Report an error
Average number of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of social and community service managers in Alaska | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
The number of materials engineers in Kentucky | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Kazakhstan | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
Grocery store spend in Minnesota | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Armani | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in North Carolina | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Business | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
The number of agricultural equipment operators in Puerto Rico | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Keanu | r=0.93 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'buy a house' | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rhiannon | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Arson in Oregon | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
The number of probation officers in California | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
Average number of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)