Download png, svg
AI explanation
As Democrat votes for Senators in Florida increased, there was a corresponding rise in legislation promoting self-empowerment and personal boundaries. This led to a cultural shift in which people felt more confident asserting themselves, thereby reducing the prevalence of the age-old playground taunt and the subsequent searches for how to combat it.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image with the theme of self-empowerment and assertiveness in Florida. In the visual, depict individuals standing confidently and taking control of their boundaries. Show a symbolic representation of the diminishing influence of the phrase "stop hitting yourself" by depicting a playground scene with children standing tall and asserting themselves. The image could also include subtle elements representing the increase in Democrat votes for Senators, without depicting any political symbols. Capture the essence of the cultural shift towards self-respect and assertiveness in a simple yet impactful manner. Maintain the style of a Discovery magazine cover image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech A Discovery magazine cover image Data cyber art Cyberpunk Low poly
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself', in the following situation: As Democrat votes for Senators in Florida increased, there was a corresponding rise in legislation promoting self-empowerment and personal boundaries. This led to a cultural shift in which people felt more confident asserting themselves, thereby reducing the prevalence of the age-old playground taunt and the subsequent searches for how to combat it.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Florida, as Democrat votes for Senators increased, a wave of legislation promoting self-empowerment and personal boundaries swept through the state. People were seen standing up for themselves with confidence. Meanwhile, the Google searches for "stop hitting yourself" dwindled as the playground taunt lost its power, reflecting the cultural shift towards assertiveness and self-respect.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Florida, as Democrat votes for Senators increased, a wave of legislation promoting self-empowerment and personal boundaries swept through the state. People were seen standing up for themselves with confidence. Meanwhile, the Google searches for "stop hitting yourself" dwindled as the playground taunt lost its power, reflecting the cultural shift towards assertiveness and self-respect. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image with the theme of self-empowerment and assertiveness in Florida. In the visual, depict individuals standing confidently and taking control of their boundaries. Show a symbolic representation of the diminishing influence of the phrase "stop hitting yourself" by depicting a playground scene with children standing tall and asserting themselves. The image could also include subtle elements representing the increase in Democrat votes for Senators, without depicting any political symbols. Capture the essence of the cultural shift towards self-respect and assertiveness in a simple yet impactful manner. Maintain the style of a Discovery magazine cover image.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Democrat votes for Senators in Florida positively influenced stop hitting yourself (Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'). Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches The Journal of Political Search Trends Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2018.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of political preferences and online behavior has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the quirky and often perplexing nature of human decision-making. In this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore the link between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the peculiar Google search query "stop hitting yourself". While one might initially dismiss this as a whimsical endeavor, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysis.
The quest for knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, and our journey into the correlation between political voting patterns and the urge to utter the classic childhood taunt, "stop hitting yourself", is no exception. By leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical escapade that revealed a remarkable relationship between these seemingly disparate elements.
It is well known that in the world of research, one must be prepared for unexpected twists and turns, and our findings certainly deliver on this front. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the period from 2004 to 2018 left our team both astounded and amused. This statistically significant connection uncovers a peculiar dance between political inclinations and the inclination to investigate the act of self-inflicted admonishment through online searches.
As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the world of data analysis, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the intriguing interplay between political choices and the digital quest to "stop hitting yourself". It is our hope that our findings will not only elicit a chuckle but also stimulate further investigation into the peculiar ways in which human behavior and online queries intertwine.
Stay tuned for the elucidation of our comical yet compelling discoveries as we unravel the enigmatic entanglement of "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of political preferences and online behavior has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the quirky and often perplexing nature of human decision-making. In this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore the link between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the peculiar Google search query "stop hitting yourself". While one might initially dismiss this as a whimsical endeavor, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysis.
The quest for knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, and our journey into the correlation between political voting patterns and the urge to utter the classic childhood taunt, "stop hitting yourself", is no exception. By leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical escapade that revealed a remarkable relationship between these seemingly disparate elements.
It is well known that in the world of research, one must be prepared for unexpected twists and turns, and our findings certainly deliver on this front. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the period from 2004 to 2018 left our team both astounded and amused. This statistically significant connection uncovers a peculiar dance between political inclinations and the inclination to investigate the act of self-inflicted admonishment through online searches.
