about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,234 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is American cheese consumption and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Massachusetts.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As American cheese consumption increased, so did the desire for a comforting and familiar option. This created a ripple effect of contentment and nostalgia, leading to a more favorable view of the incumbent party. It's almost as if every slice of cheese brought with it a sense of unity and harmony, paving the way for a landslide victory in Massachusetts. Who knew that the road to political success was paved with cheese?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] In a lively kitchen in Massachusetts, a warm glow permeates the scene as people relish grilled cheese sandwiches. Their faces radiate contentment and nostalgia, capturing the essence of unity and harmony. Amidst this heartwarming atmosphere, checkmarked ballots for the Democrat Presidential candidate pile up in the background, symbolizing a landslide victory. The representation of American cheese consumption and political triumph forms a whimsical and unexpected connection, demonstrating the unseen power of comfort and familiarity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art a Polaroid photo Concept art Low poly Macabre
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts, in the following situation: As American cheese consumption increased, so did the desire for a comforting and familiar option. This created a ripple effect of contentment and nostalgia, leading to a more favorable view of the incumbent party. It's almost as if every slice of cheese brought with it a sense of unity and harmony, paving the way for a landslide victory in Massachusetts. Who knew that the road to political success was paved with cheese?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling kitchen in Massachusetts, people are seen enjoying grilled cheese sandwiches, their faces lighting up with contentment and nostalgia. As they savor each bite, the atmosphere becomes filled with a sense of unity and harmony. Meanwhile, in the background, ballots with checkmarks for the Democrat Presidential candidate pile up, symbolizing a landslide victory. The sight of American cheese consumption and political triumph creates a whimsical and unexpected connection, demonstrating the unseen power of comfort and familiarity.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling kitchen in Massachusetts, people are seen enjoying grilled cheese sandwiches, their faces lighting up with contentment and nostalgia. As they savor each bite, the atmosphere becomes filled with a sense of unity and harmony. Meanwhile, in the background, ballots with checkmarks for the Democrat Presidential candidate pile up, symbolizing a landslide victory. The sight of American cheese consumption and political triumph creates a whimsical and unexpected connection, demonstrating the unseen power of comfort and familiarity. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] In a lively kitchen in Massachusetts, a warm glow permeates the scene as people relish grilled cheese sandwiches. Their faces radiate contentment and nostalgia, capturing the essence of unity and harmony. Amidst this heartwarming atmosphere, checkmarked ballots for the Democrat Presidential candidate pile up in the background, symbolizing a landslide victory. The representation of American cheese consumption and political triumph forms a whimsical and unexpected connection, demonstrating the unseen power of comfort and familiarity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in American cheese consumption caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts

The Dairy Political Review

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the wonderful world of politics and cheese – two things that most people wouldn't normally associate with each other. However, as the saying goes, "throw enough cheese at the wall and see what sticks." In this case, we are throwing American cheese consumption at the wall of voter preferences in Massachusetts to see if there's any correlation worth pondering.

Let's face it, political discourse can often feel like a Swiss cheese – full of holes and sometimes a little stinky. And what better way to complement this political quagmire than with a generous serving of American cheese, known for its creamy texture and ability to melt seamlessly into any situation.

Over the years, Massachusetts has been a melting pot of political ideologies, with tendencies that sometimes resemble a bubbling fondue. It's a state where the electorate has been known to be as unpredictable as a wheel of brie – one moment Republican, the next Democrat. It's in this environment that our investigation unfolds.

Our study digs deep into the gooey world of American cheese consumption and its potential impact on voter behavior in the Bay State. Armed with data from the USDA, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a quest to uncover the mysterious connection between cheese consumption and political leanings.

