about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,909 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Keanu and the second variable is Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

It's simple, really. More babies were named Keanu, which led to a higher demand for baby products. This increased the production of baby food, which in turn boosted the agricultural industry. With more people working in agriculture, there was a surplus of farmers with an inclination for charitable giving. And who is the epitome of philanthropy? None other than MrBeast himself. So, indirectly, the name Keanu sparked a chain reaction of kindness and internet stardom.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: A sun-drenched field spanning the horizon, with exceptionally realistic and richly colored rows of crops stretching endlessly, each crop having vibrant hues and unique shapes. Farmers in plaid shirts and straw hats joyfully toil together, their camaraderie evident in their expressions and body language. Their features are rendered with intricate detail, capturing the warmth of their smiles and the strength of their bonds. In the distance, a line of trucks loaded with fresh produce is displayed with lifelike realism, their forms indicative of the weight they carry. The image also features a large crowd intently gathered around a laptop, their energy and enthusiasm palpable despite their lack of detail. As light streams from the laptop screen, a mesmerizing visual of a MrBeast video playing with the crowd's reactions causing an outburst of lively chatter and numerous comments flooding the screen - all conveyed through an evocative and expressive representation. The interconnected impact of the name Keanu and MrBeast's charitable influence is subtly hinted at through the way the scene is centered around the crowd and their shared experience. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Cute cartoon Sci-fi fantacy A Discovery magazine cover image Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos, in the following situation: It's simple, really. More babies were named Keanu, which led to a higher demand for baby products. This increased the production of baby food, which in turn boosted the agricultural industry. With more people working in agriculture, there was a surplus of farmers with an inclination for charitable giving. And who is the epitome of philanthropy? None other than MrBeast himself. So, indirectly, the name Keanu sparked a chain reaction of kindness and internet stardom.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sun-drenched field, rows of vibrant crops stretch endlessly. Farmers, wearing plaid shirts and straw hats, work together, their friendly smiles reflecting the sense of community and shared purpose. In the distance, a line of trucks loaded with fresh produce waits to be distributed. Meanwhile, a large crowd clusters around a laptop, watching a MrBeast YouTube video. Their enthusiastic chatter fills the air as countless comments flood the screen, each expressing support and gratitude for his philanthropic acts. This heartwarming scene perfectly captures the interconnected impact of the name Keanu and MrBeast's charitable influence.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In a sun-drenched field, rows of vibrant crops stretch endlessly. Farmers, wearing plaid shirts and straw hats, work together, their friendly smiles reflecting the sense of community and shared purpose. In the distance, a line of trucks loaded with fresh produce waits to be distributed. Meanwhile, a large crowd clusters around a laptop, watching a MrBeast YouTube video. Their enthusiastic chatter fills the air as countless comments flood the screen, each expressing support and gratitude for his philanthropic acts. This heartwarming scene perfectly captures the interconnected impact of the name Keanu and MrBeast's charitable influence. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: A sun-drenched field spanning the horizon, with exceptionally realistic and richly colored rows of crops stretching endlessly, each crop having vibrant hues and unique shapes. Farmers in plaid shirts and straw hats joyfully toil together, their camaraderie evident in their expressions and body language. Their features are rendered with intricate detail, capturing the warmth of their smiles and the strength of their bonds. In the distance, a line of trucks loaded with fresh produce is displayed with lifelike realism, their forms indicative of the weight they carry. The image also features a large crowd intently gathered around a laptop, their energy and enthusiasm palpable despite their lack of detail. As light streams from the laptop screen, a mesmerizing visual of a MrBeast video playing with the crowd's reactions causing an outburst of lively chatter and numerous comments flooding the screen - all conveyed through an evocative and expressive representation. The interconnected impact of the name Keanu and MrBeast's charitable influence is subtly hinted at through the way the scene is centered around the crowd and their shared experience.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Keanu caused Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos

The Journal of Internet Phenomena Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Pardon my antics, dear readers, as we embark on a journey into the whimsical world of statistical sorcery, where the enigmatic connection between the iconic name "Keanu" and the avalanche of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos unravels before our incredulous eyes. Picture this - Keanu Reeves, the immortal demigod of action cinema and purveyor of breathtaking performances, and MrBeast, the YouTube wizard of wacky challenges and philanthropic masterpieces, converging in an invisible dance of data. Are we witnessing a cosmic correlation or a peculiar cosmic coincidence? Join me as we tumble down the rabbit hole of digital nomenclature and online engagement, where statistical significance meets the silver screen.

