about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,758 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the second variable is Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people delved into the world of Python, the snakes in the grass of technology felt a surge in self-esteem. This led to a reptilian uprising within the SciShow Space team, prompting longer videos to be produced in honor of their slithery overlords. Who knew that mastering a programming language could lead to such a ssseriously cosmic shift in content production!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt for DALLE-3: Style: A vintage Polaroid photo Scene: A snake-themed spaceship soaring through space, with an increasing number of Python programming books on board and longer and longer SciShow Space videos being created to honor the slithery overlords. The snakes on the ship are depicted as powerful and confident, overseeing the activities with a sense of regality and influence. The spacecraft is surrounded by a celestial backdrop, portraying the vastness and mystery of space. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Realistic a Polaroid photo Low poly Realistic
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos, in the following situation: As more people delved into the world of Python, the snakes in the grass of technology felt a surge in self-esteem. This led to a reptilian uprising within the SciShow Space team, prompting longer videos to be produced in honor of their slithery overlords. Who knew that mastering a programming language could lead to such a ssseriously cosmic shift in content production!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the number of Google searches for 'how to learn python' rose, the snakes in the grass of technology began to feel a surge in self-esteem. Meanwhile, within the SciShow Space team, there was a reptilian uprising, prompting longer videos to be produced. Picture a snake-themed spaceship soaring through the cosmos, with an increasing number of Python programming books on board and longer and longer SciShow Space videos being created to honor the slithery overlords.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: As the number of Google searches for 'how to learn python' rose, the snakes in the grass of technology began to feel a surge in self-esteem. Meanwhile, within the SciShow Space team, there was a reptilian uprising, prompting longer videos to be produced. Picture a snake-themed spaceship soaring through the cosmos, with an increasing number of Python programming books on board and longer and longer SciShow Space videos being created to honor the slithery overlords. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt for DALLE-3: Style: A vintage Polaroid photo Scene: A snake-themed spaceship soaring through space, with an increasing number of Python programming books on board and longer and longer SciShow Space videos being created to honor the slithery overlords. The snakes on the ship are depicted as powerful and confident, overseeing the activities with a sense of regality and influence. The spacecraft is surrounded by a celestial backdrop, portraying the vastness and mystery of space.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in how to learn python (Google searches for 'how to learn python') caused Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

The Journal of Comical Cross-Disciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!

(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!

(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the digital age unfolds, the daily pursuits of the internet populace reveal fascinating insights into the collective curiosities and preoccupations of our times. The convergence of technology and individual aspirations has paved the way for examining the interplay between seemingly unrelated interests. In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel the intricate web woven between the burgeoning interest in learning the Python programming language and the magnetic allure of SciShow Space videos on YouTube.

It has long been known that the internet serves as a window to the global mind, a tool for understanding the burning questions and eclectic interests of the human race. Thus, when a distinct correlation emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos, our curiosity was piqued! This discovery presented an intriguing opportunity to explore the potential interrelationship between the desire to master a programming language and the fascination with the cosmic expanse. As we delved into the data, it became evident that this connection was no mere happenstance; the correlation offered an astronomical revelation of its own!

Say, did you hear about the astronaut who stepped on a piece of gum? He got stuck in orbit! Speaking of orbit, we noticed that the correlation coefficient between 'how to learn python' searches and SciShow Space video length was a staggering 0.9744466. One might say it was a cosmic connection of cosmic proportions! This robust correlation, coupled with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, left us astounded and eager to further explore the intricacies at play.

Our findings raise a plethora of questions and spark numerous contemplations. Could it be that the pursuit of Python proficiency ignites a parallel yearning for astronomical understanding? Perhaps as individuals endeavor to decipher the intricacies of coding, they also harbor a subconscious craving for unraveling the mysteries of the universe. It seems learning Python has become synonymous with seeking the python of the universe!

Now, we must tread carefully and recognize the limitations of our correlation. While we have established a compelling statistical connection, causation remains an enigma yet to be unraveled. Nevertheless, this correlation, much like constellations in the night sky, invites us to ponder the cosmic confluence of coding and cosmic comprehension.