So, grab a cracker, slice of cheese, and let's venture into the cheesy labyrinth of Massachusetts' politics as we explore the cheddar effect on the state's Democrat preferences. Get ready for a gouda time, because the 'whey' we see it, this research is 'grate-ing'!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the wonderful world of politics and cheese – two things that most people wouldn't normally associate with each other. However, as the saying goes, "throw enough cheese at the wall and see what sticks." In this case, we are throwing American cheese consumption at the wall of voter preferences in Massachusetts to see if there's any correlation worth pondering.
Let's face it, political discourse can often feel like a Swiss cheese – full of holes and sometimes a little stinky. And what better way to complement this political quagmire than with a generous serving of American cheese, known for its creamy texture and ability to melt seamlessly into any situation.
Over the years, Massachusetts has been a melting pot of political ideologies, with tendencies that sometimes resemble a bubbling fondue. It's a state where the electorate has been known to be as unpredictable as a wheel of brie – one moment Republican, the next Democrat. It's in this environment that our investigation unfolds.
Our study digs deep into the gooey world of American cheese consumption and its potential impact on voter behavior in the Bay State. Armed with data from the USDA, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a quest to uncover the mysterious connection between cheese consumption and political leanings.
So, grab a cracker, slice of cheese, and let's venture into the cheesy labyrinth of Massachusetts' politics as we explore the cheddar effect on the state's Democrat preferences. Get ready for a gouda time, because the 'whey' we see it, this research is 'grate-ing'!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts has been a topic of intrigue and speculation for many years. Smith et al. (2015) conducted an analysis that suggested a potential association between the two variables, laying the groundwork for further investigation. Building upon Smith's seminal work, Doe (2018) delved deeper into the cheesy realm of electoral behavior, uncovering intriguing patterns that hinted at a correlation between cheese intake and political inclinations. Jones (2020) contributed to this line of inquiry with a study that echoed the findings of previous research, solidifying the idea that perhaps there is more to the common saying "you are what you eat" than meets the eye.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Big Cheese: A History of American Dairy" by A. Lactose (2017) provides a comprehensive look at the cultural significance of cheese in the United States, shedding light on its potential role in shaping societal norms and behaviors, including political preferences. In a similar vein, "Curds and Votes: A Dairy-licious Approach to Understanding Political Movements" by B. Brie (2019) offers a tantalizing exploration of the possible intersections between cheese consumption and political ideologies, serving as a source of inspiration for our own investigation.

In the world of fiction, "The Cheddar Chronicles" by M. Gouda (2005) takes readers on a whimsical journey through a land where cheese reigns supreme, interweaving tales of political intrigue with the savory allure of dairy products. Meanwhile, "Feta, Fiction, and Fantasy" by C. Monterey (2013) presents a fantastical narrative that blurs the lines between reality and imagination, offering a creative perspective on the potential influence of cheese on the political landscape.

Additionally, childhood influences have played a role in shaping our understanding of cheese and its impact on society. Shows such as "Wallace and Gromit" and "SpongeBob SquarePants," with its iconic Krabby Patty topped with a slice of American cheese, have ingrained in us a deep appreciation for the lighthearted and sometimes absurd connections between food and culture, providing a lens through which we view our own research endeavors.

As we navigate the sea of literature surrounding American cheese consumption and political preferences, it becomes apparent that the topic is not as bland as a slice of processed cheese. Our investigation aims to add a sprinkle of levity to this analytical landscape, blending the serious pursuit of knowledge with a healthy dose of cheesy humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the wonderful world of politics and cheese – two things that most people wouldn't normally associate with each other. However, as the saying goes, "throw enough cheese at the wall and see what sticks." In this case, we are throwing American cheese consumption at the wall of voter preferences in Massachusetts to see if there's any correlation worth pondering.
Let's face it, political discourse can often feel like a Swiss cheese – full of holes and sometimes a little stinky. And what better way to complement this political quagmire than with a generous serving of American cheese, known for its creamy texture and ability to melt seamlessly into any situation.
Over the years, Massachusetts has been a melting pot of political ideologies, with tendencies that sometimes resemble a bubbling fondue. It's a state where the electorate has been known to be as unpredictable as a wheel of brie – one moment Republican, the next Democrat. It's in this environment that our investigation unfolds.
Our study digs deep into the gooey world of American cheese consumption and its potential impact on voter behavior in the Bay State. Armed with data from the USDA, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a quest to uncover the mysterious connection between cheese consumption and political leanings.
So, grab a cracker, slice of cheese, and let's venture into the cheesy labyrinth of Massachusetts' politics as we explore the cheddar effect on the state's Democrat preferences. Get ready for a gouda time, because the 'whey' we see it, this research is 'grate-ing'!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:

Like a mouse seeking out a wedge of cheddar in a maze, our research team scoured the internet, sniffing out any and all data related to American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. We prowled through the USDA's voluminous cheese production statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab's election results with the tenacity of a lactose-intolerant individual seeking out dairy-free alternatives. We also perused the Harvard Dataverse for any digital breadcrumbs that might lead us to the elusive intersection of cheese and politics.

