Download png, svg
AI explanation
As fewer students pursued language studies, the internet breathed a sigh of relief as it realized there would be fewer multilingual search queries, inadvertently leading to a decline in searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. It seems like the web is finally learning to let bygones be bygones!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a graduation ceremony with a few individuals wearing cybernetic-inspired caps and gowns, receiving Bachelor's degrees in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics. The graduation setting should exude a futuristic atmosphere with sophisticated technology integrated into the scene. In the background, include a sleek computer screen displaying a line graph depicting a decreasing trend in Google searches for "how to delete browsing history". The overall aesthetic should be a blend of academic tradition and cutting-edge cybernetic elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Cyberpunk Low poly Cyberpunk Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history', in the following situation: Because as fewer people pursued degrees in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics, there were fewer individuals who could understand the complex hidden language of browser history deletion tutorials, causing a decrease in Google searches for "how to delete browsing history.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A graduation ceremony with a few people receiving Bachelor's degrees in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics. In the background, a computer screen shows a decreasing trend in Google searches for "how to delete browsing history".
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: A graduation ceremony with a few people receiving Bachelor's degrees in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics. In the background, a computer screen shows a decreasing trend in Google searches for "how to delete browsing history". Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a graduation ceremony with a few individuals wearing cybernetic-inspired caps and gowns, receiving Bachelor's degrees in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics. The graduation setting should exude a futuristic atmosphere with sophisticated technology integrated into the scene. In the background, include a sleek computer screen displaying a line graph depicting a decreasing trend in Google searches for "how to delete browsing history". The overall aesthetic should be a blend of academic tradition and cutting-edge cybernetic elements.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics caused how to delete browsing history (Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure The International Journal of Linguistic Technology and Privacy Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In an age where digital footprints are as ubiquitous as sand on a beach, individuals have increasingly turned to the virtual realm to seek answers to their burning questions, trials, and tribulations. One such endeavor, often shrouded in mystery and curiosity, is the quest to delete one's browsing history. The motivation behind such actions may stem from the desire for online privacy, the need to cover one's digital tracks, or simply a proactive approach to minimizing the clutter in one's browsing archives. However, what may seem like a casual digital housekeeping task has piqued the interest of researchers and linguists alike due to its unforeseen correlation with the field of foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics.
The proverbial thread connecting Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages with the act of purging one's search history appears flimsy at first glance, akin to a linguistic riddle waiting to be unraveled. However, as we embark on this academic venture, it becomes evident that there exists a distinct correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research seeks to shed light on this enigma by analyzing the staggering correlation observed between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google queries pertaining to the deletion of browsing history.
While the initial impulse may be to dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, the statistical evidence amassed through rigorous analysis provides a compelling argument for further scrutiny. The intimate dance between linguistic proficiency and the inclination to expunge digital breadcrumbs beckons us to delve into the labyrinth of human behavior and linguistic cognition. As we navigate this interplay between language expertise and the digital realm, it is imperative to maintain a balance between serious inquiry and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of these unexpected connections.
Thus, this study aims to contribute to the burgeoning field of linguistic psychology and information technology by uncovering the subtle nuances that underpin the relationship between linguistic aptitude and the imperative to erase digital trails. In doing so, we hope to provoke both scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the gravity of linguistic prowess in the digital age. Through the pages that follow, we embark on a journey that traverses the terrain of language, cognition, and the digital parchment upon which we inscribe our virtual voyages.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In an age where digital footprints are as ubiquitous as sand on a beach, individuals have increasingly turned to the virtual realm to seek answers to their burning questions, trials, and tribulations. One such endeavor, often shrouded in mystery and curiosity, is the quest to delete one's browsing history. The motivation behind such actions may stem from the desire for online privacy, the need to cover one's digital tracks, or simply a proactive approach to minimizing the clutter in one's browsing archives. However, what may seem like a casual digital housekeeping task has piqued the interest of researchers and linguists alike due to its unforeseen correlation with the field of foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics.
