about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,001 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and the second variable is The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Steinfeld Cup Final teams' scores got closer, the tension in the air increased. This spike in collective stress created a ripple effect, leading to an upsurge in demand for stress-relief services. Coincidentally, many computer network support specialists in Virginia had also taken up part-time jobs as 'Professional Competitive Sports Calm-ifiers.' With their Zen-like abilities, they were previously the go-to professionals for calming down frantic sports fans. However, as the teams' scores became more neck-and-neck, these specialists found themselves torn between two equally demanding professions. Eventually, they had to make a choice, and sadly for Virginia's tech world, they decided to pursue their true passion for competitive cup final score differentials, leaving the computer network support industry in a state of despair - both emotionally and technically.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that reflects the contrasting atmospheres of a sports bar during a game and a group of computer network support specialists at work in Virginia in a minimalistic style. The scene should show patrons watching the Steinfeld Cup Final on big screens, with the score displayed above each screen. In the same space, depict a group of computer network support specialists huddled at a nearby table, focused on discussing technical issues and collaborating. Capture the varying emotions of the sports fans and the teamwork of the specialists, highlighting the differences in the game's score and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art inspired by bauhaus Minimalism Art nouveau inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling sports bar in Virginia, patrons cheer loudly as they watch the Steinfeld Cup Final on multiple big screens. The score is displayed in bright digital numbers above each screen, showing a close game between the two teams. At the same time, a group of computer network support specialists are huddled at a nearby table, discussing technical issues and collaborating on solving problems for their clients. The varying emotions of the sports fans and the focused teamwork of the specialists highlight both the difference in score of the teams and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling sports bar in Virginia, patrons cheer loudly as they watch the Steinfeld Cup Final on multiple big screens. The score is displayed in bright digital numbers above each screen, showing a close game between the two teams. At the same time, a group of computer network support specialists are huddled at a nearby table, discussing technical issues and collaborating on solving problems for their clients. The varying emotions of the sports fans and the focused teamwork of the specialists highlight both the difference in score of the teams and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that reflects the contrasting atmospheres of a sports bar during a game and a group of computer network support specialists at work in Virginia in a minimalistic style. The scene should show patrons watching the Steinfeld Cup Final on big screens, with the score displayed above each screen. In the same space, depict a group of computer network support specialists huddled at a nearby table, focused on discussing technical issues and collaborating. Capture the varying emotions of the sports fans and the teamwork of the specialists, highlighting the differences in the game's score and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams caused The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

Journal of Sports Statistics and Technology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Sports and technology - two seemingly unrelated domains coming together in an unexpected symphony of statistical intrigue. The Steinfeld Cup, a pinnacle of athleticism and intense competition, is an event that many fervent sports enthusiasts hold in high regard. On the other hand, in the world of technology, computer network support specialists in Virginia work tirelessly to ensure the seamless functioning of networks, quietly bringing order to the digital chaos. While it may seem like these two spheres are as distinct as chalk and cheese, this research seeks to unravel the tangled web of their potential connection.

You might be pondering, "What could possibly link the exhilarating outcome of a sports finale to the employment numbers of tech-savvy individuals in the state of Virginia?" Well, allow us to indulge in a moment of statistical whimsy as we delve into the enigmatic alliance of the esteemed Steinfeld Cup final scores and the diligent computer network support specialists. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we invite you to join us with a smile and an open mind, because truth be told, this study is about to take a turn for the unexpected - just like a surprising game-changing play in the final moments of a championship match.

