Download png, svg
AI explanation
The Republican candidate's platform included a promise to build a space force, attracting UFOs to Oregon for an impromptu recruitment drive. The campaign rhetoric was so otherworldly that it inadvertently established a direct line of communication with intergalactic beings, leading to a surge in UFO interest in the state. And as the political tension heated up, it created the perfect atmospheric conditions for an influx of UFO activity, proving that in the world of politics, the truth is out there!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image of a rural town in Oregon, with a bustling community center swarming with local residents waiting in a long line to cast their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. Above the town, in the sky, a group of glowing UFOs hover majestically, catching the attention of onlookers and causing a stir on social media. The intersection of political fervor and otherworldly curiosity creates a truly unexpected scene, as the promise of a space force has seemingly brought the cosmos directly to Oregon's doorstep. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy 3D Pixar Style Voxel art Sci-fi fantacy Photorealism
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantacy
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon, in the following situation: The Republican candidate's platform included a promise to build a space force, attracting UFOs to Oregon for an impromptu recruitment drive. The campaign rhetoric was so otherworldly that it inadvertently established a direct line of communication with intergalactic beings, leading to a surge in UFO interest in the state. And as the political tension heated up, it created the perfect atmospheric conditions for an influx of UFO activity, proving that in the world of politics, the truth is out there!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Oregon, a rural town's community center is bustling with activity. Outside, a line extends down the street, composed of local residents eagerly waiting to cast their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, in the sky above, a group of glowing UFOs hovers majestically, catching the attention of passing onlookers and causing a stir on social media. The intersection of political fervor and otherworldly curiosity creates a truly unexpected scene, as the promise of a space force has seemingly brought the cosmos directly to Oregon's doorstep.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantacy ] and depicting this scene: In Oregon, a rural town's community center is bustling with activity. Outside, a line extends down the street, composed of local residents eagerly waiting to cast their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, in the sky above, a group of glowing UFOs hovers majestically, catching the attention of passing onlookers and causing a stir on social media. The intersection of political fervor and otherworldly curiosity creates a truly unexpected scene, as the promise of a space force has seemingly brought the cosmos directly to Oregon's doorstep. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image of a rural town in Oregon, with a bustling community center swarming with local residents waiting in a long line to cast their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. Above the town, in the sky, a group of glowing UFOs hover majestically, catching the attention of onlookers and causing a stir on social media. The intersection of political fervor and otherworldly curiosity creates a truly unexpected scene, as the promise of a space force has seemingly brought the cosmos directly to Oregon's doorstep. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles."
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon caused UFO sightings in Oregon to increase.
AI academic paper
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon The Cosmic Observer: Journal of Interstellar Politics and Societal Analysis Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and National UFO Reporting Center to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings, fellow Earthlings and possibly intergalactic beings who may have stumbled upon this academic escapade! Today, we embark on a journey delving not into the depths of galaxies far, far away, but right here in the land of Oregon, exploring the eccentric correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate and UFO sightings. Strap in, because we're about to take a detour from conventional political analyses into the realm of the, shall we say, "unconventional" – and no, we're not talking about political candidates wearing alien disguises, although that would certainly make for an entertaining debate night!
Now, I know what you're thinking. "UFO sightings and political voting patterns? How in the cosmos could there be any connection?" Trust me, I shared that skepticism. But as we traversed the data landscape, we found ourselves in a starship ride of statistical revelations that left us more intrigued than a Roswell conspiracy theorist at Area 51. Come along, and let's uncover the enigmatic relationship between political preferences and potential close encounters of the third kind!
But first, a disclaimer – no, this is not a newfangled attempt at political punditry or an intergalactic conspiracy theory. We're adopting a serious analytical approach in our quest for truth, with just a dash of cosmic curiosity and a sprinkle of humor to keep things as light as a UFO sighting in the night sky.
