about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,391 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is Google searches for 'tummy ache'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn started expressing FOMO genes, making it emotionally sensitive and causing distress to anyone who consumed it.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A meme ]: An image of a picturesque North Dakota cornfield with towering genetically modified cornstalks reaching for the sky, and a group of squirrels, some of them scurrying between the rows, while others feast on expired dairy products from an overturned trash can. In the distance, amidst the serenity of the cornfield, a faint image of nearby residents can be seen sitting at their computers, frantically searching "tummy ache" on Google, creating a humorous contrast to the tranquil natural setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art a meme A photo-realistic image A scene from Skyrim a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: A meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache', in the following situation: Because the genetically modified corn in North Dakota has become so efficient at repelling pests, the local squirrel population has resorted to raiding more trash cans for food, leading to them consuming more expired dairy products and causing a spike in tummy aches.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a North Dakota cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn stretch across the horizon. A group of squirrels scurry between the rows, searching for food. In the distance, a few squirrels overturn a trash can, feasting on expired dairy products. At the same time, nearby residents are sitting at their computer, frantically searching "tummy ache" on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A meme ] and depicting this scene: In a North Dakota cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn stretch across the horizon. A group of squirrels scurry between the rows, searching for food. In the distance, a few squirrels overturn a trash can, feasting on expired dairy products. At the same time, nearby residents are sitting at their computer, frantically searching "tummy ache" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A meme ]: An image of a picturesque North Dakota cornfield with towering genetically modified cornstalks reaching for the sky, and a group of squirrels, some of them scurrying between the rows, while others feast on expired dairy products from an overturned trash can. In the distance, amidst the serenity of the cornfield, a faint image of nearby residents can be seen sitting at their computers, frantically searching "tummy ache" on Google, creating a humorous contrast to the tranquil natural setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused tummy ache (Google searches for 'tummy ache') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

The Journal of Agricultural Mischief

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.

Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.

Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The widespread use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a topic of both scrutiny and celebration. Proponents advocate for increased crop yields and enhanced resistance to pests, while skeptics raise concerns over potential health and environmental consequences. In this study, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of the potential connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'.

As we embarked on this research journey, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the scarecrow win an award?" The answer, of course, is that it was outstanding in its field. Similarly, our investigation sought to uncover any outstanding associations between GMO corn and gastrointestinal distress.

The state of North Dakota is a significant contributor to the production of corn in the United States, with a substantial portion of its cultivation comprising GMO varieties. The rise of GMO adoption over the past few decades has posed an intriguing question: are there any abdominal repercussions associated with the consumption of GMO corn? Our analysis aimed to peel back the layers of this enigma and shed light on any potential correlation.

It's not uncommon for individuals to turn to search engines when experiencing physical discomfort, and 'tummy ache' serves as a common colloquial term for a range of gastrointestinal issues. Our utilization of Google Trends data allowed us to explore the ebb and flow of public interest in this phenomenon and its hypothetical link to GMO corn consumption.

With a keen focus on statistical rigor and a hint of humor along the way, this research endeavors to not only uncover potential correlations but also to provoke a chuckle or two along the path to knowledge. Our findings aim to provide a kernel of insight into the influence of agricultural practices on public health concerns, serving as both a serious investigation and a cornucopia of academic amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.

Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The widespread use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a topic of both scrutiny and celebration. Proponents advocate for increased crop yields and enhanced resistance to pests, while skeptics raise concerns over potential health and environmental consequences. In this study, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of the potential connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'.
As we embarked on this research journey, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the scarecrow win an award?" The answer, of course, is that it was outstanding in its field. Similarly, our investigation sought to uncover any outstanding associations between GMO corn and gastrointestinal distress.
The state of North Dakota is a significant contributor to the production of corn in the United States, with a substantial portion of its cultivation comprising GMO varieties. The rise of GMO adoption over the past few decades has posed an intriguing question: are there any abdominal repercussions associated with the consumption of GMO corn? Our analysis aimed to peel back the layers of this enigma and shed light on any potential correlation.
It's not uncommon for individuals to turn to search engines when experiencing physical discomfort, and 'tummy ache' serves as a common colloquial term for a range of gastrointestinal issues. Our utilization of Google Trends data allowed us to explore the ebb and flow of public interest in this phenomenon and its hypothetical link to GMO corn consumption.
With a keen focus on statistical rigor and a hint of humor along the way, this research endeavors to not only uncover potential correlations but also to provoke a chuckle or two along the path to knowledge. Our findings aim to provide a kernel of insight into the influence of agricultural practices on public health concerns, serving as both a serious investigation and a cornucopia of academic amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' in North Dakota. They suggest a potential association between these variables, prompting further investigation into the impact of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

Speaking of tummy aches, did you hear about the guy who invented Lifesavers? He made a mint! Jokes aside, the potential link between GMO corn and stomach discomfort raises intriguing questions about the broader implications of agricultural practices on public health.

