about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,173 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the second variable is Google searches for 'rick and morty'.  The chart goes from 2013 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the excitement and tension levels rose during the Steinfeld Cup Final, viewers found themselves craving something to balance out the intensity. The absurd escapades of Rick and Morty provided the perfect contrast, offering a much-needed dose of levity and bizarre humor. As the difference in score widened, so did the need for a mental palate cleanser, leading to a surge in searches for the animated duo. It seems that even in the world of sports, the multiverse of entertainment has a way of interdimensional cable-ing itself into the fan experience!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of the Steinfeld Cup Final in a 3D Pixar style. The stands are filled with cheering fans of one team celebrating a big lead in the score, while another team's fans look tense. Above the stadium, a giant screen displays the Google search bar with a huge spike in searches for "rick and morty" as curious fans look for updates on the popular show during halftime. Capture the excitement and tension in the stadium, along with the intrigue surrounding the search trend. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism Photorealism An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: 3D Pixar Style

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the stands of the Steinfeld Cup Final, one team's fans are celebrating a big lead in the score while another team's fans look tense. Meanwhile, on the giant screen above the stadium, the Google search bar shows a huge spike in searches for "rick and morty" as curious fans search for updates on the popular show during halftime.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ 3D Pixar Style ] and depicting this scene: In the stands of the Steinfeld Cup Final, one team's fans are celebrating a big lead in the score while another team's fans look tense. Meanwhile, on the giant screen above the stadium, the Google search bar shows a huge spike in searches for "rick and morty" as curious fans search for updates on the popular show during halftime. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of the Steinfeld Cup Final in a 3D Pixar style. The stands are filled with cheering fans of one team celebrating a big lead in the score, while another team's fans look tense. Above the stadium, a giant screen displays the Google search bar with a huge spike in searches for "rick and morty" as curious fans look for updates on the popular show during halftime. Capture the excitement and tension in the stadium, along with the intrigue surrounding the search trend.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams caused rick and morty (Google searches for 'rick and morty') to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'

The Journal of Pop Culture Analytics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 and p < 0.05 for 2013 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Sports and popular culture have always been intertwined, much like spaghetti and meatballs - inseparable despite any messy comparisons. In this study, we delve into the peculiar rabbit hole of sports fandom and its unexpected connection to the world of animated television. Specifically, we explore the enigmatic relationship between the performance of teams in the prestigious Steinfeld Cup Final and the digital trail left by enthusiasts of the animated series "Rick and Morty" in the form of Google searches. Our aim is to uncover whether there exists a significant correlation, or as we like to call it, a "scorelation," between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

As researchers, we often find ourselves immersed in the statistical labyrinth, navigating through the nebulous terrain of data points and p-values. In this enthralling journey, our guiding beacon is the pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns amidst the noise, not unlike seeking the fabled philosopher's stone in the realm of academic research. While it may seem like a strange curiosity, akin to a platypus roaming the world of quantitative analysis, the quest to unravel the mysteries of human behavior often leads us down unexpected avenues.

The Steinfeld Cup Final serves as the ideal setting for our analysis, resembling a grand chessboard where teams battle it out, evoking the thrill of a high-stakes game of Jenga. Meanwhile, "Rick and Morty," with its blend of scientific fiction and absurdist humor, captivates audiences, much like a mesmerizing chemical reaction in a laboratory. The juxtaposition of these two vastly different domains sets the stage for an enthralling investigation, similar to a thrilling dance between variables in a statistical model.

Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this whimsical exploration, where we seek to unravel the threads of correlation hidden within this tapestry of disparate interests. As we venture further into this uncharted territory, be prepared for unexpected detours, playful observations, and perhaps even an occasional "pun"-derful insight into the fascinating world of sports, pop culture, and human behavior. After all, science will be science, but a touch of humor never hurt anyone - unless, of course, you're a statistics textbook.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Sports and popular culture have always been intertwined, much like spaghetti and meatballs - inseparable despite any messy comparisons. In this study, we delve into the peculiar rabbit hole of sports fandom and its unexpected connection to the world of animated television. Specifically, we explore the enigmatic relationship between the performance of teams in the prestigious Steinfeld Cup Final and the digital trail left by enthusiasts of the animated series "Rick and Morty" in the form of Google searches. Our aim is to uncover whether there exists a significant correlation, or as we like to call it, a "scorelation," between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As researchers, we often find ourselves immersed in the statistical labyrinth, navigating through the nebulous terrain of data points and p-values. In this enthralling journey, our guiding beacon is the pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns amidst the noise, not unlike seeking the fabled philosopher's stone in the realm of academic research. While it may seem like a strange curiosity, akin to a platypus roaming the world of quantitative analysis, the quest to unravel the mysteries of human behavior often leads us down unexpected avenues.
The Steinfeld Cup Final serves as the ideal setting for our analysis, resembling a grand chessboard where teams battle it out, evoking the thrill of a high-stakes game of Jenga. Meanwhile, "Rick and Morty," with its blend of scientific fiction and absurdist humor, captivates audiences, much like a mesmerizing chemical reaction in a laboratory. The juxtaposition of these two vastly different domains sets the stage for an enthralling investigation, similar to a thrilling dance between variables in a statistical model.
Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this whimsical exploration, where we seek to unravel the threads of correlation hidden within this tapestry of disparate interests. As we venture further into this uncharted territory, be prepared for unexpected detours, playful observations, and perhaps even an occasional "pun"-derful insight into the fascinating world of sports, pop culture, and human behavior. After all, science will be science, but a touch of humor never hurt anyone - unless, of course, you're a statistics textbook.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) examined the nuances of fan behavior and its impact on sports outcomes. They found that the fervent support of fans could potentially influence the performance of teams, resembling a Greek chorus providing a passionate backdrop to the theatrical spectacle of sports. This notion not only paints a vivid picture of the fervor surrounding sports events but also serves as a reminder that the audience's enthusiasm may hold far-reaching consequences beyond mere spectatorship.

Expanding on this line of inquiry, Jones et al. (2018) delved into the realm of internet search trends and their relation to popular culture phenomena. Their study shed light on the dynamic interplay between digital footprints and cultural phenomena, reminiscent of a spider spinning an intricate web of connectivity across the vast expanse of cyberspace. The authors' exploration of search engine queries as a reflection of societal interests offers a compelling lens through which to view the intertwining of sports and popular culture in the digital age.

Drawing from the rich tapestry of non-fiction literature, "What to Expect When You're Expecting Google Trends" (Gupta, 2019) presents a comprehensive guide to navigating the labyrinthine world of search engine data analysis. While the title may allude to an entirely different subject matter, its insights into the complex domain of internet search behavior are invaluable, much like discovering a treasure map in a forgotten attic.

On the fiction front, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" (Adams, 1979) offers a whimsical journey through the cosmos, akin to the adventure of unraveling the intricacies of fan fervor and digital footprints. While it may seem light-years apart from our research topic, its quirky exploration of the unknown resonates with our quest to decode the enigmatic relationship between sports events and internet search trends.

In a surprising twist, social media posts have also offered intriguing glimpses into the potential connection between Steinfeld Cup Final performances and Google searches for "Rick and Morty". @FanOfMystery4Life enthusiastically exclaimed, "Every time my team wins, it's like a portal gun to increased 'Rick and Morty' searches! Coincidence? I think not!" This anecdotal evidence, though not scientifically rigorous, adds a colorful sprinkle of anecdotal evidence to the tapestry of our investigation.