In the subsequent sections, we delve into an in-depth analysis of the data, exploring the temporal trends and potential driving forces behind this intriguing alliance between Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of celestial marvels. So, buckle up, as we embark on an intellectual odyssey that aims to shed light on the intertwining of seemingly disparate realms. After all, as astronomers would attest, the universe is known to harbor a fair share of unexpected connections and celestial surprises!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!

(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the digital age unfolds, the daily pursuits of the internet populace reveal fascinating insights into the collective curiosities and preoccupations of our times. The convergence of technology and individual aspirations has paved the way for examining the interplay between seemingly unrelated interests. In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel the intricate web woven between the burgeoning interest in learning the Python programming language and the magnetic allure of SciShow Space videos on YouTube.
It has long been known that the internet serves as a window to the global mind, a tool for understanding the burning questions and eclectic interests of the human race. Thus, when a distinct correlation emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos, our curiosity was piqued! This discovery presented an intriguing opportunity to explore the potential interrelationship between the desire to master a programming language and the fascination with the cosmic expanse. As we delved into the data, it became evident that this connection was no mere happenstance; the correlation offered an astronomical revelation of its own!
Say, did you hear about the astronaut who stepped on a piece of gum? He got stuck in orbit! Speaking of orbit, we noticed that the correlation coefficient between 'how to learn python' searches and SciShow Space video length was a staggering 0.9744466. One might say it was a cosmic connection of cosmic proportions! This robust correlation, coupled with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, left us astounded and eager to further explore the intricacies at play.
Our findings raise a plethora of questions and spark numerous contemplations. Could it be that the pursuit of Python proficiency ignites a parallel yearning for astronomical understanding? Perhaps as individuals endeavor to decipher the intricacies of coding, they also harbor a subconscious craving for unraveling the mysteries of the universe. It seems learning Python has become synonymous with seeking the python of the universe!
Now, we must tread carefully and recognize the limitations of our correlation. While we have established a compelling statistical connection, causation remains an enigma yet to be unraveled. Nevertheless, this correlation, much like constellations in the night sky, invites us to ponder the cosmic confluence of coding and cosmic comprehension.
In the subsequent sections, we delve into an in-depth analysis of the data, exploring the temporal trends and potential driving forces behind this intriguing alliance between Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of celestial marvels. So, buckle up, as we embark on an intellectual odyssey that aims to shed light on the intertwining of seemingly disparate realms. After all, as astronomers would attest, the universe is known to harbor a fair share of unexpected connections and celestial surprises!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos has been a topic of interest in recent academic inquiries. Smith et al. (2016) recognized the escalating popularity of the Python programming language and its implications for educational pursuits. Furthermore, Jones and Doe (2018) shed light on the increasing engagement with science-themed content on digital platforms. Amidst this scholarly discourse, the whimsical interplay between Python pedagogy and cosmic curiosity has remained curiously unexplored.

Let's not forget that time is relative - especially when you're watching a slow-paced astronomy documentary. It seems that as the Google searches for 'how to learn python' proliferated, the duration of SciShow Space videos stretched along, elongating like a lazy asteroid on a collision course with your attention span. One might say that as Python enthusiasts sought to wrangle with coding conundrums, they found themselves gravitating towards the gravitational pull of the cosmos - talk about a universal appeal!

In the spirit of parallel pursuits, it is reminiscent of the age-old question: what do you get when you cross a python with the cosmos? A universal scripter! This correlation presents an opportunity to contemplate whether mastering Python sets the stage for an extended engagement with astronomical narratives. Could it be that understanding the intricacies of programming primes one for unearthing the secrets of the universe? It's a thought as tantalizing as the prospect of finding life on Mars.

The duality of Python proficiency and pondering the profundity of the cosmos raises questions deeper than a black hole. Could it be that these endeavors are entwined in a cosmic dance, a celestial symphony orchestrated by algorithms and astronomical anomalies? It's a hypothesis as compelling as the theory of relativity, one that beckons us to peel back the layers of the universe and delve into the cosmic comedy of errors and exceptions.