In "Doe's study," the researchers observe a similar trend, with a statistically significant relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn in North Dakota and online queries related to digestive issues. These findings highlight the need for continued inquiry into the potential effects of genetically modified crops on gastrointestinal well-being.

Our research also drew inspiration from non-fiction works such as Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and Marion Nestle's "Safe Food," which provided valuable insights into the complexities of food production and the impact of agricultural practices on human health. Additionally, fictional accounts such as Margaret Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" offered imaginative perspectives on genetically modified organisms and their potential consequences.

In addition to scholarly literature and acclaimed works, we ventured into unconventional sources, including satirical websites, comic strips, and even random musings overheard at the local farmer's market. While some may dismiss these sources as mere jest, we gleaned unexpected kernels of wisdom amid the jest and jollity.

However, the most unexpected source of insight came from our exhaustive perusal of CVS receipts, which surprisingly included anecdotal evidence of customers attributing their intestinal discomfort to a recent encounter with corn-based products. While unconventional, these diverse sources collectively contributed to a cornucopia of findings that transcended traditional scholarly boundaries.

As we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of GMOs and gastrointestinal distress, our study endeavors to strike a balance between scholarly rigor and a lighthearted spirit – much like the delicate equilibrium of a finely crafted dad joke. Our ultimate goal is to offer a narrative that not only informs but also entertains, eliciting a chuckle or two along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.

Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The widespread use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a topic of both scrutiny and celebration. Proponents advocate for increased crop yields and enhanced resistance to pests, while skeptics raise concerns over potential health and environmental consequences. In this study, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of the potential connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'.
As we embarked on this research journey, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the scarecrow win an award?" The answer, of course, is that it was outstanding in its field. Similarly, our investigation sought to uncover any outstanding associations between GMO corn and gastrointestinal distress.
The state of North Dakota is a significant contributor to the production of corn in the United States, with a substantial portion of its cultivation comprising GMO varieties. The rise of GMO adoption over the past few decades has posed an intriguing question: are there any abdominal repercussions associated with the consumption of GMO corn? Our analysis aimed to peel back the layers of this enigma and shed light on any potential correlation.
It's not uncommon for individuals to turn to search engines when experiencing physical discomfort, and 'tummy ache' serves as a common colloquial term for a range of gastrointestinal issues. Our utilization of Google Trends data allowed us to explore the ebb and flow of public interest in this phenomenon and its hypothetical link to GMO corn consumption.
With a keen focus on statistical rigor and a hint of humor along the way, this research endeavors to not only uncover potential correlations but also to provoke a chuckle or two along the path to knowledge. Our findings aim to provide a kernel of insight into the influence of agricultural practices on public health concerns, serving as both a serious investigation and a cornucopia of academic amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In seeking to unravel the potential connection between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache', our research team employed a multifaceted approach that combined data analysis and linguistic gymnastics.

To commence our endeavor, we engaged in the meticulous collection of data spanning the years 2005 to 2023, drawing primarily from sources such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for comprehensive information on GMO corn production. Additionally, we harnessed the expansive capabilities of Google Trends to discern the fluctuations in online searches related to gastrointestinal discomfort.

In an effort to infuse some light-heartedness into our rigorous methodology, we occasionally pondered, "What did the farmer say after he lost his tractor?" His response was a simple, "Where's my tractor?" Similarly, our data collection process was characterized by unwavering focus and the occasional lighthearted quip to cultivate a spirit of intellectual curiosity.

Upon assembling the requisite data, we embarked on an arduous journey of quantitative analysis and statistical scrutiny. Employing advanced statistical techniques such as correlation analysis and time-series modeling, we endeavored to distill meaningful insights from the intricate web of information.

Like a kernel of corn popping into a fluffy piece of popcorn, our statistical methods worked to unearth any potential associations between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the temporal patterns of 'tummy ache' searches. While the road was fraught with complex computations and methodological contemplations, it ultimately led to the illumination of an intriguing connection worthy of scholarly examination.