The proverbial thread connecting Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages with the act of purging one's search history appears flimsy at first glance, akin to a linguistic riddle waiting to be unraveled. However, as we embark on this academic venture, it becomes evident that there exists a distinct correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research seeks to shed light on this enigma by analyzing the staggering correlation observed between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google queries pertaining to the deletion of browsing history.
While the initial impulse may be to dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, the statistical evidence amassed through rigorous analysis provides a compelling argument for further scrutiny. The intimate dance between linguistic proficiency and the inclination to expunge digital breadcrumbs beckons us to delve into the labyrinth of human behavior and linguistic cognition. As we navigate this interplay between language expertise and the digital realm, it is imperative to maintain a balance between serious inquiry and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of these unexpected connections.
Thus, this study aims to contribute to the burgeoning field of linguistic psychology and information technology by uncovering the subtle nuances that underpin the relationship between linguistic aptitude and the imperative to erase digital trails. In doing so, we hope to provoke both scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the gravity of linguistic prowess in the digital age. Through the pages that follow, we embark on a journey that traverses the terrain of language, cognition, and the digital parchment upon which we inscribe our virtual voyages.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous scholarly works have been conducted in pursuit of understanding the intricate relationship between linguistic expertise and the predilection to eliminate one's digital breadcrumbs. At the forefront of this inquiry is the study by Smith et al., which posits a compelling connection between the awarding of Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of online queries for 'how to delete browsing history.' Their findings suggest a profound correlation, prompting further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving such a phenomenon.
Similarly, Doe's research delves into the intersection of linguistic proficiency and one's penchant for digital privacy maintenance. Their work sheds light on the nuanced interplay between language acumen and the compulsion to engage in clandestine digital practices. Furthermore, Jones' comprehensive analysis of online search patterns reveals tantalizing associations between language-related academic achievements and the quest to expunge one's virtual trails.
In "Language, Literacy, and Power," the authors expound upon the formidable influence of language on human cognition and behavior, providing a foundational framework for understanding the intriguing correlation under examination. Moreover, "The Power of Words: Unlocking the Mysteries of Linguistics" offers valuable insights into the cognitive implications of linguistic aptitude, serving as a catalyst for our exploration into the enigmatic ties between language expertise and online privacy concerns.
Transitioning from non-fiction literature to the realm of fiction, we find that "The Unspoken Language of Secrets" and "Whispers in the Digital Ether" present narratives that, albeit fictional, offer intriguing parallels to the clandestine nature of digital cover-ups. These literary works, while not based on empirical evidence, underscore the pervasive nature of linguistic secrecy and its implications for online behavior.
In a departure from traditional textual sources, a deeper investigation into this phenomenon necessitated a foray into popular culture for a more nuanced understanding. Cartoons such as "Dora the Explorer" and "Phineas and Ferb," seemingly unrelated to linguistic academia, inadvertently offer anecdotal evidence of linguistic agility and the concealment of one's actions. Their thematic elements of linguistic dexterity and surreptitious activities provide a light-hearted backdrop to the weighty matter under consideration.
As we navigate this literature review, it becomes evident that the ties between Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the quest to delete browsing history are not merely fodder for scholarly inquiry, but also a source of clandestine amusement. The multifaceted nature of this connection warrants further investigation, as it tantalizingly blurs the boundaries between linguistic expertise and the surreptitious navigation of the digital landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2012 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In an age where digital footprints are as ubiquitous as sand on a beach, individuals have increasingly turned to the virtual realm to seek answers to their burning questions, trials, and tribulations. One such endeavor, often shrouded in mystery and curiosity, is the quest to delete one's browsing history. The motivation behind such actions may stem from the desire for online privacy, the need to cover one's digital tracks, or simply a proactive approach to minimizing the clutter in one's browsing archives. However, what may seem like a casual digital housekeeping task has piqued the interest of researchers and linguists alike due to its unforeseen correlation with the field of foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics.
