about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,780 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and the second variable is Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The genetically modified corn stalks were inadvertently emitting a pheromone that had a calming effect on people, leading to more relaxed and happy passengers flying with Southwest Airlines.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure! Here's an image generation prompt in the requested style: Generate a simple scene in a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. The scene is set in a vibrant cornfield in Indiana. The towering stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze. The golden ears of corn are interspersed with bright purple and blue kernels, creating a whimsical and humorous sight. In the sky, a Southwest Airlines plane soars overhead, with passengers looking out the windows and smiling. Their contented expressions reflect the increased level of humor in the state, leading to higher customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Vaporwave Hyper-realistic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Minimalism
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines, in the following situation: Because GMO corn in Indiana increased the level of humor in the state, passengers were in a better mood when flying Southwest Airlines, leading to higher customer satisfaction.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant cornfield in Indiana, towering stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze. The golden ears of corn are interspersed with bright purple and blue kernels, creating a whimsical and humorous sight. Meanwhile, a Southwest Airlines plane soars overhead, with passengers looking out the windows and smiling. Their contented expressions reflect the increased level of humor in the state, leading to higher customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant cornfield in Indiana, towering stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze. The golden ears of corn are interspersed with bright purple and blue kernels, creating a whimsical and humorous sight. Meanwhile, a Southwest Airlines plane soars overhead, with passengers looking out the windows and smiling. Their contented expressions reflect the increased level of humor in the state, leading to higher customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure! Here's an image generation prompt in the requested style: Generate a simple scene in a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. The scene is set in a vibrant cornfield in Indiana. The towering stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze. The golden ears of corn are interspersed with bright purple and blue kernels, creating a whimsical and humorous sight. In the sky, a Southwest Airlines plane soars overhead, with passengers looking out the windows and smiling. Their contented expressions reflect the increased level of humor in the state, leading to higher customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Indiana caused Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

The Journal of Agri-Flight Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9087447 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Ah, the mysterious and marvelous world of correlations! As researchers, we often find ourselves chasing after statistical relationships like children chasing fireflies on a summer night – with a mixture of excitement, anticipation, and a healthy dose of skepticism. In this particular study, we set out to uncover the enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the customer satisfaction levels with a major airline, Southwest Airlines. Our quest led us down a path lined with data, uncertainty, and a generous sprinkling of puns – because after all, what is research without a little humor?

The decision to explore this seemingly bizarre link stemmed from a moment of whimsy, or perhaps sheer curiosity, within our research team. We pondered, "Could there possibly be a corn-nection between agriculture and air travel satisfaction?" Lo and behold, as we delved into the USDA data on GMO corn production and the customer satisfaction ratings provided by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Southwest Airlines, we were struck by the emergence of a correlation coefficient so strong, it could have lifted an entire cornfield off the ground.

Our findings presented a correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value that practically winked at us, signaling statistical significance with a mischievous twinkle in its eye. As we peered into the kernel of this correlation, spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we realized we were about to embark on a journey that intertwined the maize-y world of agriculture with the high-flying domain of consumer contentment. Hold on to your hats – or more fittingly, your aviation-themed headgear – because we, too, were taken aback by the unexpected twists and turns in our research voyage.

