about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,708 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia and the second variable is Solar power generated in Kazakhstan.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Democrats voted for Senators in Georgia, it sent a surge of positivity through the atmosphere. This positivity somehow traveled all the way to Kazakhstan, where it inspired their citizens to invest in solar power. It's like the political butterfly effect, but with solar panels and international vibes. Remember, when it comes to politics and solar power, it's all about shining a light on the situation, no matter how far away it may seem!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a vibrant image illustrating the global impact of political enthusiasm and renewable energy following the Georgia Senate elections. In the foreground, depict a wave of blue and red voters casting their ballots for Democratic Senators in Georgia, capturing their enthusiasm and hope. As the scene transitions to Kazakhstan, showcase citizens installing solar panels on rooftops against a backdrop of the expansive Kazakh landscape, symbolizing the embrace of renewable energy. Capture the connection between political engagement and green initiatives by visually showing the spreading influence and impact of the Georgia votes, represented by the growing proliferation of solar panels across different regions, illuminating the world with optimism and sustainable power. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration A Discovery magazine cover image Minimalism Surrealism Realistic
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan, in the following situation: As more Democrats voted for Senators in Georgia, it sent a surge of positivity through the atmosphere. This positivity somehow traveled all the way to Kazakhstan, where it inspired their citizens to invest in solar power. It's like the political butterfly effect, but with solar panels and international vibes. Remember, when it comes to politics and solar power, it's all about shining a light on the situation, no matter how far away it may seem!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant scene, we see a wave of blue and red voters casting their ballots for Democratic Senators in Georgia, creating an aura of hope and positivity. This aura stretches across the globe, reaching Kazakhstan, where it inspires citizens to embrace solar power. People in Kazakhstan begin installing solar panels on rooftops, symbolizing the international connection between political enthusiasm and renewable energy. The distant impact of the Georgia votes is visualized through the growing spread of solar panels, illuminating the world with optimism and sustainable power.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant scene, we see a wave of blue and red voters casting their ballots for Democratic Senators in Georgia, creating an aura of hope and positivity. This aura stretches across the globe, reaching Kazakhstan, where it inspires citizens to embrace solar power. People in Kazakhstan begin installing solar panels on rooftops, symbolizing the international connection between political enthusiasm and renewable energy. The distant impact of the Georgia votes is visualized through the growing spread of solar panels, illuminating the world with optimism and sustainable power. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a vibrant image illustrating the global impact of political enthusiasm and renewable energy following the Georgia Senate elections. In the foreground, depict a wave of blue and red voters casting their ballots for Democratic Senators in Georgia, capturing their enthusiasm and hope. As the scene transitions to Kazakhstan, showcase citizens installing solar panels on rooftops against a backdrop of the expansive Kazakh landscape, symbolizing the embrace of renewable energy. Capture the connection between political engagement and green initiatives by visually showing the spreading influence and impact of the Georgia votes, represented by the growing proliferation of solar panels across different regions, illuminating the world with optimism and sustainable power.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia caused Solar power generated in Kazakhstan to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

The Journal of Solar Policy and International Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.

While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.

While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of politics and renewable energy has long been a topic of interest for policymakers, environmentalists, and now, apparently, statisticians with a penchant for whimsical correlations as well. The juxtaposition of Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan may seem like an odd pairing akin to mismatched socks, but as we delve into this peculiar association, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which political actions and energy practices may weave an unseen web of interconnectedness.

In the realm of statistical inquiries, we often search for causation, attempting to decipher the tangled knots of data to discern meaningful relationships. However, in this instance, we present an unexpected convergence - a delightful statistical surprise that overshadows the conventional predictability of political behavior and energy patterns.

Through a rigorous analysis of the intricate data threads collected from diverse sources, we have unearthed a correlation coefficient so eerily close to unity that one might suspect a mischievous statistical fairy has sprinkled the data with unnecessary precision. Nonetheless, as we know, correlation does not imply causation, but it does certainly imply an invitation for a fascinating intellectual romp through the unlikely storylines that bind these two seemingly unrelated variables.

Our unconventional foray into the world of solar-centric electoral politics carries with it an air of intrigue and amusement. We invite the readers to embark on this whimsical journey as we attempt to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan - a testament to the delightful unpredictability that often emerges from the intricate dance between data and human phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.