In the upcoming pages, we will venture into the realm of statistical connections, applying rigorous methods to shed light on this unexplored territory of academic investigation. So, buckle up as we unravel the curious commingling of sports zeal and technological prowess, bringing a dash of wit and a sprinkle of scientific rigor to the table. Because when it comes to research, sometimes the most unanticipated discoveries lurk just beneath the surface - much like finding a USB drive full of obscure memes in the depths of a data center.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Sports and technology - two seemingly unrelated domains coming together in an unexpected symphony of statistical intrigue. The Steinfeld Cup, a pinnacle of athleticism and intense competition, is an event that many fervent sports enthusiasts hold in high regard. On the other hand, in the world of technology, computer network support specialists in Virginia work tirelessly to ensure the seamless functioning of networks, quietly bringing order to the digital chaos. While it may seem like these two spheres are as distinct as chalk and cheese, this research seeks to unravel the tangled web of their potential connection.
You might be pondering, "What could possibly link the exhilarating outcome of a sports finale to the employment numbers of tech-savvy individuals in the state of Virginia?" Well, allow us to indulge in a moment of statistical whimsy as we delve into the enigmatic alliance of the esteemed Steinfeld Cup final scores and the diligent computer network support specialists. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we invite you to join us with a smile and an open mind, because truth be told, this study is about to take a turn for the unexpected - just like a surprising game-changing play in the final moments of a championship match.
In the upcoming pages, we will venture into the realm of statistical connections, applying rigorous methods to shed light on this unexplored territory of academic investigation. So, buckle up as we unravel the curious commingling of sports zeal and technological prowess, bringing a dash of wit and a sprinkle of scientific rigor to the table. Because when it comes to research, sometimes the most unanticipated discoveries lurk just beneath the surface - much like finding a USB drive full of obscure memes in the depths of a data center.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) conduct an in-depth analysis of the Steinfeld Cup Final scores and their relation to various socio-economic factors. Their findings suggest a potential link between the fervor of the sporting event and its impact on local communities, albeit without diving into the specific realm of computer network support specialists. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) explore the employment trends of technology professionals in the state of Virginia, with a focus on the impact of industry innovations. While their work sheds light on the evolving landscape of tech employment, it does not directly address the whimsical juxtaposition of sports outcomes and tech staffing.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "Data and Decisions" by Anderson (2019) presents a comprehensive examination of statistical methodologies used in complex research inquiries. The methodologies discussed in this work provide a valuable framework for our own statistical analysis of the unanticipated correlation between Steinfeld Cup Final scores and computer network support specialists in Virginia. Further, "Tech Trends and Tidbits" by Brown (2020) offers insights into the dynamic nature of the tech industry, supplementing our understanding of the employment dynamics in Virginia.

Drawing from the world of fiction, "The Statistical Sleuth" by Ramsey (2007) takes readers on a whimsical journey through the use of statistics to unravel perplexing mysteries. While fiction, the principles elucidated in this work inspire our approach to unraveling the unusual symbiosis between sports triumphs and technological livelihoods. Additionally, "Tech Tales" by Green (2015) weaves fantastical narratives around the world of technology, infusing a touch of creativity into our analytical pursuit.

In a surprising and unconventional turn, cartoons and children's shows have provided unexpected inspiration for this investigation. The subtle humor and underlying complexity of problem-solving in "Phineas and Ferb" and "The Magic School Bus" have served as a lighthearted reminder that even the most whimsical of connections can carry profound significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Sports and technology - two seemingly unrelated domains coming together in an unexpected symphony of statistical intrigue. The Steinfeld Cup, a pinnacle of athleticism and intense competition, is an event that many fervent sports enthusiasts hold in high regard. On the other hand, in the world of technology, computer network support specialists in Virginia work tirelessly to ensure the seamless functioning of networks, quietly bringing order to the digital chaos. While it may seem like these two spheres are as distinct as chalk and cheese, this research seeks to unravel the tangled web of their potential connection.
You might be pondering, "What could possibly link the exhilarating outcome of a sports finale to the employment numbers of tech-savvy individuals in the state of Virginia?" Well, allow us to indulge in a moment of statistical whimsy as we delve into the enigmatic alliance of the esteemed Steinfeld Cup final scores and the diligent computer network support specialists. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we invite you to join us with a smile and an open mind, because truth be told, this study is about to take a turn for the unexpected - just like a surprising game-changing play in the final moments of a championship match.
In the upcoming pages, we will venture into the realm of statistical connections, applying rigorous methods to shed light on this unexplored territory of academic investigation. So, buckle up as we unravel the curious commingling of sports zeal and technological prowess, bringing a dash of wit and a sprinkle of scientific rigor to the table. Because when it comes to research, sometimes the most unanticipated discoveries lurk just beneath the surface - much like finding a USB drive full of obscure memes in the depths of a data center.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
To uncover the mysterious connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia, our research team embarked on a data collection odyssey that would make Odysseus envious. We scoured the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through the treacherous seas of unreliable sources and stormy clouds of outdated data. Despite the murky waters, we managed to salvage pertinent information from reputable sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The Years in Question:
Our investigation spanned the years 2012 to 2020, a time period during which the battlegrounds of the Steinfeld Cup bore witness to exhilarating victories and heartbreaking defeats, while Virginia’s tech realm witnessed the ebb and flow of network support specialists.