As we navigate through this amalgamation of scholarly works, literary whimsy, and social musings, we are reminded of the quirky nature of human endeavors. The interplay between sports outcomes and popular culture resonates with the unexpected ironies of life, much like discovering a unicorn in a haystack. Indeed, our quest to unravel this puzzle will undoubtedly be laced with surprises, pun-derful moments, and the occasional foray into the zany world of statistical correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2013 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Sports and popular culture have always been intertwined, much like spaghetti and meatballs - inseparable despite any messy comparisons. In this study, we delve into the peculiar rabbit hole of sports fandom and its unexpected connection to the world of animated television. Specifically, we explore the enigmatic relationship between the performance of teams in the prestigious Steinfeld Cup Final and the digital trail left by enthusiasts of the animated series "Rick and Morty" in the form of Google searches. Our aim is to uncover whether there exists a significant correlation, or as we like to call it, a "scorelation," between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As researchers, we often find ourselves immersed in the statistical labyrinth, navigating through the nebulous terrain of data points and p-values. In this enthralling journey, our guiding beacon is the pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns amidst the noise, not unlike seeking the fabled philosopher's stone in the realm of academic research. While it may seem like a strange curiosity, akin to a platypus roaming the world of quantitative analysis, the quest to unravel the mysteries of human behavior often leads us down unexpected avenues.
The Steinfeld Cup Final serves as the ideal setting for our analysis, resembling a grand chessboard where teams battle it out, evoking the thrill of a high-stakes game of Jenga. Meanwhile, "Rick and Morty," with its blend of scientific fiction and absurdist humor, captivates audiences, much like a mesmerizing chemical reaction in a laboratory. The juxtaposition of these two vastly different domains sets the stage for an enthralling investigation, similar to a thrilling dance between variables in a statistical model.
Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this whimsical exploration, where we seek to unravel the threads of correlation hidden within this tapestry of disparate interests. As we venture further into this uncharted territory, be prepared for unexpected detours, playful observations, and perhaps even an occasional "pun"-derful insight into the fascinating world of sports, pop culture, and human behavior. After all, science will be science, but a touch of humor never hurt anyone - unless, of course, you're a statistics textbook.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

To delve into this mysterious connection between the Steinfeld Cup Final scores and the Google searches for 'Rick and Morty', we embarked on a journey that was as unpredictable as a game of Snakes and Ladders. Our methodology, much like a magician’s sleight of hand, involved a series of intricate maneuvers to extract and analyze data from the vast expanse of the virtual world, akin to a digital expedition hunting for statistical treasure.

First, we scoured the vast repositories of knowledge on the internet, primarily drawing data from the indispensable troves of Wikipedia and Google Trends. While some may dub these sources as 'unconventional', we, akin to intrepid explorers, seized the opportunity to tap into the collective wisdom of the World Wide Web. Our data collection spanned from 2013 to 2020, capturing the ebb and flow of trends amidst the digital flux, not unlike collecting rare specimens in a biological expedition.

The primary variable of interest, the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams, was procured from official sports databases, ensuring the reliability and accuracy of our sports-related data. Meanwhile, the frequency of Google searches for 'Rick and Morty' served as our unconventional yet captivating counterpart, providing a window into the digital footprints of a fervent fandom.

Grasping this amalgamation of data, we applied a delicate blend of statistical techniques, akin to crafting a fine dish in a scientific kitchen. The seemingly distinct variables of sporting achievements and animated television allure were merged through a rigorous correlation analysis, employing the enigmatic tools of hypothesis testing and regression modeling.

Our quest for understanding the interplay between these seemingly unrelated entities led us to traverse the winding path of statistical software, where we wrestled with matrices and conducted multivariate analyses, akin to a cerebral game of Sudoku. Not unlike wielding a scientist's microscope, we scrutinized the nitty-gritty details of statistical significance, seeking to uncover the elusive patterns hidden within the labyrinth of data, much as one would seek a needle in a haystack.