While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and renewable energy has long been a topic of interest for policymakers, environmentalists, and now, apparently, statisticians with a penchant for whimsical correlations as well. The juxtaposition of Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan may seem like an odd pairing akin to mismatched socks, but as we delve into this peculiar association, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which political actions and energy practices may weave an unseen web of interconnectedness.
In the realm of statistical inquiries, we often search for causation, attempting to decipher the tangled knots of data to discern meaningful relationships. However, in this instance, we present an unexpected convergence - a delightful statistical surprise that overshadows the conventional predictability of political behavior and energy patterns.
Through a rigorous analysis of the intricate data threads collected from diverse sources, we have unearthed a correlation coefficient so eerily close to unity that one might suspect a mischievous statistical fairy has sprinkled the data with unnecessary precision. Nonetheless, as we know, correlation does not imply causation, but it does certainly imply an invitation for a fascinating intellectual romp through the unlikely storylines that bind these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our unconventional foray into the world of solar-centric electoral politics carries with it an air of intrigue and amusement. We invite the readers to embark on this whimsical journey as we attempt to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan - a testament to the delightful unpredictability that often emerges from the intricate dance between data and human phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find an extensive analysis of political demographics in Georgia, focusing on voter behavior and party affiliations. This study provides a solid foundation for understanding the political landscape and voter preferences within the state. Similarly, "Doe and Johnson" delve into the intricacies of solar energy production in Kazakhstan, offering a comprehensive overview of the country's renewable energy sector, including factors that contribute to solar power generation.

Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction, the classic treatise "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" introduces readers to the whimsical world of intergalactic travel and the unexpected connections that abound in the universe. Although not directly related to electoral dynamics in Georgia or solar power generation in Kazakhstan, the serendipitous encounters and humorous escapades depicted in this work inspire a lighthearted approach to exploring unlikely correlations.

On a more serious note, the novel "Solar" by Ian McEwan interweaves the personal and professional spheres of a physicist and the ethical dilemmas surrounding solar technology, offering a thought-provoking narrative that touches on the complexities of renewable energy development. While the themes of this fictional work diverge from the empirical investigations at hand, the inherent irony of a novel about solar power coinciding with our research topic does not go unnoticed.

In a less literary capacity, the televisually inclined researcher would be remiss to overlook the investigative prowess of "The X-Files," a show known for its exploration of unusual phenomena and unexplained connections. While Agent Mulder's "I want to believe" mantra may not align precisely with the rigorous scientific inquiry we champion, the spirit of curiosity and openness to the unexpected echoes the ethos of our inquiry.

In "Jones and Smith," the authors offer a detailed examination of international energy trade relations, providing valuable insights into the interplay of geopolitical factors and energy production dynamics. This work contributes to our understanding of the broader context within which the solar power generation in Kazakhstan operates, shedding light on potential external influences that may inadvertently intersect with political dynamics in Georgia.

As we venture into this peculiar realm of enquiry, it becomes unavoidably clear that the convergence of Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan is a subject that elicits both wry amusement and scholarly intrigue. Our interdisciplinary approach and mirthful spirit shall guide us in unraveling the idiosyncratic web of connections that underlie this seemingly improbable correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.

While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and renewable energy has long been a topic of interest for policymakers, environmentalists, and now, apparently, statisticians with a penchant for whimsical correlations as well. The juxtaposition of Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan may seem like an odd pairing akin to mismatched socks, but as we delve into this peculiar association, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which political actions and energy practices may weave an unseen web of interconnectedness.
In the realm of statistical inquiries, we often search for causation, attempting to decipher the tangled knots of data to discern meaningful relationships. However, in this instance, we present an unexpected convergence - a delightful statistical surprise that overshadows the conventional predictability of political behavior and energy patterns.
Through a rigorous analysis of the intricate data threads collected from diverse sources, we have unearthed a correlation coefficient so eerily close to unity that one might suspect a mischievous statistical fairy has sprinkled the data with unnecessary precision. Nonetheless, as we know, correlation does not imply causation, but it does certainly imply an invitation for a fascinating intellectual romp through the unlikely storylines that bind these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our unconventional foray into the world of solar-centric electoral politics carries with it an air of intrigue and amusement. We invite the readers to embark on this whimsical journey as we attempt to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan - a testament to the delightful unpredictability that often emerges from the intricate dance between data and human phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

"Methodology"

In unraveling the perplexing correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan, our research team employed a seemingly incongruous mix of statistical wizardry, data mining, and a dash of whimsical curiosity. The methodology adopted for this study reflects our determination to navigate the labyrinthine pathways of data collection, processing, and analysis, akin to intrepid explorers on an unexpected statistical safari.

Data Collection:
The first step in our meandering expedition involved sifting through the digital savannahs of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration. The wide-ranging temporal arc of 2012 to 2021 was chosen to capture the evolutionary nuances of both political proclivities in Georgia and the solar energy extravaganza in Kazakhstan, as if we were peering through a statistical time machine marveling at the twists and turns of both variables.

For Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, we meticulously gathered data on electoral turnouts and party alignments, parsing through polling records with the precision of a surgeon and the patience of a zen master. Meanwhile, the solar power generated in Kazakhstan summoned us to engage in an evocative dance with kilowatt-hour production figures, basking in the glow of photovoltaic panels and the hum of inverters with a reverence reserved for the celestial bodies.

Data Processing:
With our data trove procured from remote corners of the digital universe, we embarked on a peculiar ritual of data cleansing and harmonization, akin to a symphonic endeavor to compose a melodic correlation between two seemingly discordant variables. This meticulous process involved the gentle persuasion of outlier removal, the judicious imputation of missing values, and the artful alignment of temporal scales, all while whispering sweet statistical nothings to the datasets.

Statistical Analysis:
The culmination of our methodological odyssey arrived at the shores of statistical analysis, where we hoisted the sails of correlation coefficients and unfurled the flag of p-values. Our trusty companion, Pearson's correlation coefficient, led us on a merry statistical promenade, revealing a bafflingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308, akin to snagging a shiny golden statistical horseshoe from the proverbial data haystack. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 added a dramatic crescendo to our findings, akin to the unexpected plot twist in a whimsical statistical tale.

In summary, the methodology of this study embodies a harmonious blend of rigor, serendipity, and an unapologetic flair for offbeat statistical explorations. As we embark on this adventure, we invite our readers to join us in celebrating the delightful serendipity that often emerges from the crossroads of data, analysis, and a touch of statistical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9941308, r-squared of 0.9882960, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.

While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of politics and renewable energy has long been a topic of interest for policymakers, environmentalists, and now, apparently, statisticians with a penchant for whimsical correlations as well. The juxtaposition of Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan may seem like an odd pairing akin to mismatched socks, but as we delve into this peculiar association, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which political actions and energy practices may weave an unseen web of interconnectedness.
In the realm of statistical inquiries, we often search for causation, attempting to decipher the tangled knots of data to discern meaningful relationships. However, in this instance, we present an unexpected convergence - a delightful statistical surprise that overshadows the conventional predictability of political behavior and energy patterns.
Through a rigorous analysis of the intricate data threads collected from diverse sources, we have unearthed a correlation coefficient so eerily close to unity that one might suspect a mischievous statistical fairy has sprinkled the data with unnecessary precision. Nonetheless, as we know, correlation does not imply causation, but it does certainly imply an invitation for a fascinating intellectual romp through the unlikely storylines that bind these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our unconventional foray into the world of solar-centric electoral politics carries with it an air of intrigue and amusement. We invite the readers to embark on this whimsical journey as we attempt to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan - a testament to the delightful unpredictability that often emerges from the intricate dance between data and human phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our analysis, we uncovered an astonishingly strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. The correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and an r-squared of 0.9882960 suggest a connection that defies conventional explanation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results indicate a statistically significant relationship, much to the surprise - and perhaps amusement - of our research team.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot depicts this unexpectedly robust correlation, prompting us to ponder the whimsical confluence of political leanings in Georgia with the sun-drenched energy output in Kazakhstan. One cannot help but marvel at the remarkable nature of this statistical oddity, which poses an intriguing riddle for both statisticians and scientific jesters alike.

The uncanny alliance between these variables serves as a delightful reminder of the serendipitous discoveries that await intrepid researchers in the labyrinthine world of data analysis. While the rational mind may balk at the seemingly incongruent pairing of Georgia and Kazakhstan, or of politics and solar energy, our findings beckon us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical nuances and their unexpected interconnections.

This perplexing correlation opens the floodgates to an array of witty quips and waggish musings, reminding us that in the realm of statistical investigation, the pursuit of knowledge and merriment need not be mutually exclusive. The universe of data presents us with a carnival of curiosities, and our findings leave us marveling at the humorous caprice of statistical relationships, where even the most unconventional pairings can converge in surprising harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.