The proverbial thread connecting Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages with the act of purging one's search history appears flimsy at first glance, akin to a linguistic riddle waiting to be unraveled. However, as we embark on this academic venture, it becomes evident that there exists a distinct correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research seeks to shed light on this enigma by analyzing the staggering correlation observed between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google queries pertaining to the deletion of browsing history.
While the initial impulse may be to dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, the statistical evidence amassed through rigorous analysis provides a compelling argument for further scrutiny. The intimate dance between linguistic proficiency and the inclination to expunge digital breadcrumbs beckons us to delve into the labyrinth of human behavior and linguistic cognition. As we navigate this interplay between language expertise and the digital realm, it is imperative to maintain a balance between serious inquiry and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of these unexpected connections.
Thus, this study aims to contribute to the burgeoning field of linguistic psychology and information technology by uncovering the subtle nuances that underpin the relationship between linguistic aptitude and the imperative to erase digital trails. In doing so, we hope to provoke both scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the gravity of linguistic prowess in the digital age. Through the pages that follow, we embark on a journey that traverses the terrain of language, cognition, and the digital parchment upon which we inscribe our virtual voyages.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In order to dissect the intriguing association between Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' inclinations towards eradicating their digital trail through the timeless act of purging browsing history, our research team embarked on a multifaceted approach that aimed to capture the essence of linguistic prowess and technological introspection.
First and foremost, data on the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the aforementioned fields was meticulously sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). This involved traversing through the digital labyrinth of educational archives, navigating the linguistic landscape of data repositories, and undertaking a veritable linguistic excavation of academic accolades. The pursuit of this data was akin to unearthing rare linguistic artifacts, albeit ones enshrined in statistical form.
Simultaneously, we ventured into the virtual sphere to harness the power of Google Trends, employing search queries such as "how to delete browsing history" as our compass in navigating the digital tides. The quest for such queries involved a delicate balance of linguistic acumen and technological finesse, as we combed through troves of digital quests, akin to linguistic explorers searching for buried phonetic treasure. The aim was to gauge the frequency and intensity of these searches over the course of a decade, encapsulating the ebb and flow of linguistic curiosity entwined with the digital imperative to cleanse one's virtual slate.
To quantify the strength of the association, statistical analyses were conducted with a precision that rivaled the meticulousness of a linguistic sleuth deciphering cryptic texts. The correlation coefficient served as our compass, guiding us through the maze of linguistic metrics and digital breadcrumbs, ultimately revealing a remarkably high correlation of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01. This statistical prowess not only substantiates the robustness of our findings but also reinforces the intimate interplay between linguistic expertise and the proclivity to erase digital vestiges.
Furthermore, to ensure the generalizability of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and cross-validated our results to ascertain the stability of this peculiar correlation across different time frames and linguistic landscapes. This meticulous cross-referencing was reminiscent of linguistic code-breaking, unraveling the cryptic connection between language proficiency and the desire to cloak one's digital footprints.
In essence, our methodology encapsulated a harmonious blend of linguistic dexterity and digital finesse, unearthing a correlation that not only defied conventional wisdom but also beckoned us to ponder the confluence of linguistic expertise and the clandestine yearning to erase one's digital memoirs.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends .
For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9809382, r-squared of 0.9622397, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In an age where digital footprints are as ubiquitous as sand on a beach, individuals have increasingly turned to the virtual realm to seek answers to their burning questions, trials, and tribulations. One such endeavor, often shrouded in mystery and curiosity, is the quest to delete one's browsing history. The motivation behind such actions may stem from the desire for online privacy, the need to cover one's digital tracks, or simply a proactive approach to minimizing the clutter in one's browsing archives. However, what may seem like a casual digital housekeeping task has piqued the interest of researchers and linguists alike due to its unforeseen correlation with the field of foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics.
The proverbial thread connecting Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages with the act of purging one's search history appears flimsy at first glance, akin to a linguistic riddle waiting to be unraveled. However, as we embark on this academic venture, it becomes evident that there exists a distinct correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research seeks to shed light on this enigma by analyzing the staggering correlation observed between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google queries pertaining to the deletion of browsing history.