Data Analysis:

To say that our data analysis was meticulous would be an understatement. We meticulously sliced and diced the data like a skilled cheesemonger, making sure to separate the cheddar from the curds. After conducting a detailed examination of American cheese consumption and Democrat votes in Massachusetts from 1990 to 2020, we engaged in statistical acrobatics that would make a contortionist envious. Through the magic of correlation analysis and regression models, we teased out the hidden patterns and relationships within the data, much like unraveling the complex flavors of a fine aged cheese.

Correlation Coefficient Calculation:

Armed with our metaphorical fondue forks, we excavated the cheese mines of data to calculate the correlation coefficient between American cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. We employed the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our calculations yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This result left us feeling as gratified as someone who found their grilled cheese perfectly golden brown and crispy.

Statistical Significance Testing:

With a statistical significance level of p < 0.01, we confidently assert that the observed correlation between American cheese consumption and Democrat Presidential candidate votes in Massachusetts is about as significant as a 20-pound wheel of artisanal cheese. Through rigorous hypothesis testing, we shone a spotlight on the cheese-laden path that appears to influence political leanings in the state.

Limitations and Delimitations:

In the spirit of transparency, we must acknowledge that our study is not without its holes, much like a slice of Emmental. As with any research endeavor, our study has limitations, including the potential for confounding variables and the inherent complexity of human behavior. Additionally, our findings are specifically delimited to the context of Massachusetts and may not be easily extrapolated to other states or global political arenas.

By combining the precision of a top-tier cheesemonger and the analytical rigor of a political scientist, we delved into the tangy world of American cheese consumption and its potential effects on Democrat Presidential candidate preferences in Massachusetts. Our methodology is as sharp as a wedge of aged cheddar, and our findings promise to be as satisfying as a well-crafted cheese platter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9685320, r-squared of 0.9380543, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the wonderful world of politics and cheese – two things that most people wouldn't normally associate with each other. However, as the saying goes, "throw enough cheese at the wall and see what sticks." In this case, we are throwing American cheese consumption at the wall of voter preferences in Massachusetts to see if there's any correlation worth pondering.
Let's face it, political discourse can often feel like a Swiss cheese – full of holes and sometimes a little stinky. And what better way to complement this political quagmire than with a generous serving of American cheese, known for its creamy texture and ability to melt seamlessly into any situation.
Over the years, Massachusetts has been a melting pot of political ideologies, with tendencies that sometimes resemble a bubbling fondue. It's a state where the electorate has been known to be as unpredictable as a wheel of brie – one moment Republican, the next Democrat. It's in this environment that our investigation unfolds.
Our study digs deep into the gooey world of American cheese consumption and its potential impact on voter behavior in the Bay State. Armed with data from the USDA, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a quest to uncover the mysterious connection between cheese consumption and political leanings.
So, grab a cracker, slice of cheese, and let's venture into the cheesy labyrinth of Massachusetts' politics as we explore the cheddar effect on the state's Democrat preferences. Get ready for a gouda time, because the 'whey' we see it, this research is 'grate-ing'!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. The correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and an r-squared value of 0.9380543 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing a 'gouda' foundation for our findings.

The magnitude of the correlation suggests that as American cheese consumption increased, so did the proportion of votes for the Democrat candidate. In other words, it appears that as the cheesy goodness made its way into the diets of Massachusetts residents, their political leanings also melted in favor of the Democrat party. This intriguing relationship leaves us contemplating whether it's the calcium content or the cheesy allure that sways voter sentiment. It seems that cheese indeed possesses a certain 'brie-ght' influence in the political arena.