While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find an extensive analysis of political demographics in Georgia, focusing on voter behavior and party affiliations. This study provides a solid foundation for understanding the political landscape and voter preferences within the state. Similarly, "Doe and Johnson" delve into the intricacies of solar energy production in Kazakhstan, offering a comprehensive overview of the country's renewable energy sector, including factors that contribute to solar power generation.
Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction, the classic treatise "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" introduces readers to the whimsical world of intergalactic travel and the unexpected connections that abound in the universe. Although not directly related to electoral dynamics in Georgia or solar power generation in Kazakhstan, the serendipitous encounters and humorous escapades depicted in this work inspire a lighthearted approach to exploring unlikely correlations.
On a more serious note, the novel "Solar" by Ian McEwan interweaves the personal and professional spheres of a physicist and the ethical dilemmas surrounding solar technology, offering a thought-provoking narrative that touches on the complexities of renewable energy development. While the themes of this fictional work diverge from the empirical investigations at hand, the inherent irony of a novel about solar power coinciding with our research topic does not go unnoticed.
In a less literary capacity, the televisually inclined researcher would be remiss to overlook the investigative prowess of "The X-Files," a show known for its exploration of unusual phenomena and unexplained connections. While Agent Mulder's "I want to believe" mantra may not align precisely with the rigorous scientific inquiry we champion, the spirit of curiosity and openness to the unexpected echoes the ethos of our inquiry.
In "Jones and Smith," the authors offer a detailed examination of international energy trade relations, providing valuable insights into the interplay of geopolitical factors and energy production dynamics. This work contributes to our understanding of the broader context within which the solar power generation in Kazakhstan operates, shedding light on potential external influences that may inadvertently intersect with political dynamics in Georgia.
As we venture into this peculiar realm of enquiry, it becomes unavoidably clear that the convergence of Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan is a subject that elicits both wry amusement and scholarly intrigue. Our interdisciplinary approach and mirthful spirit shall guide us in unraveling the idiosyncratic web of connections that underlie this seemingly improbable correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we uncovered an astonishingly strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. The correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and an r-squared of 0.9882960 suggest a connection that defies conventional explanation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results indicate a statistically significant relationship, much to the surprise - and perhaps amusement - of our research team.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot depicts this unexpectedly robust correlation, prompting us to ponder the whimsical confluence of political leanings in Georgia with the sun-drenched energy output in Kazakhstan. One cannot help but marvel at the remarkable nature of this statistical oddity, which poses an intriguing riddle for both statisticians and scientific jesters alike.
The uncanny alliance between these variables serves as a delightful reminder of the serendipitous discoveries that await intrepid researchers in the labyrinthine world of data analysis. While the rational mind may balk at the seemingly incongruent pairing of Georgia and Kazakhstan, or of politics and solar energy, our findings beckon us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical nuances and their unexpected interconnections.
This perplexing correlation opens the floodgates to an array of witty quips and waggish musings, reminding us that in the realm of statistical investigation, the pursuit of knowledge and merriment need not be mutually exclusive. The universe of data presents us with a carnival of curiosities, and our findings leave us marveling at the humorous caprice of statistical relationships, where even the most unconventional pairings can converge in surprising harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have shed light on a whimsically perplexing correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. The substantial correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value affirm the unexpected connection that has bamboozled both scholars and cynics alike.

The interplay between political leanings in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises more than a few eyebrows and elicits more than a few chuckles. Yet, our findings have lent credence to the notion that seemingly incongruent variables can, in fact, exhibit a compelling relationship. The implied causality, however improbable, underscores the delightful irony of statistical analysis and the capricious dance of data points.

In a whimsical turn of events, our results support the prior literature's speculations on the unpredictable nature of intercorrelations. Just as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" whimsically explores unexpected connections in the universe, our research unearths a peculiar pairing that beckons us to ponder the mirthful mysteries of statistical analysis. Thus, our study not only adds a touch of levity to the somber world of data analysis but also emphasizes the need for scholarly exploration of the unexpected and the improbable.

The comical confluence of Democrat votes in Georgia and solar power in Kazakhstan serves as a beacon of whimsy, reminding us that, in the domain of empirical inquiry, the pursuit of knowledge can be punctuated by moments of delightful absurdity. This amusing correlation hints at a world of statistical jest and scholarly merriment, where the most improbable connections can inspire both intellectual inquiry and a good-natured chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.

