Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the 'distracted boyfriend' meme gained traction, companies realized the need for more office clerks to manage all the new workplace distractions caused by employees reenacting the meme. Remember, when seeking a promotion, always keep your focus and avoid getting caught up in office meme-antics!Create a meme inspired by the distracted boyfriend meme that in some way references The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme caused The number of office clerks in Kentucky to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky The Journal of Memetics and Cultural Phenomena Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9665885 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The emergence of internet memes and their impact on various aspects of society has become a subject of increasing interest and inquiry in recent years. From Grumpy Cat to the "This is Fine" dog, memes have made their way into popular culture and have even infiltrated the academic world, beckoning researchers to explore their peculiar influence. The 'distracted boyfriend' meme, in particular, has garnered significant attention since its inception. The imagery of a man ogling another woman while his significant other looks on disapprovingly has captivated the online community, spawning countless variations and parodies. This meme has permeated social media, indicating a potential cultural shift that cannot be ignored, even in the hallowed halls of statistical analysis.
Meanwhile, the realm of employment, particularly in the administrative sector, has its own set of nuances and peculiarities, much like a meme with several layers of meaning. Office clerks, with their steadfast dedication to paperwork and unwavering commitment to the plastic plant in the corner of the office, are often overlooked in discussions of labor market dynamics. The state of Kentucky, known for its bourbon and bluegrass, also boasts a substantial population of office clerks, quietly managing the administrative duties that keep the cogs of the state's economy turning. The question arises: could there be a connection between the viral spread of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment trends of office clerks in the Bluegrass State? Against the backdrop of the meme's meteoric rise to stardom, this correlation may seem as unexpected as finding a stapler in the break room suddenly becoming a viral sensation.
Stay tuned for the following sections, where we delve into the intricate dance between internet culture and labor statistics, and uncover the tantalizing relationship between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the diligent office clerks of Kentucky. With a smirk and a raised eyebrow, we invite you to join us on this statistical escapade.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The emergence of internet memes and their impact on various aspects of society has become a subject of increasing interest and inquiry in recent years. From Grumpy Cat to the "This is Fine" dog, memes have made their way into popular culture and have even infiltrated the academic world, beckoning researchers to explore their peculiar influence. The 'distracted boyfriend' meme, in particular, has garnered significant attention since its inception. The imagery of a man ogling another woman while his significant other looks on disapprovingly has captivated the online community, spawning countless variations and parodies. This meme has permeated social media, indicating a potential cultural shift that cannot be ignored, even in the hallowed halls of statistical analysis.
Meanwhile, the realm of employment, particularly in the administrative sector, has its own set of nuances and peculiarities, much like a meme with several layers of meaning. Office clerks, with their steadfast dedication to paperwork and unwavering commitment to the plastic plant in the corner of the office, are often overlooked in discussions of labor market dynamics. The state of Kentucky, known for its bourbon and bluegrass, also boasts a substantial population of office clerks, quietly managing the administrative duties that keep the cogs of the state's economy turning. The question arises: could there be a connection between the viral spread of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment trends of office clerks in the Bluegrass State? Against the backdrop of the meme's meteoric rise to stardom, this correlation may seem as unexpected as finding a stapler in the break room suddenly becoming a viral sensation.
Stay tuned for the following sections, where we delve into the intricate dance between internet culture and labor statistics, and uncover the tantalizing relationship between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the diligent office clerks of Kentucky. With a smirk and a raised eyebrow, we invite you to join us on this statistical escapade.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A comprehensive review of the literature pertaining to the interplay between viral internet phenomena and employment demographics yields a wealth of intriguing findings and unexpected connections. While the initial pursuit led the researchers to scholarly works by esteemed authors such as Smith, Doe, and Jones, the subsequent exploration took a hilariously unexpected turn akin to stumbling upon a meme in a corporate email thread.
In "The Impact of Digital Culture on Labor Market Trends," Smith et al. scrutinize the influence of online content on the patterns of occupational engagement. Their astute observations laid the groundwork for contemplating the potential influence of internet memes on the professional landscape, serving as a serious starting point before the subsequent literature led us to more lighthearted territories.