Figure 1 displays the scatterplot showcasing the striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Democrat votes. The steep incline of the trendline paints a vivid picture of how the spreadable delight of American cheese aligns with the spread of Democrat support in the state. It's quite the 'havarti' party when cheese consumption and political preferences seem to dance together in such harmony.

The statistical significance of p < 0.01 further solidifies these findings, underscoring the unlikelihood that this striking relationship is a mere 'accidenti.' Instead, it suggests a meaningful association that merits further examination and contemplation, just like pondering the perfect pairing of cheese and wine.

In conclusion, our research has unraveled a captivating connection between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. It appears that the 'grate' American cheese may not only find its way onto sandwiches and burgers but also into the hearts and minds of Massachusetts voters, influencing their political inclinations. This study leaves us with a 'cheddar-worthy' observation that in the realm of politics, the 'whey' to a voter's heart might just be through their stomach – one cheesy slice at a time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts has been a topic of intrigue and speculation for many years. Smith et al. (2015) conducted an analysis that suggested a potential association between the two variables, laying the groundwork for further investigation. Building upon Smith's seminal work, Doe (2018) delved deeper into the cheesy realm of electoral behavior, uncovering intriguing patterns that hinted at a correlation between cheese intake and political inclinations. Jones (2020) contributed to this line of inquiry with a study that echoed the findings of previous research, solidifying the idea that perhaps there is more to the common saying "you are what you eat" than meets the eye.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Big Cheese: A History of American Dairy" by A. Lactose (2017) provides a comprehensive look at the cultural significance of cheese in the United States, shedding light on its potential role in shaping societal norms and behaviors, including political preferences. In a similar vein, "Curds and Votes: A Dairy-licious Approach to Understanding Political Movements" by B. Brie (2019) offers a tantalizing exploration of the possible intersections between cheese consumption and political ideologies, serving as a source of inspiration for our own investigation.
In the world of fiction, "The Cheddar Chronicles" by M. Gouda (2005) takes readers on a whimsical journey through a land where cheese reigns supreme, interweaving tales of political intrigue with the savory allure of dairy products. Meanwhile, "Feta, Fiction, and Fantasy" by C. Monterey (2013) presents a fantastical narrative that blurs the lines between reality and imagination, offering a creative perspective on the potential influence of cheese on the political landscape.
Additionally, childhood influences have played a role in shaping our understanding of cheese and its impact on society. Shows such as "Wallace and Gromit" and "SpongeBob SquarePants," with its iconic Krabby Patty topped with a slice of American cheese, have ingrained in us a deep appreciation for the lighthearted and sometimes absurd connections between food and culture, providing a lens through which we view our own research endeavors.
As we navigate the sea of literature surrounding American cheese consumption and political preferences, it becomes apparent that the topic is not as bland as a slice of processed cheese. Our investigation aims to add a sprinkle of levity to this analytical landscape, blending the serious pursuit of knowledge with a healthy dose of cheesy humor.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. The correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and an r-squared value of 0.9380543 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing a 'gouda' foundation for our findings.
The magnitude of the correlation suggests that as American cheese consumption increased, so did the proportion of votes for the Democrat candidate. In other words, it appears that as the cheesy goodness made its way into the diets of Massachusetts residents, their political leanings also melted in favor of the Democrat party. This intriguing relationship leaves us contemplating whether it's the calcium content or the cheesy allure that sways voter sentiment. It seems that cheese indeed possesses a certain 'brie-ght' influence in the political arena.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot showcasing the striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Democrat votes. The steep incline of the trendline paints a vivid picture of how the spreadable delight of American cheese aligns with the spread of Democrat support in the state. It's quite the 'havarti' party when cheese consumption and political preferences seem to dance together in such harmony.
The statistical significance of p < 0.01 further solidifies these findings, underscoring the unlikelihood that this striking relationship is a mere 'accidenti.' Instead, it suggests a meaningful association that merits further examination and contemplation, just like pondering the perfect pairing of cheese and wine.
In conclusion, our research has unraveled a captivating connection between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. It appears that the 'grate' American cheese may not only find its way onto sandwiches and burgers but also into the hearts and minds of Massachusetts voters, influencing their political inclinations. This study leaves us with a 'cheddar-worthy' observation that in the realm of politics, the 'whey' to a voter's heart might just be through their stomach – one cheesy slice at a time.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation not only reaffirm the prior research on the relationship between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts but also add a layer of richness to the understanding of this intriguing correlation. As we look back at the cheese-laden path laid out by previous studies, it becomes apparent that our findings stand on the shoulder of giants in the dairy industry. The work of Smith, Doe, and Jones – among others – has set the cheesy stage for our own research, emphasizing the 'gouda' foundation upon which our conclusions are built. It seems that the evidence is as sharp as a well-aged cheddar when it comes to the profound impact of cheese on political predilections.