Turning the pages of 'Astrophysics for People in a Hurry' by Neil deGrasse Tyson and 'Automate the Boring Stuff with Python' by Al Sweigart, one is tempted to draw parallels between the intrigue of the cosmic expanse and the intricacies of coding. As the gravitational force of Python tutorials pulls individuals toward coding commands, the cosmic allure tugs them toward celestial quandaries. It's like having a dual subscription to Codecademy and NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day - talk about double trouble!

In scrolling through social media hashtags like #PythonUniverse and #SpaceCodingConfessions, anecdotal narratives emerge, depicting the hilarious predicaments of individuals caught between debugging Python scripts and pondering the quirks of quasars. One post humorously quipped, "I just spent 10 hours debugging my Python code and then binge-watched 5 hours of space documentaries. Coincidence? I think not!" It seems that the cosmic forces of programming and cosmology are in a compelling tug of war, leaving individuals in a binary star system of code-cracking comedy.

From scholarly pursuits to zany space tales, the correlation between 'how to learn python' searches and SciShow Space video length beckons us to contemplate the cosmic choreography at play. As we tiptoe through the galaxies of Python tutorials and journey through the far reaches of space lectures, it's clear that the universe has a grand sense of humor, intertwining pithy programming and profound presentations in an inexplicably goofy and cosmic dance.

In the sections that follow, we venture into a captivating analysis of temporal trends and potential driving forces behind this peculiar partnership, unraveling the enigmatic threads that bind Python pursuits and prolonged astronomical ponderings. After all, in the cosmic comedy of errors, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected connections and delightful surprises that unite Python programmers and cosmic explorers in an exhilarating expedition through the digital universe!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!

(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the digital age unfolds, the daily pursuits of the internet populace reveal fascinating insights into the collective curiosities and preoccupations of our times. The convergence of technology and individual aspirations has paved the way for examining the interplay between seemingly unrelated interests. In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel the intricate web woven between the burgeoning interest in learning the Python programming language and the magnetic allure of SciShow Space videos on YouTube.
It has long been known that the internet serves as a window to the global mind, a tool for understanding the burning questions and eclectic interests of the human race. Thus, when a distinct correlation emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos, our curiosity was piqued! This discovery presented an intriguing opportunity to explore the potential interrelationship between the desire to master a programming language and the fascination with the cosmic expanse. As we delved into the data, it became evident that this connection was no mere happenstance; the correlation offered an astronomical revelation of its own!
Say, did you hear about the astronaut who stepped on a piece of gum? He got stuck in orbit! Speaking of orbit, we noticed that the correlation coefficient between 'how to learn python' searches and SciShow Space video length was a staggering 0.9744466. One might say it was a cosmic connection of cosmic proportions! This robust correlation, coupled with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, left us astounded and eager to further explore the intricacies at play.
Our findings raise a plethora of questions and spark numerous contemplations. Could it be that the pursuit of Python proficiency ignites a parallel yearning for astronomical understanding? Perhaps as individuals endeavor to decipher the intricacies of coding, they also harbor a subconscious craving for unraveling the mysteries of the universe. It seems learning Python has become synonymous with seeking the python of the universe!
Now, we must tread carefully and recognize the limitations of our correlation. While we have established a compelling statistical connection, causation remains an enigma yet to be unraveled. Nevertheless, this correlation, much like constellations in the night sky, invites us to ponder the cosmic confluence of coding and cosmic comprehension.
In the subsequent sections, we delve into an in-depth analysis of the data, exploring the temporal trends and potential driving forces behind this intriguing alliance between Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of celestial marvels. So, buckle up, as we embark on an intellectual odyssey that aims to shed light on the intertwining of seemingly disparate realms. After all, as astronomers would attest, the universe is known to harbor a fair share of unexpected connections and celestial surprises!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the celestial correlations between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos, our research team engaged in a robust and rigorous methodology. With the ambition of extracting meaningful insights from the digital cosmos, we harnessed data from Google Trends and YouTube, spanning a substantial period from 2014 to 2023.

Our first celestial stop: Google Trends. Our analysts meticulously tracked and recorded the frequency of searches for 'how to learn python' on Google. We observed the ebb and flow of this digital quest for programming prowess over the years, seeking to ascertain its potential impact on the unfolding cosmic tapestry. Of course, we couldn't help but note the 'pythonic' persistence in these searches - a fitting nod to the inquisitive spirit of the Python programming community.