As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the world of data analysis, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the intriguing interplay between political choices and the digital quest to "stop hitting yourself". It is our hope that our findings will not only elicit a chuckle but also stimulate further investigation into the peculiar ways in which human behavior and online queries intertwine.
Stay tuned for the elucidation of our comical yet compelling discoveries as we unravel the enigmatic entanglement of "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that political behavior and internet search patterns represent a noteworthy area of inquiry, particularly in the context of voter preferences and online activity. This initial foray into the realm of digital exploration sets the stage for our investigation into the correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". As we dive into the literature surrounding this unconventional subject matter, it becomes evident that the intersection of political choices and whimsical online queries is brimming with potential for amusement and revelatory insights.
Building on the foundation laid by "Jones et al.," who delve into the curious relationship between online search trends and human behavior, we extend our examination to uncover the unexpected association between political inclination and the compulsion to enquire about the act of self-inflicted admonishment. While the scholarly community may raise an eyebrow at the initial juxtaposition of these variables, our findings beckon us to embrace the delightful absurdity of statistical investigation.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Google Story" by David A. Vise and Mark Malseed and "The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart" by Bill Bishop offer valuable insights into the realms of internet search dynamics and political polarization, respectively. In the fictional domain, the whimsical worlds portrayed in "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll and "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley provide a lens through which to appreciate the enigmatic interplay between human proclivities and the digital landscape.
Our pursuit of unorthodox correlations extends beyond the confines of traditional literature, as social media posts have also caught our attention. A tweet by @PoliticalPunster speculating on the potential nexus between political ideology and whimsical search queries adds a playful touch to our investigation. Quips and musings on online forums contribute to the lighthearted atmosphere that infuses our scholarly pursuit, propelling us into a realm of scholarly exploration where the unexpected reigns supreme.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2018
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of political preferences and online behavior has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the quirky and often perplexing nature of human decision-making. In this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore the link between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the peculiar Google search query "stop hitting yourself". While one might initially dismiss this as a whimsical endeavor, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysis.
The quest for knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, and our journey into the correlation between political voting patterns and the urge to utter the classic childhood taunt, "stop hitting yourself", is no exception. By leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical escapade that revealed a remarkable relationship between these seemingly disparate elements.
It is well known that in the world of research, one must be prepared for unexpected twists and turns, and our findings certainly deliver on this front. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the period from 2004 to 2018 left our team both astounded and amused. This statistically significant connection uncovers a peculiar dance between political inclinations and the inclination to investigate the act of self-inflicted admonishment through online searches.
As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the world of data analysis, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the intriguing interplay between political choices and the digital quest to "stop hitting yourself". It is our hope that our findings will not only elicit a chuckle but also stimulate further investigation into the peculiar ways in which human behavior and online queries intertwine.
Stay tuned for the elucidation of our comical yet compelling discoveries as we unravel the enigmatic entanglement of "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To commence our zany exploration into the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself," we endeavored to amass a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2004 to 2018. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our merry band of researchers embarked on a quest to unravel the perplexing relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Firstly, we delved into the treasure trove of political data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, extracting the number of Democrat votes for Senators in Florida. This process involved sifting through an assortment of official election records, ensuring that our data was as pristine as a freshly scrubbed meme.
Subsequently, we turned our attention to the wacky world of internet search trends using Google Trends, where we gleefully retrieved the search volume for the whimsical phrase "stop hitting yourself." In this endeavor, we took care to capture the fluctuations and quirks of search behavior over the specified time period, ensuring that our analyses were as rich with nuance as a stand-up comedian’s routine.
With our dataset in hand, we endeavored to manipulate the data without getting tangled up in its idiosyncrasies. Employing robust statistical techniques, we merrily calculated correlation coefficients and p-values, all the while being mindful of potential confounding variables that might sneak in like a punchline in a serious conversation.
Our methodology for this analysis has been honed to both entertain and enlighten, recognizing the joyous fusion of curiosity and good statistical practice. As we frolic through the labyrinth of data analysis, we invite fellow researchers to join us in untangling this web of peculiar connections between political proclivities and the modern-day quest to "stop hitting yourself." With statistical models as our trusty jesters, we set out to amuse, enlighten, and above all else, uncover the unexpected harmony between politics and the urge to utter a timeless childhood taunt.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .
For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8535747, r-squared of 0.7285897, and p < 0.05.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of political preferences and online behavior has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the quirky and often perplexing nature of human decision-making. In this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore the link between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the peculiar Google search query "stop hitting yourself". While one might initially dismiss this as a whimsical endeavor, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysis.
The quest for knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, and our journey into the correlation between political voting patterns and the urge to utter the classic childhood taunt, "stop hitting yourself", is no exception. By leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical escapade that revealed a remarkable relationship between these seemingly disparate elements.
It is well known that in the world of research, one must be prepared for unexpected twists and turns, and our findings certainly deliver on this front. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the period from 2004 to 2018 left our team both astounded and amused. This statistically significant connection uncovers a peculiar dance between political inclinations and the inclination to investigate the act of self-inflicted admonishment through online searches.
As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the world of data analysis, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the intriguing interplay between political choices and the digital quest to "stop hitting yourself". It is our hope that our findings will not only elicit a chuckle but also stimulate further investigation into the peculiar ways in which human behavior and online queries intertwine.
Stay tuned for the elucidation of our comical yet compelling discoveries as we unravel the enigmatic entanglement of "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, a noteworthy correlation emerged between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself". The correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, indicating that as Democrat votes for Senators in Florida increased, so did the volume of searches for "stop hitting yourself".
The r-squared value of 0.7285897 illustrates that approximately 73% of the variation in the volume of "stop hitting yourself" searches can be explained by changes in Democrat votes for Senators in Florida. This statistical observation is as surprising as finding a hidden treasure in a box of statistical tools. The p-value of less than 0.05 further strengthens the evidence for a significant connection, rendering this correlation far more than a mere statistical fluke – it is a statistical serendipity.
To visually illustrate the robust relationship discovered, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the striking positive correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself". The plot showcases the intriguing dance of data points across the axis, revealing a pattern that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysts and social observers alike.
The statistical correlation unearthed in this research presents an intellectually stimulating and comically perplexing revelation. It challenges conventional wisdom and invites imagination and curiosity to explore the lighthearted interplay between political sentiments and the inexplicable urge to search for admonishing phrases online. This unexpected connection between political behavior and a whimsical search query serves as a reminder that in the world of research, the most peculiar and unexpected findings can often lead to the most intriguing and illuminating insights.
This statistical escapade through the data landscape invites fellow researchers to join in this whimsical odyssey and further investigate the enthralling enigma of the "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State. It is our hope that these findings will not only provoke amusement but also stimulate scholarly curiosity and contemplation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that political behavior and internet search patterns represent a noteworthy area of inquiry, particularly in the context of voter preferences and online activity. This initial foray into the realm of digital exploration sets the stage for our investigation into the correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". As we dive into the literature surrounding this unconventional subject matter, it becomes evident that the intersection of political choices and whimsical online queries is brimming with potential for amusement and revelatory insights.
Building on the foundation laid by "Jones et al.," who delve into the curious relationship between online search trends and human behavior, we extend our examination to uncover the unexpected association between political inclination and the compulsion to enquire about the act of self-inflicted admonishment. While the scholarly community may raise an eyebrow at the initial juxtaposition of these variables, our findings beckon us to embrace the delightful absurdity of statistical investigation.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Google Story" by David A. Vise and Mark Malseed and "The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart" by Bill Bishop offer valuable insights into the realms of internet search dynamics and political polarization, respectively. In the fictional domain, the whimsical worlds portrayed in "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll and "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley provide a lens through which to appreciate the enigmatic interplay between human proclivities and the digital landscape.
Our pursuit of unorthodox correlations extends beyond the confines of traditional literature, as social media posts have also caught our attention. A tweet by @PoliticalPunster speculating on the potential nexus between political ideology and whimsical search queries adds a playful touch to our investigation. Quips and musings on online forums contribute to the lighthearted atmosphere that infuses our scholarly pursuit, propelling us into a realm of scholarly exploration where the unexpected reigns supreme.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, a noteworthy correlation emerged between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself". The correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, indicating that as Democrat votes for Senators in Florida increased, so did the volume of searches for "stop hitting yourself".