As we delve into the unearthly connections between the political and the paranormal, buckle up for a ride that's wilder than a bumpy UFO abduction trajectory. And remember, keep your eyes on the stars, your feet on the ground, and your voting booths free from extraterrestrial interference – unless, of course, you're an actual extraterrestrial, in which case, welcome! Let's dive in!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings, fellow Earthlings and possibly intergalactic beings who may have stumbled upon this academic escapade! Today, we embark on a journey delving not into the depths of galaxies far, far away, but right here in the land of Oregon, exploring the eccentric correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate and UFO sightings. Strap in, because we're about to take a detour from conventional political analyses into the realm of the, shall we say, "unconventional" – and no, we're not talking about political candidates wearing alien disguises, although that would certainly make for an entertaining debate night!
Now, I know what you're thinking. "UFO sightings and political voting patterns? How in the cosmos could there be any connection?" Trust me, I shared that skepticism. But as we traversed the data landscape, we found ourselves in a starship ride of statistical revelations that left us more intrigued than a Roswell conspiracy theorist at Area 51. Come along, and let's uncover the enigmatic relationship between political preferences and potential close encounters of the third kind!
But first, a disclaimer – no, this is not a newfangled attempt at political punditry or an intergalactic conspiracy theory. We're adopting a serious analytical approach in our quest for truth, with just a dash of cosmic curiosity and a sprinkle of humor to keep things as light as a UFO sighting in the night sky.
As we delve into the unearthly connections between the political and the paranormal, buckle up for a ride that's wilder than a bumpy UFO abduction trajectory. And remember, keep your eyes on the stars, your feet on the ground, and your voting booths free from extraterrestrial interference – unless, of course, you're an actual extraterrestrial, in which case, welcome! Let's dive in!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2010) use data from the Oregon Secretary of State to examine the voting patterns for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon from 1976 to 2016. Their rigorous analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the political landscape in the state, shedding light on the factors influencing voters' choices. However, as they remain firmly grounded in terrestrial politics, we must look to a slightly less conventional source to uncover the extraterrestrial nuances at play.
Doe and Jones (2015) take a different approach, delving into the realm of anomalous experiences in the Pacific Northwest. Their study collates reports from the National UFO Reporting Center, documenting the sightings of unidentified flying objects across Oregon. While their focus is on the mysterious and unexplained, their findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the possibility of extraterrestrial influence on the residents of the state.
Turning our attention to related literature, "Alien Encounters: A Compendium of Unexplained Phenomena" by Xenoquest and "Politics: A Guide to the Unpredictable Universe" by Electoraldynamics provide intriguing insights from the realms of speculative non-fiction. These readings prompt us to consider the improbable intersections of political decision-making and cosmic occurrences.
On a more fictional note, "The War of the Worlds" by H.G. Wells and "Stranger in a Strange Land" by Robert A. Heinlein invite us to contemplate the intersection of terrestrial politics and interplanetary encounters in speculative narratives. While these works may not offer empirical evidence, they certainly stoke the fires of imagination when considering the cosmic dimensions of our exploration.
In the digital sphere, the internet meme "Ancient Aliens" piques our interest with its humorous take on extraterrestrial theories, often featuring the enigmatic figure of Giorgio A. Tsoukalos. While the meme may not be a scholarly source, it captures the popular fascination with the possibility of otherworldly interventions in human affairs, perhaps even including political events.
As we navigate the labyrinthine connections between political inclinations and unearthly phenomena, it becomes evident that the landscape is rife with unexpected twists and turns. With this eclectic array of sources as our guide, we embark on our inquiry with open minds and a healthy dose of cosmic curiosity. Let us now delve deeper into the uncharted territories where the political and the paranormal converge, as we seek to unravel the enigmatic correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and National UFO Reporting Center . You used data from 1976 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings, fellow Earthlings and possibly intergalactic beings who may have stumbled upon this academic escapade! Today, we embark on a journey delving not into the depths of galaxies far, far away, but right here in the land of Oregon, exploring the eccentric correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate and UFO sightings. Strap in, because we're about to take a detour from conventional political analyses into the realm of the, shall we say, "unconventional" – and no, we're not talking about political candidates wearing alien disguises, although that would certainly make for an entertaining debate night!
