about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,411 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and the second variable is Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2011, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air became cleaner, the squirrels in Natchez, Mississippi, swapped their aggressive behavior for a more laid-back, tree-hugging approach. Remember, when it comes to squirrels, cleaner air means fewer berserk furry daredevils!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of Cubism depicting Natchez, Mississippi, with cleaner air and squirrels peacefully scampering around the trees. In the image, show the reduced pollution from factories and people calmly using their phones without any sense of alarm. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Data cyber art Scalar art Cubism 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: Cubism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel', in the following situation: As the air became cleaner, the squirrels in Natchez, Mississippi, swapped their aggressive behavior for a more laid-back, tree-hugging approach. Remember, when it comes to squirrels, cleaner air means fewer berserk furry daredevils!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Natchez, Mississippi, the air is visibly cleaner as the smokestacks of the factories release less pollution into the sky. Squirrels can be seen peacefully scampering around the trees, their behavior noticeably calm and relaxed. A few people in the distance are on their phones, searching for "attacked by a squirrel" on Google, but there are noticeably fewer of these searches compared to before.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cubism ] and depicting this scene: In Natchez, Mississippi, the air is visibly cleaner as the smokestacks of the factories release less pollution into the sky. Squirrels can be seen peacefully scampering around the trees, their behavior noticeably calm and relaxed. A few people in the distance are on their phones, searching for "attacked by a squirrel" on Google, but there are noticeably fewer of these searches compared to before. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of Cubism depicting Natchez, Mississippi, with cleaner air and squirrels peacefully scampering around the trees. In the image, show the reduced pollution from factories and people calmly using their phones without any sense of alarm.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi caused attacked by a squirrel (Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

The Journal of Ecological Comedy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2011.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:

[[INTRODUCTION]]

The fascination with squirrels in Natchez, Mississippi extends beyond the typical admiration for these bushy-tailed creatures. While the town boasts a rich historical and cultural heritage, it has also become an unexpected nexus for a peculiar phenomenon - an increase in Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. As researchers, we were confronted with the improbable connection between this curious online behavior and the atmospheric conditions of Natchez. This led us on an investigative journey to uncover the relationship between air pollution and the proclivity of individuals to seek squirrel-related encounters on the internet.

In recent years, the field of environmental health has increasingly recognized the subtle yet consequential ways in which air quality can impact human health and behavior. The effects of air pollution have been linked to a myriad of health issues, ranging from respiratory ailments to cognitive impairment. However, the notion that air pollution might influence one's preoccupation with squirrel-related mishaps had yet to be explored. This seemingly whimsical inquiry prompted our investigation - an attempt to unearth any kernels of truth nestled within this lighthearted subject matter.

Research in environmental epidemiology has traditionally focused on more conventional health outcomes, such as asthma or cardiovascular diseases. The peculiar proclivity for squirrel-related searches, however, presented an opportunity to tread into uncharted territory and perhaps shed light on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in response to environmental stimuli. Moreover, our examination of this offbeat query emphasizes the potential for serendipitous discoveries when exploring non-traditional indicators of public health and well-being.

As such, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of air pollution data in Natchez, Mississippi, juxtaposed against the frequency of Google searches related to encounters with squirrels. While this endeavor may seem unconventional, we approached it with the utmost seriousness and rigor, albeit punctuated with a healthy dose of squirrel-related puns and humor. Our hope is that this research not only provides insight into the unusual connection between air pollution and squirrel fascination but also injects a sense of levity into the often-serious realm of environmental health research.