The notion that a name could influence the digital discourse seems ludicrous. After all, what's in a name? Well, Shakespeare, darling, let me tell you – a whole lot! The moniker "Keanu" has transcended its lexical roots, catapulted into stardom by the ever-charismatic Keanu Reeves. Meanwhile, the enigma of MrBeast's enthralling content has sparked an avalanche of comments, leaving us pondering: Is there a peculiar karmic connection between the name "Keanu" and the cacophony of YouTube commentary? Are we witnessing a celestial alignment of consonants and comments? Or is this just a bewitching fluke that science has finally unearthed?

My esteemed colleagues, let us delve into the motley tapestry of data, where the unexpected intertwining of popular first names and online interactions challenges our notions of rationality. Buckle up, for we are about to embark on a statistical odyssey that will make our jaws drop faster than a Keanu Reeves fight scene!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Pardon my antics, dear readers, as we embark on a journey into the whimsical world of statistical sorcery, where the enigmatic connection between the iconic name "Keanu" and the avalanche of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos unravels before our incredulous eyes. Picture this - Keanu Reeves, the immortal demigod of action cinema and purveyor of breathtaking performances, and MrBeast, the YouTube wizard of wacky challenges and philanthropic masterpieces, converging in an invisible dance of data. Are we witnessing a cosmic correlation or a peculiar cosmic coincidence? Join me as we tumble down the rabbit hole of digital nomenclature and online engagement, where statistical significance meets the silver screen.
The notion that a name could influence the digital discourse seems ludicrous. After all, what's in a name? Well, Shakespeare, darling, let me tell you – a whole lot! The moniker "Keanu" has transcended its lexical roots, catapulted into stardom by the ever-charismatic Keanu Reeves. Meanwhile, the enigma of MrBeast's enthralling content has sparked an avalanche of comments, leaving us pondering: Is there a peculiar karmic connection between the name "Keanu" and the cacophony of YouTube commentary? Are we witnessing a celestial alignment of consonants and comments? Or is this just a bewitching fluke that science has finally unearthed?
My esteemed colleagues, let us delve into the motley tapestry of data, where the unexpected intertwining of popular first names and online interactions challenges our notions of rationality. Buckle up, for we are about to embark on a statistical odyssey that will make our jaws drop faster than a Keanu Reeves fight scene!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Before plunging into the comical and perplexing realm of Keanu-related statistics and YouTube comments, it is crucial to acknowledge the steadfast foundation laid by previous scholarly works. Smith and Doe (2015) explored the impact of celebrity names on digital engagement, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics of internet culture and nomenclature. Their study provided valuable insights into the ways in which celebrity personas imprint themselves on the digital landscape, paving the way for our own investigation into the mystifying Keanu phenomenon.

In a similarly serious vein, Jones (2018) delved into the complexities of online interactions and the unforeseen factors that shape user engagement. While their research did not directly delve into the connection between particular names and digital discourse, it set the stage for a broader exploration of the intricate web of influences woven into the fabric of online interaction.

Transitioning from these scholarly pursuits to a more eclectic mix of literary and cultural influences, we turn to non-fiction works that lend a touch of gravitas to the whimsical topic at hand. "The Power of Names" by John Smith delves into the historical, psychological, and cultural significance of names, offering a comprehensive exploration of the subtle forces at play when it comes to the naming of individuals and its impact on society. This scholarly work, although not directly tied to our specific investigation, serves as a poignant reminder of the weight carried by appellations in the world at large.

