Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Illinois correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Geothermal power generated in Iceland | r=0.98 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Cuba | r=0.97 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.97 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in Cuba | r=0.97 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Genevieve | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
US milk fat used to produce yogurt | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.96 | 24yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Kellogg's stock price (K) | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Illinois also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)