In summary, our methodology combined the rigor of traditional statistical analysis with the whimsy of exploring the digital realm, similar to embarking on a delightful journey through Wonderland. As the data yielded its revelations, we danced the tango with statistical significance and harnessed the power of correlation, all the while keeping a keen eye for unexpected insights and delightful curiosities that sprinkle the landscape of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2013 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.7542222, r-squared of 0.5688512, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Sports and popular culture have always been intertwined, much like spaghetti and meatballs - inseparable despite any messy comparisons. In this study, we delve into the peculiar rabbit hole of sports fandom and its unexpected connection to the world of animated television. Specifically, we explore the enigmatic relationship between the performance of teams in the prestigious Steinfeld Cup Final and the digital trail left by enthusiasts of the animated series "Rick and Morty" in the form of Google searches. Our aim is to uncover whether there exists a significant correlation, or as we like to call it, a "scorelation," between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As researchers, we often find ourselves immersed in the statistical labyrinth, navigating through the nebulous terrain of data points and p-values. In this enthralling journey, our guiding beacon is the pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns amidst the noise, not unlike seeking the fabled philosopher's stone in the realm of academic research. While it may seem like a strange curiosity, akin to a platypus roaming the world of quantitative analysis, the quest to unravel the mysteries of human behavior often leads us down unexpected avenues.
The Steinfeld Cup Final serves as the ideal setting for our analysis, resembling a grand chessboard where teams battle it out, evoking the thrill of a high-stakes game of Jenga. Meanwhile, "Rick and Morty," with its blend of scientific fiction and absurdist humor, captivates audiences, much like a mesmerizing chemical reaction in a laboratory. The juxtaposition of these two vastly different domains sets the stage for an enthralling investigation, similar to a thrilling dance between variables in a statistical model.
Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this whimsical exploration, where we seek to unravel the threads of correlation hidden within this tapestry of disparate interests. As we venture further into this uncharted territory, be prepared for unexpected detours, playful observations, and perhaps even an occasional "pun"-derful insight into the fascinating world of sports, pop culture, and human behavior. After all, science will be science, but a touch of humor never hurt anyone - unless, of course, you're a statistics textbook.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 between the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the volume of Google searches for 'Rick and Morty' from 2013 to 2020. This finding, with an r-squared value of 0.5688512, suggests that approximately 56.89% of the variation in the scores can be explained by the volume of searches for the animated series. These results indicate a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) between the two variables, providing compelling evidence of the intertwining of sports enthusiasm and popular culture intrigue.

To visually depict this intriguing association, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed. The scatterplot showcases the pronounced positive correlation between the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the number of Google searches for 'Rick and Morty'. It's almost as if each data point is enthusiastically high-fiving the other, symbolizing the harmonic convergence between sports excitement and animated fandom.

The unexpectedly robust "scorelation" uncovered in this study challenges traditional perceptions of the influence of popular culture on sports outcomes. While some might dismiss this connection as an obscure oddity, our findings suggest that the world of sports and the realm of animated entertainment intersect in ways that are both remarkable and paradigm-shifting. It appears that the ripple effect of "Rick and Morty" fandom might be more than just a mere blip on the radar of Steinfeld Cup Final performances.

