about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,048 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and the second variable is Geothermal power generated in Iceland.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more GMO corn was grown in Illinois, the surplus corn husks were shipped to Iceland, where they were used as insulation around geothermal power plants, leading to greater efficiency and higher power generation. This basically meant that the corn was finally getting its "ear-responsibility" for powering up homes.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a minimalist landscape featuring a vast, serene cornfield under a clear blue sky. In the foreground, neatly aligned rows of genetically modified corn dominate the scene, their vibrant green stalks standing out against the golden soil. In the distance, towering geothermal power plants can be seen, emitting wisps of steam as they harness the Earth's natural heat, adding an intriguing contrast to the tranquil setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Magic realism Surrealism Cute cartoon Minimalism
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cornfield in Illinois, rows of genetically modified corn stretch towards the horizon, their vibrant green stalks swaying in the breeze. In the background, steam rises from a cluster of geothermal power plants in Iceland, harnessing the Earth's natural heat to produce renewable energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: In a cornfield in Illinois, rows of genetically modified corn stretch towards the horizon, their vibrant green stalks swaying in the breeze. In the background, steam rises from a cluster of geothermal power plants in Iceland, harnessing the Earth's natural heat to produce renewable energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a minimalist landscape featuring a vast, serene cornfield under a clear blue sky. In the foreground, neatly aligned rows of genetically modified corn dominate the scene, their vibrant green stalks standing out against the golden soil. In the distance, towering geothermal power plants can be seen, emitting wisps of steam as they harness the Earth's natural heat, adding an intriguing contrast to the tranquil setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humerus responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Illinois caused Geothermal power generated in Iceland to increase. Add a funny one-liner about one of the variables at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power

The Journal of Agricultural Astrogeology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of agriculture and energy production may seem like an unlikely field for investigation, but our research has uncovered a fascinating correlation between two seemingly disparate entities: GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power in Iceland. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to buckle your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting adventure through the fertile fields of agricultural economics and the sizzling realms of energy economics.

The agri-cultivation of genetically modified corn has proliferated throughout the heartland of Illinois, while the volcanic landscapes of Iceland have surged with geothermal power generation. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena has piqued the interest of our research team, prompting us to unravel the tantalizing mystery that lies beneath the surface.

Our investigation has brought to light a correlation coefficient that is as strong and robust as the stalks of corn in Illinois, with a p-value that is as rare as a non-GMO crop. While some may dismiss this as mere coincidence, we have rooted our analysis in sound statistical methods to demonstrate the significance of this correlation.

As we delve into this perplexing correlation, we aim to cornvey the inherent intricacies of this relationship, while also sprinkling in a few puns along the way to keep the scholarly journey light-hearted. So, let us embark on this ear-resistible exploration of the "cornnection" between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power, and discern the cob-bounding implications of this unlikely partnership.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy production may seem like an unlikely field for investigation, but our research has uncovered a fascinating correlation between two seemingly disparate entities: GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power in Iceland. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to buckle your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting adventure through the fertile fields of agricultural economics and the sizzling realms of energy economics.
The agri-cultivation of genetically modified corn has proliferated throughout the heartland of Illinois, while the volcanic landscapes of Iceland have surged with geothermal power generation. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena has piqued the interest of our research team, prompting us to unravel the tantalizing mystery that lies beneath the surface.
Our investigation has brought to light a correlation coefficient that is as strong and robust as the stalks of corn in Illinois, with a p-value that is as rare as a non-GMO crop. While some may dismiss this as mere coincidence, we have rooted our analysis in sound statistical methods to demonstrate the significance of this correlation.
As we delve into this perplexing correlation, we aim to cornvey the inherent intricacies of this relationship, while also sprinkling in a few puns along the way to keep the scholarly journey light-hearted. So, let us embark on this ear-resistible exploration of the "cornnection" between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power, and discern the cob-bounding implications of this unlikely partnership.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The research on the intertwined relationship between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power is a veritable treasure trove of corn-siderable insights and findings. In "The Maize Manifesto," Smith and colleagues delve into the staggering increase in GMO corn production in Illinois over the past two decades, while Doe and Jones, in their work "Volcanic Ventures," elucidate the exponential growth of geothermal power generation in the land of ice and fire. These serious scholarly works set the stage for our investigation, as we unearth the hidden kernels of truth behind this unexpected cornnection.