With each twist of the cornstalk and descent into the nuances of airline satisfaction, we were humbled by the realization that correlations, much like GMOs and corn, can hold both marvel and mystery within their statistical embrace. So, as we present our findings, we invite you to embrace the unpredictability of statistical relationships, the joy of uncovering peculiar correlations, and the humor that inevitably arises when seemingly unrelated realms collide. As we delve deeper into our discoveries, we shall aim to leave no kernel unturned and no flight of fancy unexplored. It's a-maize-ing how research can take us from cornfields to flight paths, but here we are, ready to unravel the delightful and surprising entanglement of GMO corn and airline satisfaction. Onward, fellow researchers, to the field of statistical whimsy and scientific marvels!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Ah, the mysterious and marvelous world of correlations! As researchers, we often find ourselves chasing after statistical relationships like children chasing fireflies on a summer night – with a mixture of excitement, anticipation, and a healthy dose of skepticism. In this particular study, we set out to uncover the enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the customer satisfaction levels with a major airline, Southwest Airlines. Our quest led us down a path lined with data, uncertainty, and a generous sprinkling of puns – because after all, what is research without a little humor?
The decision to explore this seemingly bizarre link stemmed from a moment of whimsy, or perhaps sheer curiosity, within our research team. We pondered, "Could there possibly be a corn-nection between agriculture and air travel satisfaction?" Lo and behold, as we delved into the USDA data on GMO corn production and the customer satisfaction ratings provided by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Southwest Airlines, we were struck by the emergence of a correlation coefficient so strong, it could have lifted an entire cornfield off the ground.
Our findings presented a correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value that practically winked at us, signaling statistical significance with a mischievous twinkle in its eye. As we peered into the kernel of this correlation, spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we realized we were about to embark on a journey that intertwined the maize-y world of agriculture with the high-flying domain of consumer contentment. Hold on to your hats – or more fittingly, your aviation-themed headgear – because we, too, were taken aback by the unexpected twists and turns in our research voyage.
With each twist of the cornstalk and descent into the nuances of airline satisfaction, we were humbled by the realization that correlations, much like GMOs and corn, can hold both marvel and mystery within their statistical embrace. So, as we present our findings, we invite you to embrace the unpredictability of statistical relationships, the joy of uncovering peculiar correlations, and the humor that inevitably arises when seemingly unrelated realms collide. As we delve deeper into our discoveries, we shall aim to leave no kernel unturned and no flight of fancy unexplored. It's a-maize-ing how research can take us from cornfields to flight paths, but here we are, ready to unravel the delightful and surprising entanglement of GMO corn and airline satisfaction. Onward, fellow researchers, to the field of statistical whimsy and scientific marvels!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of correlations, much like a box of surprise-flavored jelly beans, is often filled with unexpected twists and delightful encounters. As we embark on our journey to unravel the peculiar link between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines, we first turn to the hallowed halls of scholarly research.

In "Agricultural Practices and Consumer Satisfaction: An Analysis of Midwestern Corn Belt Trends," Smith et al. delve into the intricate dance between farming methods and consumer contentment. While their focus is primarily on the relationship between organic farming and consumer preferences, their work lays the fertile groundwork for our exploration into the realm of GMO corn and its potential impact on airborne satisfaction.

On a different but equally relevant note, Doe and Jones, in their compelling piece "Flying High: A Sociological Analysis of Air Travel Satisfaction," offer insights into the multifaceted nature of passenger contentment. Although their work centers on societal influences and customer experiences at large, we cannot help but draw parallels between the complexities of customer satisfaction and the enigmatic nature of GMOs in cornfields.

Expanding our horizons beyond the conventional boundaries of academic literature, we cannot overlook the contributions of widely acclaimed non-fiction works. "GM-Oh Yes: A Tantalizing Tale of Genetically Modified Corn," authored by renowned agricultural scientist Lorem Ipsum, provides a comprehensive panorama of the GMO corn landscape, leaving no kernel unturned in its exploration of this controversial agricultural phenomenon.

In a departure from the strictly factual and objective, the fiction aisle offers us a whimsical treat in the form of "The Cornfield Chronicles: A Tale of High-Flying Adventures," written by the imaginative scribe Lorem Ipsum. Although a work of fiction, the novel's portrayal of airborne escapades and the alluring mystery of Indiana's cornfields strikes a curious resonance with our investigation.

Turning to the digital sphere, a slew of social media posts caught our attention, each adding a sprinkle of everyday insight to our quest. In a cleverly captioned Instagram post, a traveler juxtaposes the sprawling fields of GMO corn with the distant silhouette of a Southwest Airlines plane, prompting followers to ponder the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate entities. Similarly, a Twitter thread delves into the symbolism of corn in Midwestern culture and its potential impact on regional attitudes, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking angle to our pursuit.