In conclusion, our results offer a fresh perspective on the multifaceted dynamics of fan behavior and its potential impact on sports events. The peculiar correlation unearthed here underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres, urging us to delve deeper into the labyrinth of human idiosyncrasies. While we acknowledge that the link between a sports tournament and a TV show may raise eyebrows, our statistical analysis leaves little room for doubt: the "Rick" of popular culture and the "Morty" of sports enthusiasm have indeed embarked on a lively dance, weaving an intricate tapestry of correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) examined the nuances of fan behavior and its impact on sports outcomes. They found that the fervent support of fans could potentially influence the performance of teams, resembling a Greek chorus providing a passionate backdrop to the theatrical spectacle of sports. This notion not only paints a vivid picture of the fervor surrounding sports events but also serves as a reminder that the audience's enthusiasm may hold far-reaching consequences beyond mere spectatorship.
Expanding on this line of inquiry, Jones et al. (2018) delved into the realm of internet search trends and their relation to popular culture phenomena. Their study shed light on the dynamic interplay between digital footprints and cultural phenomena, reminiscent of a spider spinning an intricate web of connectivity across the vast expanse of cyberspace. The authors' exploration of search engine queries as a reflection of societal interests offers a compelling lens through which to view the intertwining of sports and popular culture in the digital age.
Drawing from the rich tapestry of non-fiction literature, "What to Expect When You're Expecting Google Trends" (Gupta, 2019) presents a comprehensive guide to navigating the labyrinthine world of search engine data analysis. While the title may allude to an entirely different subject matter, its insights into the complex domain of internet search behavior are invaluable, much like discovering a treasure map in a forgotten attic.
On the fiction front, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" (Adams, 1979) offers a whimsical journey through the cosmos, akin to the adventure of unraveling the intricacies of fan fervor and digital footprints. While it may seem light-years apart from our research topic, its quirky exploration of the unknown resonates with our quest to decode the enigmatic relationship between sports events and internet search trends.
In a surprising twist, social media posts have also offered intriguing glimpses into the potential connection between Steinfeld Cup Final performances and Google searches for "Rick and Morty". @FanOfMystery4Life enthusiastically exclaimed, "Every time my team wins, it's like a portal gun to increased 'Rick and Morty' searches! Coincidence? I think not!" This anecdotal evidence, though not scientifically rigorous, adds a colorful sprinkle of anecdotal evidence to the tapestry of our investigation.
As we navigate through this amalgamation of scholarly works, literary whimsy, and social musings, we are reminded of the quirky nature of human endeavors. The interplay between sports outcomes and popular culture resonates with the unexpected ironies of life, much like discovering a unicorn in a haystack. Indeed, our quest to unravel this puzzle will undoubtedly be laced with surprises, pun-derful moments, and the occasional foray into the zany world of statistical correlations.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 between the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the volume of Google searches for 'Rick and Morty' from 2013 to 2020. This finding, with an r-squared value of 0.5688512, suggests that approximately 56.89% of the variation in the scores can be explained by the volume of searches for the animated series. These results indicate a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) between the two variables, providing compelling evidence of the intertwining of sports enthusiasm and popular culture intrigue.
To visually depict this intriguing association, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed. The scatterplot showcases the pronounced positive correlation between the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the number of Google searches for 'Rick and Morty'. It's almost as if each data point is enthusiastically high-fiving the other, symbolizing the harmonic convergence between sports excitement and animated fandom.
The unexpectedly robust "scorelation" uncovered in this study challenges traditional perceptions of the influence of popular culture on sports outcomes. While some might dismiss this connection as an obscure oddity, our findings suggest that the world of sports and the realm of animated entertainment intersect in ways that are both remarkable and paradigm-shifting. It appears that the ripple effect of "Rick and Morty" fandom might be more than just a mere blip on the radar of Steinfeld Cup Final performances.
In conclusion, our results offer a fresh perspective on the multifaceted dynamics of fan behavior and its potential impact on sports events. The peculiar correlation unearthed here underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres, urging us to delve deeper into the labyrinth of human idiosyncrasies. While we acknowledge that the link between a sports tournament and a TV show may raise eyebrows, our statistical analysis leaves little room for doubt: the "Rick" of popular culture and the "Morty" of sports enthusiasm have indeed embarked on a lively dance, weaving an intricate tapestry of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The discussion section is an opportune moment to unravel the enigmatic relationship between our study's findings and the broader landscape of academic inquiry. With the prowess of statistical analysis as our guide, we unearthed a rather unexpected gem in the realm of fan behavior and its resonance with sports outcomes.

Harking back to the whimsical insights gleaned from "What to Expect When You're Expecting Google Trends" (Gupta, 2019), our results lend empirical weight to the notion of internet search trends as a mirror reflecting societal interests. In a quantum leap of logic, it's as if investigating the connection between Steinfeld Cup Final scores and Google searches for 'Rick and Morty' offered us a peek through a multidimensional portal into the kaleidoscopic tapestry of human fascination.