Statistical Analysis:
With a hearty dose of skepticism and a pinch of statistical sorcery, we subjected the collected data to rigorous analysis. Utilizing well-known statistical software (which shall remain nameless, as it's quite the enigma), we calculated the correlation coefficient and p-value with the poised precision of a gymnast on a balance beam. After much number-crunching and contemplation, we unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 and a p-value that winked at us with significance of less than 0.01. This revelation not only raised our eyebrows but also caused a few statistical heart palpitations among the team.

Variable Manipulation:
We conducted various manipulations on the data, employing subtle statistical shapeshifting to ensure that the collected variables played nicely with one another. This process involved massaging the data with gentle tugs and tucks, akin to a sculptor delicately chiseling a block of marble into an exquisite masterpiece. Simultaneously, we took great care to avoid overcooking the statistical soup, as we wanted our findings to retain a delectable hint of raw, untampered truth.

Limitations:
In the spirit of transparency, we must acknowledge the limitations of our methodology. Due to the inherent constraints of retrospective data collection and the nature of correlational studies, causation cannot be inferred from our findings. Additionally, the speculative nature of the study and the unexpected relationship under investigation cast a shadow of uncertainty over the results. Nevertheless, armed with statistical rigor and a sprinkling of humor, we endeavored to tease out the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate realms of the Steinfeld Cup finale and the Virginia tech workforce.

In conclusion, our methodology may have been unconventional and our findings unexpected, but it is our hope that this lighthearted foray into statistical whimsy will inspire further exploration and perhaps even a few smiles among the academic community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8444394, r-squared of 0.7130779, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Sports and technology - two seemingly unrelated domains coming together in an unexpected symphony of statistical intrigue. The Steinfeld Cup, a pinnacle of athleticism and intense competition, is an event that many fervent sports enthusiasts hold in high regard. On the other hand, in the world of technology, computer network support specialists in Virginia work tirelessly to ensure the seamless functioning of networks, quietly bringing order to the digital chaos. While it may seem like these two spheres are as distinct as chalk and cheese, this research seeks to unravel the tangled web of their potential connection.
You might be pondering, "What could possibly link the exhilarating outcome of a sports finale to the employment numbers of tech-savvy individuals in the state of Virginia?" Well, allow us to indulge in a moment of statistical whimsy as we delve into the enigmatic alliance of the esteemed Steinfeld Cup final scores and the diligent computer network support specialists. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we invite you to join us with a smile and an open mind, because truth be told, this study is about to take a turn for the unexpected - just like a surprising game-changing play in the final moments of a championship match.
In the upcoming pages, we will venture into the realm of statistical connections, applying rigorous methods to shed light on this unexplored territory of academic investigation. So, buckle up as we unravel the curious commingling of sports zeal and technological prowess, bringing a dash of wit and a sprinkle of scientific rigor to the table. Because when it comes to research, sometimes the most unanticipated discoveries lurk just beneath the surface - much like finding a USB drive full of obscure memes in the depths of a data center.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

The examination of the relationship between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia from 2012 to 2020 unveiled an intriguing statistical connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 reflects a robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. This coefficient suggests that as the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams increases, so does the number of employed computer network support specialists in Virginia. In other words, it appears that the more intense the competition and the greater the score discrepancy in the Cup Final, the higher the demand for technologically adept professionals in the state.

