeavor. The "Security Cat" meme, with its vigilant feline guardian, humorously echoes the diligence of security personnel, while the "Infinite Scroll" meme wryly nods to the captivating nature of lengthy digital content. These seemingly lighthearted phenomena mirror the playful spirit of our investigation, offering their own whimsical take on the interplay of security and technology.

As we tread the hallowed halls of academia and wander into the quirky corridors of obscure correlations, we embrace the enigma and invite our readers to join us in uncovering the unexpected threads that bind security guardians and the labyrinthine expanse of technology-themed videos. For in the captivating dance of statistics, even the most peculiar pairings can reveal a comedic ballet of interconnectedness, reminding us that in the world of research, the unexpected often holds the most delightful surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down the labyrinthine paths of unexpected correlations, unearthing connections that defy conventional wisdom. In this study, we embark on a delightfully unconventional exploration of the stylized tango between the number of security guards stationed in the idyllic plains of South Dakota and the average duration of the captivating YouTube videos hailing from the esoteric world of "Technology Connections." While on the surface, these two variables may appear as distant as a quasar in a different galaxy, our inquisitive journey aims to unravel the whimsical dance that intertwines security and technology with a bit of statistical flair and perhaps a pinch of Wile E. Coyote-esque curiosity.
Amidst the cornfields and prairies of South Dakota, where the gentle hum of technological marvels mingles with the crisp whisper of the wind, the diligent souls tasked with safeguarding the land weave a tapestry of protection. Simultaneously, in the virtual realm, the wry and erudite presenter of Technology Connections spins tales of technological antiquity, diving headfirst into the captivating realms of yesteryear's gadgets. As we gaze upon these two seemingly unrelated domains, our endeavor is to decipher the enigmatic correlation that binds them, like a professor pondering the perplexities of simultaneous equations while sipping from a mug emblazoned with the comedic visage of Albert Einstein.
Armed with data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the maze of videos that constitute Technology Connections' compendium, we wade into the abyss of statistical happenstance. Our analysis, encompassing the years 2015 through 2022, reveals a striking relationship that would make even Schroedinger's cat cock an eyebrow in bemusement. And as we journey through this landscape of statistical whimsy, we invite you to join us in uncovering the truth behind this peculiar entanglement, where security forces and technological musings engage in a choreographed ballet of numbers, bringing to mind the synchronicity of a precision-engineered Rube Goldberg machine.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a whimsical lilt in the cadence of our prose, we endeavor to unravel the embrace between security guardians and the temporal tapestry of technology-themed content. Our findings promise to reveal a connection as reliable as the laws of thermodynamics and as intriguing as a cat chasing a laser pointer. So, come along, dear reader, as we journey into the land where the unexpected is the rule, and the improbable is the guiding star.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To commence our whimsical quest into the enchanting realm of statistical analysis, we employed a convoluted yet merry mix of data collection and analysis methods that would give even the most seasoned statisticians a hearty chuckle and perhaps an affectionate eye-roll.

Firstly, we sauntered into the digital expanse of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) like a troupe of curious jesters, where we dexterously plucked the figures pertaining to the gallant guardians of security in the expansive meadows of South Dakota. With a wink and a nudge, we gathered the number of security guards gainfully employed in the region, taking care to separate the figures from any potential naysayers lurking in the shadows of uncertainty.

Next, we pirouetted across the algorithmic pathways of YouTube, sifting through the captivating chronicles of "Technology Connections" like amateur archeologists eager to unearth ancient mysteries. With the finesse of a practiced sleight-of-hand artist, we meticulously recorded the average length of these technology-centric videos, making sure to capture the ornate nuances of each digit as one would catalog the delicate hues of a rare butterfly.

Once our data danced into the realms of our computers, we summoned the spectral powers of statistical software, embracing the enigmatic R language and the beguiling Python to perform a magnum opus of numerical wizardry. With the grace of a ballet maestro conducting a waltz, we entwined the datasets, coaxing them to perform an elegant pas de deux that would make even the most stoic of mathematicians crack a smile.

Following this fanciful data duet, we gazed deeply into the crystal ball of statistical analysis, invoking the ethereal spirits of correlation coefficients, p-values, and regression analysis. In a dazzling display of numerical divination, we summoned the wisdom of these mystical entities to discern the hidden truths woven within the fabric of our collected data.

