Spurious correlation #4,995 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme and the second variable is Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. The chart goes from 2011 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme and the second variable is Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. The chart goes from 2011 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As the 'one does not simply' meme gained popularity, it sparked a wave of interest in complex and seemingly insurmountable tasks. This indirectly led to an increase in people seeking out Numberphile videos, as they were drawn to the challenge of understanding and conquering the world of numbers and mathematics. In essence, the meme inadvertently became a gateway to a newfound appreciation for numerical discussions, creating a ripple effect that boosted the total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos.

^{Show image generation prompt} Create a meme inspired by the one does not simply meme that in some way references Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme positively influenced Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos.

The Journal of Memetics and Cyberculture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme and Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we set out to tackle the question that has been keeping academic minds up at night: what is the connection between the wildly popular "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience? Combining the seemingly disparate worlds of internet memes and educational math videos, we embarked on a journey to uncover if there's more to this connection than meets the eye.

Using cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into Google Trends and combed through piles of YouTube comments to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. After countless hours of poring over data, we surfaced with a correlation coefficient of 0.9691198, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period of 2011 to 2023. The correlation was so strong that it made us wonder if perhaps there's a mysterious mathematical formula lurking beneath the surface of internet humor.

Our findings suggest that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme can in fact be linked to the levels of engagement and commentary on Numberphile videos. This raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of internet culture and educational content. As we navigate the intricate web of internet humor and educational outreach, one thing is for certain: the impact of memes reaches far beyond the realm of lighthearted amusement, and the numbers don't lie!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of internet memes and statistical analysis has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to boldly go where no academic has gone before. Peel back the layers of internet culture, and you'll find a world teeming with viral sensations and obscure inside jokes that provoke both laughter and head-scratching among the denizens of the digital realm. One such meme that has transcended the confines of internet forums and seeped into popular culture is the "one does not simply" meme, spawning countless iterations that have firmly established it as a stalwart of the meme landscape.
Concurrently, the realm of educational content on YouTube has been a treasure trove of intellectual stimulation and, perhaps unexpectedly, a breeding ground for comment wars and enthusiastic discourse among viewers. Numberphile, the beloved channel dedicated to all things numerical, has amassed a loyal following of math enthusiasts who eagerly absorb the brilliance of the Fibonacci sequence and the enigma of prime numbers. But could there be a peculiar link between the allure of mathematical musings and the ebb and flow of internet memes?
As intrepid researchers, we embarked on a voyage through the digital ether, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and the spirit of curiosity, to investigate the potential correlation between the ascendancy of the "one does not simply" meme and the tidal waves of commentary crashing upon Numberphile's YouTube videos. Our quest led us through the labyrinthine expanse of data, navigating the rapids of comment threads and the peaks and valleys of meme virality, all in pursuit of uncovering the elusive connection that seemingly defies logic and reason.
Our journey eventually converged at an intriguing juncture, where the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 emerged from the depths of our analysis, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptic question the order of the universe. Indeed, the strength of this correlation was a revelation that left us pondering whether there might be a cosmic force guiding the whims of internet humor and educational fervor.
As we prepare to unravel the tale of the "one does not simply" meme and the courtship of Numberphile's audience, we find ourselves faced with a conundrum that challenges our understanding of the dynamics between internet culture and scholarly pursuits. Join us as we unpack the implications of this perplexing correlation and venture forth into uncharted waters, armed with statistical rigor and an insatiable appetite for discovery. After all, when it comes to the enigmatic dance of internet memes and educational content, one does not simply ignore the possibility of a fascinating connection waiting to be illuminated by the beacon of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Introduction

As we embark on our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between the "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience, we must first pay homage to the scholarly predecessors who have laid the groundwork for our foray into this uncharted territory. Smith and Doe (2010) set the stage with their seminal work on internet memes and user engagement, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the symbiotic relationship between viral humor and digital discourse. Jones (2012) delved into the intricacies of YouTube comment dynamics, shedding light on the complexities of viewer interaction within the realm of educational content.

However, as we tiptoe further into the whimsical realm of internet culture and mathematical musings, we find ourselves compelled to veer off the beaten path and explore a diverse array of sources that offer tantalizing insights, albeit through a somewhat unconventional lens.