With our scholarly compass pointing toward the intersection of agricultural innovation and consumer satisfaction, we find ourselves straddling the line between empirical rigor and whimsical exploration. And so, dear readers, as we march forth into the heart of our findings, let us embrace the delightful absurdity of this extravagant correlation. After all, what's research without a hint of mischief and a kernel of humor?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Ah, the mysterious and marvelous world of correlations! As researchers, we often find ourselves chasing after statistical relationships like children chasing fireflies on a summer night – with a mixture of excitement, anticipation, and a healthy dose of skepticism. In this particular study, we set out to uncover the enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the customer satisfaction levels with a major airline, Southwest Airlines. Our quest led us down a path lined with data, uncertainty, and a generous sprinkling of puns – because after all, what is research without a little humor?
The decision to explore this seemingly bizarre link stemmed from a moment of whimsy, or perhaps sheer curiosity, within our research team. We pondered, "Could there possibly be a corn-nection between agriculture and air travel satisfaction?" Lo and behold, as we delved into the USDA data on GMO corn production and the customer satisfaction ratings provided by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Southwest Airlines, we were struck by the emergence of a correlation coefficient so strong, it could have lifted an entire cornfield off the ground.
Our findings presented a correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value that practically winked at us, signaling statistical significance with a mischievous twinkle in its eye. As we peered into the kernel of this correlation, spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we realized we were about to embark on a journey that intertwined the maize-y world of agriculture with the high-flying domain of consumer contentment. Hold on to your hats – or more fittingly, your aviation-themed headgear – because we, too, were taken aback by the unexpected twists and turns in our research voyage.
With each twist of the cornstalk and descent into the nuances of airline satisfaction, we were humbled by the realization that correlations, much like GMOs and corn, can hold both marvel and mystery within their statistical embrace. So, as we present our findings, we invite you to embrace the unpredictability of statistical relationships, the joy of uncovering peculiar correlations, and the humor that inevitably arises when seemingly unrelated realms collide. As we delve deeper into our discoveries, we shall aim to leave no kernel unturned and no flight of fancy unexplored. It's a-maize-ing how research can take us from cornfields to flight paths, but here we are, ready to unravel the delightful and surprising entanglement of GMO corn and airline satisfaction. Onward, fellow researchers, to the field of statistical whimsy and scientific marvels!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection:

As we delved into the tangled web of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines, we embarked on a data collection journey that would have made even the most intrepid explorer blush. We scoured the internet like intrepid digital treasure hunters, mining for valuable nuggets of information from trusted sources such as the USDA and the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). It was a veritable corn-ucopia of data, spanning the years 2000 to 2021, with kernels of information ripe for the plucking.

GMO Corn Production in Indiana:

With a kernel of determination, we navigated the cyber cornfields of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to unearth data on GMO corn production in the heartland state of Indiana. Utilizing their agriculturally bountiful datasets, we conducted a meticulous analysis of the prevalence and distribution of GMO corn across different counties in Indiana. We left no stalk unturned and no cob uncounted, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of the GMO corn landscape.

Airline Satisfaction Ratings:

In our pursuit of the elusive relationship between corn and customer contentment, we set our sights on the high-flying domain of airline satisfaction ratings. The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) became our trusty co-pilot in this aerial odyssey, bestowing us with a trove of satisfaction data specific to Southwest Airlines. With each rating and review, the satisfaction of the flying public was laid bare before us, allowing for an in-depth scrutiny of the variables influencing their airborne delight.

Correlation Calculation – The Statistical Maize:

Armed with our bounty of data, we set out to calculate the correlation coefficient that would serve as our compass in navigating the unpredictable terrain of statistical relationships. Employing robust statistical tools, we unleashed the power of correlation analysis to unravel the connections between GMO corn production in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. With p-values as our guiding stars and regression analyses as our wings, we derived a correlation coefficient that spoke volumes – or rather, percentages – about the interwoven strands of maize and satisfaction.

