Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the enthusiasm for the Libertarian candidate spread across the vast state of Alaska, so did the spirit of independence. This unexpected surge in support inadvertently led to a spike in demand for sustainable energy sources. Inspired by the principles of self-reliance, many Alaska residents began embracing off-grid living and exploring alternative fuel options. This sudden interest in biomass energy technologies caught the attention of international investors, prompting a significant flow of capital into Uganda's biomass power sector. This just goes to show that when it comes to politics and power, even the most remote connections can ignite a spark of change in the global landscape.
Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a detailed woodblock painting that depicts a vast Alaskan landscape. In the foreground, a large group of people are shown enthusiastically casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, symbolizing a strong sense of independence. In the distance, a bustling biomass power plant in Uganda is depicted, receiving a significant boost in investment due to the sudden interest in sustainable energy sources sparked by Alaska's surge in demand. The intricate woodblock style should convey the diverse and dynamic scenes while capturing the essence of the two contrasting locations. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Scalar art Macabre Woodblock painting Pop art
ChatGPT: Woodblock painting
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda, in the following situation: As the enthusiasm for the Libertarian candidate spread across the vast state of Alaska, so did the spirit of independence. This unexpected surge in support inadvertently led to a spike in demand for sustainable energy sources. Inspired by the principles of self-reliance, many Alaska residents began embracing off-grid living and exploring alternative fuel options. This sudden interest in biomass energy technologies caught the attention of international investors, prompting a significant flow of capital into Uganda's biomass power sector. This just goes to show that when it comes to politics and power, even the most remote connections can ignite a spark of change in the global landscape.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Alaskan landscape, a large group of people can be seen voting enthusiastically for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, displaying a strong sense of independence. Meanwhile, in Uganda, a bustling biomass power plant is receiving a significant boost in investment, fueled by the sudden interest in sustainable energy sources sparked by Alaska's surge in demand.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Woodblock painting ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Alaskan landscape, a large group of people can be seen voting enthusiastically for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, displaying a strong sense of independence. Meanwhile, in Uganda, a bustling biomass power plant is receiving a significant boost in investment, fueled by the sudden interest in sustainable energy sources sparked by Alaska's surge in demand. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a detailed woodblock painting that depicts a vast Alaskan landscape. In the foreground, a large group of people are shown enthusiastically casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, symbolizing a strong sense of independence. In the distance, a bustling biomass power plant in Uganda is depicted, receiving a significant boost in investment due to the sudden interest in sustainable energy sources sparked by Alaska's surge in demand. The intricate woodblock style should convey the diverse and dynamic scenes while capturing the essence of the two contrasting locations.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska caused Biomass power generated in Uganda to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
 |
Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda The Journal of Renewable Energy Policy and Politics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the interplay between political ideologies and global energy trends has piqued the curiosity of researchers and policymakers alike. While the correlation between certain political outcomes and domestic policies has been extensively studied, the link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda may seem as likely as finding a polar bear in the Sahara – but as our research reveals, sometimes the most surprising connections are the most illuminating.
As we delve into the interconnected web of seemingly disparate factors, we aim to shed light on the unexpected and, dare I say, electrifying relationship between political preferences and renewable energy practices. After all, who would have thought that the land of the midnight sun would have anything in common with the Pearl of Africa? It seems that political leanings can reach across continents, transcending geographic and cultural divides to influence the evolution of sustainable energy sources.
The findings of our study not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the global impact of political choices but also introduce a whimsical twist to the serious pursuit of academic inquiry. As the saying goes, "When life gives you Libertarians in Alaska, make biomass power in Uganda – it's a win-win situation for everyone involved!". With this lighthearted approach, we hope to spark a renewed interest in exploring unexpected connections and embracing the levity that can be found in the pursuit of knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the interplay between political ideologies and global energy trends has piqued the curiosity of researchers and policymakers alike. While the correlation between certain political outcomes and domestic policies has been extensively studied, the link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda may seem as likely as finding a polar bear in the Sahara – but as our research reveals, sometimes the most surprising connections are the most illuminating.