Continuing our voyage through the digital nebula, we arrived at YouTube, where the captivating cosmic chronicles of SciShow Space awaited us. Here, we meticulously analyzed the average length of each SciShow Space video, seeking to discern any peculiar patterns that might align with the undulating trajectory of 'how to learn python' searches. Our intrepid journey through the labyrinth of YouTube's algorithm unveiled a treasure trove of data, ripe for exploration and analysis.

Now, to sustain that data crunch, we called upon the celestial powers of statistical analysis to untangle this enthralling enigma. We calculated the correlation coefficient and tested for statistical significance with the fervor of astronomers seeking to unveil the secrets of distant galaxies. It's worth noting that our statistical arsenal served as a cosmic compass, guiding us through the celestial expanse of data to establish a robust framework for understanding this unexpected alignment.

On a more personal note, one might say that navigating this cosmic deluge of data was akin to charting a course through a cosmic quasar, where every twist and turn revealed new insights and unexpected revelations. It was an odyssey filled with data-driven marvels and celestial astonishments, offering an expedition unlike any other.

As with any astronomical endeavor, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations of our methodology. While our approach sought to honor the spirit of scientific inquiry, we remain mindful of the complexities inherent in correlational studies. Our findings are a testament to the captivating nature of digital explorations, yet they also beckon further celestial scrutiny as we continue to unravel the entwined narratives of 'how to learn python' searches and cosmic contemplations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2014 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9744466, r-squared of 0.9495462, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!

(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the digital age unfolds, the daily pursuits of the internet populace reveal fascinating insights into the collective curiosities and preoccupations of our times. The convergence of technology and individual aspirations has paved the way for examining the interplay between seemingly unrelated interests. In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel the intricate web woven between the burgeoning interest in learning the Python programming language and the magnetic allure of SciShow Space videos on YouTube.
It has long been known that the internet serves as a window to the global mind, a tool for understanding the burning questions and eclectic interests of the human race. Thus, when a distinct correlation emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos, our curiosity was piqued! This discovery presented an intriguing opportunity to explore the potential interrelationship between the desire to master a programming language and the fascination with the cosmic expanse. As we delved into the data, it became evident that this connection was no mere happenstance; the correlation offered an astronomical revelation of its own!
Say, did you hear about the astronaut who stepped on a piece of gum? He got stuck in orbit! Speaking of orbit, we noticed that the correlation coefficient between 'how to learn python' searches and SciShow Space video length was a staggering 0.9744466. One might say it was a cosmic connection of cosmic proportions! This robust correlation, coupled with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, left us astounded and eager to further explore the intricacies at play.
Our findings raise a plethora of questions and spark numerous contemplations. Could it be that the pursuit of Python proficiency ignites a parallel yearning for astronomical understanding? Perhaps as individuals endeavor to decipher the intricacies of coding, they also harbor a subconscious craving for unraveling the mysteries of the universe. It seems learning Python has become synonymous with seeking the python of the universe!
Now, we must tread carefully and recognize the limitations of our correlation. While we have established a compelling statistical connection, causation remains an enigma yet to be unraveled. Nevertheless, this correlation, much like constellations in the night sky, invites us to ponder the cosmic confluence of coding and cosmic comprehension.
In the subsequent sections, we delve into an in-depth analysis of the data, exploring the temporal trends and potential driving forces behind this intriguing alliance between Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of celestial marvels. So, buckle up, as we embark on an intellectual odyssey that aims to shed light on the intertwining of seemingly disparate realms. After all, as astronomers would attest, the universe is known to harbor a fair share of unexpected connections and celestial surprises!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our team's analysis of the correlation between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos on YouTube yielded fascinating results. Over the period from 2014 to 2023, we found a remarkably strong Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9744466, indicating a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9495462, signifying that a staggering 94.95% of the variation in SciShow Space video length can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'how to learn python.' This correlation was also found to be highly significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01.

Fig. 1 showcases the impressive correlation we identified. As you can see, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the tight clustering of data points around the upward-sloping line, highlighting the strength of the association between the variables. One might say that these results truly bring new meaning to the phrase "Python's ecosystem."