Adding a dash of fiction to our scholarly stew, "The Name Game" by Jane Doe ventures into the realm of speculative fiction, exploring a world where names possess mystical properties and influence the fates of individuals. While purely speculative in nature, this imaginative piece of literature reminds us of the magical aura surrounding names and their potential to influence the course of events, albeit in a more whimsical and fictional context.

Taking a delightful detour into the realm of childhood nostalgia, we recall the animated series "The Magic School Bus," where Ms. Frizzle and her intrepid students journey through the wondrous world of science. In an episode aptly titled "The Naming Nuisance," the class explores the significance of names and their impact on the world around them. While aimed at a younger audience, the episode's lighthearted take on the importance of names serves as a charming reminder of the pervasive influence of appellations.

And who could forget the timeless classic "Sesame Street," where the cheerful muppets impart valuable lessons to young viewers? In an episode featuring the lovable Count von Count, the importance of counting comments and the influence of names on engagement takes center stage in a mirthful and engaging manner. While our research delves into more sophisticated statistical analyses, the spirit of curiosity and exploration embodied by these childhood favorites remains a vital part of our scholarly pursuit.

With this motley crew of influences in mind, we embark on our own statistical odyssey, armed with a blend of levity and rigor befitting the enigmatic Keanu-nomenon and its peculiar intersection with YouTube comments. Let the merriment commence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Pardon my antics, dear readers, as we embark on a journey into the whimsical world of statistical sorcery, where the enigmatic connection between the iconic name "Keanu" and the avalanche of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos unravels before our incredulous eyes. Picture this - Keanu Reeves, the immortal demigod of action cinema and purveyor of breathtaking performances, and MrBeast, the YouTube wizard of wacky challenges and philanthropic masterpieces, converging in an invisible dance of data. Are we witnessing a cosmic correlation or a peculiar cosmic coincidence? Join me as we tumble down the rabbit hole of digital nomenclature and online engagement, where statistical significance meets the silver screen.
The notion that a name could influence the digital discourse seems ludicrous. After all, what's in a name? Well, Shakespeare, darling, let me tell you – a whole lot! The moniker "Keanu" has transcended its lexical roots, catapulted into stardom by the ever-charismatic Keanu Reeves. Meanwhile, the enigma of MrBeast's enthralling content has sparked an avalanche of comments, leaving us pondering: Is there a peculiar karmic connection between the name "Keanu" and the cacophony of YouTube commentary? Are we witnessing a celestial alignment of consonants and comments? Or is this just a bewitching fluke that science has finally unearthed?
My esteemed colleagues, let us delve into the motley tapestry of data, where the unexpected intertwining of popular first names and online interactions challenges our notions of rationality. Buckle up, for we are about to embark on a statistical odyssey that will make our jaws drop faster than a Keanu Reeves fight scene!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the web of whimsy and wonder surrounding the Keanu-nundrum, our research team employed a multifaceted and, dare I say, splendidly convoluted methodology. First and foremost, we tapped into the treasure trove of data provided by the US Social Security Administration, scouring through years of birth records to track the undulating waves of Keanu popularity. Armed with spreadsheets and an ardent passion for puns, we meticulously mapped out the annual occurrences of the name "Keanu" in the United States, recognizing that behind every statistical anomaly lies a story waiting to be told.

At the same time, in the digital realm of YouTube, we bravely ventured into the thunderous realm of MrBeast's captivating videos. Armed with an abundance of popcorn and an unwavering commitment to comedy, we pored over comments sections with the dedication of linguistic archaeologists, sifting through the veritable goldmine of user-generated content to extract the average number of comments per video. Our determination to decipher this Keanu-nigma knew no bounds, as we waded through the sea of "First!", "Like if you love MrBeast!", and "This is literally the best thing on the internet!" exclamations.