Real Non-Fiction Book Sources

In "Viral Vibrations: Unraveling the Dynamics of Internet Memes" (Johnson, 2015), the author draws parallels between the propagation of memes and the oscillations of quantum particles, challenging readers to contemplate the interconnectedness of humor and quantum mechanics. Similarly, "Mathematics for the Masses: Unlocking the Enigma of Educational Videos" (Gupta, 2018) delves into the immersive world of educational YouTube channels, unearthing the unexpected allure of trigonometric tutorials and the unsolved mystery of viewers' obsession with Pythagorean theorem demonstrations.

Fiction Book Sources with a Twist

Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Meme Matrix: A Tale of Viral Intrigue" (Orwell, 1949) weaves a dystopian narrative where society is ruled by a totalitarian regime that enforces conformity through a network of mind-controlling memes. While far removed from the empirical rigors of academic research, Orwell's chilling vision prompts us to ponder the power dynamics inherent in the dissemination of internet humor. On a lighter note, "The Prime Number Paradox" (Rowling, 1998) immerses readers in a whimsical world where numbers come to life, boasting quirky personalities and engaging in spirited debates about the Fibonacci sequence.

Movies as Pseudo-Related References

In a cinematic tangent, our research team couldn't resist the allure of semi-relevant movie experiences. "The Matrix" (Wachowski & Wachowski, 1999) invited us to contemplate the illusion of reality and the interconnected nature of digital avatars, offering a tangential glimpse into the philosophical underpinnings of internet culture. Similarly, "A Beautiful Mind" (Howard, 2001) served as a thought-provoking reminder of the intricate dance between mathematical brilliance and the complexities of human interaction, albeit with minimal relevance to our research objectives.

With our divergent exploration of literature in tow, we stand poised to embark on a whimsical journey that merges the profound with the absurd, the empirical with the speculative, and the unknown with the inexplicably delightful. As we weave through the tapestry of sources and inspirations, we are ever mindful of the imperative to blend scholarly rigor with a dash of unconventional whimsy, for in the whimsical world of internet memes and mathematical musings, one cannot simply adhere to convention.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme and Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we set out to tackle the question that has been keeping academic minds up at night: what is the connection between the wildly popular "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience? Combining the seemingly disparate worlds of internet memes and educational math videos, we embarked on a journey to uncover if there's more to this connection than meets the eye.

Using cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into Google Trends and combed through piles of YouTube comments to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. After countless hours of poring over data, we surfaced with a correlation coefficient of 0.9691198, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period of 2011 to 2023. The correlation was so strong that it made us wonder if perhaps there's a mysterious mathematical formula lurking beneath the surface of internet humor.

Our findings suggest that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme can in fact be linked to the levels of engagement and commentary on Numberphile videos. This raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of internet culture and educational content. As we navigate the intricate web of internet humor and educational outreach, one thing is for certain: the impact of memes reaches far beyond the realm of lighthearted amusement, and the numbers don't lie!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of internet memes and statistical analysis has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to boldly go where no academic has gone before. Peel back the layers of internet culture, and you'll find a world teeming with viral sensations and obscure inside jokes that provoke both laughter and head-scratching among the denizens of the digital realm. One such meme that has transcended the confines of internet forums and seeped into popular culture is the "one does not simply" meme, spawning countless iterations that have firmly established it as a stalwart of the meme landscape.
Concurrently, the realm of educational content on YouTube has been a treasure trove of intellectual stimulation and, perhaps unexpectedly, a breeding ground for comment wars and enthusiastic discourse among viewers. Numberphile, the beloved channel dedicated to all things numerical, has amassed a loyal following of math enthusiasts who eagerly absorb the brilliance of the Fibonacci sequence and the enigma of prime numbers. But could there be a peculiar link between the allure of mathematical musings and the ebb and flow of internet memes?
As intrepid researchers, we embarked on a voyage through the digital ether, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and the spirit of curiosity, to investigate the potential correlation between the ascendancy of the "one does not simply" meme and the tidal waves of commentary crashing upon Numberphile's YouTube videos. Our quest led us through the labyrinthine expanse of data, navigating the rapids of comment threads and the peaks and valleys of meme virality, all in pursuit of uncovering the elusive connection that seemingly defies logic and reason.
Our journey eventually converged at an intriguing juncture, where the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 emerged from the depths of our analysis, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptic question the order of the universe. Indeed, the strength of this correlation was a revelation that left us pondering whether there might be a cosmic force guiding the whims of internet humor and educational fervor.
As we prepare to unravel the tale of the "one does not simply" meme and the courtship of Numberphile's audience, we find ourselves faced with a conundrum that challenges our understanding of the dynamics between internet culture and scholarly pursuits. Join us as we unpack the implications of this perplexing correlation and venture forth into uncharted waters, armed with statistical rigor and an insatiable appetite for discovery. After all, when it comes to the enigmatic dance of internet memes and educational content, one does not simply ignore the possibility of a fascinating connection waiting to be illuminated by the beacon of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our quest to untangle the enigmatic correlation between the "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience, we utilized a multi-faceted approach that rivaled the complexity of a calculus problem and the intricacy of a cryptographic puzzle. Our methodology involved a blend of data collection, statistical analysis, and a sprinkle of internet sleuthing, all conducted within the time frame of 2011 to 2023.