In our study, the significant correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 aligns with the previous scholarly investigations into the dairy-politics nexus. This robust connection provides a 'grate' validation of the earlier work, confirming that when it comes to political preferences, cheese might indeed be more than just an innocent indulgence but rather a silent influencer lurking in the background. Our findings reinforce the 'feta' that the relationship between American cheese consumption and voter preferences is not merely a 'cheese-whiz' idea but a concept that merits serious attention and contemplation.

The statistical significance of p < 0.01 further emphasizes the 'muenster' impact of American cheese on Democrat votes in Massachusetts, dispelling any lingering doubts about the meaningful nature of this correlation. Our 'bleu'-tiful results illustrate the strength of the association, leaving little 'rind' for skepticism about the potential role of cheese in shaping political alliances. Instead, they beckon us to consider the possibility of a 'brie-ghter' future for understanding electoral behavior through the lens of dietary choices.

Figure 1, with its compelling depiction of the correlation between American cheese consumption and Democrat votes, stands as a testament to the 'gouda' evidence brought forth by our investigation. The image of cheese and political inclinations dancing together in a harmonious 'havarti' captures the essence of our findings and evokes a sense of 'camembert' satisfaction at the robustness of this relationship.

Our research, while entertaining in its exploration of the cheesy terrain, ultimately offers a 'cheddar-worthy' insight into the potential influence of American cheese consumption on voter preferences. As we consider the implications of these findings, it becomes clear that the age-old aphorism "you are what you eat" may, in fact, hold 'swiss'ting truth when it comes to shaping political sympathies. Our study adds a slice of 'gouda' humor to the analytical landscape, but underneath the surface, it lays bare a tantalizing connection that calls for a deeper understanding of the subtle yet significant forces at play in the world of politics.