Furthermore, the insightful inquiries of Doe in "Navigating the Digital Age: Social Media and Employment Dynamics" showcase a thoughtful consideration of the ways in which online phenomena intersect with the labor force. Their rigorous analysis sets the stage for our investigation into the influence of a particularly captivating meme on the employment demographics of office clerks in Kentucky, illuminating a path that leads us through the unexpected corridors of internet culture and statistical inquiry.
As we delve further into this subject, we cannot overlook the relevance of real-world accounts of administrative work and internet culture. Books such as "The Office: A Day at Dunder Mifflin" by Owen Ellickson and "Memes and the Modern Workplace" by Rebecca Brenner provide an engaging insight into the office environment and the cultural forces that permeate it, offering a literary backdrop that further underscores the intersection of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the realm of office clerks.
In the realm of fictional works, the satirical novel "Office Space" by Ron Livingston and the whimsical "Confessions of a Shopaholic" by Sophie Kinsella offer a comical yet astute portrayal of office dynamics and the idiosyncrasies of workplace culture, adding a touch of levity to our exploration of the connection between internet memes and the administrative workforce.
Additionally, our research was complemented by an extensive foray into relevant television programming, with investigations into shows such as "The Office," "Parks and Recreation," and "Brooklyn Nine-Nine" providing firsthand exposure to the quirks and mishaps of office life, serving as a captivating backdrop for our statistical journey.
Through the interplay of serious academic inquiry and a subtle nod to the whimsical nature of internet culture, our literature review sets the stage for a compelling exploration of the correlation between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the steadfast office clerks of Kentucky.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2006 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The emergence of internet memes and their impact on various aspects of society has become a subject of increasing interest and inquiry in recent years. From Grumpy Cat to the "This is Fine" dog, memes have made their way into popular culture and have even infiltrated the academic world, beckoning researchers to explore their peculiar influence. The 'distracted boyfriend' meme, in particular, has garnered significant attention since its inception. The imagery of a man ogling another woman while his significant other looks on disapprovingly has captivated the online community, spawning countless variations and parodies. This meme has permeated social media, indicating a potential cultural shift that cannot be ignored, even in the hallowed halls of statistical analysis.
Meanwhile, the realm of employment, particularly in the administrative sector, has its own set of nuances and peculiarities, much like a meme with several layers of meaning. Office clerks, with their steadfast dedication to paperwork and unwavering commitment to the plastic plant in the corner of the office, are often overlooked in discussions of labor market dynamics. The state of Kentucky, known for its bourbon and bluegrass, also boasts a substantial population of office clerks, quietly managing the administrative duties that keep the cogs of the state's economy turning. The question arises: could there be a connection between the viral spread of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment trends of office clerks in the Bluegrass State? Against the backdrop of the meme's meteoric rise to stardom, this correlation may seem as unexpected as finding a stapler in the break room suddenly becoming a viral sensation.
Stay tuned for the following sections, where we delve into the intricate dance between internet culture and labor statistics, and uncover the tantalizing relationship between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the diligent office clerks of Kentucky. With a smirk and a raised eyebrow, we invite you to join us on this statistical escapade.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To investigate the correlation between the popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the number of office clerks in Kentucky, a robust and, dare I say, dapper methodology was employed. The data collection process, much like a well-tailored suit, had to be meticulously crafted to ensure the most accurate and reliable results. We scoured the vast expanse of the internet, sifting through the digital haystack to find the proverbial meme needle. Our primary source of meme data was Google Trends, a veritable treasure trove of search interest that provided insight into the ebb and flow of 'distracted boyfriend' meme popularity from 2006 to 2022. As we delved into this sea of data, we found ourselves navigating through the choppy waters of internet culture, occasionally encountering peculiar memes that seemed to have sprouted from the depths of collective online consciousness. Alas, we remained undistracted and kept our eyes firmly fixed on the 'distracted boyfriend' meme – a task not for the faint of heart, mind you.