Furthermore, to ensure that our findings were as robust as an oak tree and as reliable as a Swiss timepiece, we applied the rigorous cauldron of hypothesis testing, stirring the brew until it bubbled with statistical significance and scholarly pizzazz.

Lastly, like jesters concluding a grand performance, we peer-reviewed our methods and findings with the discerning eye of eagle-eyed scholars, ensuring that our merry dance through the realms of statistical analysis was as accurate as an archer's bullseye and as captivating as a grand finale of fireworks.

With this vivacious confluence of data collection, analysis, and statistical sorcery, we endeavored to shed light on the beguiling connection between the guardians of South Dakota and the technologically infused reveries of "Technology Connections," inviting our readers to join us in this jovial romp through the tapestry of statistical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9952977, r-squared of 0.9906176, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down the labyrinthine paths of unexpected correlations, unearthing connections that defy conventional wisdom. In this study, we embark on a delightfully unconventional exploration of the stylized tango between the number of security guards stationed in the idyllic plains of South Dakota and the average duration of the captivating YouTube videos hailing from the esoteric world of "Technology Connections." While on the surface, these two variables may appear as distant as a quasar in a different galaxy, our inquisitive journey aims to unravel the whimsical dance that intertwines security and technology with a bit of statistical flair and perhaps a pinch of Wile E. Coyote-esque curiosity.
Amidst the cornfields and prairies of South Dakota, where the gentle hum of technological marvels mingles with the crisp whisper of the wind, the diligent souls tasked with safeguarding the land weave a tapestry of protection. Simultaneously, in the virtual realm, the wry and erudite presenter of Technology Connections spins tales of technological antiquity, diving headfirst into the captivating realms of yesteryear's gadgets. As we gaze upon these two seemingly unrelated domains, our endeavor is to decipher the enigmatic correlation that binds them, like a professor pondering the perplexities of simultaneous equations while sipping from a mug emblazoned with the comedic visage of Albert Einstein.
Armed with data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the maze of videos that constitute Technology Connections' compendium, we wade into the abyss of statistical happenstance. Our analysis, encompassing the years 2015 through 2022, reveals a striking relationship that would make even Schroedinger's cat cock an eyebrow in bemusement. And as we journey through this landscape of statistical whimsy, we invite you to join us in uncovering the truth behind this peculiar entanglement, where security forces and technological musings engage in a choreographed ballet of numbers, bringing to mind the synchronicity of a precision-engineered Rube Goldberg machine.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a whimsical lilt in the cadence of our prose, we endeavor to unravel the embrace between security guardians and the temporal tapestry of technology-themed content. Our findings promise to reveal a connection as reliable as the laws of thermodynamics and as intriguing as a cat chasing a laser pointer. So, come along, dear reader, as we journey into the land where the unexpected is the rule, and the improbable is the guiding star.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Technology Connections YouTube channel has yielded intriguing results that would make even the most stoic statistician perk up with curiosity. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of security guards in South Dakota and the average duration of Technology Connections videos revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9952977. This coefficient, denoting an almost inseparable bond between the two variables, can be likened to the fidelity of an electron to its orbital path, or perhaps the unbreakable alliance between duct tape and MacGyver.

The accompanying r-squared value of 0.9906176, which measures the proportion of the variance in the average video duration that is predictable from the number of security guards, further emphasizes the strength of this connection. This finding underscores the undeniable influence of security forces on the temporal landscape of technology-focused narratives, akin to the gravitational pull exerted by a particularly captivating black hole.

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 attests to the statistical significance of our findings, firmly establishing the validity of the correlation and dismissing the possibility of this striking relationship being a mere statistical fluke. This level of significance is as unmistakable as the distinctive pop of a champagne cork, heralding the arrival of a noteworthy scientific observation.

Furthermore, the visually compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) presents a clear depiction of the tight relationship between the number of security guards and the average duration of Technology Connections videos. The plot resembles a harmonized duet between two variables, with each data point forming a melodic line that contributes to the symphonic resonance of the overall pattern. This illustration vividly captures the intricacy of this unexpected correlation, much like an artist's captivating brushstrokes teasing out the playful dance of statistical association.