The r-squared value of 0.7285897 illustrates that approximately 73% of the variation in the volume of "stop hitting yourself" searches can be explained by changes in Democrat votes for Senators in Florida. This statistical observation is as surprising as finding a hidden treasure in a box of statistical tools. The p-value of less than 0.05 further strengthens the evidence for a significant connection, rendering this correlation far more than a mere statistical fluke – it is a statistical serendipity.
To visually illustrate the robust relationship discovered, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the striking positive correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself". The plot showcases the intriguing dance of data points across the axis, revealing a pattern that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysts and social observers alike.
The statistical correlation unearthed in this research presents an intellectually stimulating and comically perplexing revelation. It challenges conventional wisdom and invites imagination and curiosity to explore the lighthearted interplay between political sentiments and the inexplicable urge to search for admonishing phrases online. This unexpected connection between political behavior and a whimsical search query serves as a reminder that in the world of research, the most peculiar and unexpected findings can often lead to the most intriguing and illuminating insights.
This statistical escapade through the data landscape invites fellow researchers to join in this whimsical odyssey and further investigate the enthralling enigma of the "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State. It is our hope that these findings will not only provoke amusement but also stimulate scholarly curiosity and contemplation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself" may seem as peculiar as a statistical unicorn, yet our findings lend substantial support to the prior research in this delightful and absurd field. The statistical relationship uncovered in this study aligns with the whimsical musings of "Smith et al." and the curious insights of "Jones et al."—proving that the nexus between political leanings and the urge to seek out self-inflicted admonishment online is not just a flight of fancy, but a statistically significant reality.
Drawing from the rich tapestry of prior literature, this study builds upon the robust foundation laid by "Smith et al." in underscoring the remarkable interplay between political preferences and online behavior. Our results solidify the notion that the digital realm is not merely a repository for serious inquiries but also a whimsical mirror reflecting the curious inclinations of human nature. The unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself" serves as a whimsical testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, akin to stumbling upon a scientific punchline in the annals of data analysis.
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.7285897 serves as a playful reminder of the statistical rigidity underpinning this comical correlation. It provides compelling evidence that the variation in "stop hitting yourself" searches can be predominantly elucidated by the fluctuating landscape of Democrat votes for Senators in the Sunshine State. As perplexing as decoding a cryptic statistical quip, our findings underscore the definitive impact of political sentiment on the volume of online searches for self-admonishment.
The amusing trajectory of this research mirrors the eccentricity of Lewis Carroll's "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland," as it ventures into a realm governed by statistical wonder and whimsicality. The unexpected correlation serves as a delightful counterpart to the imaginative worlds crafted by fiction authors, presenting a statistical quirk that captivates the intellect and tickles the scholarly sensibilities.
In the realm of political intrigue, our findings add a touch of statistical intrigue to the unfolding narrative of voter behavior, where the act of casting a ballot intertwines with the curious compulsion to seek out humorous phrases online. This correlation, far from a statistical oddity, emerges as a statistical enigma that beckons researchers, like enthusiastic detectives, to delve deeper into the amusing intersection of politics and online whimsy.
Our study not only sheds light on the statistically significant correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself" but also serves as a whimsical call to peers and scholars to embrace the delightful absurdity that lies concealed within data patterns. The lighthearted interplay between political preferences and online inquiries, as revealed in this investigation, poses both an intellectually stimulating conundrum and a statistical riddle fit for scholarly exploration and contemplation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of political preferences and online behavior has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the quirky and often perplexing nature of human decision-making. In this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore the link between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the peculiar Google search query "stop hitting yourself". While one might initially dismiss this as a whimsical endeavor, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysis.
The quest for knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, and our journey into the correlation between political voting patterns and the urge to utter the classic childhood taunt, "stop hitting yourself", is no exception. By leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical escapade that revealed a remarkable relationship between these seemingly disparate elements.
It is well known that in the world of research, one must be prepared for unexpected twists and turns, and our findings certainly deliver on this front. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the period from 2004 to 2018 left our team both astounded and amused. This statistically significant connection uncovers a peculiar dance between political inclinations and the inclination to investigate the act of self-inflicted admonishment through online searches.
As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the world of data analysis, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the intriguing interplay between political choices and the digital quest to "stop hitting yourself". It is our hope that our findings will not only elicit a chuckle but also stimulate further investigation into the peculiar ways in which human behavior and online queries intertwine.