In line with the spirit of academic thoroughness, we also conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of our findings. This involved subjecting the data to a battery of alternative statistical models and hypothetical scenarios to ensure that our results remained steadfast in the face of analytical chicanery.

Throughout the process, we remained mindful of the need for methodological rigor and a sprinkle of whimsical humor. After all, "Why don't scientists trust atoms?" The answer, naturally, is that they make up everything. In a similar vein, our research methodology was underpinned by a commitment to meticulous inquiry and a touch of scientific jest to enliven the pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9615343, r-squared of 0.9245483, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.

Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The widespread use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a topic of both scrutiny and celebration. Proponents advocate for increased crop yields and enhanced resistance to pests, while skeptics raise concerns over potential health and environmental consequences. In this study, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of the potential connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'.
As we embarked on this research journey, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the scarecrow win an award?" The answer, of course, is that it was outstanding in its field. Similarly, our investigation sought to uncover any outstanding associations between GMO corn and gastrointestinal distress.
The state of North Dakota is a significant contributor to the production of corn in the United States, with a substantial portion of its cultivation comprising GMO varieties. The rise of GMO adoption over the past few decades has posed an intriguing question: are there any abdominal repercussions associated with the consumption of GMO corn? Our analysis aimed to peel back the layers of this enigma and shed light on any potential correlation.
It's not uncommon for individuals to turn to search engines when experiencing physical discomfort, and 'tummy ache' serves as a common colloquial term for a range of gastrointestinal issues. Our utilization of Google Trends data allowed us to explore the ebb and flow of public interest in this phenomenon and its hypothetical link to GMO corn consumption.
With a keen focus on statistical rigor and a hint of humor along the way, this research endeavors to not only uncover potential correlations but also to provoke a chuckle or two along the path to knowledge. Our findings aim to provide a kernel of insight into the influence of agricultural practices on public health concerns, serving as both a serious investigation and a cornucopia of academic amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our investigation, we unearthed a significant and robust correlation between the use of genetically modified corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This relationship is further supported by the r-squared value of 0.9245483, signifying that approximately 92.45% of the variance in 'tummy ache' searches can be explained by the variation in GMO corn use. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association.

Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation we found between GMO corn cultivation and the incidence of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. The scatterplot depicts a positively sloped trend line, further emphasizing the robust connection between these two phenomena.

It's hard to ignore the signs (pun intended) when the data reveals such a strong relationship between GMO corn and stomach-related searches. We were humored, but not surprised, by this uncovering. It's as if corn was whispering to us, "I may be causing some rumbling in the tummy – I hope you can digest this information." Our work provides evidence for further investigation into the potential impact of GMOs on gastrointestinal health, serving as a kernel of realization in the field of agricultural and public health research.

The strength of this correlation raises eyebrow(s), prompting a revisiting of the potential consequences of genetically modified corn use. Our findings may leave some feeling a bit corn-fused, but they also offer fodder for considerations in agricultural and health policy moving forward.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.

Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' in North Dakota. They suggest a potential association between these variables, prompting further investigation into the impact of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.
Speaking of tummy aches, did you hear about the guy who invented Lifesavers? He made a mint! Jokes aside, the potential link between GMO corn and stomach discomfort raises intriguing questions about the broader implications of agricultural practices on public health.
In "Doe's study," the researchers observe a similar trend, with a statistically significant relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn in North Dakota and online queries related to digestive issues. These findings highlight the need for continued inquiry into the potential effects of genetically modified crops on gastrointestinal well-being.
Our research also drew inspiration from non-fiction works such as Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and Marion Nestle's "Safe Food," which provided valuable insights into the complexities of food production and the impact of agricultural practices on human health. Additionally, fictional accounts such as Margaret Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" offered imaginative perspectives on genetically modified organisms and their potential consequences.
In addition to scholarly literature and acclaimed works, we ventured into unconventional sources, including satirical websites, comic strips, and even random musings overheard at the local farmer's market. While some may dismiss these sources as mere jest, we gleaned unexpected kernels of wisdom amid the jest and jollity.
However, the most unexpected source of insight came from our exhaustive perusal of CVS receipts, which surprisingly included anecdotal evidence of customers attributing their intestinal discomfort to a recent encounter with corn-based products. While unconventional, these diverse sources collectively contributed to a cornucopia of findings that transcended traditional scholarly boundaries.
As we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of GMOs and gastrointestinal distress, our study endeavors to strike a balance between scholarly rigor and a lighthearted spirit – much like the delicate equilibrium of a finely crafted dad joke. Our ultimate goal is to offer a narrative that not only informs but also entertains, eliciting a chuckle or two along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation, we unearthed a significant and robust correlation between the use of genetically modified corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This relationship is further supported by the r-squared value of 0.9245483, signifying that approximately 92.45% of the variance in 'tummy ache' searches can be explained by the variation in GMO corn use. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association.
Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation we found between GMO corn cultivation and the incidence of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. The scatterplot depicts a positively sloped trend line, further emphasizing the robust connection between these two phenomena.
It's hard to ignore the signs (pun intended) when the data reveals such a strong relationship between GMO corn and stomach-related searches. We were humored, but not surprised, by this uncovering. It's as if corn was whispering to us, "I may be causing some rumbling in the tummy – I hope you can digest this information." Our work provides evidence for further investigation into the potential impact of GMOs on gastrointestinal health, serving as a kernel of realization in the field of agricultural and public health research.
The strength of this correlation raises eyebrow(s), prompting a revisiting of the potential consequences of genetically modified corn use. Our findings may leave some feeling a bit corn-fused, but they also offer fodder for considerations in agricultural and health policy moving forward.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study support previous research, including the findings of Smith et al. and Doe's study, which indicated a positive correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' in North Dakota. Our robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value further reinforce the notion of a tangible association between GMO corn and online queries related to gastrointestinal discomfort. It appears that the corn industry may be causing a stir both literally and figuratively.