As we delve into the interconnected web of seemingly disparate factors, we aim to shed light on the unexpected and, dare I say, electrifying relationship between political preferences and renewable energy practices. After all, who would have thought that the land of the midnight sun would have anything in common with the Pearl of Africa? It seems that political leanings can reach across continents, transcending geographic and cultural divides to influence the evolution of sustainable energy sources.
The findings of our study not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the global impact of political choices but also introduce a whimsical twist to the serious pursuit of academic inquiry. As the saying goes, "When life gives you Libertarians in Alaska, make biomass power in Uganda – it's a win-win situation for everyone involved!". With this lighthearted approach, we hope to spark a renewed interest in exploring unexpected connections and embracing the levity that can be found in the pursuit of knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Political Voting Patterns and Renewable Energy Development," the authors find a positive correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. This unexpected connection raises questions about the global impact of political leanings on renewable energy practices. Who would have thought that Alaskan ballots could wield such influence on sustainable energy initiatives in Uganda? It's almost as surprising as finding a solar-powered flashlight.
Moving on to the works of Doe and Jones, "The Interplay of Political Choices and Global Energy Utilization" presents a comprehensive analysis of the indirect effects of political voting on energy policies in disparate regions. The authors delve into the intricacies of how political attitudes can resonate across continents, shaping the landscape of renewable energy infrastructure. The correlation found in their study is as striking as a bolt of lightning in a clear blue sky. It seems that even halfway across the world, a vote for the Libertarian candidate in Alaska can wield as much power as a biomass generator in Uganda.
Now, let's shift our focus to some non-fiction books that are tangentially related to our quirky topic. "Renewable Energy in Developing Countries" by Lorem Ipsum provides insights into the challenges and opportunities of implementing biomass power in Uganda. The book offers a serious examination of the factors influencing renewable energy adoption, but nothing could have prepared us for the unexpected quirkiness of the Libertarian-Alaskan connection. It's like stumbling upon a solar panel in a sea of biomass power generators.
In contrast, "The Political Economy of Energy" by John Smith delves into the intricate interplay between political ideologies and energy trends. While the book offers a wealth of knowledge on the subject, it never delves into the comical side effects of unexpected political correlations. It's almost like a blackout in the midst of a power surge.
Let's not overlook the impact of fiction on our understanding of this peculiar relationship. Works such as "Energy Wars: A Political Thriller" and "Biomass Chronicles: The Renewable Quest" paint vivid imaginary landscapes of political intrigue and energy upheaval. These imaginative narratives offer a playful take on the serious subjects of political leanings and renewable energy efforts. It's as if a wind turbine suddenly sprouted in the middle of a political convention.
As we journey beyond the realms of academia, we cannot discount the influence of popular culture on our perceptions. Cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus" convey themes of environmental stewardship and sustainable energy, albeit in a lighthearted manner. Who would have thought that cartoon characters could provide valuable insights into the interconnection of global energy and political choices? It's like discovering a treasure trove of solar-powered gizmos in a house powered by biomass energy.
In summary, the unexpected connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda challenges conventional wisdom and infuses the discourse of academic research with a touch of whimsy. As we navigate through this uncharted territory of political and energy fusion, we are reminded of the wise words: "Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the interplay between political ideologies and global energy trends has piqued the curiosity of researchers and policymakers alike. While the correlation between certain political outcomes and domestic policies has been extensively studied, the link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda may seem as likely as finding a polar bear in the Sahara – but as our research reveals, sometimes the most surprising connections are the most illuminating.
As we delve into the interconnected web of seemingly disparate factors, we aim to shed light on the unexpected and, dare I say, electrifying relationship between political preferences and renewable energy practices. After all, who would have thought that the land of the midnight sun would have anything in common with the Pearl of Africa? It seems that political leanings can reach across continents, transcending geographic and cultural divides to influence the evolution of sustainable energy sources.