Considering the observations put forth by Jones et al. (2018) about the web of connectivity across cyberspace, it appears that our findings provide a tangible manifestation of this interconnectedness, akin to stumbling upon a secret map hidden within the matrix of digital footprints.

Moreover, when juxtaposed with the Greek chorus analogy evoked by Smith and Doe (2015), our study's emphasis on the fervent support of fans finds resonance in the fervor of 'Rick and Morty' enthusiasts, who seemingly shape the digital backdrop to the theatrical spectacle of sports. It's as if we've uncovered the mystical incantation that fuels the passionate interplay between animated fandom and sports enthusiasm, akin to discovering a treasure trove of fan fervor at the end of a rainbow.

In retrospect, the scatterplot depicting the synergy between Steinfeld Cup Final scores and 'Rick and Morty' searches takes on a life of its own, resembling a synchronized dance between sports excitement and animated intrigue. Each data point seems to perform an exuberant tandem twirl, mirroring the harmonic convergence between seemingly incongruent spheres.

In essence, our study's statistical "scorelation" and paradigm-challenging revelation are a testament to the capricious nature of human endeavors. The discovery of a robust connection between sports and popular culture not only adds a colorful sprinkle of anecdotal evidence to the tapestry of our investigation but also underscores the quirky interplay of human idiosyncrasies.

As we reflect on our findings, it becomes evident that the "Rick" of popular culture and the "Morty" of sports enthusiasm are not just distant acquaintances but fervent partners in a lively dance, weaving an intricate tapestry of correlation that leaves a lasting impact, much like unearthing a unicorn in a haystack. Our quest to decipher this enigmatic relationship is akin to a whimsical journey through the cosmos, where every twist and turn unravels a delightful surprise and offers a glimpse into the zany world of statistical correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and Google searches for 'rick and morty'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Sports and popular culture have always been intertwined, much like spaghetti and meatballs - inseparable despite any messy comparisons. In this study, we delve into the peculiar rabbit hole of sports fandom and its unexpected connection to the world of animated television. Specifically, we explore the enigmatic relationship between the performance of teams in the prestigious Steinfeld Cup Final and the digital trail left by enthusiasts of the animated series "Rick and Morty" in the form of Google searches. Our aim is to uncover whether there exists a significant correlation, or as we like to call it, a "scorelation," between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As researchers, we often find ourselves immersed in the statistical labyrinth, navigating through the nebulous terrain of data points and p-values. In this enthralling journey, our guiding beacon is the pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns amidst the noise, not unlike seeking the fabled philosopher's stone in the realm of academic research. While it may seem like a strange curiosity, akin to a platypus roaming the world of quantitative analysis, the quest to unravel the mysteries of human behavior often leads us down unexpected avenues.
The Steinfeld Cup Final serves as the ideal setting for our analysis, resembling a grand chessboard where teams battle it out, evoking the thrill of a high-stakes game of Jenga. Meanwhile, "Rick and Morty," with its blend of scientific fiction and absurdist humor, captivates audiences, much like a mesmerizing chemical reaction in a laboratory. The juxtaposition of these two vastly different domains sets the stage for an enthralling investigation, similar to a thrilling dance between variables in a statistical model.
Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this whimsical exploration, where we seek to unravel the threads of correlation hidden within this tapestry of disparate interests. As we venture further into this uncharted territory, be prepared for unexpected detours, playful observations, and perhaps even an occasional "pun"-derful insight into the fascinating world of sports, pop culture, and human behavior. After all, science will be science, but a touch of humor never hurt anyone - unless, of course, you're a statistics textbook.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 between the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the volume of Google searches for 'Rick and Morty' from 2013 to 2020. This finding, with an r-squared value of 0.5688512, suggests that approximately 56.89% of the variation in the scores can be explained by the volume of searches for the animated series. These results indicate a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) between the two variables, providing compelling evidence of the intertwining of sports enthusiasm and popular culture intrigue.
To visually depict this intriguing association, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed. The scatterplot showcases the pronounced positive correlation between the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the number of Google searches for 'Rick and Morty'. It's almost as if each data point is enthusiastically high-fiving the other, symbolizing the harmonic convergence between sports excitement and animated fandom.
The unexpectedly robust "scorelation" uncovered in this study challenges traditional perceptions of the influence of popular culture on sports outcomes. While some might dismiss this connection as an obscure oddity, our findings suggest that the world of sports and the realm of animated entertainment intersect in ways that are both remarkable and paradigm-shifting. It appears that the ripple effect of "Rick and Morty" fandom might be more than just a mere blip on the radar of Steinfeld Cup Final performances.
In conclusion, our results offer a fresh perspective on the multifaceted dynamics of fan behavior and its potential impact on sports events. The peculiar correlation unearthed here underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres, urging us to delve deeper into the labyrinth of human idiosyncrasies. While we acknowledge that the link between a sports tournament and a TV show may raise eyebrows, our statistical analysis leaves little room for doubt: the "Rick" of popular culture and the "Morty" of sports enthusiasm have indeed embarked on a lively dance, weaving an intricate tapestry of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In light of our enlightening study on the curious bond between the performances in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the buzz around "Rick and Morty," we find ourselves in a pickle – or shall we say, a "pickle Rick"? The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 and its statistical significance (p < 0.05) have become more than mere data points; they are windows into the quirky world where sports fandom and animated series enthusiasts collide.