The public's heightened interest in understanding potential health implications of GMOs in corn is reflected in the surge of Google searches related to stomach discomfort. This striking correspondence between GMO corn cultivation and 'tummy ache' queries raises pertinent questions about the broader impact of agricultural practices on human health, accentuating the need for continued inquiry and careful consideration of agricultural policies. It's clear that this research has unearthed a kernel of truth that cannot be ignored.

Our study has illuminated a compelling relationship that warrants further investigation, not to mention a few chuckles along the way. While humor might be a welcome break from the serious nature of academic research, it is worth noting that our results are no laughing matter. The data points to a significant linkage between GMO corn and gastrointestinal distress, paving the way for a cornucopia of future inquiries into the potential consequences of genetically modified crops on public health.

This research serves as both a seed of curiosity and a potential catalyst for policy discussions surrounding agricultural practices and consumer well-being. The findings suggest a need for thoughtful corn-sideration of the implications of GMO use in corn cultivation. As the old adage goes, "You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs," but perhaps we also shouldn't ignore the rumbles in our tummies along the way.

In conclusion, our study adds weight to the growing body of evidence linking GMO corn to stomach-related discomfort, and ins-pie-res further exploration into the consequences of genetically modified crops on gastrointestinal health. The con-stalk-tions of our findings extend beyond the realm of academia, serving as a kernel of realization for policymakers and the public alike. It's clear that the impact of GMO corn cultivation on digestive well-being is no joke, and our findings bring a-maize-ing insight into an area that is ripe for further investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.

Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.

During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The widespread use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a topic of both scrutiny and celebration. Proponents advocate for increased crop yields and enhanced resistance to pests, while skeptics raise concerns over potential health and environmental consequences. In this study, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of the potential connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'.
As we embarked on this research journey, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the scarecrow win an award?" The answer, of course, is that it was outstanding in its field. Similarly, our investigation sought to uncover any outstanding associations between GMO corn and gastrointestinal distress.
The state of North Dakota is a significant contributor to the production of corn in the United States, with a substantial portion of its cultivation comprising GMO varieties. The rise of GMO adoption over the past few decades has posed an intriguing question: are there any abdominal repercussions associated with the consumption of GMO corn? Our analysis aimed to peel back the layers of this enigma and shed light on any potential correlation.
It's not uncommon for individuals to turn to search engines when experiencing physical discomfort, and 'tummy ache' serves as a common colloquial term for a range of gastrointestinal issues. Our utilization of Google Trends data allowed us to explore the ebb and flow of public interest in this phenomenon and its hypothetical link to GMO corn consumption.
With a keen focus on statistical rigor and a hint of humor along the way, this research endeavors to not only uncover potential correlations but also to provoke a chuckle or two along the path to knowledge. Our findings aim to provide a kernel of insight into the influence of agricultural practices on public health concerns, serving as both a serious investigation and a cornucopia of academic amusement.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation, we unearthed a significant and robust correlation between the use of genetically modified corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This relationship is further supported by the r-squared value of 0.9245483, signifying that approximately 92.45% of the variance in 'tummy ache' searches can be explained by the variation in GMO corn use. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association.
Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation we found between GMO corn cultivation and the incidence of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. The scatterplot depicts a positively sloped trend line, further emphasizing the robust connection between these two phenomena.
It's hard to ignore the signs (pun intended) when the data reveals such a strong relationship between GMO corn and stomach-related searches. We were humored, but not surprised, by this uncovering. It's as if corn was whispering to us, "I may be causing some rumbling in the tummy – I hope you can digest this information." Our work provides evidence for further investigation into the potential impact of GMOs on gastrointestinal health, serving as a kernel of realization in the field of agricultural and public health research.
The strength of this correlation raises eyebrow(s), prompting a revisiting of the potential consequences of genetically modified corn use. Our findings may leave some feeling a bit corn-fused, but they also offer fodder for considerations in agricultural and health policy moving forward.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has revealed a compelling and noteworthy correlation between the use of genetically modified corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our findings provide robust evidence of a strong positive relationship, emphasizing the potential impact of GMO corn consumption on gastrointestinal health. The statistical rigor of our analysis, coupled with the exploratory nature of the study, positions this research as a pivotal stepping stone in unraveling the intriguing dynamics between agricultural practices and public health concerns.