Concurrently, to track the employment trends of office clerks in the state of Kentucky, we turned to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a venerable institution akin to a stalwart lighthouse guiding us through the tumultuous seas of economic data. Our analysis covered the period from 2006 to 2022, allowing us to capture the undulating waves of employment figures and discern any discernible patterns that may have emerged in parallel with the meteoric rise of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme. The marriage of these two distinct sources – one representing the whimsical world of internet culture, the other embodying the steadfast domain of labor statistics – was akin to a match made in statistical heaven.
Statistical analysis, akin to a grand orchestral performance, required the harmonious interplay of various quantitative techniques to uncover the potential correlation between the meme's online prevalence and the employment landscape of office clerks in the Bluegrass State. Engaging in a waltz of mathematical prowess, we employed cross-correlation analysis, a technique designed to illuminate any synchronous movements between the two datasets. This method allowed us to scrutinize the temporal relationship between the meme's surges in popularity and potential fluctuations in the number of office clerks in Kentucky. Furthermore, we utilized robust linear regression models, akin to tuning the strings of a statistical violin, to discern the nature and strength of the correlation, should one be detected.
Our analytical journey was not without its challenges, however. While we approached the task with the utmost seriousness, we couldn't help but marvel at the serendipitous entanglement of memes and employment data. The unpredictable nature of internet culture and the staid realm of labor statistics converged in a manner that evoked both scholarly intrigue and lighthearted amusement. In the great tradition of statistical exploration, we boldly ventured forth into this uncharted territory, armed with a steadfast commitment to uncovering the elusive connection between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the diligent office clerks who quietly navigate the administrative seas of Kentucky.
Stay tuned for the following sections, where we unveil the fascinating revelations borne of this statistical odyssey and invite you to partake in the joyously unexpected findings.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2006 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9665885, r-squared of 0.9342934, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The emergence of internet memes and their impact on various aspects of society has become a subject of increasing interest and inquiry in recent years. From Grumpy Cat to the "This is Fine" dog, memes have made their way into popular culture and have even infiltrated the academic world, beckoning researchers to explore their peculiar influence. The 'distracted boyfriend' meme, in particular, has garnered significant attention since its inception. The imagery of a man ogling another woman while his significant other looks on disapprovingly has captivated the online community, spawning countless variations and parodies. This meme has permeated social media, indicating a potential cultural shift that cannot be ignored, even in the hallowed halls of statistical analysis.
Meanwhile, the realm of employment, particularly in the administrative sector, has its own set of nuances and peculiarities, much like a meme with several layers of meaning. Office clerks, with their steadfast dedication to paperwork and unwavering commitment to the plastic plant in the corner of the office, are often overlooked in discussions of labor market dynamics. The state of Kentucky, known for its bourbon and bluegrass, also boasts a substantial population of office clerks, quietly managing the administrative duties that keep the cogs of the state's economy turning. The question arises: could there be a connection between the viral spread of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment trends of office clerks in the Bluegrass State? Against the backdrop of the meme's meteoric rise to stardom, this correlation may seem as unexpected as finding a stapler in the break room suddenly becoming a viral sensation.
Stay tuned for the following sections, where we delve into the intricate dance between internet culture and labor statistics, and uncover the tantalizing relationship between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the diligent office clerks of Kentucky. With a smirk and a raised eyebrow, we invite you to join us on this statistical escapade.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the number of office clerks in Kentucky has yielded some rather intriguing results. After sifting through copious amounts of internet data, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared of 0.9342934, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variability in the employment of office clerks in Kentucky can be explained by the rise and fall of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme. In classic statistical fashion, we also found that the p-value was less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the meme's popularity and the number of office clerks.
To visually represent this striking correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that showcases the linear association between the two variables. The scatterplot reveals a trend so pronounced that one might say it stands out as conspicuously as a fluorescent highlighter on a Post-it note.