It seems that the "scorelation" between these seemingly unrelated variables is more than just a statistical anomaly - it unravels a comically entangled tale, akin to a convoluted plot in an animated show. The visual representation of our findings in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the enthusiastic high-fiving between these variables, reflecting a harmonious union reminiscent of a post-game victory celebration.

While some might view our research as a whimsical endeavor, akin to a scientific expedition in a land of puns and laughter, the statistical evidence undeniably underscores the impact of fan behavior on sports outcomes. As we bid adieu to this enthralling journey, we are compelled to declare that further research in this area may not yield substantial pickle – err, we mean, further insights. It appears that the "Rick and Morty" "scorelation" has been satisfactorily uncovered, leaving us with a data-driven smile and a nod to the zany interconnectedness of human interests.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, it is with a lighthearted note and a statistical wink that we conclude our exploration, firmly stating that no further research is required. After all, we are in no mood to turn this study into a "Rick-ulous" quest for dimension-hopping statistical anomalies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pop Culture Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quantum Cartoon Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Game of Searchers: Exploring the Interplay Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Google Searches for 'Rick and Morty' with an abstract of This paper explores the curious connection between the performance of teams in the Steinfeld Cup Final and the frequency of Google searches for the animated series "Rick and Morty". Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2013 to 2020. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7542222 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). While the relationship between a sports event and an animated TV show may seem like comparing apples and oranges, the statistical evidence suggests otherwise. Our research illuminates the quirky world of fandom behavior and its potential influence on sports outcomes. Pardon the pun, but it appears that in the realm of Steinfeld Cup Finals, the "rick" of a team's performance may indeed elicit a "Morty" of internet interest.

ChatGPT:

Steinfeld Cup Final, Google searches, Rick and Morty, correlation coefficient, Wikipedia data, Google Trends, sports outcomes, fandom behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams

Google searches for 'rick and morty'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'rick and morty' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'rick and morty'

Correlation r = 0.7542222 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5688512 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 56.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'rick and morty') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams) over the 8 years from 2013 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0306. 0.0306110558851129950000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 3.06% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 33 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.11, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20132014201520162017201820192020
Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams (Score difference)11315413
Google searches for 'rick and morty' (Rel. search volume)23.3333310.66671243.166717.2519.666718.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,1,3,1,5,4,1,3,])
array_2 = np.array([2,3.33333,10.6667,12,43.1667,17.25,19.6667,18.25,])
array_1_name = "Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'rick and morty'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2173 · Black Variable ID: 376 · Red Variable ID: 1495
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0