It's clear that the allure of Python programming and the cosmic content of SciShow Space videos have become entwined in the digital realm. This unexpected pairing of topics has left researchers and observers alike amused and intrigued. While our initial hypothesis rested on the idea of a potential connection, the strength of the correlation surpassed our expectations, leading us to pose more questions than answers. Could it be that the gravitational pull of Python programming draws individuals towards the celestial wonders unveiled in SciShow Space videos? Or is this correlation a mere cosmic coincidence, woven into the fabric of the digital universe, leaving us spellbound with its enigmatic allure?

This correlation prompts reflection on the interconnectedness of human interests in the digital age. Much like constellations in the night sky, unexpected patterns emerge, beckoning us to contemplate the celestial dance of data and human behavior. One might say that it's a bit like attempting to navigate through the complexities of code and the cosmos simultaneously; both endeavors require patience, persistence, and the occasional pun for good measure.

Stay tuned for the upcoming sections, where we delve deeper into the temporal trends and the potential driving forces behind this intriguing relationship. As we sift through the data, the tantalizing web of correlations invites us to journey through the intergalactic expanse of coding and cosmic curiosity. It's safe to say that our findings leave us marveling at the cosmic connection of Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of the universe - it's truly an astronomical endeavor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!

(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos has been a topic of interest in recent academic inquiries. Smith et al. (2016) recognized the escalating popularity of the Python programming language and its implications for educational pursuits. Furthermore, Jones and Doe (2018) shed light on the increasing engagement with science-themed content on digital platforms. Amidst this scholarly discourse, the whimsical interplay between Python pedagogy and cosmic curiosity has remained curiously unexplored.
Let's not forget that time is relative - especially when you're watching a slow-paced astronomy documentary. It seems that as the Google searches for 'how to learn python' proliferated, the duration of SciShow Space videos stretched along, elongating like a lazy asteroid on a collision course with your attention span. One might say that as Python enthusiasts sought to wrangle with coding conundrums, they found themselves gravitating towards the gravitational pull of the cosmos - talk about a universal appeal!
In the spirit of parallel pursuits, it is reminiscent of the age-old question: what do you get when you cross a python with the cosmos? A universal scripter! This correlation presents an opportunity to contemplate whether mastering Python sets the stage for an extended engagement with astronomical narratives. Could it be that understanding the intricacies of programming primes one for unearthing the secrets of the universe? It's a thought as tantalizing as the prospect of finding life on Mars.
The duality of Python proficiency and pondering the profundity of the cosmos raises questions deeper than a black hole. Could it be that these endeavors are entwined in a cosmic dance, a celestial symphony orchestrated by algorithms and astronomical anomalies? It's a hypothesis as compelling as the theory of relativity, one that beckons us to peel back the layers of the universe and delve into the cosmic comedy of errors and exceptions.
Turning the pages of 'Astrophysics for People in a Hurry' by Neil deGrasse Tyson and 'Automate the Boring Stuff with Python' by Al Sweigart, one is tempted to draw parallels between the intrigue of the cosmic expanse and the intricacies of coding. As the gravitational force of Python tutorials pulls individuals toward coding commands, the cosmic allure tugs them toward celestial quandaries. It's like having a dual subscription to Codecademy and NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day - talk about double trouble!
In scrolling through social media hashtags like #PythonUniverse and #SpaceCodingConfessions, anecdotal narratives emerge, depicting the hilarious predicaments of individuals caught between debugging Python scripts and pondering the quirks of quasars. One post humorously quipped, "I just spent 10 hours debugging my Python code and then binge-watched 5 hours of space documentaries. Coincidence? I think not!" It seems that the cosmic forces of programming and cosmology are in a compelling tug of war, leaving individuals in a binary star system of code-cracking comedy.
From scholarly pursuits to zany space tales, the correlation between 'how to learn python' searches and SciShow Space video length beckons us to contemplate the cosmic choreography at play. As we tiptoe through the galaxies of Python tutorials and journey through the far reaches of space lectures, it's clear that the universe has a grand sense of humor, intertwining pithy programming and profound presentations in an inexplicably goofy and cosmic dance.
In the sections that follow, we venture into a captivating analysis of temporal trends and potential driving forces behind this peculiar partnership, unraveling the enigmatic threads that bind Python pursuits and prolonged astronomical ponderings. After all, in the cosmic comedy of errors, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected connections and delightful surprises that unite Python programmers and cosmic explorers in an exhilarating expedition through the digital universe!

