Report an error
Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'leeroy jenkins' meme | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
West Nile Virus Cases | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'weird flex but ok' meme | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
US dairy skim solids used to produce frozen dairy products | r=0.85 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' | r=0.81 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Republican Senators in Mississippi | r=0.78 | 7yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Burkina Faso | r=0.7 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Natchez, Mississippi also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)