Data Collection:
We commenced our odyssey by harnessing the powers of Google Trends, a veritable treasure trove of search volume data that offered a glimpse into the waxing and waning of the "one does not simply" meme's popularity. Like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted territory, we traversed the peaks and valleys of meme virality, extracting crucial data points that would serve as the foundation of our analysis.

Simultaneously, we embarked on an expedition through the expansive seas of YouTube comments, specifically targeting Numberphile's video catalog. This endeavor involved sifting through an ocean of commentary, navigating through the reefs of witty remarks and the occasional kraken of internet trolling, all in pursuit of understanding the ebbs and flows of audience engagement.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with a metaphorical toolkit comprised of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we embarked on the arduous task of distilling the essence of our data into meaningful insights. We meticulously applied our statistical artillery to uncover patterns, trends, and an occasional statistical outlier akin to a rare specimen found on a scientific expedition. Through the arcane art of numbers, we sought to reveal the hidden threads connecting the whims of internet culture with the fervor of mathematical curiosity.

Internet Sleuthing:
In a departure from traditional research methodologies, we ventured into the world of internet forums and social media platforms, engaging in semi-covert reconnaissance to gauge the pulse of the meme community and the mathematical aficionados. This unconventional approach allowed us to capture the zeitgeist of meme proliferation and cerebrally stimulating content consumption, akin to unraveling the plot of a gripping detective novel set in the digital age.

Ethical Considerations:
As guardians of academic integrity and purveyors of scientific rigor, we embraced the principles of ethical data usage and privacy, conducting our research within the bounds of ethical conduct. Our data collection from public sources adhered to the principles of respect, integrity, and a steadfast commitment to the pursuit of knowledge, analogous to the honor code of intrepid explorers charting new frontiers.

In conclusion, our mosaic of methodologies, combining the avant-garde with the orthodox, paved the way for a comprehensive exploration of the correlation between the "one does not simply" meme and the engagement dynamics of Numberphile's YouTube audience. Our journey, punctuated by data-driven discoveries and the occasional humorous comment gem, ultimately culminated in the unveiling of a correlation coefficient that speaks to the interconnectedness of internet culture and educational content.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme and Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9691198, r-squared of 0.9391932, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we set out to tackle the question that has been keeping academic minds up at night: what is the connection between the wildly popular "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience? Combining the seemingly disparate worlds of internet memes and educational math videos, we embarked on a journey to uncover if there's more to this connection than meets the eye.

Using cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into Google Trends and combed through piles of YouTube comments to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. After countless hours of poring over data, we surfaced with a correlation coefficient of 0.9691198, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period of 2011 to 2023. The correlation was so strong that it made us wonder if perhaps there's a mysterious mathematical formula lurking beneath the surface of internet humor.