Experimental Control – Tackling Statistical Turbulence:

In our pursuit of rigorous research, we diligently mitigated the potential confounding factors that could have sown seeds of doubt in our results. Controlling for external variables such as climate fluctuations, economic instability, and the occasional unexpected flock of statistical birds, we ensured that our findings were as pure as, well, non-GMO corn. By doing so, we aimed to cultivate a study that possessed the statistical robustness and intellectual integrity worthy of the scientific community's trust.

The Harvest – Data Synthesis and Interpretation:

In synthesizing our findings, we sought to distill the statistical maize into a digestible feast of insights and implications. Our interpretations were not mere kernels of thought but hearty cobs of wisdom, offering a panoramic view of the unexpected correlation between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Finally, we emerged from the vast data fields with a harvest of scientific understanding and a newfound admiration for the whimsical juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and aviation delight.

In conclusion, our research methodology was meticulously designed to plow through the statistical soil of GMO corn and airline satisfaction, sowing the seeds of scientific inquiry and reaping a bountiful crop of insights. As we present our findings, we invite fellow researchers to join us in marveling at the a-maize-ing correlations that await in the fertile fields of statistical exploration. So buckle up, fellow scholars, for the journey ahead promises a thrilling flight through statistical wonder and scientific mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9087447, r-squared of 0.8258168, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Ah, the mysterious and marvelous world of correlations! As researchers, we often find ourselves chasing after statistical relationships like children chasing fireflies on a summer night – with a mixture of excitement, anticipation, and a healthy dose of skepticism. In this particular study, we set out to uncover the enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the customer satisfaction levels with a major airline, Southwest Airlines. Our quest led us down a path lined with data, uncertainty, and a generous sprinkling of puns – because after all, what is research without a little humor?
The decision to explore this seemingly bizarre link stemmed from a moment of whimsy, or perhaps sheer curiosity, within our research team. We pondered, "Could there possibly be a corn-nection between agriculture and air travel satisfaction?" Lo and behold, as we delved into the USDA data on GMO corn production and the customer satisfaction ratings provided by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Southwest Airlines, we were struck by the emergence of a correlation coefficient so strong, it could have lifted an entire cornfield off the ground.
Our findings presented a correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value that practically winked at us, signaling statistical significance with a mischievous twinkle in its eye. As we peered into the kernel of this correlation, spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we realized we were about to embark on a journey that intertwined the maize-y world of agriculture with the high-flying domain of consumer contentment. Hold on to your hats – or more fittingly, your aviation-themed headgear – because we, too, were taken aback by the unexpected twists and turns in our research voyage.
With each twist of the cornstalk and descent into the nuances of airline satisfaction, we were humbled by the realization that correlations, much like GMOs and corn, can hold both marvel and mystery within their statistical embrace. So, as we present our findings, we invite you to embrace the unpredictability of statistical relationships, the joy of uncovering peculiar correlations, and the humor that inevitably arises when seemingly unrelated realms collide. As we delve deeper into our discoveries, we shall aim to leave no kernel unturned and no flight of fancy unexplored. It's a-maize-ing how research can take us from cornfields to flight paths, but here we are, ready to unravel the delightful and surprising entanglement of GMO corn and airline satisfaction. Onward, fellow researchers, to the field of statistical whimsy and scientific marvels!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between GMO corn production in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines yielded some delightfully unexpected findings. We discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8258168, and a p-value of less than 0.01. If these statistics were passengers on a plane, they'd be sitting in the first-class section, sipping on some statistically significant champagne and enjoying the view of a strongly correlated landscape below.

Perhaps even more visually captivating is the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that graphically portrays this maize-merizing correlation. As you gaze upon it, envision the data points sprouting like genetically modified crops, intertwining with the altitude of customer satisfaction scores in a manner worthy of admiration. It's a graphically captivating testament to the unanticipated vine that connects agricultural practices and air travel contentment!

This a-maize-ing correlation suggests that as GMO corn production in Indiana has grown over the past two decades, so has the customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. If only we could genetically modify all corn to produce such high levels of satisfaction! Alas, our statistical findings cannot be explained by a mere kernel of truth; they beckon us to explore the intricate interplay between agricultural advancements and the experiences of those soaring through the friendly skies.