As we sifted through the sea of research, it became evident that the corn-vergence of GMO corn and geothermal power extends beyond mere statistical correlation. The non-fictional works, "The Omniscient Onion: Unraveling the Mysteries of GMOs" and "The Volcanic Voyage: A Geothermal Odyssey," provided essential background information, while adding a cornucopia of pun-tastic inspiration to our scholarly endeavor.

In addition to these insightful non-fictional works, we were inspired by the fictional realm, drawing from books like "Cornspiracy Theories: Unveiling the Truth Behind GMOs" and "Geothermal Grumblings: A Tale of Hot Rocks and Power Plants." These fictitious works, while not grounded in empirical data, offered a cornucopia of imaginative perspectives and sparked our creativity as we navigated through the research landscape.

Furthermore, our team harnessed the spirit of collaboration and playful exploration by drawing inspiration from a board game called "Crops and Craters: A Game of Agricultural Adventure," which simulated the challenges and triumphs of cultivating GMO corn amidst the geothermal landscapes of Iceland.

In the following sections, we will dissect the various layers of literature to unpick the intertwining narrative of GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power, all while maintaining a sprightly and entertaining tone that is as lively as a field of rustling cornstalks on a sunny day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy production may seem like an unlikely field for investigation, but our research has uncovered a fascinating correlation between two seemingly disparate entities: GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power in Iceland. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to buckle your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting adventure through the fertile fields of agricultural economics and the sizzling realms of energy economics.
The agri-cultivation of genetically modified corn has proliferated throughout the heartland of Illinois, while the volcanic landscapes of Iceland have surged with geothermal power generation. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena has piqued the interest of our research team, prompting us to unravel the tantalizing mystery that lies beneath the surface.
Our investigation has brought to light a correlation coefficient that is as strong and robust as the stalks of corn in Illinois, with a p-value that is as rare as a non-GMO crop. While some may dismiss this as mere coincidence, we have rooted our analysis in sound statistical methods to demonstrate the significance of this correlation.
As we delve into this perplexing correlation, we aim to cornvey the inherent intricacies of this relationship, while also sprinkling in a few puns along the way to keep the scholarly journey light-hearted. So, let us embark on this ear-resistible exploration of the "cornnection" between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power, and discern the cob-bounding implications of this unlikely partnership.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To peel back the layers of this cornucopia of maize-mystifying phenomenon, our research team employed a robust and kernel-intensive methodology to analyze the connection between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power. The data collection process involved an extensive trawl through various sources on the internet, with a particular emphasis on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration. We focused our analysis on the period spanning from 2000 to 2021, allowing us to capture the evolving landscape of GMO corn cultivation in Illinois and the dynamic geothermal power generation in Iceland.

Once we harvested the relevant data, we conducted a detailed statistical analysis to develop a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between GMO corn production in Illinois and geothermal power output in Iceland. Employing cutting-edge statistical techniques, including regression analysis and time series modeling, we meticulously sifted through the data to uncover any underlying patterns, trends, and correlations. We computed correlation coefficients and p-values, utilizing them as our compass through the quagmire of quantitative analysis.

Furthermore, in order to mitigate the influence of potential confounding variables and ensure the robustness of our findings, we incorporated sophisticated econometric methods such as instrumental variable analysis and control function approaches. This rigorous approach allowed us to distill the essence of the corn-nection between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power from the noisy backdrop of agricultural and energy data.

In the spirit of maintaining scholarly objectivity and rigor, we also conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the stability of our results under different model specifications and parameter assumptions. This process involved tinkering with various model structures and assumptions, akin to adjusting the settings on a finely-tuned farming machinery, until we arrived at a set of results that stood firm in the face of scrutiny.