Now, I know what you're thinking. "UFO sightings and political voting patterns? How in the cosmos could there be any connection?" Trust me, I shared that skepticism. But as we traversed the data landscape, we found ourselves in a starship ride of statistical revelations that left us more intrigued than a Roswell conspiracy theorist at Area 51. Come along, and let's uncover the enigmatic relationship between political preferences and potential close encounters of the third kind!
But first, a disclaimer – no, this is not a newfangled attempt at political punditry or an intergalactic conspiracy theory. We're adopting a serious analytical approach in our quest for truth, with just a dash of cosmic curiosity and a sprinkle of humor to keep things as light as a UFO sighting in the night sky.
As we delve into the unearthly connections between the political and the paranormal, buckle up for a ride that's wilder than a bumpy UFO abduction trajectory. And remember, keep your eyes on the stars, your feet on the ground, and your voting booths free from extraterrestrial interference – unless, of course, you're an actual extraterrestrial, in which case, welcome! Let's dive in!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
To probe the celestial-terrestrial nexus between political proclivities and potential extraterrestrial eavesdropping, we embarked on an odyssey through the digital cosmos to gather the necessary data. Our search led us to repositories that house not just earthly political statistics but also data on otherworldly apparitions, namely the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center – talk about a rendezvous of disparate datasets! We leveraged information dating back to 1976, ensuring our investigation encompassed a time span vast enough to capture the flux of both political leanings and UFO sightings.
Planetary Projections – Statistical Analysis:
Now, the real cosmic challenge was to untangle the cosmic knots of data we had gathered. Our statistical voyage took us through the binary nebulae of regression, correlation analysis, and inferential tests. We sought out the elusive correlation coefficient to gauge the strength and direction of the unearthly connection we had set out to unravel, employing a method that even the most astute extraterrestrial observers would find enthralling.
To ascertain the degree of association between votes cast for the Republican presidential candidate and reported UFO sightings, we employed a rigorous statistical approach, accounting for numerous control variables that might perturb our cosmic calculations. Our methodology was as rigorous as the gravitational pull of a black hole, leaving no asteroid unturned in our quest for empirical insights.
Asteroidal Annotations – Control Variables:
Our quest wouldn't have been complete without taking into account earthly factors that could potentially eclipse the observed association. Variables such as population density, urban-rural divide, and even factors related to weather patterns were all considered akin to the swirling cosmic debris that could distort our extraterrestrial viewpoints.
Data Analysis and Interpretation:
After navigating the cosmos of computational statistics, we arrived at our empirical waypoints, disseminating the findings that emerged from the celestial confluence of political preferences and potential UFO encounters. The correlation coefficient we unearthed gleamed like a planetary conjunction, revealing a striking value of 0.8551173. And with the p-value dazzlingly below 0.01, we stood in awe of the interstellar forces at play within the electoral theater of Oregon.
Interstellar Intricacies – Caveats and Limitations:
While we endeavor to bring this unearthly connection to the forefront, we acknowledge the limitations of our research. Probabilistic pitfalls and the perennial question of causation versus correlation hovers over our cosmic findings like a spectral apparition, reminding us that there might yet be more to uncover in this celestial mystery.
Oh, and we must note that, contrary to popular belief, our research team has not been infiltrated by shape-shifting extraterrestrial agents – or at least, none that have made their presence known thus far.
In conclusion, our methodology was as structured and meticulous as an interstellar expedition, enabling us to navigate the enigmatic realms of political preferences and potential extraterrestrial engagements. Our findings, while seemingly otherworldly, present a compelling case for further examination of the cosmic undercurrents that may influence earthly electoral dynamics.
So, with our data-driven star charts in hand, let's take a celestial plunge into the planetary correlations that have left us starry-eyed with wonderment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and National UFO Reporting Center .
For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8551173, r-squared of 0.7312257, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Greetings, fellow Earthlings and possibly intergalactic beings who may have stumbled upon this academic escapade! Today, we embark on a journey delving not into the depths of galaxies far, far away, but right here in the land of Oregon, exploring the eccentric correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate and UFO sightings. Strap in, because we're about to take a detour from conventional political analyses into the realm of the, shall we say, "unconventional" – and no, we're not talking about political candidates wearing alien disguises, although that would certainly make for an entertaining debate night!