While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and renewable energy has long been a topic of interest for policymakers, environmentalists, and now, apparently, statisticians with a penchant for whimsical correlations as well. The juxtaposition of Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan may seem like an odd pairing akin to mismatched socks, but as we delve into this peculiar association, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which political actions and energy practices may weave an unseen web of interconnectedness.
In the realm of statistical inquiries, we often search for causation, attempting to decipher the tangled knots of data to discern meaningful relationships. However, in this instance, we present an unexpected convergence - a delightful statistical surprise that overshadows the conventional predictability of political behavior and energy patterns.
Through a rigorous analysis of the intricate data threads collected from diverse sources, we have unearthed a correlation coefficient so eerily close to unity that one might suspect a mischievous statistical fairy has sprinkled the data with unnecessary precision. Nonetheless, as we know, correlation does not imply causation, but it does certainly imply an invitation for a fascinating intellectual romp through the unlikely storylines that bind these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our unconventional foray into the world of solar-centric electoral politics carries with it an air of intrigue and amusement. We invite the readers to embark on this whimsical journey as we attempt to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and the solar power generated in Kazakhstan - a testament to the delightful unpredictability that often emerges from the intricate dance between data and human phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we uncovered an astonishingly strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. The correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and an r-squared of 0.9882960 suggest a connection that defies conventional explanation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results indicate a statistically significant relationship, much to the surprise - and perhaps amusement - of our research team.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot depicts this unexpectedly robust correlation, prompting us to ponder the whimsical confluence of political leanings in Georgia with the sun-drenched energy output in Kazakhstan. One cannot help but marvel at the remarkable nature of this statistical oddity, which poses an intriguing riddle for both statisticians and scientific jesters alike.
The uncanny alliance between these variables serves as a delightful reminder of the serendipitous discoveries that await intrepid researchers in the labyrinthine world of data analysis. While the rational mind may balk at the seemingly incongruent pairing of Georgia and Kazakhstan, or of politics and solar energy, our findings beckon us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical nuances and their unexpected interconnections.
This perplexing correlation opens the floodgates to an array of witty quips and waggish musings, reminding us that in the realm of statistical investigation, the pursuit of knowledge and merriment need not be mutually exclusive. The universe of data presents us with a carnival of curiosities, and our findings leave us marveling at the humorous caprice of statistical relationships, where even the most unconventional pairings can converge in surprising harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the nexus between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan has proven to be a source of unexpected delight and amusement for our research team. The statistical merriment that emerged from our rigorous analysis, adorned with a correlation coefficient so strikingly near unity, showcases the whimsical caprice of data patterns that confound traditional expectations. It is as if the statistical fairy, armed with a sense of humor, has playfully taunted us with this startling correlation, leading us to contemplate the comical quirks that hide within the labyrinthine web of statistical relationships.

As our investigation comes to an end, we are compelled to acknowledge the sheer audacity of statistical surprises, where the seemingly incongruous pairing of political leanings in Georgia and solar energy in Kazakhstan has unfolded a captivating tale of interconnectedness. While our research has provided a gleeful romp through the unconventional corridors of data analysis and statistical jocularity, it is with a twinge of regret that we must bring the curtain down on this perplexing correlation. For, in the whimsical world of statistical exploration, this curious alliance stands as a testament to the unpredictable nature of data and the endless potential for waggish musings.

It is our fervent hope that our findings will inspire future researchers to embrace the delightful paradoxes that lay hidden within the realm of statistical analysis. And yet, as we savor the delightful absurdity of our discovery, we assert with a chuckle that no further research is needed in this area. The unlikely kinship between Democrat votes in Georgia and solar power in Kazakhstan stands as a droll enigma in the annals of statistical jocundity, forever etched in the tapestry of scientific whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Solar Policy and International Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Renewable Energy Policy and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Sunny Side of Politics: A Solar-Centric Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in Georgia and Solar Power Generated in Kazakhstan with an abstract of This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the interconnectedness between Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia and solar power generated in Kazakhstan. Our research team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration to unravel the intricate relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9941308 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, indicating a strong association between the two variables.
While the link between voter behavior in Georgia and solar energy production in Kazakhstan raises eyebrows and invites incredulity, our results undeniably suggest a substantial, albeit perplexing, connection. We encourage further exploration and theorization to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind this curious correlation, which may hold unforeseen implications for both political dynamics and energy policies. This study brings to light a comical quirk in the world of data analysis and presents a compelling case for humor-infused research endeavors.

ChatGPT:

Democrat votes, Senators, Georgia, solar power, Kazakhstan, analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, voter behavior, energy production, political dynamics, humor-infused research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Georgia
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia

Solar power generated in Kazakhstan
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Kazakhstan in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Kazakhstan

Correlation r = 0.9941308 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9882960 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Kazakhstan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia) over the 4 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0059. 0.0058692090475209735000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.59% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 170 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 3 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 3 because we have two variables measured over a period of 4 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014201620202021
Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia (Percentage of votes)45.206441.033396.3442101.66
Solar power generated in Kazakhstan (Billion kWh)0.0970.1361.491.8178




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([45.2064,41.0333,96.3442,101.66,])
array_2 = np.array([0.097,0.136,1.49,1.8178,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Kazakhstan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 5708 · Black Variable ID: 26369 · Red Variable ID: 23763
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0