In summary, our results unearth an intriguing correlation that stretches from the heartland of America to the high-altitude journeys across the country. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines elevates our understanding of the improbable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. This discovery leaves us with a sense of wonder and curiosity as we contemplate the unforeseen relationships that may be concealed within our data, waiting to be plucked – much like ears of corn from a field ripe with possibility.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of correlations, much like a box of surprise-flavored jelly beans, is often filled with unexpected twists and delightful encounters. As we embark on our journey to unravel the peculiar link between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines, we first turn to the hallowed halls of scholarly research.
In "Agricultural Practices and Consumer Satisfaction: An Analysis of Midwestern Corn Belt Trends," Smith et al. delve into the intricate dance between farming methods and consumer contentment. While their focus is primarily on the relationship between organic farming and consumer preferences, their work lays the fertile groundwork for our exploration into the realm of GMO corn and its potential impact on airborne satisfaction.
On a different but equally relevant note, Doe and Jones, in their compelling piece "Flying High: A Sociological Analysis of Air Travel Satisfaction," offer insights into the multifaceted nature of passenger contentment. Although their work centers on societal influences and customer experiences at large, we cannot help but draw parallels between the complexities of customer satisfaction and the enigmatic nature of GMOs in cornfields.
Expanding our horizons beyond the conventional boundaries of academic literature, we cannot overlook the contributions of widely acclaimed non-fiction works. "GM-Oh Yes: A Tantalizing Tale of Genetically Modified Corn," authored by renowned agricultural scientist Lorem Ipsum, provides a comprehensive panorama of the GMO corn landscape, leaving no kernel unturned in its exploration of this controversial agricultural phenomenon.
In a departure from the strictly factual and objective, the fiction aisle offers us a whimsical treat in the form of "The Cornfield Chronicles: A Tale of High-Flying Adventures," written by the imaginative scribe Lorem Ipsum. Although a work of fiction, the novel's portrayal of airborne escapades and the alluring mystery of Indiana's cornfields strikes a curious resonance with our investigation.
Turning to the digital sphere, a slew of social media posts caught our attention, each adding a sprinkle of everyday insight to our quest. In a cleverly captioned Instagram post, a traveler juxtaposes the sprawling fields of GMO corn with the distant silhouette of a Southwest Airlines plane, prompting followers to ponder the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate entities. Similarly, a Twitter thread delves into the symbolism of corn in Midwestern culture and its potential impact on regional attitudes, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking angle to our pursuit.
With our scholarly compass pointing toward the intersection of agricultural innovation and consumer satisfaction, we find ourselves straddling the line between empirical rigor and whimsical exploration. And so, dear readers, as we march forth into the heart of our findings, let us embrace the delightful absurdity of this extravagant correlation. After all, what's research without a hint of mischief and a kernel of humor?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between GMO corn production in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines yielded some delightfully unexpected findings. We discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8258168, and a p-value of less than 0.01. If these statistics were passengers on a plane, they'd be sitting in the first-class section, sipping on some statistically significant champagne and enjoying the view of a strongly correlated landscape below.
Perhaps even more visually captivating is the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that graphically portrays this maize-merizing correlation. As you gaze upon it, envision the data points sprouting like genetically modified crops, intertwining with the altitude of customer satisfaction scores in a manner worthy of admiration. It's a graphically captivating testament to the unanticipated vine that connects agricultural practices and air travel contentment!
This a-maize-ing correlation suggests that as GMO corn production in Indiana has grown over the past two decades, so has the customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. If only we could genetically modify all corn to produce such high levels of satisfaction! Alas, our statistical findings cannot be explained by a mere kernel of truth; they beckon us to explore the intricate interplay between agricultural advancements and the experiences of those soaring through the friendly skies.
In summary, our results unearth an intriguing correlation that stretches from the heartland of America to the high-altitude journeys across the country. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines elevates our understanding of the improbable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. This discovery leaves us with a sense of wonder and curiosity as we contemplate the unforeseen relationships that may be concealed within our data, waiting to be plucked – much like ears of corn from a field ripe with possibility.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The discussion section of this research paper is going to be an a-maize-ing journey, so buckle up as we navigate through the curious correlation between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Our results have shown a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, and boy, oh boy, did we have some corny findings!