While the initial impulse may be to dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, the statistical evidence amassed through rigorous analysis provides a compelling argument for further scrutiny. The intimate dance between linguistic proficiency and the inclination to expunge digital breadcrumbs beckons us to delve into the labyrinth of human behavior and linguistic cognition. As we navigate this interplay between language expertise and the digital realm, it is imperative to maintain a balance between serious inquiry and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of these unexpected connections.
Thus, this study aims to contribute to the burgeoning field of linguistic psychology and information technology by uncovering the subtle nuances that underpin the relationship between linguistic aptitude and the imperative to erase digital trails. In doing so, we hope to provoke both scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the gravity of linguistic prowess in the digital age. Through the pages that follow, we embark on a journey that traverses the terrain of language, cognition, and the digital parchment upon which we inscribe our virtual voyages.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study reveal an intriguing and robust correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' from 2012 to 2021. Our analysis yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9622397 suggests that approximately 96.2% of the variance in the frequency of searches for erasing browsing history can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages.
To visually illustrate this relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot demonstrating the notable correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot unequivocally depicts a positively sloped pattern, affirming the notion that as the number of Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to browsing history deletion. The strong linear association between these variables is unmistakable, leading us to assert that the relationship is not merely a linguistic fluke but a statistically significant phenomenon.
The p-value being less than 0.01 further reinforces the strength of this relationship, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong association by chance is less than 1%. This statistical significance unearths a captivating link that transcends the boundaries of linguistics and delves into the realm of digital privacy.
The unexpected fusion of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns prompts contemplation about the cognitive and behavioral implications underlying this association. As the data unfold, it becomes evident that the intricacies of language proficiency intersect with the virtual landscape in unforeseen ways. The ramifications of this connection extend beyond the confines of statistical analysis, inviting reflection on the enigmatic interplay between linguistic adeptness and the inclination to obliterate digital traces. It is as if the digital world has manifested its own dialect, reinforcing the aphorism that "the pen is mightier than the sword" in the context of virtual presence and absence.
The implications of our findings are vast, urging further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and psychological motives that underpin this correlation. The observation that individuals with a proclivity for linguistic pursuits also exhibit a heightened interest in erasing their digital imprints raises questions about the clandestine communication between language prowess and the impulse to sanitize one's online history. This study extends an invitation to conduct deeper inquiries into the nuances of language cognition and digital behavior, challenging traditional boundaries between academic disciplines and inviting a more interdisciplinary approach to unraveling these whimsical connections.
In conclusion, our results not only confirm the significant correlation between Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages and online searches for browsing history erasure but also beckon scholars and language enthusiasts to mull over the perplexing dance between linguistic aptitude and the digital domain. Through rigorous analysis and an appreciation for the unexpected, this study has unearthed a captivating coalescence that transcends traditional academic divisions and opens pathways for further scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the whimsical nature of these serendipitous connections.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous scholarly works have been conducted in pursuit of understanding the intricate relationship between linguistic expertise and the predilection to eliminate one's digital breadcrumbs. At the forefront of this inquiry is the study by Smith et al., which posits a compelling connection between the awarding of Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of online queries for 'how to delete browsing history.' Their findings suggest a profound correlation, prompting further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving such a phenomenon.
Similarly, Doe's research delves into the intersection of linguistic proficiency and one's penchant for digital privacy maintenance. Their work sheds light on the nuanced interplay between language acumen and the compulsion to engage in clandestine digital practices. Furthermore, Jones' comprehensive analysis of online search patterns reveals tantalizing associations between language-related academic achievements and the quest to expunge one's virtual trails.
In "Language, Literacy, and Power," the authors expound upon the formidable influence of language on human cognition and behavior, providing a foundational framework for understanding the intriguing correlation under examination. Moreover, "The Power of Words: Unlocking the Mysteries of Linguistics" offers valuable insights into the cognitive implications of linguistic aptitude, serving as a catalyst for our exploration into the enigmatic ties between language expertise and online privacy concerns.