In summary, our findings not only unearth a remarkable link between security personnel and technology-themed content duration but also showcase the delightful capriciousness of statistical analysis. This study offers a lighthearted and whimsical exploration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables, injecting a dose of playful curiosity into the realm of empirical inquiry. In unraveling this enigmatic bond, we have revealed an alliance as captivating as a dazzling scientific demonstration and as unexpected as finding a tortilla chip shaped like a perfect sine wave.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between the number of security guards in South Dakota and the average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos has garnered surprisingly little attention in academic literature, despite its potentially fascinating and humorous implications. Studies by Smith (2016) and Doe (2019) have delved into the impact of security personnel on public safety, while Jones (2018) has explored the trends in video content duration on digital platforms. However, none seem to have stumbled upon the fortuitous intersection of these seemingly unrelated variables.
In "The Economics of Security Guard Employment," Smith (2016) examines the economic impact of security guard employment in various regions, but curiously overlooks the potential influence on the duration of YouTube videos, perhaps failing to see the forest for the trees. Similarly, Doe's (2019) work on security personnel's role in deterring crime in rural areas provides valuable insights but regrettably neglects to consider the potential ripple effect on the digital realm.
On the other hand, Jones (2018) in "Digital Content Dynamics" offers a thorough analysis of video length trends across diverse online platforms. However, this comprehensive study fails to grasp the serendipitous connection between security staffing and the captivating depths of technological exposition presented by the charmingly erudite host of Technology Connections. It appears that the elusive bond between these two domains has remained hidden in the scholarly annals, waiting to be unearthed like a forgotten treasure chest tucked away in the labyrinthine catacombs of statistical whimsy.
To broaden the scope, we also turn our gaze toward non-fiction works that explore related themes. "The History of Security" by Martin (2014) and "Exploring the Online Landscape" by Davis (2017) provide valuable context for understanding the respective realms of security management and digital content creation. However, it takes a keen eye - and perhaps a touch of whimsy - to discern the latent connection between the two, which may have eluded the grasp of these esteemed authors.
In the realm of fiction, novels such as "The Guardian's Code" by Orwell (1954) and "The Technological Tapestry" by Austen (1817) dabble in themes of protection and technological intricacies. While these literary works may not directly address the specific correlation under scrutiny, their imaginative musings add a touch of creative inspiration to our exploration.
Not to be forgotten are popular internet memes that bear a tangential connection to our research endeavor. The "Security Cat" meme, with its vigilant feline guardian, humorously echoes the diligence of security personnel, while the "Infinite Scroll" meme wryly nods to the captivating nature of lengthy digital content. These seemingly lighthearted phenomena mirror the playful spirit of our investigation, offering their own whimsical take on the interplay of security and technology.
As we tread the hallowed halls of academia and wander into the quirky corridors of obscure correlations, we embrace the enigma and invite our readers to join us in uncovering the unexpected threads that bind security guardians and the labyrinthine expanse of technology-themed videos. For in the captivating dance of statistics, even the most peculiar pairings can reveal a comedic ballet of interconnectedness, reminding us that in the world of research, the unexpected often holds the most delightful surprises.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Technology Connections YouTube channel has yielded intriguing results that would make even the most stoic statistician perk up with curiosity. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of security guards in South Dakota and the average duration of Technology Connections videos revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9952977. This coefficient, denoting an almost inseparable bond between the two variables, can be likened to the fidelity of an electron to its orbital path, or perhaps the unbreakable alliance between duct tape and MacGyver.
The accompanying r-squared value of 0.9906176, which measures the proportion of the variance in the average video duration that is predictable from the number of security guards, further emphasizes the strength of this connection. This finding underscores the undeniable influence of security forces on the temporal landscape of technology-focused narratives, akin to the gravitational pull exerted by a particularly captivating black hole.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 attests to the statistical significance of our findings, firmly establishing the validity of the correlation and dismissing the possibility of this striking relationship being a mere statistical fluke. This level of significance is as unmistakable as the distinctive pop of a champagne cork, heralding the arrival of a noteworthy scientific observation.
Furthermore, the visually compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) presents a clear depiction of the tight relationship between the number of security guards and the average duration of Technology Connections videos. The plot resembles a harmonized duet between two variables, with each data point forming a melodic line that contributes to the symphonic resonance of the overall pattern. This illustration vividly captures the intricacy of this unexpected correlation, much like an artist's captivating brushstrokes teasing out the playful dance of statistical association.
In summary, our findings not only unearth a remarkable link between security personnel and technology-themed content duration but also showcase the delightful capriciousness of statistical analysis. This study offers a lighthearted and whimsical exploration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables, injecting a dose of playful curiosity into the realm of empirical inquiry. In unraveling this enigmatic bond, we have revealed an alliance as captivating as a dazzling scientific demonstration and as unexpected as finding a tortilla chip shaped like a perfect sine wave.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our investigation into the correlation between the number of security guards in South Dakota and the average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos unearths a whimsically unexpected yet statistically robust relationship. This lighthearted exploration has not only shed light on the bewildering connection between security presence and digital content duration but has also enlivened the staid corridors of academic inquiry.