First things first, let's not shy away from addressing the elephant in the room - or should I say, the cornfield? Our results are not something to be taken lightly; they provide strong support for prior research that hinted at a connection between agricultural practices and consumer contentment. In fact, Smith et al.'s exploration of farming methods and customer preferences laid the fertile groundwork for our study, and our findings a-maize-ingly corroborate their insights! Then, Doe and Jones' work on air travel satisfaction provided us with a high-flying perspective on customer contentment, and lo and behold, their sociological analysis aligns seamlessly with our statistically significant correlation. Who would've thought that GMO corn and airline satisfaction could be peas in a pod?

Moreover, the captivating non-fiction works and digital musings that we so diligently incorporated into our literature review, despite their unconventional nature, added an intriguing layer of context to our findings. Although "The Cornfield Chronicles" may be a work of fiction, its resonance with our investigation cannot be ignored, much like how the presence of GMO corn in Indiana seems to be impossible to ignore for those navigating the skies with Southwest Airlines.

Our statistical results speak volumes, much like the resonance of a well-constructed pun – loud and clear. The robust correlation coefficient and p-value shine brighter than a harvest moon in a clear, starry sky, affirming the strength of the relationship between GMO corn production and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. This maize-y connection does have us pondering the depths of its implications – are happier consumers the secret ingredient for a smoother flight experience?

So, there you have it, folks. Our findings not only confirm the unlikely bond between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines, but they also invite us to embrace the whimsical absurdity of this extravagant correlation. They serve as a reminder that even in the world of rigorous research and statistical analysis, there's always room for a kernel of humor and delight. After all, as researchers, we should never underestimate the power of a-maize-ing puns and unexpected twists in our academic papers!

So, until our next research adventure, let's keep the spirit of curious exploration alive. As the saying goes, "Research is a-maize-ing when we add a dash of unexpected flavor!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Ah, the mysterious and marvelous world of correlations! As researchers, we often find ourselves chasing after statistical relationships like children chasing fireflies on a summer night – with a mixture of excitement, anticipation, and a healthy dose of skepticism. In this particular study, we set out to uncover the enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the customer satisfaction levels with a major airline, Southwest Airlines. Our quest led us down a path lined with data, uncertainty, and a generous sprinkling of puns – because after all, what is research without a little humor?
The decision to explore this seemingly bizarre link stemmed from a moment of whimsy, or perhaps sheer curiosity, within our research team. We pondered, "Could there possibly be a corn-nection between agriculture and air travel satisfaction?" Lo and behold, as we delved into the USDA data on GMO corn production and the customer satisfaction ratings provided by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for Southwest Airlines, we were struck by the emergence of a correlation coefficient so strong, it could have lifted an entire cornfield off the ground.
Our findings presented a correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value that practically winked at us, signaling statistical significance with a mischievous twinkle in its eye. As we peered into the kernel of this correlation, spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we realized we were about to embark on a journey that intertwined the maize-y world of agriculture with the high-flying domain of consumer contentment. Hold on to your hats – or more fittingly, your aviation-themed headgear – because we, too, were taken aback by the unexpected twists and turns in our research voyage.
With each twist of the cornstalk and descent into the nuances of airline satisfaction, we were humbled by the realization that correlations, much like GMOs and corn, can hold both marvel and mystery within their statistical embrace. So, as we present our findings, we invite you to embrace the unpredictability of statistical relationships, the joy of uncovering peculiar correlations, and the humor that inevitably arises when seemingly unrelated realms collide. As we delve deeper into our discoveries, we shall aim to leave no kernel unturned and no flight of fancy unexplored. It's a-maize-ing how research can take us from cornfields to flight paths, but here we are, ready to unravel the delightful and surprising entanglement of GMO corn and airline satisfaction. Onward, fellow researchers, to the field of statistical whimsy and scientific marvels!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between GMO corn production in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines yielded some delightfully unexpected findings. We discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8258168, and a p-value of less than 0.01. If these statistics were passengers on a plane, they'd be sitting in the first-class section, sipping on some statistically significant champagne and enjoying the view of a strongly correlated landscape below.
Perhaps even more visually captivating is the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that graphically portrays this maize-merizing correlation. As you gaze upon it, envision the data points sprouting like genetically modified crops, intertwining with the altitude of customer satisfaction scores in a manner worthy of admiration. It's a graphically captivating testament to the unanticipated vine that connects agricultural practices and air travel contentment!
This a-maize-ing correlation suggests that as GMO corn production in Indiana has grown over the past two decades, so has the customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. If only we could genetically modify all corn to produce such high levels of satisfaction! Alas, our statistical findings cannot be explained by a mere kernel of truth; they beckon us to explore the intricate interplay between agricultural advancements and the experiences of those soaring through the friendly skies.
In summary, our results unearth an intriguing correlation that stretches from the heartland of America to the high-altitude journeys across the country. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines elevates our understanding of the improbable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. This discovery leaves us with a sense of wonder and curiosity as we contemplate the unforeseen relationships that may be concealed within our data, waiting to be plucked – much like ears of corn from a field ripe with possibility.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has peeled back the husk of statistical mysteries to reveal a kernel of truth: there exists an uncanny and statistically significant relationship between GMO corn production in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Who would have thought that the humble cornstalk and the friendly skies could be intertwined in such a maizementous manner?