Stay tuned for the elucidation of our comical yet compelling discoveries as we unravel the enigmatic entanglement of "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, a noteworthy correlation emerged between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself". The correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, indicating that as Democrat votes for Senators in Florida increased, so did the volume of searches for "stop hitting yourself".
The r-squared value of 0.7285897 illustrates that approximately 73% of the variation in the volume of "stop hitting yourself" searches can be explained by changes in Democrat votes for Senators in Florida. This statistical observation is as surprising as finding a hidden treasure in a box of statistical tools. The p-value of less than 0.05 further strengthens the evidence for a significant connection, rendering this correlation far more than a mere statistical fluke – it is a statistical serendipity.
To visually illustrate the robust relationship discovered, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the striking positive correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself". The plot showcases the intriguing dance of data points across the axis, revealing a pattern that tickles the funny bone of statistical analysts and social observers alike.
The statistical correlation unearthed in this research presents an intellectually stimulating and comically perplexing revelation. It challenges conventional wisdom and invites imagination and curiosity to explore the lighthearted interplay between political sentiments and the inexplicable urge to search for admonishing phrases online. This unexpected connection between political behavior and a whimsical search query serves as a reminder that in the world of research, the most peculiar and unexpected findings can often lead to the most intriguing and illuminating insights.
This statistical escapade through the data landscape invites fellow researchers to join in this whimsical odyssey and further investigate the enthralling enigma of the "stop hitting yourself" searches and Democrat votes in the Sunshine State. It is our hope that these findings will not only provoke amusement but also stimulate scholarly curiosity and contemplation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has established a robust and statistically significant correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and Google searches for "stop hitting yourself". This unexpected finding not only raises eyebrows but also elicits a chuckle, akin to stumbling upon a statistical unicorn in a field of mundane data points. The correlation coefficient of 0.8535747, with a p-value of less than 0.05, paints a picture of an unlikely dance between political preferences and the impish urge to search for self-inflicted admonishments online.
Our findings invite a whimsical contemplation of the interplay between political inclinations and the inexplicable allure of the phrase "stop hitting yourself". One cannot help but ponder whether the voters' internal dialogue silently echoes this amusing refrain as they cast their ballots. The statistical razzle-dazzle of our results, with an r-squared value of 0.7285897, leaves us marveling at the whimsical ways of data analysis, akin to discovering a statistical pearl in an ocean of numbers.
The lighthearted yet thought-provoking nature of our findings highlights the delightful unpredictability of research endeavors. Our statistical escapade showcases the comical yet compelling adventures that await those who dare to explore the whimsical frontiers of data analysis. As we bid adieu to this statistical romp, we assert with gusto that no further examination is needed in this offbeat domain, for our findings stand as a monument to the delightful and unanticipated correlations that lurk within the folds of data analysis.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Political Search Trends
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Political Goofiness Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches with an abstract of This study delves into the amusing realm of political behavior and internet search trends by investigating the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Florida and the Google search query "stop hitting yourself". Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team established a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8535747 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, amusingly hinting at an unexpected relationship between political preferences and a whimsical online query. This revelation invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which human behavior intertwines with the digital landscape.
ChatGPT:
"Democrat votes Florida," "Google search trends Florida," "political behavior internet search correlation," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse," "correlation coefficient p-value," "Google search queries political preferences," "digital landscape human behavior."
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for Democratic Senators in FloridaDetailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Florida
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Florida
Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7285897 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Florida) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2018.
p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0306. 0.0305908599876707520000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 3.06% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 33 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.14, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2006 | 2010 | 2012 | 2016 | 2018 | |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Florida (Total votes) | 3590200 | 2890550 | 1092940 | 4523450 | 4122090 | 4089470 |
Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself' (Rel. search volume) | 15.25 | 9.58333 | 7.91667 | 18.8333 | 14.5833 | 12.5833 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3590200,2890550,1092940,4523450,4122090,4089470,])
array_2 = np.array([15.25,9.58333,7.91667,18.8333,14.5833,12.5833,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Florida"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for Democratic Senators in Florida
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Stop Hitting Yourself: An Examination of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Florida and Google Searches
Hats off to you for rating!
Correlation ID: 5186 · Black Variable ID: 26219 · Red Variable ID: 1484