Report an error
Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia | r=0.84 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'call me maybe' meme | r=0.8 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'rick and morty' | r=0.75 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year | r=0.74 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Mars and the Sun | r=0.49 | 20yrs | No |
Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)