The findings of our study not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the global impact of political choices but also introduce a whimsical twist to the serious pursuit of academic inquiry. As the saying goes, "When life gives you Libertarians in Alaska, make biomass power in Uganda – it's a win-win situation for everyone involved!". With this lighthearted approach, we hope to spark a renewed interest in exploring unexpected connections and embracing the levity that can be found in the pursuit of knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To investigate the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda, a multi-faceted methodology was employed. The data on votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska was collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, while information on biomass power generation in Uganda was obtained from the Energy Information Administration and local Ugandan energy authorities. It’s worth noting that collecting this data was like a treasure hunt, but instead of gold, we found statistical goldmines!
In order to ensure the robustness of our analysis, a combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques was utilized. First, a time-series analysis was conducted to assess the changing patterns of Libertarian votes in Alaska and biomass power generation in Uganda from 2000 to 2020. The years were chosen arbitrarily, but let's just say it was a good thing Y2K didn't mess up the data!
Following this, a cross-sectional analysis was performed to compare the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the annual biomass power capacity installed in Uganda. The comparison was akin to examining apples and oranges, but don't worry, we brought our statistical fruit basket.
Moreover, to account for potential confounding variables and control for external influences, a multivariate regression analysis was implemented. This involved including variables such as GDP per capita, environmental policies, and international aid received by Uganda, which was like juggling flaming torches – challenging, but ultimately quite thrilling.
Lastly, a qualitative analysis was conducted through interviews with key stakeholders in Ugandan energy production and Alaskan political analysts. The insights gathered from these interviews provided a rich contextual understanding of the sociopolitical and economic dynamics at play. It was like gaining access to the ultimate backstage pass, but instead of rockstars, we were interviewing policymakers and energy experts!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9579003, r-squared of 0.9175730, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In recent years, the interplay between political ideologies and global energy trends has piqued the curiosity of researchers and policymakers alike. While the correlation between certain political outcomes and domestic policies has been extensively studied, the link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda may seem as likely as finding a polar bear in the Sahara – but as our research reveals, sometimes the most surprising connections are the most illuminating.
As we delve into the interconnected web of seemingly disparate factors, we aim to shed light on the unexpected and, dare I say, electrifying relationship between political preferences and renewable energy practices. After all, who would have thought that the land of the midnight sun would have anything in common with the Pearl of Africa? It seems that political leanings can reach across continents, transcending geographic and cultural divides to influence the evolution of sustainable energy sources.
The findings of our study not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the global impact of political choices but also introduce a whimsical twist to the serious pursuit of academic inquiry. As the saying goes, "When life gives you Libertarians in Alaska, make biomass power in Uganda – it's a win-win situation for everyone involved!". With this lighthearted approach, we hope to spark a renewed interest in exploring unexpected connections and embracing the levity that can be found in the pursuit of knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of the analysis demonstrated a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9579003, one might say the relationship between these two variables is as tight as a bear hug from a polar bear! This finding suggests that there may be a meaningful link between political inclinations in one part of the world and the renewable energy practices in another – an unexpected but undeniably fascinating connection.
The r-squared value of 0.9175730 further emphasizes the robustness of this association, indicating that over 91% of the variation in biomass power generation in Uganda can be attributed to the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska. It's as if every Libertarian vote cast in the icy tundra has a palpable impact on the generation of sustainable energy in the lush landscapes of Uganda. Who would have thought that political choices could have such a far-reaching ripple effect?
As we reflect on these intriguing results, one can't help but wonder: do the trees sway a little differently in Uganda when a Libertarian vote is cast in Alaska? It's a thought-provoking and amusing notion that invites further exploration into the interconnectedness of global phenomena. And as any good researcher knows, sometimes the most unexpected connections lead to the most illuminating discoveries.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation. In other words, the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by chance alone is as slim as a solar panel in an Alaskan winter – highly improbable and distinctly noteworthy.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the biomass power generated in Uganda. This visual representation serves as a striking visual testament to the unexpected but substantial relationship uncovered by our analysis. It's as if Alaska and Uganda are engaged in a dance of influence, each step of political preference echoing across continents to shape the energy landscape in uniquely interconnected ways.