Stay tuned for the revelation of our findings, which promise to offer a nutty perspective on the interplay between air pollution and the online musings of squirrel encounters in Natchez.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The fascination with squirrels in Natchez, Mississippi extends beyond the typical admiration for these bushy-tailed creatures. While the town boasts a rich historical and cultural heritage, it has also become an unexpected nexus for a peculiar phenomenon - an increase in Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. As researchers, we were confronted with the improbable connection between this curious online behavior and the atmospheric conditions of Natchez. This led us on an investigative journey to uncover the relationship between air pollution and the proclivity of individuals to seek squirrel-related encounters on the internet.
In recent years, the field of environmental health has increasingly recognized the subtle yet consequential ways in which air quality can impact human health and behavior. The effects of air pollution have been linked to a myriad of health issues, ranging from respiratory ailments to cognitive impairment. However, the notion that air pollution might influence one's preoccupation with squirrel-related mishaps had yet to be explored. This seemingly whimsical inquiry prompted our investigation - an attempt to unearth any kernels of truth nestled within this lighthearted subject matter.
Research in environmental epidemiology has traditionally focused on more conventional health outcomes, such as asthma or cardiovascular diseases. The peculiar proclivity for squirrel-related searches, however, presented an opportunity to tread into uncharted territory and perhaps shed light on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in response to environmental stimuli. Moreover, our examination of this offbeat query emphasizes the potential for serendipitous discoveries when exploring non-traditional indicators of public health and well-being.
As such, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of air pollution data in Natchez, Mississippi, juxtaposed against the frequency of Google searches related to encounters with squirrels. While this endeavor may seem unconventional, we approached it with the utmost seriousness and rigor, albeit punctuated with a healthy dose of squirrel-related puns and humor. Our hope is that this research not only provides insight into the unusual connection between air pollution and squirrel fascination but also injects a sense of levity into the often-serious realm of environmental health research.
Stay tuned for the revelation of our findings, which promise to offer a nutty perspective on the interplay between air pollution and the online musings of squirrel encounters in Natchez.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have predominantly focused on the association between air pollution and traditional health outcomes, such as respiratory illnesses and cardiovascular diseases. Smith et al. (2015) found a significant correlation between particulate matter pollution and the prevalence of asthma in urban areas. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2017) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis, demonstrating the adverse impact of air pollution on cognitive function in adults. While these studies have undeniably contributed to our understanding of the health effects of air pollution, they regrettably neglected to explore the potential influence of air quality on individuals' fervent interest in squirrel-related mishaps. This oversight left a conspicuous gap in the literature, warranting an investigation into the unconventional connection between air pollution and the propensity to seek information about squirrel attacks on the internet.

In "Eco-Squirrel: Understanding the Ecological Impact of Urban Squirrel Populations," the authors examine the ecological implications of urban squirrel populations and their interactions with human environments. While the focus of the book is undoubtedly serious in its ecological concerns, it inadvertently offers a squirrel-centric lens that may prove invaluable to our own research. Furthermore, "The Secret Life of Squirrels" presents an anthropomorphic portrayal of squirrels, depicting their adventures and escapades in a manner that, while fictional, sheds light on the public's fascination with these bushy-tailed creatures.

Diving deeper into the world of fiction, "Squirrel Attack: A Thrilling Tale of Rodent Revenge" presents a dramatic portrayal of a vengeful squirrel wreaking havoc on unsuspecting protagonists. While admittedly far-fetched, the mention of squirrel attacks in the title drew our attention for obvious reasons. Additionally, "Nuts for Nuts: A Culinary Adventure" - while primarily a cookbook extolling the virtues of various nut recipes - inadvertently emphasizes society's enduring fascination with nuts and, by extension, squirrels.

As we endeavored to approach this research with scholarly rigor, it is important to note that our literature review was not limited to traditional academic sources. In an unorthodox but undeniably thorough pursuit of relevant information, we perused a wide array of materials, including popular culture references, internet memes, and even the curious narratives found on the backs of CVS receipts. While some may dismiss these unconventional sources as frivolous, we argue that they offered a unique perspective into the public's enduring intrigue with squirrel-related content. After all, in the pursuit of nutty correlations, one must be unafraid to crack open unconventional sources to reveal the kernel of truth within.