Transitioning from non-fiction literature to the realm of fiction, we find that "The Unspoken Language of Secrets" and "Whispers in the Digital Ether" present narratives that, albeit fictional, offer intriguing parallels to the clandestine nature of digital cover-ups. These literary works, while not based on empirical evidence, underscore the pervasive nature of linguistic secrecy and its implications for online behavior.
In a departure from traditional textual sources, a deeper investigation into this phenomenon necessitated a foray into popular culture for a more nuanced understanding. Cartoons such as "Dora the Explorer" and "Phineas and Ferb," seemingly unrelated to linguistic academia, inadvertently offer anecdotal evidence of linguistic agility and the concealment of one's actions. Their thematic elements of linguistic dexterity and surreptitious activities provide a light-hearted backdrop to the weighty matter under consideration.
As we navigate this literature review, it becomes evident that the ties between Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the quest to delete browsing history are not merely fodder for scholarly inquiry, but also a source of clandestine amusement. The multifaceted nature of this connection warrants further investigation, as it tantalizingly blurs the boundaries between linguistic expertise and the surreptitious navigation of the digital landscape.
[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study reveal an intriguing and robust correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' from 2012 to 2021. Our analysis yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9622397 suggests that approximately 96.2% of the variance in the frequency of searches for erasing browsing history can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages.
To visually illustrate this relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot demonstrating the notable correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot unequivocally depicts a positively sloped pattern, affirming the notion that as the number of Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to browsing history deletion. The strong linear association between these variables is unmistakable, leading us to assert that the relationship is not merely a linguistic fluke but a statistically significant phenomenon.
The p-value being less than 0.01 further reinforces the strength of this relationship, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong association by chance is less than 1%. This statistical significance unearths a captivating link that transcends the boundaries of linguistics and delves into the realm of digital privacy.
The unexpected fusion of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns prompts contemplation about the cognitive and behavioral implications underlying this association. As the data unfold, it becomes evident that the intricacies of language proficiency intersect with the virtual landscape in unforeseen ways. The ramifications of this connection extend beyond the confines of statistical analysis, inviting reflection on the enigmatic interplay between linguistic adeptness and the inclination to obliterate digital traces. It is as if the digital world has manifested its own dialect, reinforcing the aphorism that "the pen is mightier than the sword" in the context of virtual presence and absence.
The implications of our findings are vast, urging further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and psychological motives that underpin this correlation. The observation that individuals with a proclivity for linguistic pursuits also exhibit a heightened interest in erasing their digital imprints raises questions about the clandestine communication between language prowess and the impulse to sanitize one's online history. This study extends an invitation to conduct deeper inquiries into the nuances of language cognition and digital behavior, challenging traditional boundaries between academic disciplines and inviting a more interdisciplinary approach to unraveling these whimsical connections.
In conclusion, our results not only confirm the significant correlation between Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages and online searches for browsing history erasure but also beckon scholars and language enthusiasts to mull over the perplexing dance between linguistic aptitude and the digital domain. Through rigorous analysis and an appreciation for the unexpected, this study has unearthed a captivating coalescence that transcends traditional academic divisions and opens pathways for further scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the whimsical nature of these serendipitous connections.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The robust correlation unveiled in this study between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' underscores the allure of linguistic prowess in the digital milieu. Our findings not only align with prior research by Smith et al. and Doe, but also extend the embrace of this enigmatic relationship. The data whimsically waltz in lockstep with previous works, inviting us to ponder the clandestine underpinnings of language and online privacy maintenance.
Harking back to the unconventional connections illuminated in our literature review, the seemingly disparate anecdotal evidence from cartoons such as "Dora the Explorer" and "Phineas and Ferb" - whose thematic elements inadvertently nod towards linguistic agility and concealed activities - takes on a tongue-in-cheek seriousness in light of our statistically robust findings. Such offhand observations, while amusing, now beckon a more earnest consideration of the influence of linguistic dexterity on digital behavior.