In conclusion, the findings of this study not only challenge conventional assumptions about the impact of political choices on global energy practices but also inject a refreshing dose of humor into the academic discourse. As the data have shown, sometimes the most surprising connections yield the most electrifying revelations – and perhaps a few good dad jokes along the way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Political Voting Patterns and Renewable Energy Development," the authors find a positive correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. This unexpected connection raises questions about the global impact of political leanings on renewable energy practices. Who would have thought that Alaskan ballots could wield such influence on sustainable energy initiatives in Uganda? It's almost as surprising as finding a solar-powered flashlight.
Moving on to the works of Doe and Jones, "The Interplay of Political Choices and Global Energy Utilization" presents a comprehensive analysis of the indirect effects of political voting on energy policies in disparate regions. The authors delve into the intricacies of how political attitudes can resonate across continents, shaping the landscape of renewable energy infrastructure. The correlation found in their study is as striking as a bolt of lightning in a clear blue sky. It seems that even halfway across the world, a vote for the Libertarian candidate in Alaska can wield as much power as a biomass generator in Uganda.
Now, let's shift our focus to some non-fiction books that are tangentially related to our quirky topic. "Renewable Energy in Developing Countries" by Lorem Ipsum provides insights into the challenges and opportunities of implementing biomass power in Uganda. The book offers a serious examination of the factors influencing renewable energy adoption, but nothing could have prepared us for the unexpected quirkiness of the Libertarian-Alaskan connection. It's like stumbling upon a solar panel in a sea of biomass power generators.
In contrast, "The Political Economy of Energy" by John Smith delves into the intricate interplay between political ideologies and energy trends. While the book offers a wealth of knowledge on the subject, it never delves into the comical side effects of unexpected political correlations. It's almost like a blackout in the midst of a power surge.
Let's not overlook the impact of fiction on our understanding of this peculiar relationship. Works such as "Energy Wars: A Political Thriller" and "Biomass Chronicles: The Renewable Quest" paint vivid imaginary landscapes of political intrigue and energy upheaval. These imaginative narratives offer a playful take on the serious subjects of political leanings and renewable energy efforts. It's as if a wind turbine suddenly sprouted in the middle of a political convention.
As we journey beyond the realms of academia, we cannot discount the influence of popular culture on our perceptions. Cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus" convey themes of environmental stewardship and sustainable energy, albeit in a lighthearted manner. Who would have thought that cartoon characters could provide valuable insights into the interconnection of global energy and political choices? It's like discovering a treasure trove of solar-powered gizmos in a house powered by biomass energy.
In summary, the unexpected connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda challenges conventional wisdom and infuses the discourse of academic research with a touch of whimsy. As we navigate through this uncharted territory of political and energy fusion, we are reminded of the wise words: "Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts."
[[RESULTS]]
The results of the analysis demonstrated a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9579003, one might say the relationship between these two variables is as tight as a bear hug from a polar bear! This finding suggests that there may be a meaningful link between political inclinations in one part of the world and the renewable energy practices in another – an unexpected but undeniably fascinating connection.
The r-squared value of 0.9175730 further emphasizes the robustness of this association, indicating that over 91% of the variation in biomass power generation in Uganda can be attributed to the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska. It's as if every Libertarian vote cast in the icy tundra has a palpable impact on the generation of sustainable energy in the lush landscapes of Uganda. Who would have thought that political choices could have such a far-reaching ripple effect?
As we reflect on these intriguing results, one can't help but wonder: do the trees sway a little differently in Uganda when a Libertarian vote is cast in Alaska? It's a thought-provoking and amusing notion that invites further exploration into the interconnectedness of global phenomena. And as any good researcher knows, sometimes the most unexpected connections lead to the most illuminating discoveries.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation. In other words, the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by chance alone is as slim as a solar panel in an Alaskan winter – highly improbable and distinctly noteworthy.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the biomass power generated in Uganda. This visual representation serves as a striking visual testament to the unexpected but substantial relationship uncovered by our analysis. It's as if Alaska and Uganda are engaged in a dance of influence, each step of political preference echoing across continents to shape the energy landscape in uniquely interconnected ways.