In summary, the existing literature, while invaluable in its exploration of conventional health outcomes related to air pollution, has regrettably neglected to examine the peculiar allure of squirrel-related search queries. Our research aims to fill this gap by unpacking the unexplored relationship between air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and the inexplicable proclivity for individuals to seek out information pertaining to encounters with squirrels. We approach this endeavor with the utmost seriousness, tempered only by our relentless pursuit of squirrel-related puns and a shared affection for all things nutty. Our findings promise to shed light on a curious correlation that, much like a squirrel's acorn stash, has remained hidden in plain sight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2011

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The fascination with squirrels in Natchez, Mississippi extends beyond the typical admiration for these bushy-tailed creatures. While the town boasts a rich historical and cultural heritage, it has also become an unexpected nexus for a peculiar phenomenon - an increase in Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. As researchers, we were confronted with the improbable connection between this curious online behavior and the atmospheric conditions of Natchez. This led us on an investigative journey to uncover the relationship between air pollution and the proclivity of individuals to seek squirrel-related encounters on the internet.
In recent years, the field of environmental health has increasingly recognized the subtle yet consequential ways in which air quality can impact human health and behavior. The effects of air pollution have been linked to a myriad of health issues, ranging from respiratory ailments to cognitive impairment. However, the notion that air pollution might influence one's preoccupation with squirrel-related mishaps had yet to be explored. This seemingly whimsical inquiry prompted our investigation - an attempt to unearth any kernels of truth nestled within this lighthearted subject matter.
Research in environmental epidemiology has traditionally focused on more conventional health outcomes, such as asthma or cardiovascular diseases. The peculiar proclivity for squirrel-related searches, however, presented an opportunity to tread into uncharted territory and perhaps shed light on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in response to environmental stimuli. Moreover, our examination of this offbeat query emphasizes the potential for serendipitous discoveries when exploring non-traditional indicators of public health and well-being.
As such, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of air pollution data in Natchez, Mississippi, juxtaposed against the frequency of Google searches related to encounters with squirrels. While this endeavor may seem unconventional, we approached it with the utmost seriousness and rigor, albeit punctuated with a healthy dose of squirrel-related puns and humor. Our hope is that this research not only provides insight into the unusual connection between air pollution and squirrel fascination but also injects a sense of levity into the often-serious realm of environmental health research.
Stay tuned for the revelation of our findings, which promise to offer a nutty perspective on the interplay between air pollution and the online musings of squirrel encounters in Natchez.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle this squirrelly conundrum, our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey that involved a whimsical mix of serious statistical analysis and offbeat investigation. Our methodology encompassed the collection and synthesis of air pollution data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the examination of Google search trends using Google Trends. We opted for a time frame spanning from 2004 to 2011 to capture a comprehensive snapshot of the air quality and the prevalence of squirrel-related searches in Natchez, Mississippi.

Air Pollution Data Collection:
To obtain air pollution data, we initially donned our metaphorical hazmat suits and scoured the EPA database like intrepid environmental detectives. We compiled information on various air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and carbon monoxide (CO). The atmospheric concentrations of these substances served as the cornerstone of our inquiry into the potential influence of air quality on the human psyche.

Google Search Trends Analysis:
In parallel, we delved into the digital wilderness of Google Trends, armed with our wits and a penchant for quirky detours. We honed our analytical prowess to explore the frequency of Google searches related to 'attacked by a squirrel' within the geographic confines of Natchez, Mississippi. Through this virtual expedition, we sought to capture the ebb and flow of public fascination with squirrel encounters in the digital domain.

Correlation Analysis:
With both datasets in hand, we conjured up our statistical sorcery to unveil the hidden patterns lurking within the numbers. Utilizing robust correlation analysis methods, we meticulously scrutinized the relationship between air pollution levels and the frequency of 'attacked by a squirrel' searches. Our calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficient and its associated p-value served as the metaphoric nutcracker to crack open the statistical shell of this enigmatic association.

Limitations and Considerations:
It is crucial to note that our research is not without its squirrel-sized limitations. While our methodology leveraged the available data with unwavering determination, factors such as potential confounding variables and the inherent complexity of human behavior necessitate cautious interpretation of our findings. Moreover, the whimsical nature of our subject matter prompted us to maintain a lighthearted approach, albeit without compromising the scientific rigor underpinning our analysis.

