Report an error
UFO sightings in Oregon correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Abdullah | r=0.93 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oregon | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.91 | 46yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.91 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Sofia | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in U.S. Pacific Islands | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in U.S. Pacific Islands | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oregon | r=0.86 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.84 | 43yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.8 | 32yrs | No |
The number of anthropologists and archeologists in Oregon | r=0.79 | 19yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.72 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Oregon also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)