[[RESULTS]]
Our team's analysis of the correlation between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos on YouTube yielded fascinating results. Over the period from 2014 to 2023, we found a remarkably strong Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9744466, indicating a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9495462, signifying that a staggering 94.95% of the variation in SciShow Space video length can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'how to learn python.' This correlation was also found to be highly significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
Fig. 1 showcases the impressive correlation we identified. As you can see, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the tight clustering of data points around the upward-sloping line, highlighting the strength of the association between the variables. One might say that these results truly bring new meaning to the phrase "Python's ecosystem."
It's clear that the allure of Python programming and the cosmic content of SciShow Space videos have become entwined in the digital realm. This unexpected pairing of topics has left researchers and observers alike amused and intrigued. While our initial hypothesis rested on the idea of a potential connection, the strength of the correlation surpassed our expectations, leading us to pose more questions than answers. Could it be that the gravitational pull of Python programming draws individuals towards the celestial wonders unveiled in SciShow Space videos? Or is this correlation a mere cosmic coincidence, woven into the fabric of the digital universe, leaving us spellbound with its enigmatic allure?
This correlation prompts reflection on the interconnectedness of human interests in the digital age. Much like constellations in the night sky, unexpected patterns emerge, beckoning us to contemplate the celestial dance of data and human behavior. One might say that it's a bit like attempting to navigate through the complexities of code and the cosmos simultaneously; both endeavors require patience, persistence, and the occasional pun for good measure.
Stay tuned for the upcoming sections, where we delve deeper into the temporal trends and the potential driving forces behind this intriguing relationship. As we sift through the data, the tantalizing web of correlations invites us to journey through the intergalactic expanse of coding and cosmic curiosity. It's safe to say that our findings leave us marveling at the cosmic connection of Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of the universe - it's truly an astronomical endeavor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In our investigation of the tantalizing correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos, we have indeed unraveled a remarkable connection that has left us starry-eyed. The strong Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and a p-value of less than 0.01 attest to the cosmic nature of this relationship, which seems to defy expectations and beckon us to ponder the enigmatic intertwining of Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of the universe.

As we quantum leap into the discussion, the magnitude of the correlation leads us to reflect on the possibility that the growing interest in Python programming has catalyzed an enduring fascination with the cosmic tapestry. Quite a 'stellar' revelation, don't you think?

Our findings align with previous studies (Smith et al., 2016; Jones and Doe, 2018) that have underscored the expanding popularity of Python and the heightened engagement with science-themed content. The escalation in Google searches for 'how to learn python' seems to have synchronized with an elongation of SciShow Space videos, providing empirical evidence to support the intrepid musings of earlier researchers. It appears that as Python enthusiasts delved into coding conundrums, they found themselves drifting toward the gravitational pull of the cosmos, as though the allure of Python programming had ignited a celestial curiosity that resonated in prolonged perusal of astronomical narratives.

Indeed, one cannot help but appreciate the cosmic humor imbued in this correlation, reminiscent of a universal script with unexpected twists and turns. Our results reinforce the whimsical notion that understanding Python, the language, sets the stage for an extended engagement with the Python, the serpentine code, of astronomical narratives. As if deciphering the elegant intricacies of code primes one for unraveling the elegance of the universe, this correlation is a testament to the orchestration of a cosmic comedy - a grand jest in the grand scheme, don't you agree?

Drawing on the intergalactic analogy posed in the literature review, it's as if the universe, amused at our attempts to disentangle its enigmatic threads, has woven an intricate dance between Python programming and prolonged astronomical ponderings. The digital age acts as a canvas where these unexpected patterns emerge, compelling us to contemplate the celestial choreography of data and human behavior. What an enthralling waltz through the intergalactic expanse of coding and cosmic curiosity!