Now, I know what you're thinking. "UFO sightings and political voting patterns? How in the cosmos could there be any connection?" Trust me, I shared that skepticism. But as we traversed the data landscape, we found ourselves in a starship ride of statistical revelations that left us more intrigued than a Roswell conspiracy theorist at Area 51. Come along, and let's uncover the enigmatic relationship between political preferences and potential close encounters of the third kind!
But first, a disclaimer – no, this is not a newfangled attempt at political punditry or an intergalactic conspiracy theory. We're adopting a serious analytical approach in our quest for truth, with just a dash of cosmic curiosity and a sprinkle of humor to keep things as light as a UFO sighting in the night sky.
As we delve into the unearthly connections between the political and the paranormal, buckle up for a ride that's wilder than a bumpy UFO abduction trajectory. And remember, keep your eyes on the stars, your feet on the ground, and your voting booths free from extraterrestrial interference – unless, of course, you're an actual extraterrestrial, in which case, welcome! Let's dive in!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon venturing into the uncharted territory at the intersection of political discourse and potential cosmic encounters, our research unearthed a startling correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and an r-squared value of 0.7312257, our findings illuminate an otherworldly connection that has eluded conventional analysis.
The statistical analysis yields a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our results suggest that there may be more to the political landscape than meets the eye, or in this case, the celestial beings' gaze.
Fig. 1 showcases the visually stunning scatterplot, illustrating the compelling correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and reported UFO sightings. The data points coalesce into a mesmerizing pattern that hints at an intimate dance between the political preferences of Oregonians and the potential presence of extraterrestrial visitors.
In the realm of academic research, exploring unorthodox connections can unveil new dimensions of understanding, and our investigation into the uncanny association between political allegiance and otherworldly sightings exemplifies this quirk of intellectual inquiry.
Our revelatory findings not only provide an intriguing piece to the puzzle of electoral dynamics but also beckon us to contemplate the diverse factors that may influence human behavior, be they earthly or, dare we say, otherworldly.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2010) use data from the Oregon Secretary of State to examine the voting patterns for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon from 1976 to 2016. Their rigorous analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the political landscape in the state, shedding light on the factors influencing voters' choices. However, as they remain firmly grounded in terrestrial politics, we must look to a slightly less conventional source to uncover the extraterrestrial nuances at play.
Doe and Jones (2015) take a different approach, delving into the realm of anomalous experiences in the Pacific Northwest. Their study collates reports from the National UFO Reporting Center, documenting the sightings of unidentified flying objects across Oregon. While their focus is on the mysterious and unexplained, their findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the possibility of extraterrestrial influence on the residents of the state.
Turning our attention to related literature, "Alien Encounters: A Compendium of Unexplained Phenomena" by Xenoquest and "Politics: A Guide to the Unpredictable Universe" by Electoraldynamics provide intriguing insights from the realms of speculative non-fiction. These readings prompt us to consider the improbable intersections of political decision-making and cosmic occurrences.
On a more fictional note, "The War of the Worlds" by H.G. Wells and "Stranger in a Strange Land" by Robert A. Heinlein invite us to contemplate the intersection of terrestrial politics and interplanetary encounters in speculative narratives. While these works may not offer empirical evidence, they certainly stoke the fires of imagination when considering the cosmic dimensions of our exploration.
In the digital sphere, the internet meme "Ancient Aliens" piques our interest with its humorous take on extraterrestrial theories, often featuring the enigmatic figure of Giorgio A. Tsoukalos. While the meme may not be a scholarly source, it captures the popular fascination with the possibility of otherworldly interventions in human affairs, perhaps even including political events.
As we navigate the labyrinthine connections between political inclinations and unearthly phenomena, it becomes evident that the landscape is rife with unexpected twists and turns. With this eclectic array of sources as our guide, we embark on our inquiry with open minds and a healthy dose of cosmic curiosity. Let us now delve deeper into the uncharted territories where the political and the paranormal converge, as we seek to unravel the enigmatic correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon venturing into the uncharted territory at the intersection of political discourse and potential cosmic encounters, our research unearthed a startling correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and an r-squared value of 0.7312257, our findings illuminate an otherworldly connection that has eluded conventional analysis.