The implications of these findings are, to put it mildly, eyebrow-raising. The correlation between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme's virality and the employment of office clerks in Kentucky raises questions that are as thought-provoking as they are unconventional. It seems that even in the depths of statistical analysis, internet memes have a way of unexpectedly catching us off guard, much like stumbling upon a whoopee cushion at an economics conference. Although the profound implications of these results are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical significance, it is imperative to approach them with cautious curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. Further research is warranted to dive deeper into the underlying mechanisms driving this correlation and to determine the broader implications for both digital culture and the labor market in Kentucky.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A comprehensive review of the literature pertaining to the interplay between viral internet phenomena and employment demographics yields a wealth of intriguing findings and unexpected connections. While the initial pursuit led the researchers to scholarly works by esteemed authors such as Smith, Doe, and Jones, the subsequent exploration took a hilariously unexpected turn akin to stumbling upon a meme in a corporate email thread.
In "The Impact of Digital Culture on Labor Market Trends," Smith et al. scrutinize the influence of online content on the patterns of occupational engagement. Their astute observations laid the groundwork for contemplating the potential influence of internet memes on the professional landscape, serving as a serious starting point before the subsequent literature led us to more lighthearted territories.
Furthermore, the insightful inquiries of Doe in "Navigating the Digital Age: Social Media and Employment Dynamics" showcase a thoughtful consideration of the ways in which online phenomena intersect with the labor force. Their rigorous analysis sets the stage for our investigation into the influence of a particularly captivating meme on the employment demographics of office clerks in Kentucky, illuminating a path that leads us through the unexpected corridors of internet culture and statistical inquiry.
As we delve further into this subject, we cannot overlook the relevance of real-world accounts of administrative work and internet culture. Books such as "The Office: A Day at Dunder Mifflin" by Owen Ellickson and "Memes and the Modern Workplace" by Rebecca Brenner provide an engaging insight into the office environment and the cultural forces that permeate it, offering a literary backdrop that further underscores the intersection of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the realm of office clerks.
In the realm of fictional works, the satirical novel "Office Space" by Ron Livingston and the whimsical "Confessions of a Shopaholic" by Sophie Kinsella offer a comical yet astute portrayal of office dynamics and the idiosyncrasies of workplace culture, adding a touch of levity to our exploration of the connection between internet memes and the administrative workforce.
Additionally, our research was complemented by an extensive foray into relevant television programming, with investigations into shows such as "The Office," "Parks and Recreation," and "Brooklyn Nine-Nine" providing firsthand exposure to the quirks and mishaps of office life, serving as a captivating backdrop for our statistical journey.
Through the interplay of serious academic inquiry and a subtle nod to the whimsical nature of internet culture, our literature review sets the stage for a compelling exploration of the correlation between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the steadfast office clerks of Kentucky.
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the number of office clerks in Kentucky has yielded some rather intriguing results. After sifting through copious amounts of internet data, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared of 0.9342934, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variability in the employment of office clerks in Kentucky can be explained by the rise and fall of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme. In classic statistical fashion, we also found that the p-value was less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the meme's popularity and the number of office clerks.
To visually represent this striking correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that showcases the linear association between the two variables. The scatterplot reveals a trend so pronounced that one might say it stands out as conspicuously as a fluorescent highlighter on a Post-it note.
The implications of these findings are, to put it mildly, eyebrow-raising. The correlation between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme's virality and the employment of office clerks in Kentucky raises questions that are as thought-provoking as they are unconventional. It seems that even in the depths of statistical analysis, internet memes have a way of unexpectedly catching us off guard, much like stumbling upon a whoopee cushion at an economics conference. Although the profound implications of these results are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical significance, it is imperative to approach them with cautious curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. Further research is warranted to dive deeper into the underlying mechanisms driving this correlation and to determine the broader implications for both digital culture and the labor market in Kentucky.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study reveal a connection between the popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the number of office clerks in Kentucky that is as intriguing as discovering a stapler mysteriously disappearing from a desk. Our results align with the existing literature, showcasing a rather unexpected correlation that is bound to create as much excitement as finding a well-timed meme in a PowerPoint presentation.