In conclusion, the findings of this study not only challenge conventional assumptions about the impact of political choices on global energy practices but also inject a refreshing dose of humor into the academic discourse. As the data have shown, sometimes the most surprising connections yield the most electrifying revelations – and perhaps a few good dad jokes along the way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The striking correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda serves as a captivating demonstration of the unexpected interconnectedness of global phenomena. Our findings not only affirm the prior research by Smith et al., which first highlighted this unusual relationship, but also shed light on the substantial influence of political preferences on renewable energy practices in distant lands. It seems that political leanings in one corner of the world can ripple across continents like a jolt of energy, leaving an indelible mark on the renewable energy landscape in seemingly unrelated regions. Who would have thought that a vote in the Last Frontier could have such far-reaching consequences? It’s like stumbling upon a wind turbine in a field of biomass power generators.
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 further reinforces the strength of the association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation. The staggering level of coherence between these seemingly disparate variables underscores the significance of political choices in shaping renewable energy initiatives. One might say it's as impactful as a renewable energy policy in a fossil-fueled world.
Our results align closely with the prior research, echoing the unexpected yet incontrovertible link between votes for the Libertarian candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. This reaffirms the validity of the peculiar interconnectedness of political leanings and renewable energy practices identified by Smith et al., and adds another layer of evidence to the intriguing tapestry of global influences. It’s almost as if a vote in Alaska sends a gust of political wind that powers the turbines of renewable energy in distant lands.
As we come to terms with the tangible impact of political preferences on energy generation in Uganda, it's clear that we have only just begun to unravel the intricate web of global interdependencies. The findings of this study not only challenge conventional assumptions about the influence of political choices on global energy practices but also infuse a refreshing dose of humor into the academic discourse. After all, who would have thought that a ballot cast in the frigid environs of Alaska could spark such a fervor for sustainable energy production halfway across the globe? It's as surprising as finding a solar-powered flashlight in a coal mine.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Biomass power generated in Uganda. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In recent years, the interplay between political ideologies and global energy trends has piqued the curiosity of researchers and policymakers alike. While the correlation between certain political outcomes and domestic policies has been extensively studied, the link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda may seem as likely as finding a polar bear in the Sahara – but as our research reveals, sometimes the most surprising connections are the most illuminating.
As we delve into the interconnected web of seemingly disparate factors, we aim to shed light on the unexpected and, dare I say, electrifying relationship between political preferences and renewable energy practices. After all, who would have thought that the land of the midnight sun would have anything in common with the Pearl of Africa? It seems that political leanings can reach across continents, transcending geographic and cultural divides to influence the evolution of sustainable energy sources.
The findings of our study not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the global impact of political choices but also introduce a whimsical twist to the serious pursuit of academic inquiry. As the saying goes, "When life gives you Libertarians in Alaska, make biomass power in Uganda – it's a win-win situation for everyone involved!". With this lighthearted approach, we hope to spark a renewed interest in exploring unexpected connections and embracing the levity that can be found in the pursuit of knowledge.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of the analysis demonstrated a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9579003, one might say the relationship between these two variables is as tight as a bear hug from a polar bear! This finding suggests that there may be a meaningful link between political inclinations in one part of the world and the renewable energy practices in another – an unexpected but undeniably fascinating connection.
The r-squared value of 0.9175730 further emphasizes the robustness of this association, indicating that over 91% of the variation in biomass power generation in Uganda can be attributed to the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska. It's as if every Libertarian vote cast in the icy tundra has a palpable impact on the generation of sustainable energy in the lush landscapes of Uganda. Who would have thought that political choices could have such a far-reaching ripple effect?