In conclusion, our investigation into the connection between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts has not only confirmed earlier research but also added a layer of savory significance to this emerging domain of inquiry. Our findings tease open the 'camembert' of political behavior, inviting further exploration into the 'whey' that dietary choices may weave themselves into the fabric of electoral allegiances. It's an 'edam' good time to be delving into the cheesy corridors of political leanings, and our study offers a 'brie-lliant' launching point for future investigations into the captivating interplay between cheese consumption and electoral sentiments.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the wonderful world of politics and cheese – two things that most people wouldn't normally associate with each other. However, as the saying goes, "throw enough cheese at the wall and see what sticks." In this case, we are throwing American cheese consumption at the wall of voter preferences in Massachusetts to see if there's any correlation worth pondering.
Let's face it, political discourse can often feel like a Swiss cheese – full of holes and sometimes a little stinky. And what better way to complement this political quagmire than with a generous serving of American cheese, known for its creamy texture and ability to melt seamlessly into any situation.
Over the years, Massachusetts has been a melting pot of political ideologies, with tendencies that sometimes resemble a bubbling fondue. It's a state where the electorate has been known to be as unpredictable as a wheel of brie – one moment Republican, the next Democrat. It's in this environment that our investigation unfolds.
Our study digs deep into the gooey world of American cheese consumption and its potential impact on voter behavior in the Bay State. Armed with data from the USDA, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a quest to uncover the mysterious connection between cheese consumption and political leanings.
So, grab a cracker, slice of cheese, and let's venture into the cheesy labyrinth of Massachusetts' politics as we explore the cheddar effect on the state's Democrat preferences. Get ready for a gouda time, because the 'whey' we see it, this research is 'grate-ing'!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. The correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and an r-squared value of 0.9380543 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing a 'gouda' foundation for our findings.
The magnitude of the correlation suggests that as American cheese consumption increased, so did the proportion of votes for the Democrat candidate. In other words, it appears that as the cheesy goodness made its way into the diets of Massachusetts residents, their political leanings also melted in favor of the Democrat party. This intriguing relationship leaves us contemplating whether it's the calcium content or the cheesy allure that sways voter sentiment. It seems that cheese indeed possesses a certain 'brie-ght' influence in the political arena.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot showcasing the striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Democrat votes. The steep incline of the trendline paints a vivid picture of how the spreadable delight of American cheese aligns with the spread of Democrat support in the state. It's quite the 'havarti' party when cheese consumption and political preferences seem to dance together in such harmony.
The statistical significance of p < 0.01 further solidifies these findings, underscoring the unlikelihood that this striking relationship is a mere 'accidenti.' Instead, it suggests a meaningful association that merits further examination and contemplation, just like pondering the perfect pairing of cheese and wine.
In conclusion, our research has unraveled a captivating connection between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. It appears that the 'grate' American cheese may not only find its way onto sandwiches and burgers but also into the hearts and minds of Massachusetts voters, influencing their political inclinations. This study leaves us with a 'cheddar-worthy' observation that in the realm of politics, the 'whey' to a voter's heart might just be through their stomach – one cheesy slice at a time.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the final analysis, it's clear that the cheddar effect on Democrat preferences in Massachusetts is no mere slice of humble pie – it's a full-blown cheese platter of political significance. The correlation coefficient, akin to a wedge of Swiss, is full of holes if you may, but it undeniably points to a strong connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state.

Our findings highlight the 'gouda'-ness of this intriguing relationship, suggesting that the cheese might not only stand alone but also stand as a signifier of political sentiment. The cheesy sway on voter behavior may indeed be a 'mozzarella' force to be reckoned with, raising the 'stake' for political campaigns to not just 'bleu' our minds but also 'cheddar' our hearts.

However, before we wade deeper into the 'brie-lliant' world of cheese-infused politics, it's crucial to acknowledge the limits of this study. As much as we love a good 'feta', we must recognize that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to explore the mechanisms driving this connection. But for now, let's celebrate this 'grate' discovery and toast to the 'brie-ght' future of political cheesemongering.

In parting, it seems that in the great 'cheddar' of life, there are always 'whey's to surprise us, and perhaps, the next time you bite into a cheesy delight, you might just be influencing the political landscape. With these 'punny' anecdotes in mind, we feel confident in declaring that there is no need for further research in this area. It's time to 'brie-lax' and let these findings age like fine cheese.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Dairy Political Review


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Policy and Political Preferences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cheesy Votes: The Cheddar Effect on Democrat Preferences in Massachusetts with an abstract of This study investigates the potential link between American cheese consumption and voter preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts. By utilizing data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9685320 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1990 to 2020. Through our analysis, we provide insight into the cheesy connections that might influence political leanings in the state. Join us in unraveling the curd-ious relationship between cheese and votes, as we explore the gratifying impact of a gouda appetite on political preferences.

ChatGPT:

American cheese consumption, Democrat voter preferences, Massachusetts, correlation coefficient, political leanings, cheese and votes, gouda appetite, USDA, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

American cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of American cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with American cheese consumption

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Massachusetts
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Massachusetts

Correlation r = 0.9685320 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9380543 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Massachusetts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., American cheese consumption) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.61E-5. 0.0000760745498782766100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00761% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,145 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
American cheese consumption (Pounds per person)11.255911.808712.683912.861213.130613.256914.362115.5
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Massachusetts (Total votes)13186401571510161649018038001904100192129019952002382200




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11.2559,11.8087,12.6839,12.8612,13.1306,13.2569,14.3621,15.5,])
array_2 = np.array([1318640,1571510,1616490,1803800,1904100,1921290,1995200,2382200,])
array_1_name = "American cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Massachusetts"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5234 · Black Variable ID: 553 · Red Variable ID: 25990
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0