As outlined in the literature review, esteemed authors such as Smith, Doe, and Jones laid the groundwork for our investigation, prompting us to delve into the whimsical realms of internet culture and statistical inquiry that are as captivating as discovering a joke hidden in a spreadsheet. The serious work of Smith et al. on the impact of digital culture on labor market trends offered a sobering starting point for our exploration, while subsequent inquiries led us through the unexpected corridors of internet culture and statistical inquiry, much like stumbling upon a meme in a solemn academic journal.
Our findings, represented by a correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, provide substantial support for the presence of a striking association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks in Kentucky, suggesting a connection as clear as a pie chart on a business report. This correlation, combined with an r-squared of 0.9342934, indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in the employment of office clerks can be statistically explained by the fluctuations in the meme's popularity – a connection as undeniable as a co-worker's loud phone conversation.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the evidence supporting this correlation, leaving little room to rebut the profound influence of the meme on the employment landscape. Our results highlight the undeniable power of internet memes in shaping real-world phenomena, offering a perspective as refreshing as a humorous email amidst a sea of professional correspondence.
In a manner that reflects the unexpected twists and turns of internet culture, our findings remind us that statistical inquiry can be as unpredictable as a sudden office prank. The relationship between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the steadfast office clerks of Kentucky hints at a connection that is as enigmatic as the intangible concept of 'inbox zero'. While our results may leave one with raised eyebrows, it is imperative to treat them with the same cautious curiosity as one would apply when opening an unidentified email attachment.
These eyebrow-raising correlations prompt further investigation into the underlying mechanisms that drive the interplay between internet memes and the labor market, expanding our understanding of digital culture and its influence on employment dynamics. The implications of our findings provoke a sense of wonder as profound as realizing a spreadsheet formula actually works, challenging us to embrace the unexpected and approach the study of digital culture and labor market trends with an open mind and a willingness to explore the uncharted territories of statistical inquiry and internet culture.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and The number of office clerks in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The emergence of internet memes and their impact on various aspects of society has become a subject of increasing interest and inquiry in recent years. From Grumpy Cat to the "This is Fine" dog, memes have made their way into popular culture and have even infiltrated the academic world, beckoning researchers to explore their peculiar influence. The 'distracted boyfriend' meme, in particular, has garnered significant attention since its inception. The imagery of a man ogling another woman while his significant other looks on disapprovingly has captivated the online community, spawning countless variations and parodies. This meme has permeated social media, indicating a potential cultural shift that cannot be ignored, even in the hallowed halls of statistical analysis.
Meanwhile, the realm of employment, particularly in the administrative sector, has its own set of nuances and peculiarities, much like a meme with several layers of meaning. Office clerks, with their steadfast dedication to paperwork and unwavering commitment to the plastic plant in the corner of the office, are often overlooked in discussions of labor market dynamics. The state of Kentucky, known for its bourbon and bluegrass, also boasts a substantial population of office clerks, quietly managing the administrative duties that keep the cogs of the state's economy turning. The question arises: could there be a connection between the viral spread of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment trends of office clerks in the Bluegrass State? Against the backdrop of the meme's meteoric rise to stardom, this correlation may seem as unexpected as finding a stapler in the break room suddenly becoming a viral sensation.
Stay tuned for the following sections, where we delve into the intricate dance between internet culture and labor statistics, and uncover the tantalizing relationship between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the diligent office clerks of Kentucky. With a smirk and a raised eyebrow, we invite you to join us on this statistical escapade.
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the number of office clerks in Kentucky has yielded some rather intriguing results. After sifting through copious amounts of internet data, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared of 0.9342934, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variability in the employment of office clerks in Kentucky can be explained by the rise and fall of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme. In classic statistical fashion, we also found that the p-value was less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the meme's popularity and the number of office clerks.
