Report an error
Solar power generated in Kazakhstan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia | r=0.99 | 4yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'i am dizzy' | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'what is my zodiac sign' | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of actuaries in Utah | r=0.94 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of college computer science teachers in Virginia | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Kazakhstan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)