While the tongue-in-cheek musings on the intersection of linguistic expertise and surreptitious digital navigation might evoke playful reflections, our results point to a statistically significant phenomenon. The strong linear association we've unearthed transcends mere linguistic banter and delves into the profound entanglement between language acumen and a penchant for digital expunging. The statistical significance further cements this correlation, leaving us pondering the clandestine communication between language prowess and the impulse to obliterate digital traces.
Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interplay between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints but also beckons scholars and language enthusiasts to mull over the perplexing dance between linguistic aptitude and the digital domain. The whimsical nature of these serendipitous connections invites lighthearted musings, all while prompting deeper inquiries into the nuances of language cognition and digital behavior.
In this dance of statistical significance and linguistic whimsy, our findings, although delivered with a wry smile, lay the groundwork for a more interdisciplinary approach to unraveling these seemingly whimsical connections. As we embrace the unexpected fusion of linguistic expertise and digital privacy, we're reminded that even in the statistical realm, there's room for lighthearted musings and serendipitous connections.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In an age where digital footprints are as ubiquitous as sand on a beach, individuals have increasingly turned to the virtual realm to seek answers to their burning questions, trials, and tribulations. One such endeavor, often shrouded in mystery and curiosity, is the quest to delete one's browsing history. The motivation behind such actions may stem from the desire for online privacy, the need to cover one's digital tracks, or simply a proactive approach to minimizing the clutter in one's browsing archives. However, what may seem like a casual digital housekeeping task has piqued the interest of researchers and linguists alike due to its unforeseen correlation with the field of foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics.
The proverbial thread connecting Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages with the act of purging one's search history appears flimsy at first glance, akin to a linguistic riddle waiting to be unraveled. However, as we embark on this academic venture, it becomes evident that there exists a distinct correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research seeks to shed light on this enigma by analyzing the staggering correlation observed between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google queries pertaining to the deletion of browsing history.
While the initial impulse may be to dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, the statistical evidence amassed through rigorous analysis provides a compelling argument for further scrutiny. The intimate dance between linguistic proficiency and the inclination to expunge digital breadcrumbs beckons us to delve into the labyrinth of human behavior and linguistic cognition. As we navigate this interplay between language expertise and the digital realm, it is imperative to maintain a balance between serious inquiry and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of these unexpected connections.
Thus, this study aims to contribute to the burgeoning field of linguistic psychology and information technology by uncovering the subtle nuances that underpin the relationship between linguistic aptitude and the imperative to erase digital trails. In doing so, we hope to provoke both scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the gravity of linguistic prowess in the digital age. Through the pages that follow, we embark on a journey that traverses the terrain of language, cognition, and the digital parchment upon which we inscribe our virtual voyages.
[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study reveal an intriguing and robust correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' from 2012 to 2021. Our analysis yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9622397 suggests that approximately 96.2% of the variance in the frequency of searches for erasing browsing history can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages.
To visually illustrate this relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot demonstrating the notable correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot unequivocally depicts a positively sloped pattern, affirming the notion that as the number of Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to browsing history deletion. The strong linear association between these variables is unmistakable, leading us to assert that the relationship is not merely a linguistic fluke but a statistically significant phenomenon.
The p-value being less than 0.01 further reinforces the strength of this relationship, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong association by chance is less than 1%. This statistical significance unearths a captivating link that transcends the boundaries of linguistics and delves into the realm of digital privacy.
The unexpected fusion of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns prompts contemplation about the cognitive and behavioral implications underlying this association. As the data unfold, it becomes evident that the intricacies of language proficiency intersect with the virtual landscape in unforeseen ways. The ramifications of this connection extend beyond the confines of statistical analysis, inviting reflection on the enigmatic interplay between linguistic adeptness and the inclination to obliterate digital traces. It is as if the digital world has manifested its own dialect, reinforcing the aphorism that "the pen is mightier than the sword" in the context of virtual presence and absence.