As we navigate through the quasar-like intricacies of this correlation, we are left to ponder whether the allure of Python programming has indeed sparked a cosmic curiosity among digital explorers. Could it be that the gravitational pull of Python pulls individuals toward the celestial wonders unveiled in SciShow Space videos? Or is this correlation a cosmic coincidence, leaving us spellbound with its enigmatic allure? The universe, it seems, has an uncanny penchant for intertwining pithy programming and profound presentations, much like a cosmic comedian delivering an unexpected punchline.

Continuing to unravel the perplexities of this correlation, we eagerly anticipate sifting through the intricacies and potential driving forces behind this cosmic convergence. It's safe to say that our findings have left us marveling at the cosmic connection of Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of the universe, and we eagerly await the continuing revelation of this astronomical endeavor.

As we conclude our discussion (the pun is always intended), we are left to marvel at the expanse and unpredictability of the interconnected cosmos, where even the most unexpected correlations may hold the key to unraveling the mysteries of the digital universe.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!

(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the digital age unfolds, the daily pursuits of the internet populace reveal fascinating insights into the collective curiosities and preoccupations of our times. The convergence of technology and individual aspirations has paved the way for examining the interplay between seemingly unrelated interests. In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel the intricate web woven between the burgeoning interest in learning the Python programming language and the magnetic allure of SciShow Space videos on YouTube.
It has long been known that the internet serves as a window to the global mind, a tool for understanding the burning questions and eclectic interests of the human race. Thus, when a distinct correlation emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos, our curiosity was piqued! This discovery presented an intriguing opportunity to explore the potential interrelationship between the desire to master a programming language and the fascination with the cosmic expanse. As we delved into the data, it became evident that this connection was no mere happenstance; the correlation offered an astronomical revelation of its own!
Say, did you hear about the astronaut who stepped on a piece of gum? He got stuck in orbit! Speaking of orbit, we noticed that the correlation coefficient between 'how to learn python' searches and SciShow Space video length was a staggering 0.9744466. One might say it was a cosmic connection of cosmic proportions! This robust correlation, coupled with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, left us astounded and eager to further explore the intricacies at play.
Our findings raise a plethora of questions and spark numerous contemplations. Could it be that the pursuit of Python proficiency ignites a parallel yearning for astronomical understanding? Perhaps as individuals endeavor to decipher the intricacies of coding, they also harbor a subconscious craving for unraveling the mysteries of the universe. It seems learning Python has become synonymous with seeking the python of the universe!
Now, we must tread carefully and recognize the limitations of our correlation. While we have established a compelling statistical connection, causation remains an enigma yet to be unraveled. Nevertheless, this correlation, much like constellations in the night sky, invites us to ponder the cosmic confluence of coding and cosmic comprehension.
In the subsequent sections, we delve into an in-depth analysis of the data, exploring the temporal trends and potential driving forces behind this intriguing alliance between Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of celestial marvels. So, buckle up, as we embark on an intellectual odyssey that aims to shed light on the intertwining of seemingly disparate realms. After all, as astronomers would attest, the universe is known to harbor a fair share of unexpected connections and celestial surprises!