In sum, our methodology seamlessly blended the solemnity of empirical analysis with the lighthearted spirit of our inquiry into the interplay between air pollution and the allure of squirrel-related escapades. With this concoction of unconventional research methods and a pinch of squirrel-related humor, we fervently pursued the revelation of the nutty nexus between air quality and the vivid imagination of squirrel enthusiasts in Natchez, Mississippi.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2011, you found a correlation 0.8053429, r-squared of 0.6485772, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The fascination with squirrels in Natchez, Mississippi extends beyond the typical admiration for these bushy-tailed creatures. While the town boasts a rich historical and cultural heritage, it has also become an unexpected nexus for a peculiar phenomenon - an increase in Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. As researchers, we were confronted with the improbable connection between this curious online behavior and the atmospheric conditions of Natchez. This led us on an investigative journey to uncover the relationship between air pollution and the proclivity of individuals to seek squirrel-related encounters on the internet.
In recent years, the field of environmental health has increasingly recognized the subtle yet consequential ways in which air quality can impact human health and behavior. The effects of air pollution have been linked to a myriad of health issues, ranging from respiratory ailments to cognitive impairment. However, the notion that air pollution might influence one's preoccupation with squirrel-related mishaps had yet to be explored. This seemingly whimsical inquiry prompted our investigation - an attempt to unearth any kernels of truth nestled within this lighthearted subject matter.
Research in environmental epidemiology has traditionally focused on more conventional health outcomes, such as asthma or cardiovascular diseases. The peculiar proclivity for squirrel-related searches, however, presented an opportunity to tread into uncharted territory and perhaps shed light on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in response to environmental stimuli. Moreover, our examination of this offbeat query emphasizes the potential for serendipitous discoveries when exploring non-traditional indicators of public health and well-being.
As such, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of air pollution data in Natchez, Mississippi, juxtaposed against the frequency of Google searches related to encounters with squirrels. While this endeavor may seem unconventional, we approached it with the utmost seriousness and rigor, albeit punctuated with a healthy dose of squirrel-related puns and humor. Our hope is that this research not only provides insight into the unusual connection between air pollution and squirrel fascination but also injects a sense of levity into the often-serious realm of environmental health research.
Stay tuned for the revelation of our findings, which promise to offer a nutty perspective on the interplay between air pollution and the online musings of squirrel encounters in Natchez.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Natchez, Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6485772 suggested that approximately 65% of the variability in the frequency of squirrel-related searches could be explained by variations in air pollution levels. The p-value of less than 0.05 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables.

To visually convey the strength of this correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the positive relationship between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.

The results of this analysis are striking, shedding light on a previously overlooked intersection between environmental factors and human behavior. While we initially approached this investigation with a sense of lighthearted curiosity, the magnitude of the correlation we uncovered demands a serious appraisal of the potential impact of air pollution on the public's fascination with squirrel encounters.

The implications of our findings stretch beyond the realm of environmental health and resonate with the quirkier aspects of human behavior. Our data suggest that environmental factors, specifically air pollution, may influence online search habits related to seemingly whimsical subjects, opening a proverbial can of worms (or perhaps a stash of acorns) for future research into the intricate web of human-environment interactions.

The robust correlation between air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' challenges traditional notions of environmental health outcomes, urging us to consider the broader influence of air quality on human behavior. As we dig deeper into this peculiar correlation, we are mindful of the potential impact of our findings, both in contributing to the scientific understanding of environmental health and in evoking a chuckle or two at the squirrelly quirks of human nature.