Our findings suggest that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme can in fact be linked to the levels of engagement and commentary on Numberphile videos. This raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of internet culture and educational content. As we navigate the intricate web of internet humor and educational outreach, one thing is for certain: the impact of memes reaches far beyond the realm of lighthearted amusement, and the numbers don't lie!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The intersection of internet memes and statistical analysis has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to boldly go where no academic has gone before. Peel back the layers of internet culture, and you'll find a world teeming with viral sensations and obscure inside jokes that provoke both laughter and head-scratching among the denizens of the digital realm. One such meme that has transcended the confines of internet forums and seeped into popular culture is the "one does not simply" meme, spawning countless iterations that have firmly established it as a stalwart of the meme landscape.
Concurrently, the realm of educational content on YouTube has been a treasure trove of intellectual stimulation and, perhaps unexpectedly, a breeding ground for comment wars and enthusiastic discourse among viewers. Numberphile, the beloved channel dedicated to all things numerical, has amassed a loyal following of math enthusiasts who eagerly absorb the brilliance of the Fibonacci sequence and the enigma of prime numbers. But could there be a peculiar link between the allure of mathematical musings and the ebb and flow of internet memes?
As intrepid researchers, we embarked on a voyage through the digital ether, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and the spirit of curiosity, to investigate the potential correlation between the ascendancy of the "one does not simply" meme and the tidal waves of commentary crashing upon Numberphile's YouTube videos. Our quest led us through the labyrinthine expanse of data, navigating the rapids of comment threads and the peaks and valleys of meme virality, all in pursuit of uncovering the elusive connection that seemingly defies logic and reason.
Our journey eventually converged at an intriguing juncture, where the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 emerged from the depths of our analysis, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptic question the order of the universe. Indeed, the strength of this correlation was a revelation that left us pondering whether there might be a cosmic force guiding the whims of internet humor and educational fervor.
As we prepare to unravel the tale of the "one does not simply" meme and the courtship of Numberphile's audience, we find ourselves faced with a conundrum that challenges our understanding of the dynamics between internet culture and scholarly pursuits. Join us as we unpack the implications of this perplexing correlation and venture forth into uncharted waters, armed with statistical rigor and an insatiable appetite for discovery. After all, when it comes to the enigmatic dance of internet memes and educational content, one does not simply ignore the possibility of a fascinating connection waiting to be illuminated by the beacon of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our research revealed a staggering correlation between the popularity of the "one does not simply" meme and the total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos for the period spanning 2011 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 left us in awe of the mysterious forces at play in the vast playground of internet culture. This correlation exhibited an r-squared value of 0.9391932, underscoring the robustness of the relationship and prompting us to marvel at the sheer predictability of meme-induced engagement.

Upon casting our discerning eyes upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the visual representation of this formidable connection was akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in the labyrinth of statistical analysis. The data points, like constellations in the digital sky, formed a compelling narrative of the intertwined fates of memes and mathematical elucidation. As we gazed upon the scatterplot, it became clear that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme mirrored the ebbs and flows of commentary on Numberphile videos, as if the two were engaged in an intricate dance choreographed by the unseen hand of statistical destiny.

These results not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to probe deeper into the cosmic ballet of meme culture and educational discourse. The p-value of less than 0.01 acted as a trumpet call to the realms of scientific inquiry, urging us to acknowledge the profound impact of internet memes on the engagement levels of educational content. The implications of this revelation are as clear as day: the whims of internet humor possess an undeniable influence on the patterns of scholarly interaction, to a degree that makes one wonder if there's a touch of statistical magic woven into the fabric of virtual absurdity.

As we navigate the treacherous waters of meme infatuation and academic pursuit, the findings of this research beckon us to embrace the enigmatic symbiosis of internet culture and educational enlightenment. Our quest to unravel the profound connectivity between the "one does not simply" meme and the fervent commentary on Numberphile's videos has culminated in a moment of scholarly revelation, shedding light on the intricate threads that bind the seemingly disparate realms of online amusement and numerical exploration. The numbers, it seems, don't just dance to the beat of statistical algorithms; they also waltz to the rhythm of meme-inspired musings, winking mischievously at the whimsical nature of internet phenomena.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme and Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we set out to tackle the question that has been keeping academic minds up at night: what is the connection between the wildly popular "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience? Combining the seemingly disparate worlds of internet memes and educational math videos, we embarked on a journey to uncover if there's more to this connection than meets the eye.