The strength of this correlation is further underscored by the r-squared value of 0.7130779, indicating that approximately 71.3% of the variability in the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia can be explained by the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams. This finding adds weight to the notion that there exists a substantive association between the outcomes of this esteemed sporting event and the demand for technical expertise in the state.

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation did not occur by chance. It further reinforces the assertion that there is a significant relationship between the variables under scrutiny.

The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced positive correlation observed in the data. The points on the graph form a clear upward trend, demonstrating the systematic increase in the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia as the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams escalates. This visual representation elucidates the striking connection identified through statistical analysis and serves as a compelling visual testament to the unexpected nexus between these seemingly unrelated domains.

Overall, the results of this investigation not only provide quantitative evidence of the correlation between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia but also infuse a sense of levity and amusement into the realm of academic research. The robust statistical findings, coupled with the unconventional nature of the relationship under scrutiny, lend an element of unexpected whimsy to the scientific discourse, akin to stumbling upon a trove of cat GIFs in a data repository.

Thus, the outcomes of this study offer a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration of the interplay between sports fervor and technological acumen, demonstrating that within the world of research, there exists ample space for statistical inquiry and scientific merriment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) conduct an in-depth analysis of the Steinfeld Cup Final scores and their relation to various socio-economic factors. Their findings suggest a potential link between the fervor of the sporting event and its impact on local communities, albeit without diving into the specific realm of computer network support specialists. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) explore the employment trends of technology professionals in the state of Virginia, with a focus on the impact of industry innovations. While their work sheds light on the evolving landscape of tech employment, it does not directly address the whimsical juxtaposition of sports outcomes and tech staffing.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "Data and Decisions" by Anderson (2019) presents a comprehensive examination of statistical methodologies used in complex research inquiries. The methodologies discussed in this work provide a valuable framework for our own statistical analysis of the unanticipated correlation between Steinfeld Cup Final scores and computer network support specialists in Virginia. Further, "Tech Trends and Tidbits" by Brown (2020) offers insights into the dynamic nature of the tech industry, supplementing our understanding of the employment dynamics in Virginia.
Drawing from the world of fiction, "The Statistical Sleuth" by Ramsey (2007) takes readers on a whimsical journey through the use of statistics to unravel perplexing mysteries. While fiction, the principles elucidated in this work inspire our approach to unraveling the unusual symbiosis between sports triumphs and technological livelihoods. Additionally, "Tech Tales" by Green (2015) weaves fantastical narratives around the world of technology, infusing a touch of creativity into our analytical pursuit.
In a surprising and unconventional turn, cartoons and children's shows have provided unexpected inspiration for this investigation. The subtle humor and underlying complexity of problem-solving in "Phineas and Ferb" and "The Magic School Bus" have served as a lighthearted reminder that even the most whimsical of connections can carry profound significance.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia from 2012 to 2020 unveiled an intriguing statistical connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 reflects a robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. This coefficient suggests that as the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams increases, so does the number of employed computer network support specialists in Virginia. In other words, it appears that the more intense the competition and the greater the score discrepancy in the Cup Final, the higher the demand for technologically adept professionals in the state.
The strength of this correlation is further underscored by the r-squared value of 0.7130779, indicating that approximately 71.3% of the variability in the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia can be explained by the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams. This finding adds weight to the notion that there exists a substantive association between the outcomes of this esteemed sporting event and the demand for technical expertise in the state.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation did not occur by chance. It further reinforces the assertion that there is a significant relationship between the variables under scrutiny.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced positive correlation observed in the data. The points on the graph form a clear upward trend, demonstrating the systematic increase in the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia as the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams escalates. This visual representation elucidates the striking connection identified through statistical analysis and serves as a compelling visual testament to the unexpected nexus between these seemingly unrelated domains.
Overall, the results of this investigation not only provide quantitative evidence of the correlation between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia but also infuse a sense of levity and amusement into the realm of academic research. The robust statistical findings, coupled with the unconventional nature of the relationship under scrutiny, lend an element of unexpected whimsy to the scientific discourse, akin to stumbling upon a trove of cat GIFs in a data repository.
Thus, the outcomes of this study offer a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration of the interplay between sports fervor and technological acumen, demonstrating that within the world of research, there exists ample space for statistical inquiry and scientific merriment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation coefficient obtained in this study supports the unconventional notion that the outcome of the Steinfeld Cup Final may have an impact on the demand for computer network support specialists in Virginia. The literature review, while conventional in its mention of prior studies, did not quite capture the whimsical undercurrent of the interplay between sports enthusiasm and technological dynamism. Nevertheless, the sources drew intriguing parallels that, when interpreted through our statistical lens, add an unexpected layer of levity to the discourse.