Despite the initial eyebrow-raising premise of our investigation, the statistical rigor and empirical evidence we have presented underscore the significance of this quizzical connection, offering a testament to the adage that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or in this case, nuttier than expected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have predominantly focused on the association between air pollution and traditional health outcomes, such as respiratory illnesses and cardiovascular diseases. Smith et al. (2015) found a significant correlation between particulate matter pollution and the prevalence of asthma in urban areas. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2017) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis, demonstrating the adverse impact of air pollution on cognitive function in adults. While these studies have undeniably contributed to our understanding of the health effects of air pollution, they regrettably neglected to explore the potential influence of air quality on individuals' fervent interest in squirrel-related mishaps. This oversight left a conspicuous gap in the literature, warranting an investigation into the unconventional connection between air pollution and the propensity to seek information about squirrel attacks on the internet.
In "Eco-Squirrel: Understanding the Ecological Impact of Urban Squirrel Populations," the authors examine the ecological implications of urban squirrel populations and their interactions with human environments. While the focus of the book is undoubtedly serious in its ecological concerns, it inadvertently offers a squirrel-centric lens that may prove invaluable to our own research. Furthermore, "The Secret Life of Squirrels" presents an anthropomorphic portrayal of squirrels, depicting their adventures and escapades in a manner that, while fictional, sheds light on the public's fascination with these bushy-tailed creatures.
Diving deeper into the world of fiction, "Squirrel Attack: A Thrilling Tale of Rodent Revenge" presents a dramatic portrayal of a vengeful squirrel wreaking havoc on unsuspecting protagonists. While admittedly far-fetched, the mention of squirrel attacks in the title drew our attention for obvious reasons. Additionally, "Nuts for Nuts: A Culinary Adventure" - while primarily a cookbook extolling the virtues of various nut recipes - inadvertently emphasizes society's enduring fascination with nuts and, by extension, squirrels.
As we endeavored to approach this research with scholarly rigor, it is important to note that our literature review was not limited to traditional academic sources. In an unorthodox but undeniably thorough pursuit of relevant information, we perused a wide array of materials, including popular culture references, internet memes, and even the curious narratives found on the backs of CVS receipts. While some may dismiss these unconventional sources as frivolous, we argue that they offered a unique perspective into the public's enduring intrigue with squirrel-related content. After all, in the pursuit of nutty correlations, one must be unafraid to crack open unconventional sources to reveal the kernel of truth within.
In summary, the existing literature, while invaluable in its exploration of conventional health outcomes related to air pollution, has regrettably neglected to examine the peculiar allure of squirrel-related search queries. Our research aims to fill this gap by unpacking the unexplored relationship between air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and the inexplicable proclivity for individuals to seek out information pertaining to encounters with squirrels. We approach this endeavor with the utmost seriousness, tempered only by our relentless pursuit of squirrel-related puns and a shared affection for all things nutty. Our findings promise to shed light on a curious correlation that, much like a squirrel's acorn stash, has remained hidden in plain sight.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Natchez, Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6485772 suggested that approximately 65% of the variability in the frequency of squirrel-related searches could be explained by variations in air pollution levels. The p-value of less than 0.05 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables.
To visually convey the strength of this correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the positive relationship between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.
The results of this analysis are striking, shedding light on a previously overlooked intersection between environmental factors and human behavior. While we initially approached this investigation with a sense of lighthearted curiosity, the magnitude of the correlation we uncovered demands a serious appraisal of the potential impact of air pollution on the public's fascination with squirrel encounters.
The implications of our findings stretch beyond the realm of environmental health and resonate with the quirkier aspects of human behavior. Our data suggest that environmental factors, specifically air pollution, may influence online search habits related to seemingly whimsical subjects, opening a proverbial can of worms (or perhaps a stash of acorns) for future research into the intricate web of human-environment interactions.
The robust correlation between air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' challenges traditional notions of environmental health outcomes, urging us to consider the broader influence of air quality on human behavior. As we dig deeper into this peculiar correlation, we are mindful of the potential impact of our findings, both in contributing to the scientific understanding of environmental health and in evoking a chuckle or two at the squirrelly quirks of human nature.
Despite the initial eyebrow-raising premise of our investigation, the statistical rigor and empirical evidence we have presented underscore the significance of this quizzical connection, offering a testament to the adage that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or in this case, nuttier than expected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The robust correlation uncovered between air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' not only defies expectations but also leads to a squirrely sense of astonishment. Our findings are not just a play on words; they offer substantial empirical evidence supporting the notion that environmental factors may influence seemingly lighthearted online search habits. This discovery sends a clear message that, much like an elusive acorn, the connection between air pollution and human behavior is not to be overlooked.

While our investigation initially raised a few eyebrows and squirreled away some skepticism, the statistical significance of the correlation coefficient demands a sober evaluation. The strength of the correlation aligns with the longstanding pursuit of unconventional correlations, akin to the fascination with absurd and seemingly unrelated variables often found in scientific exploration. The study at hand provides a tree-mendous addition to the nutty correlations branch of research, offering compelling support for the unexplored influence of air pollution on individuals' interest in squirrel-related incidents.

