Report an error
Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of agricultural equipment operators in Puerto Rico | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
The number of database administrators in Tennessee | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Google searches for 'climate change' | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Hot days in Austin | r=0.91 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Snowfall in Anchorage | r=0.86 | 10yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream | r=0.8 | 9yrs | No |
Average length of SciShow Space YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)