The shared variance of approximately 71.3% between the Steinfeld Cup Final scores and the employment rates of computer network support specialists illustrates a surprisingly strong relationship. This finding challenges the expected paradigm of purely rational, industry-driven employment trends, hinting at a realm where the fervor of sports may spark a parallel surge in technical staffing demands. As unlikely as it may seem, the evidence indicates that the excitement of the sporting event may translate into a need for additional tech support. It's as if the thrill of the Cup spills over into the demand for IT professionals, painting a picture of an electrifying symbiosis between sports triumphs and tech triumphs.

The significance of the p-value, less than 0.01, reinforces the assertion that this correlation is no fluke, virtually shouting, "This is no statistical fumble!" The scatterplot, with its upward trend, visually emphasizes the robust positive correlation, almost as if it is shouting, "Look, we're not just playing games here!"

In the scholarly world where seriousness often reigns, our findings add a refreshing breeze of whimsy, reminding us that within the realm of research, statistical inquiry can uncover unexpected connections that delightfully confound expectations. It's akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure trove of humor in a dry academic discourse - a whimsical flourish amid the starched shirts of scholarly inquiry.

In conclusion, the findings of this study bring to light an enchanting symmetry between sporting exuberance and technological robustness. It suggests that within the realm of academic research, there is ample room for statistical revelry, and the unexpected nexus between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the demand for technology professionals in Virginia adds a delightful note of mirth to the scientific melody.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Sports and technology - two seemingly unrelated domains coming together in an unexpected symphony of statistical intrigue. The Steinfeld Cup, a pinnacle of athleticism and intense competition, is an event that many fervent sports enthusiasts hold in high regard. On the other hand, in the world of technology, computer network support specialists in Virginia work tirelessly to ensure the seamless functioning of networks, quietly bringing order to the digital chaos. While it may seem like these two spheres are as distinct as chalk and cheese, this research seeks to unravel the tangled web of their potential connection.
You might be pondering, "What could possibly link the exhilarating outcome of a sports finale to the employment numbers of tech-savvy individuals in the state of Virginia?" Well, allow us to indulge in a moment of statistical whimsy as we delve into the enigmatic alliance of the esteemed Steinfeld Cup final scores and the diligent computer network support specialists. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we invite you to join us with a smile and an open mind, because truth be told, this study is about to take a turn for the unexpected - just like a surprising game-changing play in the final moments of a championship match.
In the upcoming pages, we will venture into the realm of statistical connections, applying rigorous methods to shed light on this unexplored territory of academic investigation. So, buckle up as we unravel the curious commingling of sports zeal and technological prowess, bringing a dash of wit and a sprinkle of scientific rigor to the table. Because when it comes to research, sometimes the most unanticipated discoveries lurk just beneath the surface - much like finding a USB drive full of obscure memes in the depths of a data center.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia from 2012 to 2020 unveiled an intriguing statistical connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 reflects a robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. This coefficient suggests that as the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams increases, so does the number of employed computer network support specialists in Virginia. In other words, it appears that the more intense the competition and the greater the score discrepancy in the Cup Final, the higher the demand for technologically adept professionals in the state.
The strength of this correlation is further underscored by the r-squared value of 0.7130779, indicating that approximately 71.3% of the variability in the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia can be explained by the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams. This finding adds weight to the notion that there exists a substantive association between the outcomes of this esteemed sporting event and the demand for technical expertise in the state.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation did not occur by chance. It further reinforces the assertion that there is a significant relationship between the variables under scrutiny.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced positive correlation observed in the data. The points on the graph form a clear upward trend, demonstrating the systematic increase in the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia as the difference in scores of the Steinfeld Cup Final teams escalates. This visual representation elucidates the striking connection identified through statistical analysis and serves as a compelling visual testament to the unexpected nexus between these seemingly unrelated domains.
Overall, the results of this investigation not only provide quantitative evidence of the correlation between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia but also infuse a sense of levity and amusement into the realm of academic research. The robust statistical findings, coupled with the unconventional nature of the relationship under scrutiny, lend an element of unexpected whimsy to the scientific discourse, akin to stumbling upon a trove of cat GIFs in a data repository.
Thus, the outcomes of this study offer a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration of the interplay between sports fervor and technological acumen, demonstrating that within the world of research, there exists ample space for statistical inquiry and scientific merriment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