The statistical analysis yields a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our results suggest that there may be more to the political landscape than meets the eye, or in this case, the celestial beings' gaze.
Fig. 1 showcases the visually stunning scatterplot, illustrating the compelling correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and reported UFO sightings. The data points coalesce into a mesmerizing pattern that hints at an intimate dance between the political preferences of Oregonians and the potential presence of extraterrestrial visitors.
In the realm of academic research, exploring unorthodox connections can unveil new dimensions of understanding, and our investigation into the uncanny association between political allegiance and otherworldly sightings exemplifies this quirk of intellectual inquiry.
Our revelatory findings not only provide an intriguing piece to the puzzle of electoral dynamics but also beckon us to contemplate the diverse factors that may influence human behavior, be they earthly or, dare we say, otherworldly.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings indicate a strikingly robust correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings, adding an unexpected twist to the political landscape. The eerie statistical coherence that emerges from our analysis corroborates prior research, including the often-dismissed meme "Ancient Aliens." While we initially approached our investigation with a cosmic curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism, the data compellingly aligns with the speculations presented in Xenoquest's "Alien Encounters: A Compendium of Unexplained Phenomena."
As we traverse the interstellar realm of electoral dynamics, we are reminded that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. The correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 reinforces the connection between political inclinations and extraterrestrial encounters, transcending the conventional boundaries of political science. This unorthodox correlation challenges us to reevaluate the conventional factors that shape political allegiance and voting patterns, transcending the terrestrial confines of traditional analysis.
The potential implications of our findings extend beyond the cosmic. If extraterrestrial influence can manifest itself in electoral behaviors, we are compelled to question the limits of human agency and rationality in political decision-making. Moreover, our results hint at the potential for unexplained phenomena to permeate our everyday lives, urging us to reconcile the cosmic and the commonplace.
The visual allure of the scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 serves as a striking visual testament to the entwined trajectories of political preference and potential extraterrestrial sightings. The mesmerizing pattern that emerges from the data invites us to contemplate the possibility of an intricate cosmic dance shaping the political discourse in Oregon.
In conclusion, our study challenges the traditional frameworks of political analysis and opens new avenues for interdisciplinary inquiry. By delving into the enigmatic correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and reported UFO sightings, we confront the whims and wonders of the universe that may clandestinely influence our political reality. As we grapple with the implications of our unearthly findings, we must heed the words of the bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your political philosophies."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in Oregon. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Greetings, fellow Earthlings and possibly intergalactic beings who may have stumbled upon this academic escapade! Today, we embark on a journey delving not into the depths of galaxies far, far away, but right here in the land of Oregon, exploring the eccentric correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate and UFO sightings. Strap in, because we're about to take a detour from conventional political analyses into the realm of the, shall we say, "unconventional" – and no, we're not talking about political candidates wearing alien disguises, although that would certainly make for an entertaining debate night!
Now, I know what you're thinking. "UFO sightings and political voting patterns? How in the cosmos could there be any connection?" Trust me, I shared that skepticism. But as we traversed the data landscape, we found ourselves in a starship ride of statistical revelations that left us more intrigued than a Roswell conspiracy theorist at Area 51. Come along, and let's uncover the enigmatic relationship between political preferences and potential close encounters of the third kind!
But first, a disclaimer – no, this is not a newfangled attempt at political punditry or an intergalactic conspiracy theory. We're adopting a serious analytical approach in our quest for truth, with just a dash of cosmic curiosity and a sprinkle of humor to keep things as light as a UFO sighting in the night sky.
As we delve into the unearthly connections between the political and the paranormal, buckle up for a ride that's wilder than a bumpy UFO abduction trajectory. And remember, keep your eyes on the stars, your feet on the ground, and your voting booths free from extraterrestrial interference – unless, of course, you're an actual extraterrestrial, in which case, welcome! Let's dive in!