With the diligence of a detective and the audacity of an adventurer, we merged these datasets into a statistical concoction that would make even the most esoteric of mixologists marvel. After consulting with mathematical sages and consulting the arcane texts of statistical analysis, we employed the Pearson correlation coefficient to unveil the mystifying relationship between the prevalence of the name "Keanu" and the plethora of comments adorning MrBeast's digital escapades. Our hearts pounded with anticipatory excitement as we witnessed the emergence of a correlation coefficient of 0.9299381, beckoning us to the realm of statistical significance with a wink and a nudge.

Moreover, we conducted a fishy, sorry, ‘fishing’ expedition into potential lurking variables, graciously casting our net to capture any lurking confounding factors that might attempt to cloud the clarity of our findings. We boldly danced with the lurking variables, refusing to be ensnared in their treachery, until we triumphantly emerged with a p-value less than 0.01, solidifying the unexpected tie between the name "Keanu" and the realm of rambunctious digital dialogue.

In conclusion, dear readers, our methodology may have been as circuitous as a rollercoaster ride, but every twist and turn culminated in the revelation of a tantalizing correlation between the popularity of the name "Keanu" and the robustness of comments on MrBeast's YouTube domain. We invite you, dear scholars and skeptics alike, to don your statistical spectacles and embark on this enchanting odyssey with us, for the Keanu-nundrum invites scrutiny and revels in the radiant glow of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9299381, r-squared of 0.8647849, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Pardon my antics, dear readers, as we embark on a journey into the whimsical world of statistical sorcery, where the enigmatic connection between the iconic name "Keanu" and the avalanche of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos unravels before our incredulous eyes. Picture this - Keanu Reeves, the immortal demigod of action cinema and purveyor of breathtaking performances, and MrBeast, the YouTube wizard of wacky challenges and philanthropic masterpieces, converging in an invisible dance of data. Are we witnessing a cosmic correlation or a peculiar cosmic coincidence? Join me as we tumble down the rabbit hole of digital nomenclature and online engagement, where statistical significance meets the silver screen.
The notion that a name could influence the digital discourse seems ludicrous. After all, what's in a name? Well, Shakespeare, darling, let me tell you – a whole lot! The moniker "Keanu" has transcended its lexical roots, catapulted into stardom by the ever-charismatic Keanu Reeves. Meanwhile, the enigma of MrBeast's enthralling content has sparked an avalanche of comments, leaving us pondering: Is there a peculiar karmic connection between the name "Keanu" and the cacophony of YouTube commentary? Are we witnessing a celestial alignment of consonants and comments? Or is this just a bewitching fluke that science has finally unearthed?
My esteemed colleagues, let us delve into the motley tapestry of data, where the unexpected intertwining of popular first names and online interactions challenges our notions of rationality. Buckle up, for we are about to embark on a statistical odyssey that will make our jaws drop faster than a Keanu Reeves fight scene!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and an r-squared value of 0.8647849 indicate a robust and statistically significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. As for the p-value less than 0.01, well, let's just say it's so small it could fit in a Keanu-sized pocket!

The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually portrays this eyebrow-raising correlation, making it crystal clear that the Keanu factor is indeed a force to reckon with in the realm of online engagement. It's as if Keanu's charm and MrBeast's benevolence have teamed up to create a digital dynamo that defies conventional wisdom.

The implications of these findings are nothing short of mind-boggling. Could it be that the mere mention of "Keanu" invokes a flood of comments on MrBeast videos? Are viewers typing away in awe of the name's elusive allure, or is this just the universe's way of playing a cosmic prank on the statisticians among us? One thing's for sure: this unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads and murmuring "Whoa" under our breath.

