Report an error
Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of security guards in South Dakota | r=1 | 8yrs | Yes! |
The number of political scientists in Washington | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'shrek' | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sophie | r=0.95 | 8yrs | No |
Juice ices consumption | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences | r=-0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)