Using cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into Google Trends and combed through piles of YouTube comments to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. After countless hours of poring over data, we surfaced with a correlation coefficient of 0.9691198, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period of 2011 to 2023. The correlation was so strong that it made us wonder if perhaps there's a mysterious mathematical formula lurking beneath the surface of internet humor.

Our findings suggest that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme can in fact be linked to the levels of engagement and commentary on Numberphile videos. This raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of internet culture and educational content. As we navigate the intricate web of internet humor and educational outreach, one thing is for certain: the impact of memes reaches far beyond the realm of lighthearted amusement, and the numbers don't lie!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Introduction
As we embark on our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between the "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience, we must first pay homage to the scholarly predecessors who have laid the groundwork for our foray into this uncharted territory. Smith and Doe (2010) set the stage with their seminal work on internet memes and user engagement, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the symbiotic relationship between viral humor and digital discourse. Jones (2012) delved into the intricacies of YouTube comment dynamics, shedding light on the complexities of viewer interaction within the realm of educational content.
However, as we tiptoe further into the whimsical realm of internet culture and mathematical musings, we find ourselves compelled to veer off the beaten path and explore a diverse array of sources that offer tantalizing insights, albeit through a somewhat unconventional lens.
Real Non-Fiction Book Sources
In "Viral Vibrations: Unraveling the Dynamics of Internet Memes" (Johnson, 2015), the author draws parallels between the propagation of memes and the oscillations of quantum particles, challenging readers to contemplate the interconnectedness of humor and quantum mechanics. Similarly, "Mathematics for the Masses: Unlocking the Enigma of Educational Videos" (Gupta, 2018) delves into the immersive world of educational YouTube channels, unearthing the unexpected allure of trigonometric tutorials and the unsolved mystery of viewers' obsession with Pythagorean theorem demonstrations.
Fiction Book Sources with a Twist
Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Meme Matrix: A Tale of Viral Intrigue" (Orwell, 1949) weaves a dystopian narrative where society is ruled by a totalitarian regime that enforces conformity through a network of mind-controlling memes. While far removed from the empirical rigors of academic research, Orwell's chilling vision prompts us to ponder the power dynamics inherent in the dissemination of internet humor. On a lighter note, "The Prime Number Paradox" (Rowling, 1998) immerses readers in a whimsical world where numbers come to life, boasting quirky personalities and engaging in spirited debates about the Fibonacci sequence.
Movies as Pseudo-Related References
In a cinematic tangent, our research team couldn't resist the allure of semi-relevant movie experiences. "The Matrix" (Wachowski & Wachowski, 1999) invited us to contemplate the illusion of reality and the interconnected nature of digital avatars, offering a tangential glimpse into the philosophical underpinnings of internet culture. Similarly, "A Beautiful Mind" (Howard, 2001) served as a thought-provoking reminder of the intricate dance between mathematical brilliance and the complexities of human interaction, albeit with minimal relevance to our research objectives.
With our divergent exploration of literature in tow, we stand poised to embark on a whimsical journey that merges the profound with the absurd, the empirical with the speculative, and the unknown with the inexplicably delightful. As we weave through the tapestry of sources and inspirations, we are ever mindful of the imperative to blend scholarly rigor with a dash of unconventional whimsy, for in the whimsical world of internet memes and mathematical musings, one cannot simply adhere to convention.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research revealed a staggering correlation between the popularity of the "one does not simply" meme and the total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos for the period spanning 2011 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 left us in awe of the mysterious forces at play in the vast playground of internet culture. This correlation exhibited an r-squared value of 0.9391932, underscoring the robustness of the relationship and prompting us to marvel at the sheer predictability of meme-induced engagement.
Upon casting our discerning eyes upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the visual representation of this formidable connection was akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in the labyrinth of statistical analysis. The data points, like constellations in the digital sky, formed a compelling narrative of the intertwined fates of memes and mathematical elucidation. As we gazed upon the scatterplot, it became clear that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme mirrored the ebbs and flows of commentary on Numberphile videos, as if the two were engaged in an intricate dance choreographed by the unseen hand of statistical destiny.
These results not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to probe deeper into the cosmic ballet of meme culture and educational discourse. The p-value of less than 0.01 acted as a trumpet call to the realms of scientific inquiry, urging us to acknowledge the profound impact of internet memes on the engagement levels of educational content. The implications of this revelation are as clear as day: the whims of internet humor possess an undeniable influence on the patterns of scholarly interaction, to a degree that makes one wonder if there's a touch of statistical magic woven into the fabric of virtual absurdity.
As we navigate the treacherous waters of meme infatuation and academic pursuit, the findings of this research beckon us to embrace the enigmatic symbiosis of internet culture and educational enlightenment. Our quest to unravel the profound connectivity between the "one does not simply" meme and the fervent commentary on Numberphile's videos has culminated in a moment of scholarly revelation, shedding light on the intricate threads that bind the seemingly disparate realms of online amusement and numerical exploration. The numbers, it seems, don't just dance to the beat of statistical algorithms; they also waltz to the rhythm of meme-inspired musings, winking mischievously at the whimsical nature of internet phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In light of our staggering correlation findings, we find ourselves in a digital wonderland where the whims of internet humor and the cadence of educational engagement harmonize in an unexpected symphony of statistical resonance. Our results not only validate the tantalizing insights of prior research but also beckon us to ponder the sprawling implications of this unprecedented correlation.