In summary, our research uncovers a hitherto unexplored connection between the cultural impact of a beloved actor's name and the digital interactions inspired by a popular content creator. The Keanu-nomenon has officially entered the digital discourse, and its impact is nothing short of breathtaking. This study not only contributes to the understanding of online trends but also invites further exploration into the enigmatic interplay of pop culture and digital engagement. So, dear readers, prepare to be amazed as we continue to unravel the mysteries of the digital age, one surprising correlation at a time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Before plunging into the comical and perplexing realm of Keanu-related statistics and YouTube comments, it is crucial to acknowledge the steadfast foundation laid by previous scholarly works. Smith and Doe (2015) explored the impact of celebrity names on digital engagement, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics of internet culture and nomenclature. Their study provided valuable insights into the ways in which celebrity personas imprint themselves on the digital landscape, paving the way for our own investigation into the mystifying Keanu phenomenon.
In a similarly serious vein, Jones (2018) delved into the complexities of online interactions and the unforeseen factors that shape user engagement. While their research did not directly delve into the connection between particular names and digital discourse, it set the stage for a broader exploration of the intricate web of influences woven into the fabric of online interaction.
Transitioning from these scholarly pursuits to a more eclectic mix of literary and cultural influences, we turn to non-fiction works that lend a touch of gravitas to the whimsical topic at hand. "The Power of Names" by John Smith delves into the historical, psychological, and cultural significance of names, offering a comprehensive exploration of the subtle forces at play when it comes to the naming of individuals and its impact on society. This scholarly work, although not directly tied to our specific investigation, serves as a poignant reminder of the weight carried by appellations in the world at large.
Adding a dash of fiction to our scholarly stew, "The Name Game" by Jane Doe ventures into the realm of speculative fiction, exploring a world where names possess mystical properties and influence the fates of individuals. While purely speculative in nature, this imaginative piece of literature reminds us of the magical aura surrounding names and their potential to influence the course of events, albeit in a more whimsical and fictional context.
Taking a delightful detour into the realm of childhood nostalgia, we recall the animated series "The Magic School Bus," where Ms. Frizzle and her intrepid students journey through the wondrous world of science. In an episode aptly titled "The Naming Nuisance," the class explores the significance of names and their impact on the world around them. While aimed at a younger audience, the episode's lighthearted take on the importance of names serves as a charming reminder of the pervasive influence of appellations.
And who could forget the timeless classic "Sesame Street," where the cheerful muppets impart valuable lessons to young viewers? In an episode featuring the lovable Count von Count, the importance of counting comments and the influence of names on engagement takes center stage in a mirthful and engaging manner. While our research delves into more sophisticated statistical analyses, the spirit of curiosity and exploration embodied by these childhood favorites remains a vital part of our scholarly pursuit.
With this motley crew of influences in mind, we embark on our own statistical odyssey, armed with a blend of levity and rigor befitting the enigmatic Keanu-nomenon and its peculiar intersection with YouTube comments. Let the merriment commence!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and an r-squared value of 0.8647849 indicate a robust and statistically significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. As for the p-value less than 0.01, well, let's just say it's so small it could fit in a Keanu-sized pocket!
The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually portrays this eyebrow-raising correlation, making it crystal clear that the Keanu factor is indeed a force to reckon with in the realm of online engagement. It's as if Keanu's charm and MrBeast's benevolence have teamed up to create a digital dynamo that defies conventional wisdom.
The implications of these findings are nothing short of mind-boggling. Could it be that the mere mention of "Keanu" invokes a flood of comments on MrBeast videos? Are viewers typing away in awe of the name's elusive allure, or is this just the universe's way of playing a cosmic prank on the statisticians among us? One thing's for sure: this unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads and murmuring "Whoa" under our breath.
In summary, our research uncovers a hitherto unexplored connection between the cultural impact of a beloved actor's name and the digital interactions inspired by a popular content creator. The Keanu-nomenon has officially entered the digital discourse, and its impact is nothing short of breathtaking. This study not only contributes to the understanding of online trends but also invites further exploration into the enigmatic interplay of pop culture and digital engagement. So, dear readers, prepare to be amazed as we continue to unravel the mysteries of the digital age, one surprising correlation at a time.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The razzle-dazzle of Keanu's name, coupled with the wizardry of MrBeast's content, has unveiled a digital symphony that defies conventional statistical reasoning. Our findings, set against the backdrop of scholarly groundwork, not only raise an eyebrow but trigger exclamations of "Excellent!" as they support and expand upon prior research.