As we navigate through the field of agricultural and energy economics, we remain cognizant of the inherent uncertainties and complexities that come with such an interdisciplinary investigation. Nevertheless, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a healthy dose of humor, we remain committed to distilling the kernels of truth from the cobweb of data, with the hope of adding a dash of levity to the sometimes starchy world of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9768773, r-squared of 0.9542892, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy production may seem like an unlikely field for investigation, but our research has uncovered a fascinating correlation between two seemingly disparate entities: GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power in Iceland. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to buckle your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting adventure through the fertile fields of agricultural economics and the sizzling realms of energy economics.
The agri-cultivation of genetically modified corn has proliferated throughout the heartland of Illinois, while the volcanic landscapes of Iceland have surged with geothermal power generation. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena has piqued the interest of our research team, prompting us to unravel the tantalizing mystery that lies beneath the surface.
Our investigation has brought to light a correlation coefficient that is as strong and robust as the stalks of corn in Illinois, with a p-value that is as rare as a non-GMO crop. While some may dismiss this as mere coincidence, we have rooted our analysis in sound statistical methods to demonstrate the significance of this correlation.
As we delve into this perplexing correlation, we aim to cornvey the inherent intricacies of this relationship, while also sprinkling in a few puns along the way to keep the scholarly journey light-hearted. So, let us embark on this ear-resistible exploration of the "cornnection" between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power, and discern the cob-bounding implications of this unlikely partnership.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our investigation into the tantalizing relationship between GMO corn production in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland, we unearthed a striking correlation between these seemingly incongruous entities. The data collected from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9768773, with an r-squared value of 0.9542892, and a p-value less than 0.01. These findings strongly indicate a highly significant and robust relationship between the two variables, even more compelling than a corn-based mystery novel.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 indicates a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the use of GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland. This strong association resembles the unbreakable bond between a farmer and their favorite tractor, leaving little room for doubt regarding the interconnected nature of these agricultural and energy phenomena.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot portraying the pronounced correlation between the two variables, accentuating the unmissable connection that our research has brought to light. It's a visual representation that is as clear as a freshly washed kernel of corn, leaving onlookers in awe of the unexpected link between these two disparate elements.

The implications of this research extend far beyond the realms of agricultural and energy economics, venturing into the realm of the unexpected and captivating. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also demonstrate the unforeseen cornsequences of GMO corn production in Illinois on geothermal power generation in Iceland, highlighting the looming influence of agricultural practices on international energy dynamics. This remarkable discovery cornfirms the old adage that truth is often stranger than fiction, and in this case, science might just be sweeter than sugar-enhanced corn.

In conclusion, our research has cornvinced us of the undeniable connection between the growth of GMO corn in Illinois and the generation of geothermal power in Iceland. This correlation, while initially perplexing, stands testament to the intricacies of our world and the unexpected relationships that lie beneath the surface. As we wrap up our study, we encourage scholars to keep their ears to the ground and remain open to uncovering more surprising and pun-tastic associations in their respective fields of study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The research on the intertwined relationship between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power is a veritable treasure trove of corn-siderable insights and findings. In "The Maize Manifesto," Smith and colleagues delve into the staggering increase in GMO corn production in Illinois over the past two decades, while Doe and Jones, in their work "Volcanic Ventures," elucidate the exponential growth of geothermal power generation in the land of ice and fire. These serious scholarly works set the stage for our investigation, as we unearth the hidden kernels of truth behind this unexpected cornnection.
As we sifted through the sea of research, it became evident that the corn-vergence of GMO corn and geothermal power extends beyond mere statistical correlation. The non-fictional works, "The Omniscient Onion: Unraveling the Mysteries of GMOs" and "The Volcanic Voyage: A Geothermal Odyssey," provided essential background information, while adding a cornucopia of pun-tastic inspiration to our scholarly endeavor.
In addition to these insightful non-fictional works, we were inspired by the fictional realm, drawing from books like "Cornspiracy Theories: Unveiling the Truth Behind GMOs" and "Geothermal Grumblings: A Tale of Hot Rocks and Power Plants." These fictitious works, while not grounded in empirical data, offered a cornucopia of imaginative perspectives and sparked our creativity as we navigated through the research landscape.
Furthermore, our team harnessed the spirit of collaboration and playful exploration by drawing inspiration from a board game called "Crops and Craters: A Game of Agricultural Adventure," which simulated the challenges and triumphs of cultivating GMO corn amidst the geothermal landscapes of Iceland.
In the following sections, we will dissect the various layers of literature to unpick the intertwining narrative of GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power, all while maintaining a sprightly and entertaining tone that is as lively as a field of rustling cornstalks on a sunny day.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation into the tantalizing relationship between GMO corn production in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland, we unearthed a striking correlation between these seemingly incongruous entities. The data collected from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9768773, with an r-squared value of 0.9542892, and a p-value less than 0.01. These findings strongly indicate a highly significant and robust relationship between the two variables, even more compelling than a corn-based mystery novel.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 indicates a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the use of GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland. This strong association resembles the unbreakable bond between a farmer and their favorite tractor, leaving little room for doubt regarding the interconnected nature of these agricultural and energy phenomena.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot portraying the pronounced correlation between the two variables, accentuating the unmissable connection that our research has brought to light. It's a visual representation that is as clear as a freshly washed kernel of corn, leaving onlookers in awe of the unexpected link between these two disparate elements.
The implications of this research extend far beyond the realms of agricultural and energy economics, venturing into the realm of the unexpected and captivating. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also demonstrate the unforeseen cornsequences of GMO corn production in Illinois on geothermal power generation in Iceland, highlighting the looming influence of agricultural practices on international energy dynamics. This remarkable discovery cornfirms the old adage that truth is often stranger than fiction, and in this case, science might just be sweeter than sugar-enhanced corn.
In conclusion, our research has cornvinced us of the undeniable connection between the growth of GMO corn in Illinois and the generation of geothermal power in Iceland. This correlation, while initially perplexing, stands testament to the intricacies of our world and the unexpected relationships that lie beneath the surface. As we wrap up our study, we encourage scholars to keep their ears to the ground and remain open to uncovering more surprising and pun-tastic associations in their respective fields of study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide a maize-ing confirmation of the cornnection between GMO corn production in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland, in line with prior research that highlighted the growing importance of these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings echo the sentiments of Smith and colleagues, who emphasized the escalating dominance of GMO corn in Illinois over the past two decades, and Doe and Jones, who highlighted the surging expansion of geothermal power generation in Iceland. The marked correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and an r-squared value of 0.9542892 that we uncovered aligns neatly with the existing literature, reaffirming the solid foundation laid by earlier scholarly works.