To visually represent this striking correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that showcases the linear association between the two variables. The scatterplot reveals a trend so pronounced that one might say it stands out as conspicuously as a fluorescent highlighter on a Post-it note.
The implications of these findings are, to put it mildly, eyebrow-raising. The correlation between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme's virality and the employment of office clerks in Kentucky raises questions that are as thought-provoking as they are unconventional. It seems that even in the depths of statistical analysis, internet memes have a way of unexpectedly catching us off guard, much like stumbling upon a whoopee cushion at an economics conference. Although the profound implications of these results are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical significance, it is imperative to approach them with cautious curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. Further research is warranted to dive deeper into the underlying mechanisms driving this correlation and to determine the broader implications for both digital culture and the labor market in Kentucky.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the number of office clerks in Kentucky has unveiled a relationship as strong as a double shot of espresso. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with a p-value less than 0.01, suggests a connection more compelling than a paper jam in the copier. These findings, much like an unexpected prank in the office, underscore the need to consider the influence of internet culture on labor market dynamics.
While the implications of this correlation are as intriguing as finding a unicorn in a spreadsheet, it is essential to approach them with the critical scrutiny one would give to an expense report. The meme's viral spread and its uncanny alignment with the employment patterns of office clerks in Kentucky raise questions as captivating as a magician's act at a statistics convention. However, continuing research should tread carefully, like a tightrope walker in a circus, to unravel the mechanisms underpinning this unexpected relationship.
In the grand scheme of statistical phenomena, the link between the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the state's office clerks certainly stands out as conspicuously as a neon sticky note. However, for the time being, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, sometimes a statistical correlation is as simple and straightforward as a perfectly organized filing cabinet.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Memetics and Cultural Phenomena
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Meme Studies and Workplace Dynamics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky with an abstract of This paper examines the relationship between the cultural phenomenon of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the employment landscape of office clerks in the state of Kentucky. We utilized data from Google Trends to measure the popularity of the meme, and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to assess the number of office clerks in the state. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9665885, with p < 0.01, from the years 2006 to 2022. Our findings suggest an intriguing association between the meme's viral spread and the employment patterns among office clerks. The implications of this correlation, while certainly eyebrow-raising, warrant further investigation and consideration in the context of digital culture and labor market trends.
ChatGPT:
distracted boyfriend meme, distracted boyfriend meme popularity, meme impact on employment, office clerks employment in Kentucky, Google Trends data, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, meme viral spread, cultural phenomenon correlation, digital culture impact on labor market, statistical analysis, employment patterns, labor market trends
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' memeDetailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'distracted boyfriend' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme
The number of office clerks in Kentucky
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of office clerks, general in Kentucky
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of office clerks in Kentucky
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9342934 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of office clerks in Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme) over the 17 years from 2006 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-10. 0.0000000002829474281253420400
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 2.8E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,534,225,445 random variables You don't actually need 3 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme (Relative popularity) | 4 | 3.4 | 4.22222 | 2.125 | 0 | 0.833333 | 2 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.833333 | 0.5 | 28.25 | 43.3333 | 39.0833 | 27 | 18.4167 | 16.4167 |
The number of office clerks in Kentucky (Office Clerks, General) | 24900 | 23020 | 20930 | 20950 | 22180 | 23100 | 23930 | 21850 | 21170 | 20760 | 23620 | 34240 | 36580 | 38750 | 33660 | 31900 | 27490 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,3.4,4.22222,2.125,0,0.833333,2,1,1.3,0.833333,0.5,28.25,43.3333,39.0833,27,18.4167,16.4167,])
array_2 = np.array([24900,23020,20930,20950,22180,23100,23930,21850,21170,20760,23620,34240,36580,38750,33660,31900,27490,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme"
array_2_name = "The number of office clerks in Kentucky"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme
- Line chart for only The number of office clerks in Kentucky
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: From Distracted Boyfriend to Distracted Clerk: Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and the Number of Office Clerks in Kentucky
Your rating is much appreciated!
Correlation ID: 5045 · Black Variable ID: 25128 · Red Variable ID: 8523