Our results are in concordance with previous research, offering a comically unexpected twist to the rather serious topic of security employment. The fortuitous intersection of security staffing and the captivating depths of technological exposition provides a delightful reminder that statistical analyses can be filled with more surprises than a magician's hat.

Harkening back to the literature review, the work of Smith (2016) and Doe (2019) is affirmed as we discover an unexpected ripple effect of security personnel on the digital realm, akin to finding a hidden Easter egg in a maze of statistical papers. Furthermore, the comprehensive study by Jones (2018) on video length trends across online platforms is given a playful nod as we uncover the serendipitous connection between security staffing and the captivating depths of technological exposé.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 and the compelling r-squared value of 0.9906176 underscore the undeniable influence of security forces on the temporal landscape of technology-focused narratives, akin to the gravitational pull exerted by a particularly captivating black hole - except in this case, the compelling force is related to security guards and technology content duration. The tight relationship between the number of security guards and the average duration of Technology Connections videos is captured in a visually compelling scatterplot, forming a melodic line that contributes to the symphonic resonance of the overall pattern. This visually compelling presentation serves to illustrate the delightfully capricious nature of our statistical findings.

In conclusion, our study has brought forth a playful reminder that even the most unexpected pairings can reveal a comedic ballet of interconnectedness, reminding us that statistical analyses can hold more delightful surprises than a barrel of monkeys with a penchant for playing with data sets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of security guards in South Dakota and Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down the labyrinthine paths of unexpected correlations, unearthing connections that defy conventional wisdom. In this study, we embark on a delightfully unconventional exploration of the stylized tango between the number of security guards stationed in the idyllic plains of South Dakota and the average duration of the captivating YouTube videos hailing from the esoteric world of "Technology Connections." While on the surface, these two variables may appear as distant as a quasar in a different galaxy, our inquisitive journey aims to unravel the whimsical dance that intertwines security and technology with a bit of statistical flair and perhaps a pinch of Wile E. Coyote-esque curiosity.
Amidst the cornfields and prairies of South Dakota, where the gentle hum of technological marvels mingles with the crisp whisper of the wind, the diligent souls tasked with safeguarding the land weave a tapestry of protection. Simultaneously, in the virtual realm, the wry and erudite presenter of Technology Connections spins tales of technological antiquity, diving headfirst into the captivating realms of yesteryear's gadgets. As we gaze upon these two seemingly unrelated domains, our endeavor is to decipher the enigmatic correlation that binds them, like a professor pondering the perplexities of simultaneous equations while sipping from a mug emblazoned with the comedic visage of Albert Einstein.
Armed with data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the maze of videos that constitute Technology Connections' compendium, we wade into the abyss of statistical happenstance. Our analysis, encompassing the years 2015 through 2022, reveals a striking relationship that would make even Schroedinger's cat cock an eyebrow in bemusement. And as we journey through this landscape of statistical whimsy, we invite you to join us in uncovering the truth behind this peculiar entanglement, where security forces and technological musings engage in a choreographed ballet of numbers, bringing to mind the synchronicity of a precision-engineered Rube Goldberg machine.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a whimsical lilt in the cadence of our prose, we endeavor to unravel the embrace between security guardians and the temporal tapestry of technology-themed content. Our findings promise to reveal a connection as reliable as the laws of thermodynamics and as intriguing as a cat chasing a laser pointer. So, come along, dear reader, as we journey into the land where the unexpected is the rule, and the improbable is the guiding star.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Technology Connections YouTube channel has yielded intriguing results that would make even the most stoic statistician perk up with curiosity. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of security guards in South Dakota and the average duration of Technology Connections videos revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9952977. This coefficient, denoting an almost inseparable bond between the two variables, can be likened to the fidelity of an electron to its orbital path, or perhaps the unbreakable alliance between duct tape and MacGyver.
The accompanying r-squared value of 0.9906176, which measures the proportion of the variance in the average video duration that is predictable from the number of security guards, further emphasizes the strength of this connection. This finding underscores the undeniable influence of security forces on the temporal landscape of technology-focused narratives, akin to the gravitational pull exerted by a particularly captivating black hole.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 attests to the statistical significance of our findings, firmly establishing the validity of the correlation and dismissing the possibility of this striking relationship being a mere statistical fluke. This level of significance is as unmistakable as the distinctive pop of a champagne cork, heralding the arrival of a noteworthy scientific observation.
Furthermore, the visually compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) presents a clear depiction of the tight relationship between the number of security guards and the average duration of Technology Connections videos. The plot resembles a harmonized duet between two variables, with each data point forming a melodic line that contributes to the symphonic resonance of the overall pattern. This illustration vividly captures the intricacy of this unexpected correlation, much like an artist's captivating brushstrokes teasing out the playful dance of statistical association.
In summary, our findings not only unearth a remarkable link between security personnel and technology-themed content duration but also showcase the delightful capriciousness of statistical analysis. This study offers a lighthearted and whimsical exploration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables, injecting a dose of playful curiosity into the realm of empirical inquiry. In unraveling this enigmatic bond, we have revealed an alliance as captivating as a dazzling scientific demonstration and as unexpected as finding a tortilla chip shaped like a perfect sine wave.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a captivating correlation between the number of security guards in South Dakota and the average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos. The relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables is as surprising as stumbling upon a gaggle of penguins in the heart of the Sahara. Our findings, akin to a delightful game of scientific peekaboo, shed light on the whimsical and unpredictable nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that in the realm of empirical inquiry, surprises are as abundant as protons in an atom.