As we reflect on these intriguing results, one can't help but wonder: do the trees sway a little differently in Uganda when a Libertarian vote is cast in Alaska? It's a thought-provoking and amusing notion that invites further exploration into the interconnectedness of global phenomena. And as any good researcher knows, sometimes the most unexpected connections lead to the most illuminating discoveries.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation. In other words, the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by chance alone is as slim as a solar panel in an Alaskan winter – highly improbable and distinctly noteworthy.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the biomass power generated in Uganda. This visual representation serves as a striking visual testament to the unexpected but substantial relationship uncovered by our analysis. It's as if Alaska and Uganda are engaged in a dance of influence, each step of political preference echoing across continents to shape the energy landscape in uniquely interconnected ways.
In conclusion, the findings of this study not only challenge conventional assumptions about the impact of political choices on global energy practices but also inject a refreshing dose of humor into the academic discourse. As the data have shown, sometimes the most surprising connections yield the most electrifying revelations – and perhaps a few good dad jokes along the way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has illuminated a remarkably robust correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. It seems that political leanings truly do have the power to transcend borders, much like a well-aimed political pun. The unexpected power of this connection between seemingly disparate entities certainly gives new meaning to the term "political climate."
These findings not only expand our understanding of the influence of political ideologies on renewable energy practices but also provide a source of renewable humor in the often serious world of academic research. It seems that the influence of political choices stretches further than we ever imagined - much like that one friend who always insists on inserting a pun into every conversation, no matter how unrelated.
It is clear that no more research is needed in this area, as the findings speak for themselves - though we certainly hope they also inspire a chuckle or two along the way. And remember, when it comes to uncovering unexpected correlations, always expect the unexpected - and certainly, don't underestimate the potential power of a good dad joke.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and the p-value of less than 0.01 leave little room for doubt - much like a well-crafted dad joke, these results are solid and leave a lasting impression. Therefore, we can confidently assert that the impact of Alaskan Libertarian votes on Ugandan biomass power generation is a phenomenon worth considering in the broader conversation on global energy trends.
In this spirit, we bid adieu to our research on this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic, and leave with a final dad joke: Did you hear about the Libertarian who went to Uganda and found a new source of power? He really knows how to turn political leanings into energy solutions! With that, we declare that no further research is needed in this area, and we can rest assured that we have shed light on a unique and unexpectedly amusing connection.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Renewable Energy Policy and Politics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Global Energy Innovation and Sustainability
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda with an abstract of The relationship between political ideologies and global energy trends has been a topic of increasing interest among researchers and policymakers alike. In this study, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and the generation of biomass power in Uganda. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors from 2000 to 2020.
Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9579003 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The unexpected and amusing association between Alaskan Libertarian votes and Ugandan biomass power generation prompts a reevaluation of the global impact of political choices.
As the old saying goes, "Where there’s a vote, there’s a way – for biomass power in Uganda!" This study not only provides a new perspective on the influence of political leanings on renewable energy practices, but also adds a touch of humor to the often serious discourse of academic research.
ChatGPT:
Libertarian presidential candidate, Alaska, biomass power, Uganda, political ideologies, global energy trends, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, political choices, renewable energy practices
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in AlaskaDetailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska
Biomass power generated in Uganda
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Uganda in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Uganda
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9175730 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Uganda) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska) over the 6 years from 2000 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0026. 0.0026212671117882285000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.26% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 381 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.66, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
| 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
| Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska (Percentage of votes) | 0.923098 | 0.535832 | 0.487129 | 2.45994 | 5.87713 | 2.47462 |
| Biomass power generated in Uganda (Billion kWh) | 0.03 | 0.047 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.363 | 0.188 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.923098,0.535832,0.487129,2.45994,5.87713,2.47462,])
array_2 = np.array([0.03,0.047,0.11,0.16,0.363,0.188,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Uganda"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska
- Line chart for only Biomass power generated in Uganda
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Off the Grid: The Libertarian Effect on Biomass Power in Uganda
Big thanks for reviewing!
Correlation ID: 5294 · Black Variable ID: 26053 · Red Variable ID: 24059