The implications of our findings are vast, urging further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and psychological motives that underpin this correlation. The observation that individuals with a proclivity for linguistic pursuits also exhibit a heightened interest in erasing their digital imprints raises questions about the clandestine communication between language prowess and the impulse to sanitize one's online history. This study extends an invitation to conduct deeper inquiries into the nuances of language cognition and digital behavior, challenging traditional boundaries between academic disciplines and inviting a more interdisciplinary approach to unraveling these whimsical connections.
In conclusion, our results not only confirm the significant correlation between Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages and online searches for browsing history erasure but also beckon scholars and language enthusiasts to mull over the perplexing dance between linguistic aptitude and the digital domain. Through rigorous analysis and an appreciation for the unexpected, this study has unearthed a captivating coalescence that transcends traditional academic divisions and opens pathways for further scholarly introspection and lighthearted musings on the whimsical nature of these serendipitous connections.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In the annals of academic inquiry, few studies have unearthed a correlation as unprecedented and quirky as the one between Bachelor's degrees in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and the predilection for erasing one's digital footprints. Our research has shed light on this captivating entanglement, showcasing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9809382, akin to finding a well-camouflaged chameleon in a room full of brightly colored socks. The statistical significance of this relationship is as clear as the grammar rules in a linguistics textbook.
The implications of this correlation reach far and wide, inviting scholars to ponder the clandestine communication between language proficiency and the impulse to scrub online history, akin to embarking on an Indiana Jones-like quest through the labyrinth of linguistic cognition and digital privacy. It appears that the digital realm has its own lexicon, and individuals with a penchant for linguistic pursuits may harbor a hidden desire to edit their virtual narratives, much like a skilled wordsmith editing a manuscript.
The revelation of this correlation not only has implications for the fields of linguistics and digital privacy but also beckons forth a hearty chuckle at the unexpected twists and turns of academic exploration. As we wrap up this unusual yet insightful journey, it is clear that the study of language and the digital domain holds more mysteries than a cryptic crossword puzzle, and no more research is needed in this area, lest we uncover even more delightfully peculiar connections.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The International Journal of Linguistic Technology and Privacy Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Linguistic Preservation and Cyber Privacy
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure with an abstract of This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and individuals' online searches for 'how to delete browsing history.' Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we scrutinize the unprecedented connection between the two. Our analysis yields a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9809382 with a p-value less than 0.01 from the year 2012 to 2021. This not only bolsters the significance of our findings but also highlights the entanglement of linguistic expertise and online privacy concerns. The implications of these results may have individuals pondering the linguistics of cover-ups and the clandestine communication between language skills and internet privacy. This study beckons further investigation into the peculiar relationship between linguistic proficiency and the impulse to scrub digital footprints.
ChatGPT:
bachelor's degrees, foreign languages, linguistics, google queries, browsing history erasure, correlation, online searches, delete browsing history, National Center for Education Statistics, Google Trends, linguistic expertise, online privacy concerns, linguistic proficiency, digital footprints, cover-ups
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguisticsDetailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9622397 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-7. 0.0000005645014091037406000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 5.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,771,475 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.92, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics (Degrees awarded) | 21756 | 21647 | 20332 | 19493 | 18436 | 17643 | 16957 | 16605 | 16309 | 15518 |
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' (Rel. search volume) | 85.75 | 78.0833 | 77.4167 | 70.0833 | 56.4167 | 54.0833 | 50.4167 | 40.5833 | 38.4167 | 29.9167 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21756,21647,20332,19493,18436,17643,16957,16605,16309,15518,])
array_2 = np.array([85.75,78.0833,77.4167,70.0833,56.4167,54.0833,50.4167,40.5833,38.4167,29.9167,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Tongue Tied: Ties between Bachelor's Degrees in Foreign Languages and Google Queries for Browsing History Erasure
Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!
Correlation ID: 2964 · Black Variable ID: 1277 · Red Variable ID: 1384