The exceptionally strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value celebrate the improbable bond between security guardians and the temporal tapestry of technology-themed content. It is as if the statistical universe choreographed a whimsical dance where security and technology sway in unison, reminiscent of a synchronized swim of statistical serendipity.

The visual representation in the form of a scatterplot not only visually encapsulates this uncanny connection but also serves as a delightful reminder of the statistical mosaic that underpins this charming alliance. It is a symphony of numbers, as harmonious as the notes of a well-tuned piano.

In light of these revelatory findings, it is clear that no further research is warranted in this area. Our results not only highlight the unexpected interconnectedness of variables but also emphasize the quirky and cheery aspects of scientific inquiry, leaving us to ponder the vast, amusing labyrinth of statistical relationships that permeate our universe. As the curtains draw to a close on our study, we invite fellow researchers to embrace the whimsy and unpredictability that characterize the tapestry of scientific investigation, where statistical correlations play out like a delightful game of cosmic hopscotch.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Irreverent Scientific Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Technology Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Guardians of Length: A Witty Exploration of the Correlation Between Security Guards in South Dakota and Average Duration of Technology Connections YouTube Videos with an abstract of This paper aims to investigate the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of security guards employed in South Dakota and the average length of the popular YouTube channel "Technology Connections" videos. Using data acquired from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we analyzed the time period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9952977 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We delve into the unexpected symbiotic relationship between security presence and the duration of technology-centric content, offering a lighthearted examination of this intriguing correlation. While the results may seem unusual at first glance, our research sheds light on the playful and unconventional corners of statistical analysis, showcasing how even the most seemingly disparate variables can be connected in a delightfully unexpected manner.

ChatGPT:

security guards, South Dakota, YouTube videos, Technology Connections, correlation analysis, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, technology content, symbiotic relationship, data analysis, unusual correlations, statistical significance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of security guards in South Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of security guards in South Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of security guards in South Dakota

Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9952977 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9906176 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of security guards in South Dakota) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.6E-7. 0.0000002590165770814124000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 2.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,860,757 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
The number of security guards in South Dakota (Security Guards)11601120114011801190124013101350
Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos (Length in seconds)949.25735.2757.333975.2631013.461256.431544.541663.37




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1160,1120,1140,1180,1190,1240,1310,1350,])
array_2 = np.array([949.25,735.2,757.333,975.263,1013.46,1256.43,1544.54,1663.37,])
array_1_name = "The number of security guards in South Dakota"
array_2_name = "Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 7996 · Black Variable ID: 14280 · Red Variable ID: 25702
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0