We have shown that as GMO corn production soared, so did the levels of satisfaction with Southwest Airlines, leaving us pondering if the key to contented air travelers lies within the genetically modified kernels. Perhaps bioengineers can develop an "Airline Satisfaction Supercorn" that guarantees a smooth and enjoyable flight experience for all passengers!

Our findings have demonstrated the power of statistical relationships to surprise and amaze, much like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat – or in our case, a statistically significant correlation out of a data set. The scatterplot depicting this correlation could easily be mistaken for an abstract art piece, with data points performing an aerial dance of statistical significance that would make any art connoisseur reconsider the boundaries of beauty.

In light of our a-maize-ing discoveries, we assert that further research in this particular area would yield diminishing returns and may lead us down a path that is simply too corn-y for serious scholarly pursuit. Thus, we declare with utmost confidence that no more research is needed to investigate the connection between GMO corn in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. As much as we cherish statistical anomalies and improbable correlations, it's time to let this particular kernel of whimsy rest in peace.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agri-Flight Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural and Airline Consumer Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A-Maize-ing Correlations: Exploring the Connection Between GMO Corn in Indiana and Customer Satisfaction with Southwest Airlines with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we delved into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines. Drawing on USDA data for GMO corn production and the American Customer Satisfaction Index for airline satisfaction ratings, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9087447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on this peculiar relationship but also provoke further inquiry into the influence of agricultural practices on the flying experience. Our study highlights the maize-y intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms and ventures into the corn-erstone of consumer contentment. Keep your seat belts fastened – this research journey is bound for unexpected turbulence and maizement!

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Indiana, Southwest Airlines, customer satisfaction, correlation, USDA data, genetically modified organisms, agricultural practices, American Customer Satisfaction Index, airline satisfaction ratings, correlation coefficient, p-value

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Indiana
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Indiana that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Indiana

Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines
Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index
See what else correlates with Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines

Correlation r = 0.9087447 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8258168 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Indiana) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.9E-9. 0.0000000049378871411237220000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 4.9E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 202,515,767 random variables You don't actually need 202 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana (GMO corn %)11121316212640597879838584858888868786878687
Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines (Consumer Satisfaction)70707475737474767981798177817878808080797979




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11,12,13,16,21,26,40,59,78,79,83,85,84,85,88,88,86,87,86,87,86,87,])
array_2 = np.array([70,70,74,75,73,74,74,76,79,81,79,81,77,81,78,78,80,80,80,79,79,79,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Indiana"
array_2_name = "Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2780 · Black Variable ID: 754 · Red Variable ID: 19833
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0