Importantly, our findings resonate with the broader body of research on the impact of environmental factors on human behavior. The literature review, which whimsically journeyed through squirrel-centric narratives and scholarly works, now stands as a testament to the value of unorthodox sources in uncovering nutty correlations. The unexplored ecological implications of urban squirrel populations and the inadvertent societal fascination with these bushy-tailed creatures as portrayed in pop culture have, surprisingly, set a stage for our own substantive inquiry.

Our results offer an invitation to navigate the intricate web of human-environment interactions with a renewed lens, one that acknowledges the quirky and unforeseen connections that may emerge. The strong correlation coefficient and statistical significance of our findings give rise to a newfound appreciation for the potential influence of environmental factors on seemingly whimsical human behavior. This serves as a timely reminder that, in the pursuit of scientific inquiry, no acorn should be left unturned, nor any humorous possibility unexamined.

As we reflect on the unexpected nuttiness of our findings, we are reminded that sometimes truth can indeed be stranger than fiction, or in this case, nuttier than expected. This connection strikes at the heart of the inherent complexity of human behavior, reminding us that even seemingly frivolous online search habits can bear testament to the influence of environmental factors. Our data offer a rare glimpse into the quirky interplay between human curiosity and environmental quality, leaving us with a renewed appreciation for the unpredictable and amusing twists that scientific inquiry can uncover.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The fascination with squirrels in Natchez, Mississippi extends beyond the typical admiration for these bushy-tailed creatures. While the town boasts a rich historical and cultural heritage, it has also become an unexpected nexus for a peculiar phenomenon - an increase in Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. As researchers, we were confronted with the improbable connection between this curious online behavior and the atmospheric conditions of Natchez. This led us on an investigative journey to uncover the relationship between air pollution and the proclivity of individuals to seek squirrel-related encounters on the internet.
In recent years, the field of environmental health has increasingly recognized the subtle yet consequential ways in which air quality can impact human health and behavior. The effects of air pollution have been linked to a myriad of health issues, ranging from respiratory ailments to cognitive impairment. However, the notion that air pollution might influence one's preoccupation with squirrel-related mishaps had yet to be explored. This seemingly whimsical inquiry prompted our investigation - an attempt to unearth any kernels of truth nestled within this lighthearted subject matter.
Research in environmental epidemiology has traditionally focused on more conventional health outcomes, such as asthma or cardiovascular diseases. The peculiar proclivity for squirrel-related searches, however, presented an opportunity to tread into uncharted territory and perhaps shed light on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in response to environmental stimuli. Moreover, our examination of this offbeat query emphasizes the potential for serendipitous discoveries when exploring non-traditional indicators of public health and well-being.
As such, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of air pollution data in Natchez, Mississippi, juxtaposed against the frequency of Google searches related to encounters with squirrels. While this endeavor may seem unconventional, we approached it with the utmost seriousness and rigor, albeit punctuated with a healthy dose of squirrel-related puns and humor. Our hope is that this research not only provides insight into the unusual connection between air pollution and squirrel fascination but also injects a sense of levity into the often-serious realm of environmental health research.
Stay tuned for the revelation of our findings, which promise to offer a nutty perspective on the interplay between air pollution and the online musings of squirrel encounters in Natchez.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Natchez, Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6485772 suggested that approximately 65% of the variability in the frequency of squirrel-related searches could be explained by variations in air pollution levels. The p-value of less than 0.05 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables.
To visually convey the strength of this correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the positive relationship between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.
The results of this analysis are striking, shedding light on a previously overlooked intersection between environmental factors and human behavior. While we initially approached this investigation with a sense of lighthearted curiosity, the magnitude of the correlation we uncovered demands a serious appraisal of the potential impact of air pollution on the public's fascination with squirrel encounters.
The implications of our findings stretch beyond the realm of environmental health and resonate with the quirkier aspects of human behavior. Our data suggest that environmental factors, specifically air pollution, may influence online search habits related to seemingly whimsical subjects, opening a proverbial can of worms (or perhaps a stash of acorns) for future research into the intricate web of human-environment interactions.
The robust correlation between air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' challenges traditional notions of environmental health outcomes, urging us to consider the broader influence of air quality on human behavior. As we dig deeper into this peculiar correlation, we are mindful of the potential impact of our findings, both in contributing to the scientific understanding of environmental health and in evoking a chuckle or two at the squirrelly quirks of human nature.
Despite the initial eyebrow-raising premise of our investigation, the statistical rigor and empirical evidence we have presented underscore the significance of this quizzical connection, offering a testament to the adage that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or in this case, nuttier than expected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has nut only revealed a compelling correlation between air pollution levels in Natchez, Mississippi and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel', but also cracked open a whole chestnut of questions about the human fascination with these furry creatures. The statistically significant association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 and a p-value less than 0.05, begs the question: are we all just squirreling away our concerns about air pollution in the depths of internet searches for squirrel attacks?