As we reflect on the implications of our research, we are reminded of a relevant dad joke: "What did the corn farmer say to his stalks?" He said, "We're all ears!" Just like the farmer listening to his crops, it's imperative to heed the resounding message of our findings regarding GMO corn and digestive distress.

Our work serves as a cornucopia of insight, offering a kernel of wisdom for stakeholders in both the agricultural and public health realms. The implications of our study reach far beyond the Midwestern fields, echoing the ripple effect of our findings on a wider scale. Our robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 underscore the gravity of the connection we have unearthed.

It's as if the GMO corn has been playing a game of "corny or not" with our gastrointestinal tracts, and the evidence points towards a compelling 'corny' conclusion. This definitive correlation demands attention and suggests a burgeoning area of exploration within the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and human health.

In light of our findings, it's clear that the stomach discomfort echoed in the digital landscape through 'tummy ache' searches may indeed be intertwined with the cultivation of genetically modified corn. However, it's important not to 'cob-ble' together unverified assumptions or jump to hasty implications. Further research, perhaps exploring the mechanisms underlying this correlation, may uncover the root causes and potential mitigating measures. Nevertheless, given the strength of our findings, it seems appropriate to affirm that no additional research "a-maize" necessary in establishing the need for continued investigation into the effects of GMO corn on gastrointestinal well-being.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Mischief


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Agricultural Anecdotes and Amusements


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Gastric Grit: Genetically Modified Corn in North Dakota and the Googling of 'Tummy Ache' with an abstract of This study delves into the potential link between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Our research team employed data from the USDA and Google Trends to conduct a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023.
Upon thorough examination, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9615343 and a statistically significant p-value < 0.01 emerged, revealing a surprising connection between GMO corn and online searches for stomach discomfort. Our findings suggest that there may be a palpable association, prompting further investigation into the effects of GMOs on gastrointestinal health.
During our research, we couldn't help but ask ourselves, "What did the corn say to the doctor?" It simply responded, "I'm feeling a little husky!" Our work sheds light on an intriguing relationship that serves as food for thought and a kernel of reassessment for agricultural practices and public health concerns.

ChatGPT:

GMO, genetically modified corn, North Dakota, Google Trends, USDA data, stomach discomfort, gastrointestinal health, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, agricultural practices, public health, GMO effects, corn cultivation, tummy ache, online searches

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

Google searches for 'tummy ache'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'tummy ache' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'tummy ache'

Correlation r = 0.9615343 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9245483 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'tummy ache') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 19 years from 2005 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.7E-11. 0.0000000000569779919118189250
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 5.7E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 17,550,636,069 random variables You don't actually need 17 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)15202231413739436968706667697875777485
Google searches for 'tummy ache' (Rel. search volume)12.751718.7521.666727.534.833342.66675155.58336065.416769.083371.166777.916782.583383.583.583390.590.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([15,20,22,31,41,37,39,43,69,68,70,66,67,69,78,75,77,74,85,])
array_2 = np.array([12.75,17,18.75,21.6667,27.5,34.8333,42.6667,51,55.5833,60,65.4167,69.0833,71.1667,77.9167,82.5833,83.5,83.5833,90.5,90.9,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'tummy ache'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 3391 · Black Variable ID: 747 · Red Variable ID: 1345
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0