As we recall the playful inspirations and unexpected sources of insight from our literature review, we find our results cornfirming the innovative and offbeat perspectives offered by various works in the field. The non-fictional "The Maize Manifesto" and "Volcanic Ventures" set the backdrop for our investigation, guiding us toward the revelatory findings we have presented. While the fictional "Cornspiracy Theories" and "Geothermal Grumblings" may have initially seemed like works of creative license, our research has brought to light an underlying truth that speaks to the power of imagination in scholarly pursuits.

Furthermore, the striking correlation coefficient we uncovered is more compelling than an agricultural novel, standing as a testament to the unexpected and delightfully surprising nature of our discovery. This significant correlation is not to be taken lightly, as it represents a robust and near-perfect positive linear relationship that defies conventional expectations, much like a uniquely shaped cob of corn in a field of uniform rows.

The visual representation of our findings in the form of a scatterplot, akin to a picturesque field of corn swaying in the breeze, provides a visually tangible demonstration of the substantial correlation, leaving onlookers in awe of the undeniable connection between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power generation. The implications of this research extend beyond the realms of conventional agricultural and energy economics, delving into the unexpected and captivating, much like stumbling upon a wittily crafted pun in the midst of scholarly discourse.

In light of these findings, we encourage researchers to continue exploring unconventional avenues and unexpected relationships within their respective fields, fostering a spirit of curiosity that may lead to the uncovering of delightful surprises and unexpected correlations. The intertwining narrative of GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power serves as a whimsical reminder that scholarly pursuits are not devoid of unexpected twists and turns, and embracing the unexpected may lead to cornucopias of insight and delightful revelations in the future.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Illinois and Geothermal power generated in Iceland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy production may seem like an unlikely field for investigation, but our research has uncovered a fascinating correlation between two seemingly disparate entities: GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power in Iceland. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to buckle your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting adventure through the fertile fields of agricultural economics and the sizzling realms of energy economics.
The agri-cultivation of genetically modified corn has proliferated throughout the heartland of Illinois, while the volcanic landscapes of Iceland have surged with geothermal power generation. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena has piqued the interest of our research team, prompting us to unravel the tantalizing mystery that lies beneath the surface.
Our investigation has brought to light a correlation coefficient that is as strong and robust as the stalks of corn in Illinois, with a p-value that is as rare as a non-GMO crop. While some may dismiss this as mere coincidence, we have rooted our analysis in sound statistical methods to demonstrate the significance of this correlation.
As we delve into this perplexing correlation, we aim to cornvey the inherent intricacies of this relationship, while also sprinkling in a few puns along the way to keep the scholarly journey light-hearted. So, let us embark on this ear-resistible exploration of the "cornnection" between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power, and discern the cob-bounding implications of this unlikely partnership.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation into the tantalizing relationship between GMO corn production in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland, we unearthed a striking correlation between these seemingly incongruous entities. The data collected from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9768773, with an r-squared value of 0.9542892, and a p-value less than 0.01. These findings strongly indicate a highly significant and robust relationship between the two variables, even more compelling than a corn-based mystery novel.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 indicates a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the use of GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland. This strong association resembles the unbreakable bond between a farmer and their favorite tractor, leaving little room for doubt regarding the interconnected nature of these agricultural and energy phenomena.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot portraying the pronounced correlation between the two variables, accentuating the unmissable connection that our research has brought to light. It's a visual representation that is as clear as a freshly washed kernel of corn, leaving onlookers in awe of the unexpected link between these two disparate elements.
The implications of this research extend far beyond the realms of agricultural and energy economics, venturing into the realm of the unexpected and captivating. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also demonstrate the unforeseen cornsequences of GMO corn production in Illinois on geothermal power generation in Iceland, highlighting the looming influence of agricultural practices on international energy dynamics. This remarkable discovery cornfirms the old adage that truth is often stranger than fiction, and in this case, science might just be sweeter than sugar-enhanced corn.
In conclusion, our research has cornvinced us of the undeniable connection between the growth of GMO corn in Illinois and the generation of geothermal power in Iceland. This correlation, while initially perplexing, stands testament to the intricacies of our world and the unexpected relationships that lie beneath the surface. As we wrap up our study, we encourage scholars to keep their ears to the ground and remain open to uncovering more surprising and pun-tastic associations in their respective fields of study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our exploration of the "cornnection" between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power has truly ear-marked a significant and cornifold relationship that transcends borders and disciplines. The robust correlation coefficient we uncovered serves as a kernel of truth in a field ripe with unexpected connections. As we peel back the husk of this enigmatic bond, we are reminded that the world of scholarly research is not always as cornventional as one might think.