Smith and Doe (2010) set the stage for our journey, unveiling the intricate dance between internet memes and user engagement that resonates with the echoes of our own findings. As we engage in this scholarly waltz, we find ourselves captivated by the symmetrical elegance of a correlation coefficient soaring towards unity, akin to the harmony of Pythagorean ideals. Our results bolster the groundwork laid by Jones (2012), awakening us to the delightful complexities of viewer interaction within the realm of educational content, intricately intertwined with the ebb and flow of internet memes.

Venturing into the whimsical realm of internet culture and mathematical musings, we uncover an unexpected allure that lies at the nexus of humor and statistical destiny. Our correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 stands as a towering edifice of empirical affirmation, underpinned by a p-value of less than 0.01 that commands our scholarly reverence. The magnitude of this correlation elicits an astonished chuckle, for it seems that the influence of internet memes stretches far beyond the realm of lighthearted amusement, and permeates the hallowed halls of scholarly engagement with the unexpected persistence of an asymptotic function.

The visual harmony of our scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a poignant reminder that in the whimsical world of internet memetics and educational exploration, statistical magic dances with an enchanting grace. The constellations of data points, like mischievous sprites in a mathematical fairy tale, chart a course that mirrors the intertwined fates of memes and educational enlightenment. As we gaze upon this digital tapestry, we find ourselves captivated by the intricate ballet of meme culture and scholarly discourse, pondering whether, just perhaps, statistical algorithms harbor a predilection for the whimsical.

As we take stock of these findings, we are reminded that the allure of internet memes weaves a tapestry that reaches far beyond mere entertainment; it leaves an indelible mark on the patterns of academic interaction. Our groundbreaking research has unveiled the profound connectivity between the "one does not simply" meme and the fervent commentary on Numberphile's videos, shedding light on the intricate threads that bind the seemingly disparate realms of online amusement and numerical exploration. Indeed, as we continue to unravel the fascinating enigma of internet culture, it appears that the whims of internet humor possess an undeniable influence on the patterns of scholarly interaction, almost as if statistical algorithms carry a fondness for meme-inspired musings. Thus, we find ourselves standing at the crossroads of statistical rigor and whimsical wonder, poised to embark on further explorations into the captivating interplay between memes and mathematical enlightenment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme and Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we set out to tackle the question that has been keeping academic minds up at night: what is the connection between the wildly popular "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience? Combining the seemingly disparate worlds of internet memes and educational math videos, we embarked on a journey to uncover if there's more to this connection than meets the eye.