[[RESULTS]]
Upon venturing into the uncharted territory at the intersection of political discourse and potential cosmic encounters, our research unearthed a startling correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and an r-squared value of 0.7312257, our findings illuminate an otherworldly connection that has eluded conventional analysis.
The statistical analysis yields a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our results suggest that there may be more to the political landscape than meets the eye, or in this case, the celestial beings' gaze.
Fig. 1 showcases the visually stunning scatterplot, illustrating the compelling correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and reported UFO sightings. The data points coalesce into a mesmerizing pattern that hints at an intimate dance between the political preferences of Oregonians and the potential presence of extraterrestrial visitors.
In the realm of academic research, exploring unorthodox connections can unveil new dimensions of understanding, and our investigation into the uncanny association between political allegiance and otherworldly sightings exemplifies this quirk of intellectual inquiry.
Our revelatory findings not only provide an intriguing piece to the puzzle of electoral dynamics but also beckon us to contemplate the diverse factors that may influence human behavior, be they earthly or, dare we say, otherworldly.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our journey into the peculiar nexus of political leanings and extraterrestrial encounters has left us in awe of the cosmic forces at play in Oregon. We've uncovered a correlation so strong, it might just have the strength to launch a UFO into orbit! While some may dismiss this as statistical tomfoolery, the data speaks for itself – and it's saying, "Take us to your voting booths!"
As we wrap up this otherworldly expedition, we must admit, we've had more fun than a UFO joyriding through the Milky Way. However, in the spirit of rigorous scientific inquiry, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study. Correlation does not equal causation, and we're a long way from proving that alien tourists are casting their vote in Oregon – though, imagine the political debates that would ensue if they did!
Now, let's address the elephant in the spacecraft – should we continue probing this enigmatic correlation? Well, while it may be tempting to delve deeper into the cosmic arena of political analysis, we believe it's time to beam this study up, Captain. It's been a stellar adventure, but with such astronomical correlation coefficients and p-values that are out of this world, we dare say that no further research is needed in this area. As we bid adieu to our UFO-observing, politically savvy friends in Oregon, we leave with a sense of wonder, a touch of whimsy, and an infinite supply of dad-joke-worthy puns – for who knows, maybe laughter truly is the best medicine… for both political and extraterrestrial dilemmas.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Cosmic Observer: Journal of Interstellar Politics and Societal Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Interplanetary Political Analysis and Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon with an abstract of In this study, we present the unprecedented investigation of the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oregon and UFO sightings in the same state. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the National UFO Reporting Center, we set out to unravel the enigmatic correlation that has perplexed many. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8551173 and p < 0.01 from the years 1976 to 2020, shedding light on the potentially otherworldly forces at play in electoral patterns. Our analysis opens new avenues of inquiry into the peculiar interplay between political preferences and extraterrestrial encounters, demonstrating that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
ChatGPT:
Republican presidential candidate, Oregon, votes, UFO sightings, correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, National UFO Reporting Center, electoral patterns, political preferences, extraterrestrial encounters, correlation coefficient, enigmatic correlation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in OregonDetailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon
UFO sightings in Oregon
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Oregon
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Oregon
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7312257 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., UFO sightings in Oregon) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00039. 0.0003921696113313616600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.039% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,550 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.55, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1976 | 1980 | 1984 | 1988 | 1992 | 1996 | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon (Total votes) | 492120 | 571044 | 685700 | 560126 | 475757 | 538152 | 713577 | 866831 | 738475 | 754175 | 782403 | 958448 |
UFO sightings in Oregon (UFO sightings) | 5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 98 | 87 | 89 | 170 | 157 | 224 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([492120,571044,685700,560126,475757,538152,713577,866831,738475,754175,782403,958448,])
array_2 = np.array([5,6,3,1,6,16,98,87,89,170,157,224,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon"
array_2_name = "UFO sightings in Oregon"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon
- Line chart for only UFO sightings in Oregon
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Unearthly Connections: An Extraterrestrial Approach to Analyzing Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Oregon
Your rating skills are legendary!
Correlation ID: 4471 · Black Variable ID: 26023 · Red Variable ID: 1159