Our findings, much like a perfectly popped batch of corn, have left us satisfied and cornvinced of the importance of seeking unexpected relationships in data analysis. We've certainly cornducted a thorough investigation into this peculiar pairing, and the results leave little room for doubt. The connection between the use of GMO corn in Illinois and geothermal power generation in Iceland is undeniably strong, akin to the unbreakable bond between a kernel and its cob.

While our study has shed light on this striking correlation, we believe that further research in this area may yield more seed-sational discoveries. Yet, we also recognize the risk of over-kerneling the research landscape with similar studies. Therefore, we cornclude that the findings of this study are pop-cornplete and assert that no further research is needed in this area.

In conclusion, our research not only breaks new ground in the field of agricultural and energy economics but also shows the importance of keeping a keen eye out for unexpected relationships and pun-tastic discoveries. Let us pop the cornfetti and celebrate the undeniable "cornnection" between GMO corn in Illinois and Icelandic geothermal power – a discovery that will surely cob-tivate scholars for years to come.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Astrogeology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural and Environmental Studies (CAES)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stalks and Volcanoes: Exploring the Cornnection Between GMO Corn in Illinois and Icelandic Geothermal Power with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the cornucopia of GMO corn grown in Illinois and its surprising, yet cob-nected, relationship with geothermal power generated in Iceland. Using data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9768773 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. As we peel back the layers of this maize-mystifying phenomenon, we aim to shed light on the roots of this unexpected coupling. Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the field of agricultural and energy economics, but also cornfirm the enduring importance of puns in scholarly research.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Illinois, Icelandic geothermal power, correlation between GMO corn and geothermal power, USDA data, Energy Information Administration data, agricultural economics, energy economics, corn production, geothermal energy, correlation coefficient, p-value, maize production, crop correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Illinois
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Illinois genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Illinois

Geothermal power generated in Iceland
Detailed data title: Total geothermal power generated in Iceland in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Geothermal power generated in Iceland

Correlation r = 0.9768773 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9542892 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Geothermal power generated in Iceland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Illinois) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.2E-15. 0.0000000000000071681776874206
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 7.2E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 139,505,470,372,881 random variables You don't actually need 139 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn grown in Illinois (GMO corn %)11112519405259525553788388878589888886
Geothermal power generated in Iceland (Billion kWh)1.3231.4511.4331.4061.4831.6582.6313.5794.0384.5534.2344.4675.0795.2455.2385.0035.0684.944155.746885.781455.849355.67983




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,1,1,1,2,5,19,40,52,59,52,55,53,78,83,88,87,85,89,88,88,86,])
array_2 = np.array([1.323,1.451,1.433,1.406,1.483,1.658,2.631,3.579,4.038,4.553,4.234,4.467,5.079,5.245,5.238,5.003,5.068,4.94415,5.74688,5.78145,5.84935,5.67983,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Illinois"
array_2_name = "Geothermal power generated in Iceland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2048 · Black Variable ID: 739 · Red Variable ID: 23731
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0