**[[CONCLUSION]]**

In conclusion, our investigation has shed light on the surprising correlation between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The robust positive correlation coefficient and the significant p-value indicate a noteworthy association between these seemingly disparate variables. It appears that as the difference in scores of the Cup Final teams increases, so does the demand for technical expertise in the state. This finding not only adds a touch of statistical whimsy to the world of academic research but also offers a refreshing perspective on the unexpected connections that can be uncovered through rigorous analysis.

The results of this study undoubtedly add a comical spin to the typical scholarly discourse, akin to stumbling upon a meme compilation in a library of academic journals. However, despite the lighthearted nature of our findings, the statistical rigor underpinning this investigation stands as solid as a well-constructed firewall.

In light of these compelling results, it is clear that the relationship between the Steinfeld Cup final scores and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in Virginia warrants further examination. However, we are confident that no more research is needed in this area. It is time to bid adieu to this peculiar statistical alliance and move on to other equally peculiar research endeavors. After all, in the colorful landscape of academic inquiry, there are always more unexpected correlations waiting to be uncovered, much like hidden Easter eggs in a dense forest of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sports Statistics and Technology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advanced Research in Technological Synchronicity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Net Score: Analyzing the Link Between Steinfeld Cup Final Scores and Computer Network Specialists in Virginia with an abstract of This study examines the potential connection between the final scores of the Steinfeld Cup, an esteemed sporting event, and the employment rates of computer network support specialists in the state of Virginia. Utilizing data from diverse sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to investigate this unconventional relationship. Through rigorous statistical analysis, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8444394 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2020 was identified. This investigation offers a lighthearted twist on the typical research endeavors, shedding light on an unexpected connection that may raise some eyebrows among both sports enthusiasts and tech professionals. With a touch of humor and a dash of statistical rigor, the findings of this study may add an element of whimsy to the world of academic research.

ChatGPT:

Steinfeld Cup, final scores, computer network specialists, Virginia, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, employment rates, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, sports, tech professionals, academic research, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams

The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of computer network support specialists in Virginia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia

Correlation r = 0.8444394 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7130779 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams) over the 9 years from 2012 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0042. 0.0041841593113515880000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.42% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 239 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.41, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201220132014201520162017201820192020
Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams (Score difference)1011315413
The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia (Laborers)881070207030743073907330697067807720




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10,1,1,3,1,5,4,1,3,])
array_2 = np.array([8810,7020,7030,7430,7390,7330,6970,6780,7720,])
array_1_name = "Difference in score of Steinfeld Cup Final teams"
array_2_name = "The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2001 · Black Variable ID: 376 · Red Variable ID: 19561
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0