Smith and Doe's (2015) exploration of celebrity names and digital engagement provides a sturdy foundation for our study, and boy, did we build on it like enthusiastic LEGO architects. Their insights into how famous personas leave their indelible mark on the online landscape set the stage for our jaw-dropping revelations. While they may not have anticipated the Keanu-nomenon, we've expanded their work on the digital footprints of celebrities to include the unforeseen allure of our cherished Keanu Reeves.

Jones' (2018) investigation into the complex web of online interaction didn't directly delve into name-related influences, but it laid the groundwork for our eccentric rollercoaster ride into the whimsical world of Keanu and MrBeast comments. We've taken their serious tone and injected it with the kind of playfulness usually reserved for puppies on a playground.

And let's not forget about Ms. Frizzle's inquisitive students and Count von Count from "Sesame Street." While they may have targeted a younger audience, their lighthearted explorations of names and counting resonated with our own mirthful examination of the digital naming game. Our findings not only add to the intellectual merriment but also evoke the spirit of levity and discovery championed by these childhood favorites.

In line with our results, the statistical relationship we've unearthed between the influx of "Keanu" and the surge in MrBeast comments solidifies the fascinating Keanu-nomenon as a bona fide digital dynamo. The robust correlation coefficient and minuscule p-value provide empirical muscle to the previously anecdotal notions of Keanu's charm and MrBeast's benevolent YouTube empire.

The implications of these findings, while bordering on the ludicrous, add a dash of whimsy to the seemingly serious world of statistical analysis. Our research unveils a fantastical connection between the cultural impact of a beloved actor's name and the digital interactions kindled by a philanthropic content creator. The Keanu-nomenon is here, it's breathtaking, and it's waltzing to the beat of statistical intrigue.

As the curtain rises on this unexpected correlation, we invite fellow adventurers to join us in the unabashed revelry of unraveling the digital mysteries, one surprising association at a time. So fasten your seatbelts, skeptics, enthusiasts, and Keanu-philes, for the Keanu-nomenon is nothing short of breathtaking, and it's only just begun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Keanu and Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Pardon my antics, dear readers, as we embark on a journey into the whimsical world of statistical sorcery, where the enigmatic connection between the iconic name "Keanu" and the avalanche of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos unravels before our incredulous eyes. Picture this - Keanu Reeves, the immortal demigod of action cinema and purveyor of breathtaking performances, and MrBeast, the YouTube wizard of wacky challenges and philanthropic masterpieces, converging in an invisible dance of data. Are we witnessing a cosmic correlation or a peculiar cosmic coincidence? Join me as we tumble down the rabbit hole of digital nomenclature and online engagement, where statistical significance meets the silver screen.
The notion that a name could influence the digital discourse seems ludicrous. After all, what's in a name? Well, Shakespeare, darling, let me tell you – a whole lot! The moniker "Keanu" has transcended its lexical roots, catapulted into stardom by the ever-charismatic Keanu Reeves. Meanwhile, the enigma of MrBeast's enthralling content has sparked an avalanche of comments, leaving us pondering: Is there a peculiar karmic connection between the name "Keanu" and the cacophony of YouTube commentary? Are we witnessing a celestial alignment of consonants and comments? Or is this just a bewitching fluke that science has finally unearthed?
My esteemed colleagues, let us delve into the motley tapestry of data, where the unexpected intertwining of popular first names and online interactions challenges our notions of rationality. Buckle up, for we are about to embark on a statistical odyssey that will make our jaws drop faster than a Keanu Reeves fight scene!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and an r-squared value of 0.8647849 indicate a robust and statistically significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. As for the p-value less than 0.01, well, let's just say it's so small it could fit in a Keanu-sized pocket!
The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually portrays this eyebrow-raising correlation, making it crystal clear that the Keanu factor is indeed a force to reckon with in the realm of online engagement. It's as if Keanu's charm and MrBeast's benevolence have teamed up to create a digital dynamo that defies conventional wisdom.
The implications of these findings are nothing short of mind-boggling. Could it be that the mere mention of "Keanu" invokes a flood of comments on MrBeast videos? Are viewers typing away in awe of the name's elusive allure, or is this just the universe's way of playing a cosmic prank on the statisticians among us? One thing's for sure: this unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads and murmuring "Whoa" under our breath.
In summary, our research uncovers a hitherto unexplored connection between the cultural impact of a beloved actor's name and the digital interactions inspired by a popular content creator. The Keanu-nomenon has officially entered the digital discourse, and its impact is nothing short of breathtaking. This study not only contributes to the understanding of online trends but also invites further exploration into the enigmatic interplay of pop culture and digital engagement. So, dear readers, prepare to be amazed as we continue to unravel the mysteries of the digital age, one surprising correlation at a time.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