This peculiar connection between air pollution and squirrel-related online musings has raised quite a few eyebrows (and tails) in the academic community. Our findings suggest that the impact of air quality extends beyond respiratory health and cognitive function, delving into the hitherto unexplored realm of squirrel-related inquisitiveness. It seems that the air isn't the only thing that's polluted in Natchez - our minds are also swirling with squirrelly thoughts.

The implications of our research transcend the conventional boundaries of environmental health. They beckon us to consider the idiosyncratic intersections between environmental factors and online behavior, inviting us to ponder the squirrely ways in which our minds respond to the world around us. From acorn-hoarding to Google-search indulgence, the human fascination with squirrels appears to be intertwined with the air we breathe, leaving us to wonder if there is a squirrelly residue in the air.

As we wrap up this nutty exploration, it is clear that our findings warrant acknowledgment and further investigation. However, we assert that no more research is needed in this area, and that any further inquiries into this squirrelly connection might just lead us down a rabbit hole of rodent-related revelations. With our nutty perspective on the interplay between air pollution and human musings about squirrel encounters, we anticipate that our findings will inspire a blend of curiosity and chuckles, reminding us that in the grand scheme of scientific inquiry, the unexpected and whimsical often hold the most surprising truths.

So, let's squirrel this research away with a chuckle and a nod to the quirky quirks of human nature and the nutty nature of science. And remember, when it comes to the interplay between air pollution and squirrel searches, it's not just the birds that are singing in the air – it's the squirrels too!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Comedy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Rodent Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Nutz About Squirrels: An Examination of the Impact of Air Pollution in Natchez, Mississippi on Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel' with an abstract of In this paper, we embark on a critter-ical examination of the curious connection between air pollution and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching for 'attacked by a squirrel' on Google in Natchez, Mississippi. Despite our initial trepidation, we bravely delved into this squirrelly topic with skepticism and a sense of humor (squirrel pun intended). Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the correlation between air pollution levels and the frequency of Google searches relating to squirrel attacks. Our findings revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8053429 with a p-value less than 0.05 from 2004 to 2011. This revelation not only raises eyebrows but also leaves us pondering the nutty nature of human behavior and its potential vulnerability to environmental factors. Our research adds acorn-depth insight into the quirky ways in which air quality and online search habits might intersect, humbly contributing to the wider body of research in the burgeoning field of nutty correlations.

ChatGPT:

Natchez, Mississippi, air pollution, squirrel attacks, Google searches, correlation, Environmental Protection Agency, Google Trends, human behavior, environmental factors, air quality, online search habits

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Natchez, MS-LA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi

Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'

Correlation r = 0.8053429 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6485772 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi) over the 8 years from 2004 through 2011.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.016. 0.0158523259882989850000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 1.6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 63 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.23, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011
Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi (Bad air quality days)0.01428570.03521130.03859650.0142857000.003533570.00574713
Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Rel. search volume)12.251211.752.4166703.333334.752.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0142857,0.0352113,0.0385965,0.0142857,0,0,0.00353357,0.00574713,])
array_2 = np.array([12.25,12,11.75,2.41667,0,3.33333,4.75,2.5,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5411 · Black Variable ID: 21951 · Red Variable ID: 1354
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0