Using cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into Google Trends and combed through piles of YouTube comments to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. After countless hours of poring over data, we surfaced with a correlation coefficient of 0.9691198, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period of 2011 to 2023. The correlation was so strong that it made us wonder if perhaps there's a mysterious mathematical formula lurking beneath the surface of internet humor.

Our findings suggest that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme can in fact be linked to the levels of engagement and commentary on Numberphile videos. This raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of internet culture and educational content. As we navigate the intricate web of internet humor and educational outreach, one thing is for certain: the impact of memes reaches far beyond the realm of lighthearted amusement, and the numbers don't lie!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of internet memes and statistical analysis has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to boldly go where no academic has gone before. Peel back the layers of internet culture, and you'll find a world teeming with viral sensations and obscure inside jokes that provoke both laughter and head-scratching among the denizens of the digital realm. One such meme that has transcended the confines of internet forums and seeped into popular culture is the "one does not simply" meme, spawning countless iterations that have firmly established it as a stalwart of the meme landscape.
Concurrently, the realm of educational content on YouTube has been a treasure trove of intellectual stimulation and, perhaps unexpectedly, a breeding ground for comment wars and enthusiastic discourse among viewers. Numberphile, the beloved channel dedicated to all things numerical, has amassed a loyal following of math enthusiasts who eagerly absorb the brilliance of the Fibonacci sequence and the enigma of prime numbers. But could there be a peculiar link between the allure of mathematical musings and the ebb and flow of internet memes?
As intrepid researchers, we embarked on a voyage through the digital ether, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and the spirit of curiosity, to investigate the potential correlation between the ascendancy of the "one does not simply" meme and the tidal waves of commentary crashing upon Numberphile's YouTube videos. Our quest led us through the labyrinthine expanse of data, navigating the rapids of comment threads and the peaks and valleys of meme virality, all in pursuit of uncovering the elusive connection that seemingly defies logic and reason.
Our journey eventually converged at an intriguing juncture, where the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 emerged from the depths of our analysis, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptic question the order of the universe. Indeed, the strength of this correlation was a revelation that left us pondering whether there might be a cosmic force guiding the whims of internet humor and educational fervor.
As we prepare to unravel the tale of the "one does not simply" meme and the courtship of Numberphile's audience, we find ourselves faced with a conundrum that challenges our understanding of the dynamics between internet culture and scholarly pursuits. Join us as we unpack the implications of this perplexing correlation and venture forth into uncharted waters, armed with statistical rigor and an insatiable appetite for discovery. After all, when it comes to the enigmatic dance of internet memes and educational content, one does not simply ignore the possibility of a fascinating connection waiting to be illuminated by the beacon of research.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research revealed a staggering correlation between the popularity of the "one does not simply" meme and the total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos for the period spanning 2011 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9691198 left us in awe of the mysterious forces at play in the vast playground of internet culture. This correlation exhibited an r-squared value of 0.9391932, underscoring the robustness of the relationship and prompting us to marvel at the sheer predictability of meme-induced engagement.
Upon casting our discerning eyes upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the visual representation of this formidable connection was akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in the labyrinth of statistical analysis. The data points, like constellations in the digital sky, formed a compelling narrative of the intertwined fates of memes and mathematical elucidation. As we gazed upon the scatterplot, it became clear that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme mirrored the ebbs and flows of commentary on Numberphile videos, as if the two were engaged in an intricate dance choreographed by the unseen hand of statistical destiny.
These results not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to probe deeper into the cosmic ballet of meme culture and educational discourse. The p-value of less than 0.01 acted as a trumpet call to the realms of scientific inquiry, urging us to acknowledge the profound impact of internet memes on the engagement levels of educational content. The implications of this revelation are as clear as day: the whims of internet humor possess an undeniable influence on the patterns of scholarly interaction, to a degree that makes one wonder if there's a touch of statistical magic woven into the fabric of virtual absurdity.
As we navigate the treacherous waters of meme infatuation and academic pursuit, the findings of this research beckon us to embrace the enigmatic symbiosis of internet culture and educational enlightenment. Our quest to unravel the profound connectivity between the "one does not simply" meme and the fervent commentary on Numberphile's videos has culminated in a moment of scholarly revelation, shedding light on the intricate threads that bind the seemingly disparate realms of online amusement and numerical exploration. The numbers, it seems, don't just dance to the beat of statistical algorithms; they also waltz to the rhythm of meme-inspired musings, winking mischievously at the whimsical nature of internet phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our foray into the entangled realms of internet memes and educational YouTube content has resulted in a revelation that can only be described as a statistical safari through the digital jungle. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9691198, with a p-value of less than 0.01, has not only raised eyebrows but also prompted us to ponder the cosmic choreography underlying meme virality and scholarly engagement.