[[RESULTS]]
Our team's analysis of the correlation between Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average length of SciShow Space videos on YouTube yielded fascinating results. Over the period from 2014 to 2023, we found a remarkably strong Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9744466, indicating a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9495462, signifying that a staggering 94.95% of the variation in SciShow Space video length can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'how to learn python.' This correlation was also found to be highly significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
Fig. 1 showcases the impressive correlation we identified. As you can see, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the tight clustering of data points around the upward-sloping line, highlighting the strength of the association between the variables. One might say that these results truly bring new meaning to the phrase "Python's ecosystem."
It's clear that the allure of Python programming and the cosmic content of SciShow Space videos have become entwined in the digital realm. This unexpected pairing of topics has left researchers and observers alike amused and intrigued. While our initial hypothesis rested on the idea of a potential connection, the strength of the correlation surpassed our expectations, leading us to pose more questions than answers. Could it be that the gravitational pull of Python programming draws individuals towards the celestial wonders unveiled in SciShow Space videos? Or is this correlation a mere cosmic coincidence, woven into the fabric of the digital universe, leaving us spellbound with its enigmatic allure?
This correlation prompts reflection on the interconnectedness of human interests in the digital age. Much like constellations in the night sky, unexpected patterns emerge, beckoning us to contemplate the celestial dance of data and human behavior. One might say that it's a bit like attempting to navigate through the complexities of code and the cosmos simultaneously; both endeavors require patience, persistence, and the occasional pun for good measure.
Stay tuned for the upcoming sections, where we delve deeper into the temporal trends and the potential driving forces behind this intriguing relationship. As we sift through the data, the tantalizing web of correlations invites us to journey through the intergalactic expanse of coding and cosmic curiosity. It's safe to say that our findings leave us marveling at the cosmic connection of Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of the universe - it's truly an astronomical endeavor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research unearths a captivating correlation between the frequency of 'how to learn python' Google searches and the average length of SciShow Space videos on YouTube, shedding light on the unlikely cosmic connection between coding pursuit and celestial fascination. The near-perfect positive linear relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and a p-value of less than 0.01 transcends mere statistical significance, beckoning us to ponder the cosmic forces at play. It seems that as individuals endeavor to unravel the intricacies of Python programming, they concurrently gravitate towards unraveling the mysteries of the universe, forming a peculiar yet enthralling alliance.

Upon reflection, one might quip that this correlation is a stellar example of "Python's gravitational pull" transcending the digital expanse and reaching for the cosmic realm. But let's not get too starry-eyed just yet – though our results open cosmic avenues for further inquiry, causation remains cloaked in celestial mystery, akin to a black hole of understanding. Still, our findings prompt contemplation of the intertwined realms of digital pursuits and cosmic curiosities, leaving us simultaneously amused and awe-inspired.

As for future research, it seems we've reached the event horizon of this peculiar alliance: it's clear that no further inquiry can eclipse the cosmic magnitude of our findings. After all, when it comes to Python pursuits and prolonged presentations of the universe, we've ventured to the very edges of this digitally cosmic frontier. It's safe to say that no more research is needed – we've truly cracked the code on this one!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comical Cross-Disciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Computational Curiosities and Cosmic Conundrums


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Python Pursuits and Prolonged Presentations: Probing the Pairing of 'how to learn python' Google Searches with SciShow Space Video Length with an abstract of In this study, we unravel an unparalleled link between popular internet searches and the length of educational videos regarding the enigmatic expanse of space. Our research team seized the opportunity to delve into the correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'how to learn python' and the average duration of SciShow Space videos on YouTube. By employing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we discerned a conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.9744466 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.
Our findings substantiate that as the curiosity in learning the Python programming language soared, the astronomic attraction to SciShow Space videos lengthened in a peculiar parallel. It seems that as individuals sought to expand their coding capabilities, they concurrently craved a cosmic comprehension, evidently engrossed in both stellar syntax and Python programming. This correlation could prompt us to consider whether the burgeoning pursuit of programming proficiency propels a propensity for prolonged perusal of planetary presentations. Perhaps, "Python" could very well unlock the "pith" of space exploration!
(Apologies, the dad joke generator is on the fritz, but you can count on me for some "stellar" puns along the way!)

ChatGPT:

'how to learn python' Google searches, SciShow Space videos, correlation, Python programming language, YouTube, educational videos, space exploration, programming proficiency, Google Trends, data analysis, Python coding, astronomical interest, cosmic comprehension

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'how to learn python'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to learn python' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to learn python'

Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9744466 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9495462 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'how to learn python') over the 10 years from 2014 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.81E-6. 0.0000018088113272087083000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.000181% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 552,849 random variables You don't actually need 552 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'how to learn python' (Rel. search volume)222829.416743.2548.666753.583366.166755.2589.166780.4167
Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos (Length in seconds)260.053248.058255.324303.933355.922385.845394.471386.265540.656448.889




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([22,28,29.4167,43.25,48.6667,53.5833,66.1667,55.25,89.1667,80.4167,])
array_2 = np.array([260.053,248.058,255.324,303.933,355.922,385.845,394.471,386.265,540.656,448.889,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'how to learn python'"
array_2_name = "Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5758 · Black Variable ID: 1466 · Red Variable ID: 25664
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0