**[[CONCLUSION]]**

In conclusion, our investigation into the perplexing nexus of the first name Keanu and the tsunami of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos has left us spellbound. As we wade through the sea of data, it seems that Keanu's charm may be engaging viewers in a comment frenzy worthy of a blockbuster climax. It's as if the mere mention of Keanu prompts fingers to dance over keyboards like they're mastering a Keanu-style slow-motion fight sequence!

Our findings have raised eyebrows, not unlike Keanu's signature arch – pardon the pun, but we simply couldn't resist! The statistical significance of this correlation is such that even the Matrix itself might have trouble computing it. We're left pondering whether there's a deeper, metaphysical force at play here, or if it's just the universe's quirky way of reminding us not to take statistical relationships at face value.

In the grand scheme of things, our study paves the way for a curious dance between nomenclature and digital engagement. It's almost as if the cosmic ballet of statistics has choreographed a waltz between Keanu's star power and MrBeast's digital kingdom, leaving us to marvel at the enigmatic moves of correlation and causation.

So, where do we go from here? Well, folks, it seems like our findings have peaked like a Keanu-esque stunt, and it's time to gracefully bow out – no more research needed in this utterly bizarre, yet utterly compelling corner of the digital landscape. We bid adieu to the Keanu-nundrum, leaving you to exclaim "Excellent!" at the unexpected twists of statistical sorcery.

No more comments needed – except on MrBeast's videos, of course!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Phenomena Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Internet Celebrity Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled You're Breathtaking: The Keanu-nundrum of Popularity and Comments on MrBeast YouTube Videos with an abstract of In this paper, we present the results of an in-depth investigation into the unlikely connection between the prevalence of the first name Keanu and the average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team has unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9299381 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the 2012 to 2022 period. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt the question: is there a paradoxical keanu-nctionality at play in the world of online engagement and nomenclature? We delve into the "just whoa" statistics and explore the sheer magnitude of the Keanu-nomenon, shedding light on the unorthodox relationship between the cultural impact of a beloved actor and the digital interactions inspired by a philanthropic content creator. Prepare to exclaim "Excellent!" as we unravel this tantalizing enigma and discover the unexpected maverick elements at play in the realm of online trends.

ChatGPT:

Keanu Reeves, MrBeast, YouTube comments, online engagement, Keanu-nomenon, Keanu correlation, US Social Security Administration data, YouTube analytics, Keanu impact, celebrity influence, online trends, digital interactions, paradoxical correlations, cultural impact, Keanu statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Keanu
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Keanu
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Keanu

Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9299381 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8647849 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Keanu) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.4E-5. 0.0000337237283890026400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0034% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 29,653 random variables You don't actually need 29 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Keanu (Babies born)151110142198211246282433560552485
Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos (Average Comments)621581910.22023.83970.9575168.9230971.448488.289167.9134898152788114992




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([151,110,142,198,211,246,282,433,560,552,485,])
array_2 = np.array([62158,1910.2,2023.83,970.957,5168.92,30971.4,48488.2,89167.9,134898,152788,114992,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Keanu"
array_2_name = "Average number of comments on MrBeast YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4909 · Black Variable ID: 3257 · Red Variable ID: 25739
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0