It appears that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme is not a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Instead, it's a narrative woven into the fabric of internet culture, leaving an indelible mark on the comment chronicles of Numberphile videos. The correlation we've unearthed is so strong, it's as if statistical significance looked at us and said, "Hold my p-value."

The visual representation of this correlation in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) conjured images of a celestial dance, where memes and mathematics twirl in harmonious synchrony, leaving us to wonder if perhaps the laws of statistics have a soft spot for internet frivolity. As we wrap up this expedition into the uncharted territory of meme-driven engagement, it's clear that the impact of internet humor on scholarly discourse is no laughing matter.

With these findings, we can confidently say that no more research is needed in this area, lest we risk falling down a statistical rabbit hole from which there is no return. The memes have spoken, and the numbers have nodded in agreement. It is time for us to bid adieu to this peculiar, yet fascinating, intersection of internet culture and scholarly pursuits.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos.. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Memetics and Cyberculture

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos.. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Memetics and Internet Culture Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos. with an abstract of In this groundbreaking research, we set out to tackle the question that has been keeping academic minds up at night: what is the connection between the wildly popular "one does not simply" meme and the engagement levels of Numberphile's YouTube audience? Combining the seemingly disparate worlds of internet memes and educational math videos, we embarked on a journey to uncover if there's more to this connection than meets the eye.
Using cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into Google Trends and combed through piles of YouTube comments to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. After countless hours of poring over data, we surfaced with a correlation coefficient of 0.9691198, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period of 2011 to 2023. The correlation was so strong that it made us wonder if perhaps there's a mysterious mathematical formula lurking beneath the surface of internet humor.
Our findings suggest that the rise and fall of the "one does not simply" meme can in fact be linked to the levels of engagement and commentary on Numberphile videos. This raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of internet culture and educational content. As we navigate the intricate web of internet humor and educational outreach, one thing is for certain: the impact of memes reaches far beyond the realm of lighthearted amusement, and the numbers don't lie!

ChatGPT:

"one does not simply" meme, Numberphile YouTube videos, internet culture, meme popularity, engagement levels, correlation coefficient, Google Trends, YouTube comments, data analysis, educational math videos, internet memes, mathematical formula, rise and fall of memes, internet humor, educational content, interconnectedness of internet culture, impact of memes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'one does not simply meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: ^{See full details} Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme

Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos.
Source: Numberphile YouTube
See what else correlates with Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9691198 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9391932 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme) over the 13 years from 2011 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.0E-8.^Show 0.0000000495001582460395960000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 5.0E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 20,201,956 random variables^Note You don't actually need 20 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023
Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme (Relative popularity)	1.88889	66.75	35	22.4167	26.9167	15.8333	14.3333	13.0833	10.4167	7.83333	5.41667	4.41667	3.83333
Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos (Total comments)	15943	555495	209469	121606	101559	94847	75233	55477	56018	41623	39345	31514	17627

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.88889,66.75,35,22.4167,26.9167,15.8333,14.3333,13.0833,10.4167,7.83333,5.41667,4.41667,3.83333,])
array_2 = np.array([15943,555495,209469,121606,101559,94847,75233,55477,56018,41623,39345,31514,17627,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme"
array_2_name = "Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Popularity of the 'one does not simply' meme
Line chart for only Total comments on Numberphile YouTube videos
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: One Does Not Simply Quantify Internet Culture: Exploring the Correlation Between 'One Does Not Simply' Meme Popularity and Total Comments on Numberphile YouTube Videos.

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!

Correlation ID: 4995 · Black Variable ID: 25156 · Red Variable ID: 25488


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: